#166
Rank
251
Comments
101
Likes Received
2247
Likes Given
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
There's no indication that Freddi is here to make money though
Donkov
6 months ago
Blaming shit on MAGA people is irrational. People are here to make money.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
needs to come from the government, not private citizens.
FlexLikeOuu
6 months ago
Why is this market still open? Its already sure that they are new charges against Diddy from 6 victims🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
The NHC is the source, there is zero room for interpretation.
DeucePapi
6 months ago
This market sounds like UMA hell
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
It's not overhyped, Katrina was also "just" Cat 3, the strome surge and rain is what's getting Florida
n/a
6 months ago
Mid to weak 3. 5 doomsayers are msm shills try to salvage their diminishing ad revenue. Trust me, i was actually hoping for Total Tampa Death.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Nice analysis, are you british?
Mike2025
6 months ago
This was my analysis from 9 days ago. https://old.reddit.com/r/PoliticalOdds/comments/1fspk4s/next_uk_leader_of_the_conservatives/
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Pain killer
PokerBrat
6 months ago
What does he want to drink? Advile? What?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Intensity forecast errors for 24/48 hours are just 8 and 12 mph on average, so it is unlikely to be a Cat 5 at landfall
General.William.T.Sherman
6 months ago
Winds at 155 as on 2pm update. Intensification continuing
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I feared the same, that's why I sold all my shares. Good luck to you though!
Foreseeable.
6 months ago
How does confirmation work? The Israelis dont post anything as far as I know. How do we prevent a situation where they obviously are in BJ, but there is no to little reporting? Dont appreciate another "Invade Lebanon" fight over my money :D
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
why do you always comment but never bet
ISHOWMEAT
6 months ago
This would be an interesting market for 2025 would say 60% happens in 2025
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
people in jail are being interviewed all the time
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Roux is in jail. How would the director have confronted him lmao.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Polymarket needs to hire new developers, Jesus Christ!
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
haha, you just can't let go of it..
CRYPTU
6 months ago
other is shooting up because people think its Isamu Kaneko
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
scam
MarilynMonroe
6 months ago
The leading aIternative of polymarket has the exact same bet with twice much more liquidity and different odds, I'm not sure which market is more accurate but аrbitrаgе is certainly doable https://x.com/TheDefiantNews/status/1843420090525725128
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
it's expected to weaken before landfall
khamzatborz
6 months ago
news talking about 4 and 5 why 3 so high %?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
this is not what the tweet says
latenightdegen
6 months ago
it's on the table as an option... https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1841234972776284322
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
There are rumors that one might be released soon.
Radetzky
6 months ago
This went up a lot today. Only speculation or do some people know more?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
they 100% won't add anyone else
CRYPTU
6 months ago
put Isamu Kaneko up there and i will bet $10000
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
just buy "other" or stfu
CRYPTU
6 months ago
put Isamu Kaneko up there and i will bet $10000
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
What's everyone's opinion, does Satoshi still hold the keys? Would be incredibly fucked up knowing you have Billions of Dollars worth of BTC but not being able to spend it ^^
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
pump and dump, originated on twitter, i believe
tomaz
6 months ago
In case you are wondering: There is huge market manipulation here. Some spikes are due to manipulation for memecoins. Right now there were like 4 or 5 memecoins of Adam on solana that went to over 2M MC in minutes. And most of them had the same wallets as top traders.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
that report button seems to be totally useless...
SylvesterStallone
6 months ago
Mhhh, the exact same bet has twice аs much liquidity and has different odds, I'm not sure but аrbitrаgе is certainly. doable https://x.com/TreeAphaNews/status/1842579398282871238
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
yeah, those are different, it's confusing if you're new to this.
EdgyUsername
6 months ago
Oh duh got it. I was using the oracle link, thanks!
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
np
EdgyUsername
6 months ago
Oh duh got it. I was using the oracle link, thanks!
