#580
Rank
110
Comments
41
Likes Received
47
Likes Given
DT24
8 months ago
it's over.
DT24
8 months ago
"Venezuelan oil company" is an alternative.
StanislaV
8 months ago
What questions could there be? He clearly said most of the word, and from the context, it’s absolutely clear what he meant.
DT24
8 months ago
buy more
0xffffffff
8 months ago
hmmm if this poor guy said teacher there https://x.com/therecount/status/1829332988292702645, then exactly Venezuela from Donny here lol
DT24
8 months ago
correct. you should buy more.
0xffffffff
8 months ago
wait a second, "Pluralization/possessive of the term will count toward the resolution of this market, however other forms will NOT count." Venezuelan tar.... here its not a possessive form no?
DT24
8 months ago
I totally disagree. let them buy more!
fafafafafafafafafafafafafaffafafafa
8 months ago
This market is different from past mention markets with unclear audio which resolved based on context. In those previous markets there was a lot of ambiguity in the audio about exactly what was said(walz mumbling "tchr") so there was room to use intent to decide. Here, there is no ambiguity -- Trump clearly did not say the last syllable of "venezuela".
DT24
8 months ago
you should buy more.
Randomchooser
8 months ago
Tchr.. from Walz was worse then Venez..and they resolved to YES, why this time should be different????
DT24
8 months ago
buy more.
wagabazajr
8 months ago
No holders in the comments are scammers trying to pump up their shares. Notice how they cannot sell notice how they haven’t hit 100 yet. China count is 11 . Stop being Car scamming ass wannabes
DT24
8 months ago
man is a genius
thinkingfast
8 months ago
axios getting no china at 1c makes me sick
DT24
8 months ago
what's the border count?
DT24
8 months ago
gg
DT24
8 months ago
GG
DT24
8 months ago
his legs are gone. GG
DT24
8 months ago
He just gor injured!
DT24
8 months ago
He woke up. He can't even walk!
DT24
8 months ago
cry more.
HsB34sgg
8 months ago
Isn't it nice for the world to have UMA who only takes a week to prove that all the major news networks, the Israeli government, and the IDF are all liars? By 8:59 PM ET, September 30th, Reuters, The Guardian, Forbes, The Telegraph, NPR, the Independent, the BBC, The Times of Israel, NBC, Washington Post, Fox News, New York Post, Daily Mail, Al Jazeera, and many more ALL confirmed the invasion. Both Israel, and the IDF then confirmed the invasion within the timeframe specified in the rules. Israel had initially asked for a media blackout, but had to confirm given the flood of media reports. THERE HAVE BEEN ZERO RETRACTIONS!
DT24
8 months ago
We have already saw how they voted 3 days ago!!!!!!! The have voted too early for the previous resolution which was proposed 1 hour before the deadline! Any other evidence is irrelevant. It was already decided then. I explained this to YES holder MANYYYYY times.
TooDumbToWin
8 months ago
dude don't take yourself for God this game is rigged you won good for you but there were more votes for yes than for no for now it's just two people who decide to walk and two big whales have chosen your side that's all if it had been the other way around you would react the same, congratulations to you, first and last experience with this shit
DT24
8 months ago
We both read the same rules. We both read the same news. We both saw the same votes on the previous resolution. However, our logic was superior. I have warned YES holder many many many many times.
DT24
8 months ago
GG everyone
DT24
8 months ago
It's OVERRRRRRRRRR
DT24
8 months ago
Chad is in the building!
DT24
8 months ago
yes
NUTZILLA
8 months ago
did the vote phase is over
DT24
8 months ago
it's not evenly distributed!
DFK
8 months ago
people asking if Yes still stands a chance: statistically in an evenly distributed voting right system, the answer would be no. Here Yes hangs on to the possibility (remote?) that a few heavyweight would vote against consensus. What we already have in hands is an idea of the consensus, statistically significant (imagine early results coming like that in the presidential election for example: the outcome would be crystal clear).
DT24
8 months ago
This is the final vote.
mona.lisa
8 months ago
can somebody pls confirm: can this be disputed again?
DT24
8 months ago
No 87.17% (1,448,666.87) Yes 12.83% (213,313.46)
DT24
8 months ago
No 84.45% (1,158,152.79) Yes 15.55% (213,313.46). It's looking great.
DT24
8 months ago
No 82.52% (1,007,266.08) Yes 17.48% (213,313.46). 6.9% reported.
DT24
8 months ago
I bought YES by mistake. Sold it 10 seconds later. Lost about 25% of my money. from 881 to 668. Sad!
DT24
8 months ago
No 86.45% (51,386.11) Yes 13.55% (8,053.67)
DT24
8 months ago
YES holders. It's not too late to sell.
