#933
Rank
41
Comments
13
Likes Received
147
Likes Given
n/a
9 months ago
You do realize that David Muir said ABC reached out to the City Manager, and that they weren't relying on a 6-month old video, right?
Mountainman
9 months ago
JD Vance is literally talking about it now as well. This is full blown insanity that this is even being considered settling as a "NO"
n/a
9 months ago
Correction, I mixed up literacy and IQ tests, but the point remains.
n/a
9 months ago
Lol, do you not understand how time works? March 2024, when that video was taken, is 6 months before September, when the debate occurred. Did you read the police report? Some xenophobic shithead's cat ran away, and they blamed it on the neighbors. If they reintroduced IQ tests to vote, there would no longer be a Republican party.
n/a
9 months ago
Lol, do you not understand how time works? March 2024, when that video was taken, is 6 months before September, when the debate occurred. Did you read the police report? Some xenophobic shithead's cat ran away, and they blamed it on the neighbors. If they reintroduced IQ tests to vote, there would no longer be a Republican party.
Mountainman
9 months ago
JD Vance is literally talking about it now as well. This is full blown insanity that this is even being considered settling as a "NO"
n/a
9 months ago
The video you linked, from March, is them saying they heard things, but admitting they haven't seen any proof. It's September, and unsurprisingly, it was all a bunch of lies.
Mountainman
9 months ago
JD Vance is literally talking about it now as well. This is full blown insanity that this is even being considered settling as a "NO"
n/a
9 months ago
@GNS A bunch of idiots and grifters repeating a false claim doesn't magically make it true.
Mountainman
9 months ago
JD Vance is literally talking about it now as well. This is full blown insanity that this is even being considered settling as a "NO"
n/a
9 months ago
JD Vance spread rumors of people eating pets, he's not credible.
Mountainman
9 months ago
JD Vance is literally talking about it now as well. This is full blown insanity that this is even being considered settling as a "NO"
n/a
9 months ago
I never said it should resolve YES, just that it's too early to resolve NO. I agree with you that it's very likely the affidavit is fake, but it's incredibly unfair for a clarification to be issued that requires verification in addition to the initial market condition of issuance.
ANudeEgg
9 months ago
@SimpleJack You're not making any sense. We have no verification of the author's identity. The twitter account could have drafted the affidavit themselves. That's why I say that it's akin to allowing a 10-year old to create the affidavit and counting that as Yes.
n/a
9 months ago
Imagine there's a "Will Kamala Harris win the 2024 Presidential Election?" market that ends on November 5th, and a clarification arrives that she must be declared the winner by November 5th for the market to resolve YES. "Will Kamala Harris win the election?", and "Will Kamala Harris be declared winner of the election by November 5th?" are two VERY different markets, because it takes time to verify complex information.
ANudeEgg
9 months ago
It's not an additional condition. It's a clarification which makes the market sensible. Without it, my 10-year old cousin could release an affidavit he typed up himself, and it would count.
n/a
9 months ago
That's a strawman, and nonsensical. The initial market asked if an ABC whistleblower would release an affidavit by Sunday. Anyone releasing an affidavit would not have qualified, because they would have had to have worked at ABC. The clarification could have set a reasonable deadline for vetting the identity of the whistleblower, but instead completely changed the nature of this market, requiring verification by its end date, rather than simply a release.
ANudeEgg
9 months ago
It's not an additional condition. It's a clarification which makes the market sensible. Without it, my 10-year old cousin could release an affidavit he typed up himself, and it would count.
n/a
9 months ago
It's pretty ridiculous anyone thinks it's appropriate to ask a question of whether an affidavit will be released, then add an additional condition that it must also be verified by the initial deadline. It is what it is, but just reflects incredibly poorly on the people who run this website.
n/a
9 months ago
A Russian nesting doll of right-wing propagandists is not credible.
MrNFT
9 months ago
https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1835376892352057371
n/a
9 months ago
The entire basis of this market is a tweet saying the name will be redacted. Ridiculous clarification.
🤺JustPunched
9 months ago
Just noticed the clarification lol. That is total bullshit. Wtf? Lol.
n/a
9 months ago
He's already backtracking: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/13/us/politics/trump-harris-second-debate.html "In his news conference Friday, at a golf course he owns in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif., Mr. Trump suggested he might again change his mind about another debate with Ms. Harris. “Maybe if I got in the right mood, I don’t know,” he said."
n/a
9 months ago
If Tua's out for long (or hopefully retires), his stock is gonna be worthless
nothingeverhappens
10 months ago
grateful to grab some Tyreek this cheap holy moly
n/a
9 months ago
The regular season starts on September 5th.