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
click on the market and then on the "results" tab
EdgyUsername
6 months ago
I know the link, but how do I find it on there
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
rigged
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
go away, this market has enough scammers already
SylvesterStallone
6 months ago
Mhhh, the exact same bet has twice аs much liquidity and has different odds, I'm not sure but аrbitrаgе is certainly doable https://x.com/TreeAphaNews/status/1842579398282871238
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I think some people didn't think of that when they were placing their 93ct Nunes bet, lol
kanyewestlover911
6 months ago
Cade o contrato dessa porra? Segundo turno conta ainda aqui né
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
What's the argument for No? Bibi already promised a swift response, I can't imagine him not delivering, although there is the possibility of them doing some targeted assassinations instead of a kinetic strike I suppose. Or blow up some nuclear facility and make it look like an accident, like they did in the past, in which case the market will get contested again.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Tenebrus' argument is stupid, is what I'm saying
HsB34sgg
6 months ago
Where are you getting this "in and out" BS? They go house to house clearing threats inwards, onwards, and forwards. Whoever told you "in and out" was lying to you so you stupidly buy shares. Oopsie!!!
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
If there was no world war during the invasion of Poland, why does the invasion of Poland mark the beginning of the second World War?
Tenebrus7
6 months ago
If October would not have happend September would not be N invasion, so how can September by itself be an invasion. We will see shortly, in case No loses people will be quiet - in case yes loses, people gonna spam the comment section how unfair it is.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Haha, right. Even if only the price of oil rises by a few percent over the long-run due to this, it'll cost me a lot more than the bet.. ^^
Cedarville
6 months ago
If they hit nuclear facilities and a bigger war starts, I dont think we're gonna be worrying much about the outcome of this. Which is why I voted no
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
@JustLauraZepam it all depends on the whales, but I think they won't deviate too much, would be pretty wild if every newspaper calls it an invasion but UMA the "truth machine" said No, hahah
jeterl
6 months ago
We made it boys, looks like UMA is voting yes on the November market.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Thanks, glad to hear it's not just me. The most annoying thing is getting constantly logged out after I put my browser in the background on mobile..
Le-King
6 months ago
Yup
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
only 1.3% of the votes are in, and the first votes aren't usually very representative.
jeterl
6 months ago
We made it boys, looks like UMA is voting yes on the November market.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Anyone else encountering like a million different bugs in the recent weeks?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
You can’t call it the final review until you proof that it is actually *intended* to be the final review. If you can’t proof it, it resolves to No.
PolyRig-Fried
6 months ago
Funny, a prediction market that is predicting the past. And the second final review. We need 2 new bets: can Polymarket predict the past and is a final review really a final review or can there be more than one final review?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Man, the bots (corinthians, Cajetan and cigarettes) having a field day with this market.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Hey, feel free to copy paste my argument from 3 comments below into discord, if you feel it sense.
BibiNetanyahu
6 months ago
Just checked in on the discord server and boy the NO team is struggling in there. Quick send in reinforcements team NO
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
no, I fully agree. I'm just saying if one wants to make it bulletproof, as some people argue that they didn't intend to establish control. It's ridiculous
PolyRig-Fried
6 months ago
no need to wait for november, the event is already in the past. is this a retrocausal prediction market?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
2am local time is 7am September 30th ET.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
As soon as the November market resolves to Yes we have proof that Israel intends or intended to establish control. The invasion started at the lasted on October 1st 2am local time when the IDF announced that they have sent troops into Lebanon. The “intent to establish control” must have been present at that time already, as the Israeli National Security Cabinet approved the "next phase" in its conflict with Hezbollah before that date and there have been no meetings since: Source: https://x.com/AnnaBarskiy/status/1840846261802422415
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
If someone wants to make that argument in Discord, be my guest.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
As soon as the November market resolves to Yes we have proof that Israel intends or intended to establish control. The invasion started at the lasted on October 1st 2am local time when the IDF announced that they have sent troops into Lebanon. The “intent to establish control” must have been present at that time already, as the Israeli National Security Cabinet approved the "next phase" in its conflict with Hezbollah before that date and there have been no meetings since: Source: https://x.com/AnnaBarskiy/status/1840846261802422415
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
As soon as the November market resolves to Yes we have proof that Israel intends or intended to establish control. The invasion started at the lasted on October 1st 2am local time when the IDF announced that they have sent troops into Lebanon. The “intent to establish control” must have been present at that time already, as the Israeli National Security Cabinet approved the "next phase" in its conflict with Hezbollah before that date and there have been no meetings since: Source: https://x.com/AnnaBarskiy/status/1840846261802422415
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
so the November market should resolve No too?
Car
6 months ago
Because there is no intent to establish control over regions in Lebanon.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Apparently the holdup is that we don’t know if they “intended to establish control”, but if November resolves Yes, this logically should resolve Yes too, except if you think they changed their mind about their intent halfway through. Or am I missing something?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
yeah, I'm not a diehard yes, I asked a question, would you care to answer?
