#64
Rank
122
Comments
88
Likes Received
150
Likes Given
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
They can't make the same decision every time because the situation is different every time. I believe they made the right call here and the right call on border
asdfvergvd
3 months ago
As an outsider, that additional context makes no sense because couple days ago they counted "borrd" as border in the border 30+ market. They are really inconsistent.
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
The difference is everybody heard border, here he didn't finish the word
asdfvergvd
3 months ago
As an outsider, that additional context makes no sense because couple days ago they counted "borrd" as border in the border 30+ market. They are really inconsistent.
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
One guy put it best: "He clearly did not say venezuela, he cut off mid word. We do not know if he would have finished with "venezuela" or "venezuelan" as he very well could have said "we buy our oil from venezuelan companies"."
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
Where exactly is the resolution source? I'm confused with all the links on the gov website
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
Literally, you can make in 9 hours what takes 1 year to make in the stock market
XiJinPing
3 months ago
this is the best bond on PM right now... he only did 200 in past 10 hours lmao... he's even more tired now
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
He did 199 backflips in the past 10 HOURS. Keep that in mind
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
😂
XiJinPing
3 months ago
more sleep = more sore... google DOMS (Delayed onset muscle soreness)
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
He's probably going to do 300 backflips at the last second, you're right
Car
3 months ago
he did the same thing with the Minecraft streams. Milk it out till the last second
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
Can't you find articles from reputable sources that would flip ChatGPT back to yes? I think it's possible. Very contentious
🤺JustPunched
3 months ago
It's really embarrassing that someone would exclude the title, and exclude the key piece of information. As you can see, when ChatGPT is given the title and the key piece of information, it immediately switches to No: https://chatgpt.com/share/66ff7c2a-8450-8012-95d6-abd707566ead
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
I don't disagree that they commenced a military offensive on the night of September 30, but is it truly intended to establish control over any portion of the country? It sounds to me that they are going in to knock out certain infrastructures as opposed to establish control. Please prove me wrong if you have evidence
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
Yes holders, what are the biggest sources you have for believing yes? I hold no position yet
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
It doesn't matter he doesn't play any part in resolutions it's just his opinion
Continental-Illinois
3 months ago
Shane the ceo even said that he heard “tax to pay”
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
Appreciate it Domer!
🤺JustPunched
3 months ago
I heard debate, played it for other people who all heard debate.
WolfOfPolymarket
3 months ago
*My wife the english Tsh
JohnathanDoe
3 months ago
My wife the english teacher
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
Is this a Bernie type endorsement or a RFK type endorsement?
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
Just throw a nuke at them
🤺JustPunched
4 months ago
Global warming is fake and so are hurricanes
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
Gavin Newscum is a good one
0xE42c9d2ef
4 months ago
Gavin Newscum please
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
Not you obviously 🤠
TimeQuestion
4 months ago
What UMA whales are you talking about?
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
What are the odds that UMA whales buy a huge amount of No shares and resolve it to No.. You could make almost a couple of millions that way. Is there anything to prevent this from happening? Obviously it should resolve to Yes but it still makes me pause before buying Yes at 99.9
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
We're going to get scammed on this bro. I bought No at 99c after the interview was over
Parz1val
4 months ago
Market dynamic tells nothing about the result. Market was at 98ct on both sides so on both side shares got bought cheap to get flipped quickly. Source for the resolution is still the rulebook.
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
He skipped over the entire word. Nobody got it from the live interview which is the resolution source. Another scam is about to go down
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
Nobody understood "Teacher" because he mispronounced it so badly that the market traded at 99c for No after the END of the interview. Don't be stupid people
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
For once I agree with you car
Car
4 months ago
What wallz said: …. What polymarket degens heard: “teacher”
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
No one heard it when it was" pronounced" on the live video. He did not articulate it AT ALL.