DT24
8 months ago
Correct. but how many of them? If I'm not mistaken more than 80% voted too early.
denizz
8 months ago
It’s true that NO wasn’t an option in the first round because it started before the deadline. But why is TOO SOON regarded as tantamount to a commitment to NO instead of a pure punt? Certainly and understandably some people voted TOO SOON without thinking they were committing to NO tacitly
DT24
8 months ago
They have voted yesterday on Oct 3rd for the resolution that was proposed on Sept 30th at 23:00. So they have used all the information until Oct 3rd to decide whether the invasion happened before the resolution time or not. because the deadline was not passed, they couldn't vote NO.
denizz
8 months ago
Are we really not supposed to use information from the newspaper on Oct. 1 to figure out what happened late on Sept. 30?
DT24
8 months ago
They have already voted too early for the YES resolution on Sep 30th at around 23:00. Nothing happened during that 1 hour. The November resolution is for the invasion on Oct 2nd. Scammer who bought YES at 3c-8c are selling it to you at 30c-50c. Don't get scammed.
DT24
8 months ago
It's already voted. It's over! many people don't know that! They are taking advantage of those people.
Meow.Zedong
8 months ago
That’s part of betting. The scam is when people who have large amounts of shares invested are simultaneously on the UMA deciding board and try to subvert truth by denying reality. Don’t get it twisted.
DT24
8 months ago
RBvKrsr7ZfRK sold 12,515 Yes at 33.8¢ ($4,231). He scammed the YES buyers. BE AWARE! This is already voted "Too Early" an hour before the deadline. It will 100% be voted NO. Many people bought YES last night at 3c-8c. They are selling it to you at 30c-50c.
DT24
8 months ago
what did I say that is not a fact?
RBvKrsr7ZfRK
8 months ago
Are you speaking on behalf of the UMA voters or are you making this up?
DT24
8 months ago
The second YES resolution was proposed about an hour before the deadline. It was immediately disputed. Then around 80% of voters voted "Too Early" while only about 20% voted YES. It was not lofical to vote "NO" because the resolution was proposed before the deadline. Therefore, people who voted "Too Early" believed that the resolution shouldn't be YES at that time. Also, during that one hour from when the resolution was proposed and the deadline nothing happened. This proves that those voters who voted "Too Early" will vote NO this time. Be aware of scammers. many people bought YES at 3c-8c last night and are selling it to you at 40c-50c. They have 10x-ed their money by scamming you.
DT24
8 months ago
Last night I sold my shares for 94, now I'm buying them at 80 :D
Ferguson,Turd
8 months ago
We have moved from the part where I have sympathy to now I am here to extract a pound of flesh and max pain.
DT24
8 months ago
probably in 2 days. I sold my shares.
duckduck
8 months ago
When tf will this resolve?
DT24
8 months ago
Sad!
Ferguson,Turd
8 months ago
Chad is now SELLING
DT24
8 months ago
gg everyone. that was fun.
DT24
8 months ago
I miss chad :(
DT24
8 months ago
He is back!!! chad bought 2,700 Yes at 38.6¢ ($1,043)
DT24
8 months ago
i wish he buys more YES now
Fredi9999WASP🐝
8 months ago
Shit I saw Chad going form +4k to -130k XDDDD
DT24
8 months ago
it's over bro.
HsB34sgg
8 months ago
The rules stipulate, “the COMMENCEMENT of a MILITARY OFFENSIVE”. Multiple reports on the Lebanese side confirm this BEFORE the market deadline. https://x.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1840780570378248414 More Confirmation of “the COMMENCEMENT of a MILITARY OFFENSIVE” BEFORE the deadline. https://x.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1840759133512888729 https://x.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1840772769501331888 https://x.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1840772824715173931 https://x.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1840780061948944504 https://x.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1840780093762699637 https://x.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1840780198683242905 https://x.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1840780570378248414 Google translates raids as raids, and airstrikes as airstrikes. https://x.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1840719580060070032 “During the operation, the troops conducted a targeted raid…” https://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/israel-at-war/briefings-by-idf-spokesperson-rear-admiral-daniel-hagari/october-24-press-briefings/press-briefing-by-idf-spokesperson-radm-daniel-hagari-october-1-18-50-pm-2024/
DT24
8 months ago
it's over bro
ScarFacee
8 months ago
30th Sept 2024. Israel started Limited ground invasion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfzgOAnuW08
DT24
8 months ago
why NO is not at 99?
DT24
8 months ago
I'm more confident than ever that it resolves to NO.
DT24
8 months ago
GG everyone.