Car
6 months ago
4 comments, none include proof of what I asked. Typical !
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
*November Yes of course
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
If the November market resolves to No, it would prove that there is “intent to establish control” then the only argument for this to resolve to No would be that they established their intent after spet. 30th.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
If the November market resolves to No, it would prove that there is “intent to establish control” then the only argument for this to resolve to No would be that they established their intent after spet. 30th.
BibiNetanyahu
6 months ago
Im still waiting for proof that IDF invaded lebanon without the intention to "establish control over any regions of Lebanon". maybe they want to seat and drink tea with hezbollah terrorists
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
thanks for providing an argument. When do you think Israel started to “intend to establish control”? Or do you think the November market is a No too?
Car
6 months ago
Im still waiting for proof that IDF invaded before the market end time with the intention to "establish control over any regions of Lebanon". It goes to NO otherwise
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
correction, it was 2 am local: https://x.com/IDF/status/1840890054819864776
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Hones question for the No holders, what is your argument for this to resolve to No? We have a statement from the IDF dated October 1st, 1am local time (i.e. still Sept. 20th Eastern Time) that they have troops in Lebanon. Is the argument that these were just “targeted raids” and the “actual” invasion started later? And if so, how many raids have to happen at the same time for it to constitute an invasion? How many troops have to be present in enemy territory for an invasion?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Hones question for the No holders, what is your argument for this to resolve to No? We have a statement from the IDF dated October 1st, 1am local time (i.e. still Sept. 20th Eastern Time) that they have troops in Lebanon. Is the argument that these were just “targeted raids” and the “actual” invasion started later? And if so, how many raids have to happen at the same time for it to constitute an invasion? How many troops have to be present in enemy territory for an invasion?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
local time or Eastern Time, cause October 1st 6:59 am Lebanese time is still Sept. 30th Eastern Time
Tentaclecracy
6 months ago
Here you have: the Lebanese government itself has filed a complaint with the United Nations saying that the invasion began on the 1st of October. As per the rules, the September market is NO, and the November market is YES. What else do you need? https://nournews.ir/en/news/192343/Lebanon-files-formal-complaint-with-UN-over-Israeli-invasion
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I'm just curious what UMA the decentralized Truth Machine thinks
FamilyCapital
6 months ago
If you ask people from a few countries, most of them gonna give you an answer(date), which will be 2 years later than right one. I'm not gonna tell from which country :)
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Can we get a market for World War II, I'd like to know when it actually happened...
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I agree, it is ambiguous, but it is the common phrasing.
CYQ
6 months ago
Next Friday is tommorrow. WTF makes up these markets?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Cool, I'd like some in Egypt if possible, for my scuba diving trips. The red sea is amazing.
informed
6 months ago
If you are buying Yes for Craig Wright I have beachfront property in Sahara to sell you
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Right, and tomorrow is Shabbat Shuvah, which is even more important than a regular Sabbath.
Amok
6 months ago
Shabbat has begun now. Here's what ChatGPT has to say: "Shabbat begins at sunset on Friday and lasts until nightfall on Saturday. The precise timing varies depending on location and the time of year, as it is determined by when the sun sets. In Israel, for example: In October, Shabbat typically begins around 5:30 to 6:00 p.m. on Friday and ends about 6:30 to 7:00 p.m. on Saturday. So, the window for a potential Israeli retaliatory strike today would likely be before sunset, or after Shabbat ends on Saturday night, unless an emergency necessitates action during Shabbat." Retaliating against Iran will be meant to be a show of strength. You don't show strength by abandoning your religious principles. So... Happy Shabbat NO holders.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Scam.
NathanPull
6 months ago
Mhhh, the exact same bet has twice аs much liquidity and has different odds, I'm not sure but аrbitrаgе is certainly doable https://x.com/AlphaNews_TV/status/1841970227657281751
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Scam
NathanPull
6 months ago
Mhhh, the exact same bet has twice аs much liquidity and has different odds, I'm not sure but аrbitrаgе is certainly doable https://x.com/AlphaNews_TV/status/1841970227657281751
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
He obviously didn't red the holy books ...
palisade
6 months ago
You are a net loser on this site
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
No, tomorrow is "this Friday" and Friday in a week is "next Friday".