Eridpnc
4 months ago
So they missed the word? If he cut out, but CNN released a full interview where he says the word it would still count
WolfOfPolymarket
4 months ago
https://x.com/BuffettCloner/status/1829343405220016267 He did NOT say the word Teacher! The market was trading at 99c for NO AFTER the end of the interview! He did not pronounce it correctly.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Just work with us for a refund bro, we have a good chance to make it happen and it might not even cost Poly that much. They refunded a much bigger amount on a Barron DJT token market before
hillary2win
5 months ago
All NO holders, please do NOT dispose of your shares in this market if you want to participate in lawsuits against UMA, UMA voters and Polymarket. You will need to keep the shares and records of the trades.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Don't be too quick to dismiss it, it was done before on the DJT market. Very possible here and I will advocate for it
baal
5 months ago
The potential billion dollar company in the future would rather keep their insider whale circle jerk
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
No holders are genuinely entitled to a refund, in my opinion. That clarification is clearly wrong and people don't deserve to lose money, even in small amounts, from this unfortunate event.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Let's work a refund for the No holders, shall we? We are at least entitled to this after having been robbed.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Thank you for your leadership
hillary2win
5 months ago
A good captain goes down with the ship. And in this case i was a good captain
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
I'm happy to die on the right side of history. I would do it all over again. (With inconsequential amounts)
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
post a link in the comments
markxc27
5 months ago
I just got a response directly from the campaign - “ we did not drop out but the campaign is suspended, we are still on the ballot in 40 states and Bobby asked us to vote for him in those states.”
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Let's go
🤺JustPunched
5 months ago
Good guys winning (so far).
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
If we win, we should do a massive party with all No holders, financed in part by the windfall we rightly deserve
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Never too late to join the right side
Car
5 months ago
interesting start for NO
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
We'll see if the UMA whales will rig the outcome for the popular accounts that have bought Yes shares in droves. No holders have always been on the side of truth!
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
"We are staying on the ballot in 30 States. I encourage people to vote for me in those states" Resolving this to Yes is a complete travesty.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Thank you for having common sense
yeamon
5 months ago
RFK's statement today on how voters should vote: "We're going to stay on the ballot in 30 states and I'm encouraging people to vote for me in those states." In no universe would any good faith reasonable person conclude that an explicit call for voters to NOT vote for Trump for president satisfies an endorsement of Trump for president. RFK has clearly stated his support for Trump while also clearly stating the endorsement of his own presidential bid. This is not complicated. I don't endorse drinking your own pee but I support anyone who wants to drink their pee if that makes them happy. I endorse drinking water. Words matter, rules matter, and Poly/UMA need to do the right thing and P4 this or refund everyone. "Yes" is clear cut THEFT.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
If you make a mistake once or twice, you don't have to make it a third time.
BlackSky123
5 months ago
September and November already resolved yes, inconsistent resolutions and defying Polymarket's interpretation of their own rules would be horrible.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
This is mind blowing that a poly recommendation turns people into brainwashed zombies who can't think for themselves. The guy said himself that he wants everyone to know that he is NOT terminating his campaign, simply suspending it and NOT ending it.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
If you've bought at less than 2 cents, you can't blame others for doubling or tripling their money. Many are not selling.
Justifax
5 months ago
Except your fellow scammers are dumping!! it was all a scam and chumps like you are holding the bags of sht
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
For those talking about a pump and dump, the campaign has explicitly stated no endorsement and even corrected a court filing to remove the word "endorsement". The resolution source is RFK Jr. and his campaign. It's not more complicated than that.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
It's not because you made a mistake once that you have to repeat it. This is going to a vote and we bring arguments to the table.
bluejay
5 months ago
https://polymarket.com/event/rfk-jr-endorses-trump-during-friday-address
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
AP Headline: " RFK Jr. says he is suspending, not ending his campaign. His campaign says he ‘has not endorsed Trump’" https://apnews.com/article/trump-harris-vance-walz-election-dnc-93dc79917053d8c97db4bb9cd6b0130d
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Absolutely, you're totally correct
homosexual
5 months ago
If you're on the UMA Discord server, please copy and paste the sources I linked below. RFK's campaign is exceedingly clear about this. You don't always get such clear answers! “Mr. Kennedy has not endorsed President Trump,”
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
His campaign is already updating a court filing to remove he word "endorsement" which was wrongly filed. Media does not matter as a resolution source, they don't care about the truth they just want to grab people's attention.
n/a
5 months ago
No one has verified what Nicole supposedly told one person on twitter. The entire media and 5 of his family members have publicized/commented on his endorcement
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Remember the DJT token "Was Barron Trump involved in it's creation?" Polymarket came out with a statement that it believed Barron was involved all along after the market was resolved No. The Yes holders were refunded. We are in the same situation. The conned Yes holders will likely be refunded and this market will resolve based on the truth, which is no formal endorsement as confirmed by his campaign and potentially Nicole Shanahan herself.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Read the rules. The media reports what it wants to report, Kennedy has not formally endorsed him and is still encouraging people to vote for him. Only RFK and his campaign count as a source for resolution and they haven't mentioned the word endorsement ONCE.
n/a
5 months ago
Don't be scammed. There is no proof of this just a vague screenshot. The ENTIRE media is reporting an edorcement. If Nicole or RFK really believed this they would correct the media. NOT A SINGLE JOURNALIST HAS AKNOWLEDGE THIS!