DT24
8 months ago
hahahahahahaha. HaterzLoserz sold 28,051 Yes at 69.9¢ ($19,615)
DT24
8 months ago
Congrats NO boyzzzzz
DT24
8 months ago
They only provided proof for this market: https://polymarket.com/event/israeli-forces-enters-lebanon-in-september?tid=1727755063455
HsB34sgg
8 months ago
By 8:59 PM ET, September 30th, Reuters, The Guardian, Forbes, The Telegraph, NPR, the Independent, the BBC, The Times of Israel, ABC, NBC, Washington Post, Fox News, New York Post, Daily Mail, Al Jazeera, and many more ALL confirmed the invasion. Both Israel, and the IDF then confirmed the invasion within the timeframe specified in the rules.
DT24
8 months ago
stop hating logic bro.
Polygon-RogerRabbit
8 months ago
HATER'S always HATE.
DT24
8 months ago
It's OVER! People don't understand the difference between this market and this one: https://polymarket.com/event/israeli-forces-enters-lebanon-in-september?tid=1727755063455
DT24
8 months ago
10 MINUTES!!!!!!
DT24
8 months ago
in 13 minutes, YES shares will worth 50c each.
Polygon-RogerRabbit
8 months ago
Final review 2 days 20 hours.....
DT24
8 months ago
15 MINUTES!!!!
DT24
8 months ago
Tick Tock! Tick Tock!
DT24
8 months ago
in 26 minutes the YES shrinks to 50c.
DT24
8 months ago
In an hour your shares will worth 50c each. Sell quickly.
Polygon-RogerRabbit
8 months ago
It's their right to dispute facts. Time will tell the truth.
DT24
8 months ago
I'm only selling at 50. not a cent less.
DT24
8 months ago
Disputed!!!!!!!
DT24
8 months ago
lol
aLaT
8 months ago
its the same guy that proposing before
DT24
8 months ago
It will be disputed.
DT24
8 months ago
President Joe Biden called on the IDF not to launch a ground campaign into southern Lebanon to route out the Iranian proxy group Hezbollah as tensions appeared to escalate between the two staunch allies.
DT24
8 months ago
Absolute cinema
DT24
8 months ago
I thought the same. However, Isreal intention is to enforce UN Security Council Resolution 1701
Ferguson,Turd
8 months ago
Really makes you wonder why there is an invasion market and a separate market for if troops enter lebanon. Hmmmm
DT24
8 months ago
It's over. Yes wins. GG
DT24
8 months ago
cuz it will be one of those which UMA decides at the end.
Ferguson,Turd
8 months ago
Why is Yes at 85%?
DT24
8 months ago
I can't trust what polymarket decides! I'm out. $10 profit +220 NO. GG
DT24
8 months ago
wish I had more money to buy more NO.
Adamg01
8 months ago
For No voters: Jerusalem post, Axios, official idf statement fake news
DT24
8 months ago
Sell quickly. It's not too late.
Adamg01
8 months ago
For No voters: Jerusalem post, Axios, official idf statement fake news
DT24
8 months ago
exactly. limited ground operation. not gaining control over territory.
Aquati
8 months ago
BREAKING: Israel's security cabinet has officially approved a limited ground operation into Lebanon, according to Maariv's Anna Barsky https://x.com/Faytuks/status/1840847320973214122
DT24
8 months ago
Sell quickly.
Adamg01
8 months ago
DT24 is worried he’s gonna lose 50% of his stock value for this. Dear DT24, if you’re reading this, it’s not too late to try to prevent your loss
DT24
8 months ago
Spokesman for the Israel Defense Force, Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari, “In recent hours there have been many reports and rumors about IDF activity on the Lebanese border. We ask not to transmit reports about the activities of the forces, due to the security of our forces. Stick to the official reports only and do not spread irresponsible rumors.”
Adamg01
8 months ago
DT24 is worried he’s gonna lose 50% of his stock value for this. Dear DT24, if you’re reading this, it’s not too late to try to prevent your loss
DT24
8 months ago
RUMORS
DT24
8 months ago
Yes they have entered. Explain the difference between this market and this one: https://polymarket.com/event/israeli-forces-enters-lebanon-in-september?tid=1727721910792
n/a
8 months ago
IDF soldiers enter southern Lebanon in a ground offensive for the first time since 2006 following a series of escalations with Iran-backed Hezbollah. https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-821158
DT24
8 months ago
yes. limited operation. not intention to control their territory.
fafafafafafafafafafafafafaffafafafa
8 months ago
"U.S. Officials have confirmed that Israeli Forces have now crossed into Southern Lebanon, and are beginning Limited-Ground Operations against Hezbollah Positions near the Border." https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1840833726013653264
DT24
8 months ago
Explain the difference between this market and this one: https://polymarket.com/event/israeli-forces-enters-lebanon-in-september?tid=1727721910792
HsB34sgg
8 months ago
The rules are quite clear, "This market will resolve to "Yes" if Israel commences a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of Lebanon between September 17, 2024 and September 30, 2024, 11:59 PM ET. " It's a Yes!