CYQ
6 months ago
Next Friday is tommorrow. WTF makes up these markets?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I agree, 17ct seems undervalued. Even if they take the holiday into account, they could still attack Friday night. Israel is 7 hours ahead, so they have until 7am Saturday local time to respond for this market to resolve.
Altcom
6 months ago
the price fell so much, as if the market expected to be told in advance of the time and place of such a blow if there was one. Obviously these plans are kept top secret, aren't they?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
https://polymarket.com/event/what-will-israel-target-in-iran/will-israel-target-an-iranian-oil-or-gas-facility?tid=1727996636433
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Anyone wanting to buy No, you can also buy No here for the exact same price, with less risk:
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Anyone wanting to buy No, you can also buy No here for the exact same price, with less risk:
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
It's from USA Today, and unfortunately I couldn't find any other newspaper reporting something similar
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Your reasoning makes sense, but I think the 70%+ was always a little overvalued. First, Wednesday trough Friday is Rosh Hashanah and second, in April they waited six days too, to strike back.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
well, there's one indication that they still might do it before Saturday: "The person added that the timing of any Israeli strike has also not yet been decided but was expected to be "soon" and would likely not wait for the Jewish holiday Rosh Hashanah to conclude."
Justifax
6 months ago
uhm, isn't that like a tautology?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Your reasoning makes sense, but I think the 70%+ was always a little overvalued. First, Wednesday trough Friday is Rosh Hashanah and second, in April they waited six days too, to strike back.
Altcom
6 months ago
the price fell so much, as if the market expected to be told in advance of the time and place of such a blow if there was one. Obviously these plans are kept top secret, aren't they?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
To my knowledge there only was one against an Iraqi one during the first gulf war, over 40 years ago.
denizz
6 months ago
They've done it several times
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I’m only aware of covert operations, like arson or small scale explosions that were never claimed by Israel.
denizz
6 months ago
They've done it several times
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Buying yes in one of these markets suggest the following probabilities, should a strike occur, assuming the other market is fairly priced: That it will be an oil facility with a probability of 95%, that it will be a nuclear facility with 30% and that it will be on Tehran with 40% likelihood.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Joe Biden has said the US is discussing with Israel the possibility of Israeli strikes on Iran’s oil infrastructure. When asked if he would support such strikes, Mr Biden said: "We're discussing that. I think that would be a little... anyway."
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
not unlikely that there would be multiple targets, they hit several targets in April as well, but oil *and* nuclear would be a major escalation and Israel doesn't want a war with iran. even just nuclear alone would probably cause Iran to respond. Hoping it’s not oil just for the sake of inflation.. Although I think it's more likely than not.
Remontada
6 months ago
This one is a head scratcher.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Oil prices don't have an end date though. They should have made these markets longer ...
ActDrew
6 months ago
Oil prices up almost 5% on fears Israel will strike Iranian oil facilities after Biden's comments
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Here's where the hold-up's coming from: "Romney grew irritated. “Yeah, but I’ve got 25 grandkids!” he said, throwing up his hands. “How am I going to protect 25 grandkids, two great-grandkids? I’ve got five sons, five daughters-in-law—it’s like, we’re a big group.” This was clearly a problem to which he’d given serious thought, and realized there was no solution. In the weeks after January 6, he’d spent thousands of dollars a day to protect his family from red-capped vigilantes. But how do you hide a family of 40 from a president hell-bent on revenge?"
almasudi
6 months ago
[The Atlantic; 9/24/24] There was, of course, one other possibility for Romney’s final act: a position in the next Biden administration. The two men have become unlikely friends in recent years. And according to one person close to the Biden campaign, senior Democrats in the president’s orbit had discussed appointing Romney to a high-profile diplomatic post in a second term, before Biden dropped out of the race. The conversations were hypothetical—ambassadorships aren’t typically doled out six months before an election—but such an offer would presumably be conditioned on an endorsement. And Romney wasn’t sure he could oblige. “Biden’s policies drive me crazy,” he told me. “And one of the reasons I think there are people like me who shrink at the idea of endorsing Biden is, does that mean I endorse his border policies? Or do I endorse giving trillions of dollars to college students to pay their debt?” He knew Trump’s authoritarianism and commitment to undermining America’s electoral system made him more dangerous than Biden. “The fact that if you want to be in the good graces of MAGA world you’ve got to say the election was stolen is extraordinary to me—but that is the test,” Romney said. Still, throwing his support behind a president whose policies he’d spent decades fighting against was a difficult thing to do. He told me he wasn’t ruling it out.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I have a structured settlement but I need cash now!