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Or simply a mistake? You will likely get refunded so no need to make a big deal about it.
nola72324
5 months ago
I understand that the No holders are pumping, but you all do realize that this resolving No after Polymarket says it will be Yes would be an existential disaster for them.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
You understand that "Polymarket said so" is not an argument that bears any relation to the factual situation that there was no endorsement. The source for resolution is Kennedy and his campaign, not a consensus of media sources or wrongful clarifications.
ElonMuskin
5 months ago
Polymarket already said Yes twice. The chance of not saying again os 0%. this comment section is full os scammers
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Like the media has not constantly twisted RFK Jr.'s words beyond recognition? It's business as usual for them. He purposefully avoided the word endorsement and he is still in the race.
n/a
5 months ago
A screenshot posted on twitter has no validity at all. It contradicts EVERY single media publication. No journalist has verified or even acknowledged what is in that screenshot. Until it is verified by the Journalistic Community and the dozens of articles about his endorsement are redacted that holds no weight. I highly doubt Nicole would claim every single media outlet is publicizing false information and only correct one single person on X
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
To be fair, it's what he said yesterday during his address. I'd like to have confirmation on the VP email confirming no endorsement, this one is huge.
XiJinPing
5 months ago
VIDEO PROOF IS REAL -- https://x.com/GiggityTitties/status/1827400121748767128
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Why don't you take a very small loss and join the right side. Life is so much easier here when you're right. You won't have to spend all day glued to your screen and panic at every price movement.
Pidor🐓
5 months ago
fake no walls panicking. plz just sell me ?
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Wrongful clarification, it happens. Maybe the Yes holders will be refunded.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Is this real? Oh my god
XiJinPing
5 months ago
RFK's own VP confirmed they are not officially endorsing Trump -- https://x.com/GiggityTitties/status/1827388701481299983
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
It was a rushed clarification, clearly inappropriate for this market. Polymarket can make mistakes, they are not superhuman. Humans make mistakes all the time. UMA will decide.
debased
5 months ago
I want to know which market is more certain than a clarified one
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Do not be reckless and buy Yes at the risk of losing your entire stake for 3 cents. It's not worth it. Plenty of more certain markets to do that on, even though it's foolish in many cases.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
The campaign is already updating a court filing to remove the word "Endorsement" we already know the answer
XiJinPing
5 months ago
RFK VP's DM's are open https://x.com/NicoleShanahan -- just ask her to clarify!!!
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Look at how weak the P2 arguments are on UMA compared to P4, there is a real chance we win this, much higher than 3%.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
There might be generational wealth on the table, for those who want to join as fellow No holders. Don't be fooled by the clarification, Polymarket can get it wrong. They are not the ones who have the final vote.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Everyone go to UMA and let the truth be known.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
"The resolution source for this market will be official information from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. or one of his representatives." No one is even talking about a consensus of sources for resolution! His campaign said NO ENDORSEMENT.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
@Polymarket take off your bad clarification, there's still plenty of time. What if he comes out and says he's not endorsing Trump yet?
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
A white knight must come in and dispute this
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
"The resolution source for this market will be official information from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. or one of his representatives." Read the rules, reuters doesn't matter
Pidor🐓
5 months ago
did reuters report that no won?