n/a
9 months ago
https://www.nfl.com/news/niners-wr-brandon-aiyuk-agree-to-four-year-120-million-extension
n/a
10 months ago
https://www.tmz.com/2024/08/22/beyonce-dnc-final-night-kamala-harris/
n/a
10 months ago
https://www.salon.com/2024/08/16/the-sharks-are-circling-knives-out-in-maga-world-for-campaign-chiefs-as-polls-get-worse/
n/a
10 months ago
https://x.com/Patriots/status/1824430605515260236
n/a
10 months ago
Update from training camp: https://x.com/grantcohn/status/1823796911977193705
n/a
10 months ago
It isn't confirmed because the 49ers are making a push to sign Aiyuk, similar to how they negotiated with Deebo last year: https://www.49erswebzone.com/articles/182738-report-49ers-brandon-contract-agreement/
n/a
10 months ago
Why are people buying 49ers when it's confirmed he's headed to Pittsburg?
n/a
10 months ago
"Person, woman, man, camera, tv"
0xE42c9d2ef
10 months ago
Imagine Elon stumbling across this list and giving it to Trump to say it out loud
n/a
10 months ago
https://x.com/kxtazi/status/1822125035693252870/video/1 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1821414590095261782
🤺JustPunched
10 months ago
Just a couple of old dudes talking tampons, as old men usually do.
n/a
10 months ago
She agreed a week ago, Trump pulled out, and now confirmed that he's back in. ABC has confirmed that both are committed.
Stavros-Jenkins
10 months ago
I don't believe Kamala has announced it which is how I read the rules
n/a
10 months ago
CONFIRMED!!!: https://x.com/ABC/status/1821620035896381745
n/a
10 months ago
More confirmation: https://x.com/RealPatrickWebb/status/1821618069221064714
n/a
10 months ago
Executive Editorial Producer at ABC confirms that both Trump and Kamala have accepted the September 10th debate: https://x.com/Santucci/status/1821610942440075682
n/a
10 months ago
Executive Editorial Producer at ABC confirms that both Trump and Kamala have accepted the September 10th debate: https://x.com/Santucci/status/1821610942440075682
n/a
10 months ago
https://x.com/alaynatreene/status/1821613305741636058
n/a
10 months ago
Reporter claims he switched up ABC/NBC, and has agreed to the Sept 10th debate. Hopefully he'll confirm.
n/a
10 months ago
Reporter claims he switched up ABC/NBC, and has agreed to the Sept 10th debate. Hopefully he'll confirm.
n/a
10 months ago
https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/1821204057391763530
n/a
10 months ago
"The ads, which will blanket major newspaper websites in battleground states where Trump is campaigning, starting with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, call the former president “afraid to debate” Harris, according to a news release from the DNC. The DNC plans to replicate the ads running in Atlanta on the websites of other major newspapers in swing states on days Trump will be stumping in those states. The ads will generally run the day of a Trump campaign event, but the first ads in Atlanta will run for two days, Friday and Saturday, ahead of a Trump appearance there Saturday, a DNC spokesperson said." - https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/briefs/democrats-step-up-pressure-on-trump-to-debate-harris-in-new-swing-state-ad-campaign/
n/a
10 months ago
The dude bankrupted a casino, he's a loser in even the most favorable environments.
diddy
10 months ago
Trump wants to debate, he mentioned that there should be a debate in any presidential election. Kamala is not going on Fox because she knows she is gonna get roasted. The only compromise here is if Trump agrees for ABC debate, which after all, would benefit him since he knows he would win a debate. The only question is when will they agree.
n/a
10 months ago
Even Newsmax is asking why he's not debating on ABC: https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1820860437891559592
diddy
10 months ago
Trump wants to debate, he mentioned that there should be a debate in any presidential election. Kamala is not going on Fox because she knows she is gonna get roasted. The only compromise here is if Trump agrees for ABC debate, which after all, would benefit him since he knows he would win a debate. The only question is when will they agree.
n/a
10 months ago
https://x.com/eduardomenoni/status/1819807578207252848
n/a
10 months ago
Midnight Pacific Time
4NGELS
10 months ago
Isn't it still past midnight anyways?
n/a
10 months ago
This might get interesting: https://x.com/GoodAssSub/status/1819587881364869556
n/a
10 months ago
https://www.vermontpublic.org/local-news/2024-08-01/bernie-sanders-supports-vice-president-kamala-harris-presidential-bid
Colorguesser
10 months ago
haha, link the interview, and while you are at it, read it in full. he clearly states that he endorses her
n/a
10 months ago
https://x.com/TheStalwart/status/1819090777013997592
n/a
10 months ago
3 more days? I thought they were nominating her around the 7th?
Laura
10 months ago
3 more days, yes holders. You're cooked.
n/a
10 months ago
Why do you think he has not?
Laura
10 months ago
I would have 100% disputed that if I was on the other side. But the market only had $5k bet so I guess no one bothered. I've said it before, but if anyone genuinely thinks Sanders has formally endorsed Harris per the rules, they can propose a resolution to this right now. So go on, propose it. It's your bond money.
n/a
10 months ago
This article calls it a formal endorsement: https://www.wmtw.com/article/bernie-sanders-formally-endorses-kamala-harris-for-president-at-portland-rally/61717060