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
@JoebamaBiden, when do you expect them to certify the results?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I think we can close this now, all votes are counted:
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
great, so now I've got my money locked up in yet another market until eternity because of some formality....
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I think we can close this now, all votes are counted:
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
We're so back!
TheGuru
6 months ago
The Ravens will only get better as the season goes on. They could easily be 3-0
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
https://wahlergebnisse.brandenburg.de/12/500/20240922/landtagswahl_land/ergebnisse.html
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I think we can close this now, all votes are counted:
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
I think we can close this now, all votes are counted:
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
They are official.
JoebamaBiden
6 months ago
Need official results
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
haha, looking forward to November
BuckMySalls
6 months ago
amazing that people infer something from a US presidential election 8 years ago to psyop themselves into a terrible bet on a German state election, it's like watching the NBA finals and then thinking you'll see the same pattern in a women's high school final
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
it was more like the US election 2020, first votes heavily favored afd, but when the bigger precincts report the tide turns.
BuckMySalls
6 months ago
amazing that people infer something from a US presidential election 8 years ago to psyop themselves into a terrible bet on a German state election, it's like watching the NBA finals and then thinking you'll see the same pattern in a women's high school final
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
the erststimme is for people (affiliated with a party) though, the second one seems to be for the party.
Car
6 months ago
guys Zweitstimmen doesnt even count. Zweitstimmen are only used for coalitions to get a majority. The Erststimmen is what is used to count who "has the most votes"/
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
yeah, even though it is zeitstimme, it's still going to be spd, easily
kekkone
6 months ago
So few people here understand how these elections work. But thanks for the money, regardless.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
with the first one you elect people though, and with the second one you vote for the party.
Car
6 months ago
33,62 to 33,65
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
you're on the wrong one
Car
6 months ago
33,62 to 33,65
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
did buy everything after the election was over?
BuckMySalls
6 months ago
I look forward to doing this exact same maneuver to gullible rightoids in November again
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
are you telling yourself ;) you didn't know either how the voting system with two votes works
Car
6 months ago
Dont bet on politics you know shit about.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
it's down to 1.1 now, but the more votes are counted the more accurate the forecast, obviously
Car
6 months ago
1.5% difference left and omly 75% counted. Will end eactly like the TV forecasts predict
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
yeah, that makes sense. if the first vote is for people than that should obv. not count as the rules specify a part
JoebamaBiden
6 months ago
I think it makes sense to say that it's the second vote becuase that's the vote for a party.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
why only second? should be first or both? second sound less important?
FamilyCapital
6 months ago
should total to be counted, or only second
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Can we get clarity on which votes count? Apparently you were allowed to cast two votes today? is it one or the other, or is it both combined?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
nope
432
6 months ago
3/4 of all votes counted.AFD leading with 3% and 3.5% .......HOT RACE
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
haha, lol. that is exactly the same way Trump claimed the election was stolen in 2020..
Car
6 months ago
so yall think the TV forecasts make the numbers up?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Fuck.
Fredi9999WASP🐝
6 months ago
Guys chill out, AfD is still way ahead right now. https://wahlergebnisse.brandenburg.de/12/500/20240922/landtagswahl_land/ergebnisse.html
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
very misleading at the moment
Lennart
6 months ago
Live Count: https://wahlergebnisse.brandenburg.de/12/500/20240922/landtagswahl_land/ergebnisse.html
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
just did
Lennart
6 months ago
AFD can still win.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
then buy
Lennart
6 months ago
AFD can still win.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
i put most of my profit into AfD after I sold, so it's a wash for me. But it is interesting how the price for SPD skyrocketed minutes before the announcement. Too little money though for insiders, maybe a broke intern, haha
ncap
6 months ago
Where are the datas out, someone has a link?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
It's 3% on forschungs gruppe wahlen though.
Fredi9999WASP🐝
6 months ago
Its 1% on ARD lol
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
in the past election in thuringen and saxony there was significant movement away from the exit polls. Here we have one exit poll with a 3%-point gap and one with 1% gap. The truth is in the middle, probably. But I wouldn't feel comfortable buying at these prices.