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Wow, I feel sorry for the big No holders who got robbed. Thank god I didn't bet much on this.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
The rules here specifically state a formal endorsement, unlike the other market which talks about support. This is clear no.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Before the speech, his campaign had said in a Pennsylvania court filing Friday that he would be endorsing Trump for president. However, a spokesperson for Kennedy said the court filing had been made in error. “Mr. Kennedy has not endorsed President Trump,” said spokesperson Stefanie Spear. “The filing was made by an attorney and not reviewed by the campaign.” She said the filing would be updated.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
If you resolve Bernie "No", this is a no as well. He said he supported Kamala many times, but it fell short of a formal endorsement.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
I agree with that. The august one is a clear no, this one is tougher
0xE42c9d2ef
5 months ago
the difference is that the market needs an endorsement to resolve for yes and not a formal endorsement, there's a difference between them
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Before the speech, his campaign had said in a Pennsylvania court filing Friday that he would be endorsing Trump for president. However, a spokesperson for Kennedy said the court filing had been made in error. “Mr. Kennedy has not endorsed President Trump,” said spokesperson Stefanie Spear. “The filing was made by an attorney and not reviewed by the campaign.” She said the filing would be updated.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
W @professorx Thank you
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
@Medusa why don't you buy FDA please
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
"I am not ending my campaign" He said
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
I meant past not passive
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Coached is the passive form, not possessive or plural. It DOESN'T count.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Coached is the passive form, not possessive or plural. It DOESN'T count.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
@privatenm I have no idea
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Congratulations
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Buy "Yes" if you want to bet yes, buy "No" if you want to bet no
antonio77
5 months ago
how do uou bet is quite complecated
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Congratulations
zachlol
5 months ago
just bought 82 shares of No
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
It means if you bet 70$ you get 100$ if you're right
bitterebb
5 months ago
what does the 70c mean what is that
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Totally legit
0xdae86A9566f17c9cE1763925AF23a1971B78Eb65-1724277729442
5 months ago
Is this app legit
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
You got nothing in bro, we can see your positions
moneymakerXE
5 months ago
$25.5K in
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
True, but you must be right on your initial bet and very often these things change quickly and your reward money can vanish in no time when the odds move, I'm probably just bad and need to learn more
KingofRingx3
5 months ago
i guess you have to be commited to one side and bid there, once you get some offer them for higher. If price drops you still have your bet, that you were willing to take.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
He pulled up the market on stream right now https://www.twitch.tv/kaicenat
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Yeah I bailed out, I don't know how people farm rewards profitably without being glued to their screen 24/7
KingofRingx3
5 months ago
already down to 750, will probably be going down further
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
1000 Reward? We are eating good today!
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
I'm not sitting through the entire DNC, watching one speech is already painful enough!
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
@professorx If you see this let's split the reward pool 50/50 each. We're leaving money on the table
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
No idea
Car
5 months ago
where did he lose?
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
@professorx You're down 14k you won't get it back by chasing $0.02 for 5 bucks an hour
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
You're the best domer
🤺JustPunched
5 months ago
I accidentally slept through this and a lot of people got free money. Nonetheless, looks like I made around $1k on this market. Lol. Maybe that's the key.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
I wish I had proposed, you get a cut when the disputer is wrong if I'm not mistaken! Free money
AgricultureSecretary
5 months ago
He actually disputed twice so that's 1500 dollars lost for no reason. Weird.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
What idiot disputed this? You're gonna lose your 750
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Exactly, that's what I've been saying all along
GoodTimesRoll
5 months ago
No idea why people are upset. The bet is on the elections' winner, not on who holds power. You can lose the elections and still retain power if you just choose to ignore, that doesn't change the result of the vote.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Common sense prevails
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
EU says it does not recognize Venezuela’s election result https://www.politico.eu/article/european-union-not-recognize-venezuela-election-result-nicolas-maduro/
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
You're literally betting on Gonzalez by 300 shares, MrBest
HamasDidNothingWrong
5 months ago
that's right, they are better than you.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Maduro yes betters be like: Let's rubber stamp that fraud and move on, Maduro alone decides the result of the election!
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Let's rubber stamp that fraud, that has to be the right thing to do
ALMOST
5 months ago
The current market and situation with the percentages no longer reflect reality (other betting markets in different sites have already closed - Maduro won), but rather reflect the market's expectation of how the UMA community will vote. This is, of course, nonsense because, in essence, the UMA community can act as a political organization that recognizes or does not recognize the official election results. A very interesting situation could arise - the official authorities of Venezuela declared Maduro the winner, all betting markets declared Maduro the winner, Russia + China (+basically the entire anti-Western alliance) recognize Maduro's victory, and only the Venezuella opposition, the USA (+the entire pro-Western world), and Polymarket recognize Gonzalez? Don't you guys think this is no longer betting, but clear political statements?