DT24
8 months ago
then what is the difference between this market and this one: https://polymarket.com/event/israeli-forces-enters-lebanon-in-september?tid=1727721910792
General.William.T.Sherman
8 months ago
Have the following been met? Commence ✅ Intention to change area ✅ by definition this is green lmao. Even if they pull back they just commenced an operation with the sole goal to change what is happening in the area. Thereby controlling it.
DT24
8 months ago
Wish I had more money to buy more NO. People don't read the rules. They just read the title.
DT24
8 months ago
read the rules. not the title.
Adamg01
8 months ago
it's literally called an invasion and ground assault by jerusalem post
DT24
8 months ago
U.S. Officials have confirmed that Israeli Forces have now crossed into Southern Lebanon, and are beginning Limited-Ground Operations against Hezbollah Positions near the Border. ----- Limited ground operations is NOTTTTT intend to gain control over territory.
DT24
8 months ago
They are very clear that their intention is not to establish control over territory.
Republican
8 months ago
Invasion means intent to establish control over territory. Forces entering means israeli forces going in for whatever reason
DT24
8 months ago
Can someone explain the difference between this market and this one https://polymarket.com/event/israeli-forces-enters-lebanon-in-september?tid=1727721910792
DT24
8 months ago
This market is Yes: https://polymarket.com/event/israeli-forces-enters-lebanon-in-september?tid=1727721910792
DT24
8 months ago
if Israel commences a military offensive intended to establish control.
DT24
9 months ago
is "er" a word?
0x84
9 months ago
he said golf-er. compound word
DT24
9 months ago
yes you are.
winner69
9 months ago
am i a gazillionaire or not yet ?
DT24
9 months ago
Then buy no. lol
gkg
9 months ago
he said 24 borders LMAO
DT24
9 months ago
Exactly 25 borders!
DT24
9 months ago
GG border gang
DT24
9 months ago
easy
DT24
9 months ago
hit them all
DT24
9 months ago
That's right. by released, I assume we can see it on the internet. I could be wrong. so maybe I get the assumption wrong, but I will never get the LOGIC wrong.
winner69
9 months ago
what s funny is that you think by released that you can see it on the internet ahahahahha released means that it was sent if it s confirmed it s over
DT24
9 months ago
"it" what is "it"? A signed affidavit needs to be released. Can you see the signature? you can't? Therefore, A signed affidavit is not released. it's about 2 words. SIGNED and RELEASED. Yes it's signed. Yes it's released without signature. However, A SIGNED affidavit is not RELEASED.
Lucky31
9 months ago
It was released over 6 hours before the deadline
DT24
9 months ago
your last comment just shows your IQ is less than 90. A signed affidavit is released only if you can see the signature. you can't therefore a signed affidavit is not released. I understand it's signed, but the signature is not released. I only bought 1 share. I only care about logic.
winner69
9 months ago
bro seriously did you graduate from high school ? saying A and B but not B and A
DT24
9 months ago
For this market to resolve to "Yes", the affidavit needs to be released by the resolution date - the truth of its contents is not relevant for this market.
winner69
9 months ago
tired of explaining this to 10IQ No holders , the fact that you risk 10000 for some pennys shows yow smart you are
DT24
9 months ago
The Truth does not matter.
winner69
9 months ago
if they say ah he have no relation with ABC it s fake person then NO wins
DT24
9 months ago
yes. affidavit is released and it's signed. However, a SIGNED affidavit is not RELEASED
winner69
9 months ago
brah your logic is driving me crazy it s released and signed xD before deadline do you want his signature to be all over the internet so he got his ass assassinated ? the document was sent for verification
DT24
9 months ago
it would be too late. a signed affidavit is not released by Sep 15th.
winner69
9 months ago
btw i am not coping i don t care if i lose 100$ the outcome was positive it's just make no sense to say deadline , basic english the deadline is for the report , this market shouldn't be resolved untill a main source confirm if it was a legit whistleblower or he have no relation with ABC , and it will happen because the accusation is so big it can't go without a close
DT24
9 months ago
This market will resolve to "Yes" if a whistleblower releases a signed affidavit. An affidavit is released. It was signed before the deadline. However, a SIGNED affidavit is not RELEASED before the deadline.
winner69
9 months ago
brah if polymarket agree with what you are saying never betting in it again it s so dumb like seriously ? it s literally released everywhere what you are talking about if the signature is legit and he have a relation with ABC
DT24
9 months ago
I understand the affidavit is signed before the deadline, but its not RELEASED before the deadline. We can't see the signature. Deadline is passed.
DT24
9 months ago
ABORTION!
DT24
9 months ago
50/50 is the only fair outcome.
DT24
9 months ago
bet more.
EscalateFund
9 months ago
Fraud was said at 5:23 EST
DT24
9 months ago
Liverpool will win 20th league title.