Car
6 months ago
The gap is kinda big. I doubt thats gonna change
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
*don't...
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Wouldn't that make the gap wider? they already account for that in the exit polls
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Wouldn't that make the gap wider? they already account for that in the exit polls
CalOne1
6 months ago
25% already voted via postal service. Those are typically not AfD voters. So the gap will definitely be smaller in the end
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
we should have held on to those AfD NOs damn it..
ncap
6 months ago
Where are the datas out, someone has a link?
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
it's just a 1% difference in the exit polls
Car
6 months ago
AfD voters got too cocky and didnt vote probably
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Fuck. Polls were way off, lol
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Agree again, wee can also see that in the polls from the website above, SPD got a massive surge the last couple of weeks. Forschn grupe wahlen seems to have a pretty good track record in other state electionsand they still have Afd up one point
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
So i found this poll aggregator, don't know how they select the pollsters and if there are more though: https://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/landtage/brandenburg.htm
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
@start, yup agree. That's why I bought Afd No in the beginning, but at ~55 I'd favour Afd thoigh. Happy to lose money though
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
So i found this poll aggregator, don't know how they select the pollsters and if there are more though: https://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/landtage/brandenburg.htm
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
Seems like the current odds are more reflective than the ones before. Swithed from Afd No to Yes though.
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
So i found this poll aggregator, don't know how they select the pollsters and if there are more though: https://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/landtage/brandenburg.htm
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
In Thuringen the afd outperformed the polls(even outside the margin of error), but in Saxony they were pretty spot on
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
So i found this poll aggregator, don't know how they select the pollsters and if there are more though: https://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/landtage/brandenburg.htm
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
So i found this poll aggregator, don't know how they select the pollsters and if there are more though: https://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/landtage/brandenburg.htm
CheerfulPessimist
6 months ago
It already happened at the beginning of the week, for a brief period. If the gap can grow that large in just 5 days it can also be erased just as easily.
Mike2025
7 months ago
APPL $3.48T vs MSFT $3.26T. Easy Apple win.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Thanks. They should negotiate faster, I'm getting bored.
syntox
7 months ago
sometimes the negotiations can take a few months, but it's different every time
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
This market is not over whether or not Israel did it or not
dfhdhdrh
7 months ago
Why have the mention of "however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used" if they're not gonna use it? lol
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Because that part is just the source for the resolution, it pertains to HOW we get the evidence of wheter or not Israel *explicitly claims responsibility*, meaning we don't have to get video footage of Netanyahu saying they did it, but media reporting that HE SAID he did it is enough.
dfhdhdrh
7 months ago
Why have the mention of "however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used" if they're not gonna use it? lol
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
I doubt that this market will get disputed.
the-economic-consultant
7 months ago
As others have mentioned already, Israel has claimed responsibility for the attack to U.S. intelligence. First, they mentioned prior to the attack that they were going to do something (see here: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/politics/israel-notified-us-lebanon-operation/index.html) and they have said after the attack that they were responsible (see here: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/blinken-expresses-frustration-attacks-threaten-derail-israel-hamas-113806266). The Rules does not say that Israel must claim responsibility "publicly". However, the rules do say that intelligence services count as confirmation.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
I can see where the confusion is coming from. I’m happy to answer any question you have. I’m also happy to be proven wrong, but you don’t have to engage if you don’t want to.
the-economic-consultant
7 months ago
As others have mentioned already, Israel has claimed responsibility for the attack to U.S. intelligence. First, they mentioned prior to the attack that they were going to do something (see here: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/politics/israel-notified-us-lebanon-operation/index.html) and they have said after the attack that they were responsible (see here: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/blinken-expresses-frustration-attacks-threaten-derail-israel-hamas-113806266). The Rules does not say that Israel must claim responsibility "publicly". However, the rules do say that intelligence services count as confirmation.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Yeah, they lifted it before it got enforced. Although that wasn’t my point, is irrelevant as there aren't even talks about banning telegram in any EU country at the moment, so this is clearly not gonna happen one way or another.
n/a
7 months ago
The mechanism for this happening would be the EU Digital Services Act. It’s possible to apply to a court for suspension of service, which has a 14 day cooling period (and a lot of other steps, but that one is set in stone). So this is 0% before October already.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
The very video you shared says that Israel refused to say whether they are responsible or not.