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
"Copies of the electoral voting records published by the opposition, and reviewed by several independent organisations, indicate that Edmundo González Urrutia would appear to be the winner of the Presidential elections by a significant majority." https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/08/04/venezuela-statement-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-the-eu/ The European Union clearly states that Edmundo González is the winner of the election
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Everyone knows González received more votes than Maduro. The US states unequivocally that he won. Staying in power through force doesn't make you the winner of an election, receiving the most votes does.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Again, for those mentally challenged: This market is about who won the election, not who stays in power through force. The candidate who won is the candidate who has received the most votes.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Hannibal lecter said during today's rally https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGevyx3NKP4&ab_channel=RightSideBroadcastingNetwork
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
The US recognizes opposition candidate González as the winner of Venezuela’s presidential election. It doesn't get more clear than this. You trust the US with the real numbers or a dictator with fake numbers. The market is called who is the presidential election winner, not who will rule by force. Big difference.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
The people who get the most votes win the election
VibesGreaterRules
5 months ago
The people who win elections hold the office. They don't always get the most votes.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Welcome to the club
n/a
5 months ago
Lets go boys!!!
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
@Flipp We're in this together, let's win it
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
You could buy more now that the US officially recognized Gonzalez as the winner
🤺JustPunched
5 months ago
Good guys winning, bad guys losing, etc.
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Source?
Snooty
5 months ago
The US recognized Gonzalez as the winner today btw
WolfOfPolymarket
5 months ago
Ask yourself: Is this market "Who faked the election results and gets away with it" or "Who is the Venezuela Presidential Election Winner"?
WolfOfPolymarket
6 months ago
Very nice win
WolfOfPolymarket
6 months ago
"Trump’s total includes $111.8 million that the campaign says it raised in June. That sum is less than the $127 million Biden reported raising last month". This was reported on July 2nd by AP News. Can someone explain to me why the numbers are so different in "Total Receipts"?
WolfOfPolymarket
6 months ago
Final results https://www.lemonde.fr/resultats-elections/ 182 seats New Popular Front
WolfOfPolymarket
6 months ago
What's 41-17? I don't want to offend Domer by asking him
41-17™askDomerWhatImean
6 months ago
What does this demented scumbag have against alley cats?
WolfOfPolymarket
7 months ago
inability to follow the debate format 1.5/3 ? He followed the format perfectly
0xf46
7 months ago
persistent incoherence 1/1, confusion: 1.5/2, inability to follow the debate format 1.5/3, prolonged periods of non-responsiveness: 1.5/4… so no
WolfOfPolymarket
7 months ago
I didn't say the first half, I said he was coherent for at least half of the debate, probably a bit more than that. People only focus on the moments of gaffes and confusions, there was plenty of that, but there was plenty of "normal but weak sounding" talk as well. I think that's a fair assessment
lollololol
7 months ago
I disagree with the argument that he only struggled during the first half.
WolfOfPolymarket
7 months ago
"showing poor mental ability because of old age, especially being unable to think clearly and make decisions:" According to this definition he is senile. According to the rules of this market "persistent incoherence, confusion, inability to follow the debate format, or prolonged periods of non-responsiveness." I don't think those standards are met. There was incoherence, but not persistent as he was coherent for at least half of the debate (still a terrible performance), he wasn't really confused, just slow or very slow, he followed the debate format, and he wasn't really unresponsive for prolonged periods of time. So it's a close call but it weighs more towards "No" according to the specific rules laid out, in my opionion (I have no stake).
WolfOfPolymarket
7 months ago
Congrats fellow no holder
LesterSmith
7 months ago
YESSS
WolfOfPolymarket
7 months ago
From what I can see is it really 100% to 0% for no?
WickJohn
7 months ago
Currently resolving to NO
WolfOfPolymarket
7 months ago
This bet is finished https://fortune.com/crypto/2024/06/20/djt-token-shkreli-barron-trump/
WolfOfPolymarket
7 months ago
A "preponderance" of evidence still requires evidence which is yet to be found. Roger Stone which is by far the closest to the Trump family has clearly stated zero involvement from Trump or his son in his tweet. All the people claiming the contrary have a stake in the outcome of this vote. You really believe that Trump would let his son who just graduated high school be involved with a massive crypto, pump and dump drama story in the middle of the election? No way.