Winner579
7 months ago
Looking decent for yes, I'll take a lil gamble https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dn4qh2rZ6w
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
3rd, the US being briefed after the attack (source: an anonymous government official btw.) holds the same issue. They could have been briefed about anything (Just to illustrate, they could have told them that a state aligned rouge actor was behind the attack, with Israels knowledge or blessing). The key word is again, explicitly. Israel almost never claims responsibility for covert actions on foreign soil, heck they didn’t even claim responsibility for the rocket attack on Iran earlier this year. Unless we get further info, this is a clear No.
the-economic-consultant
7 months ago
As others have mentioned already, Israel has claimed responsibility for the attack to U.S. intelligence. First, they mentioned prior to the attack that they were going to do something (see here: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/politics/israel-notified-us-lebanon-operation/index.html) and they have said after the attack that they were responsible (see here: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/blinken-expresses-frustration-attacks-threaten-derail-israel-hamas-113806266). The Rules does not say that Israel must claim responsibility "publicly". However, the rules do say that intelligence services count as confirmation.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
2nd, they informed the US that they were about to do “something” before the attack, per your own source (rules require: “EXPLICITLY claim responsibility”).
the-economic-consultant
7 months ago
As others have mentioned already, Israel has claimed responsibility for the attack to U.S. intelligence. First, they mentioned prior to the attack that they were going to do something (see here: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/politics/israel-notified-us-lebanon-operation/index.html) and they have said after the attack that they were responsible (see here: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/blinken-expresses-frustration-attacks-threaten-derail-israel-hamas-113806266). The Rules does not say that Israel must claim responsibility "publicly". However, the rules do say that intelligence services count as confirmation.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Ok so first off, the media stating that Israel was behind it is irrelevant, we all know they were. The consensus of credible reporting pertains to the “Israel explicitly CLAIMS” part.
the-economic-consultant
7 months ago
As others have mentioned already, Israel has claimed responsibility for the attack to U.S. intelligence. First, they mentioned prior to the attack that they were going to do something (see here: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/politics/israel-notified-us-lebanon-operation/index.html) and they have said after the attack that they were responsible (see here: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/blinken-expresses-frustration-attacks-threaten-derail-israel-hamas-113806266). The Rules does not say that Israel must claim responsibility "publicly". However, the rules do say that intelligence services count as confirmation.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
You aren't tracking.
the-economic-consultant
7 months ago
As others have mentioned already, Israel has claimed responsibility for the attack to U.S. intelligence. First, they mentioned prior to the attack that they were going to do something (see here: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/politics/israel-notified-us-lebanon-operation/index.html) and they have said after the attack that they were responsible (see here: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/blinken-expresses-frustration-attacks-threaten-derail-israel-hamas-113806266). The Rules does not say that Israel must claim responsibility "publicly". However, the rules do say that intelligence services count as confirmation.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
There are several reasons why this doesn’t suffice, but most importantly the US being briefed on the matter does not imply that Israel is even responsible for the attack in the first place, and even less so that “Israel explicitly claims responsibility”.
the-economic-consultant
7 months ago
As others have mentioned already, Israel has claimed responsibility for the attack to U.S. intelligence. First, they mentioned prior to the attack that they were going to do something (see here: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/politics/israel-notified-us-lebanon-operation/index.html) and they have said after the attack that they were responsible (see here: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/blinken-expresses-frustration-attacks-threaten-derail-israel-hamas-113806266). The Rules does not say that Israel must claim responsibility "publicly". However, the rules do say that intelligence services count as confirmation.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Right, I read that part, the US was briefed
the-economic-consultant
7 months ago
As others have mentioned already, Israel has claimed responsibility for the attack to U.S. intelligence. First, they mentioned prior to the attack that they were going to do something (see here: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/politics/israel-notified-us-lebanon-operation/index.html) and they have said after the attack that they were responsible (see here: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/blinken-expresses-frustration-attacks-threaten-derail-israel-hamas-113806266). The Rules does not say that Israel must claim responsibility "publicly". However, the rules do say that intelligence services count as confirmation.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
I can't find any info in either of your articles that states that israel claimed responsibility, could you quote the passage please?
the-economic-consultant
7 months ago
As others have mentioned already, Israel has claimed responsibility for the attack to U.S. intelligence. First, they mentioned prior to the attack that they were going to do something (see here: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/politics/israel-notified-us-lebanon-operation/index.html) and they have said after the attack that they were responsible (see here: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/blinken-expresses-frustration-attacks-threaten-derail-israel-hamas-113806266). The Rules does not say that Israel must claim responsibility "publicly". However, the rules do say that intelligence services count as confirmation.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Actually, they banned it briefly, not just talks. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/high-court-orders-temporary-suspension-telegrams-services-spain-2024-03-23/
n/a
7 months ago
The mechanism for this happening would be the EU Digital Services Act. It’s possible to apply to a court for suspension of service, which has a 14 day cooling period (and a lot of other steps, but that one is set in stone). So this is 0% before October already.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
If someone else wants to do a market order, I've got you covered ;)
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Well, on mobile it just says end date, there's no indication that that's just an estimate. Although it's clear here, if you read the rules, it can be cofusing in other markets if you don't know about it.
XiJinPing
7 months ago
this skenez guy is so dumb lmao
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Ugh, that bot activity in the order book is making me dizzy.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
The market goes until the election, not September 30th. The estimated date is wrong.
skenez
7 months ago
12 days left, he's just not going to say anything.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
This market isn't specifically about the EU, any country within the EU would suffice. There have already been talks in Spain earlier this year about shutting it down, if memory doesn't fail me.
n/a
7 months ago
The mechanism for this happening would be the EU Digital Services Act. It’s possible to apply to a court for suspension of service, which has a 14 day cooling period (and a lot of other steps, but that one is set in stone). So this is 0% before October already.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Ha! Classic ...
XiJinPing
7 months ago
classic fade the panic trade, no attack is happening, buy NO and profit off the panic paper hands
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Does anyone know when we can expect this market to settle?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
hmm, which one is the one reported in the news and in polls? Can't be seats though, as the title and rules specifically mention votes.
n/a
7 months ago
hmm, please specify what most votes means as there is 1. and 2. vote. I think most seats might be more appropriate -- although that would havily favour afd as of now.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
He just sold yes btw
FyouMoneyOTW
7 months ago
Go vote P2 if you haven’t yet https://discord.gg/uma dohmer justken just bought yes btw
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Congrats to you too :) This was crazy +EV all the way to the top.
LuckyLam
7 months ago
Congrats, No voters
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Happened to me too a few times; or orders don't go through. I think it happens when you switch from buy to sell after you put in your limit price, it updates the price of the limit to the current bid. You have to switch first and then put in your limit price. Don't use the mobile website anymore.
BennyS
7 months ago
I put in a limit order on mobile, entered 89c into the textbox, but the form did not fill. I sold 1000 shares and the corresponding amount at the bottom was 280. I didn’t read carefully enough. I’m not talking about the displayed odds fluctuating because of a relatively small market order that someone made
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Have you read the news? The will sentencing happen before the election" market already resolved. This is just annoying
whisperrr
7 months ago
beacause it's no 18 september, dude
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Fuck the Ravens
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
watch out for scammers linking to an "alternative" to Polymarket, they are wallet drainers and you will lose all your money.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
that was nerve wrecking, but fun
MrNFT
7 months ago
GG
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
are some of you in the stadium? the prices react much faster than my stream
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Why would one do that? and why did I have to rewrite that sentence 5 times to pass the spam filter, while literal scammers are allowed to post links to wallet drainers all day?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
What is going on with the the fewer than 16 named storms. 7 hours ago 25 different accounts bought and sold 6650 NO shares from and to each other.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
What is going on with the the fewer than 16 named storms. 7 hours ago 25 different accounts bought and sold 6650 NO shares from and to each other.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
@SkillzThatKillz fair point, I just thought about this market while watching the clip and thought it was funny
BiggestBidenFan
7 months ago
He will definitely mention Laura Loomer
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Earlier today he said Laura like 5 times within a minute, but not Loomer.
BiggestBidenFan
7 months ago
He will definitely mention Laura Loomer
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
And somehow the price for No still tanked, lol.
Car
7 months ago
now 5.69% difference
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
And still 11 trading days left. It only has to hit for one second. If I were a Yes holder, I'd be sweating.
Car
7 months ago
now 5.69% difference
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
What? Trump doesn't even acknowledge his affair with Stormy Daniels, how would you expect to get credible evidence of one with Loomer, she's certainly not going to kill her good standing with Trump by admitting to one.
Eyebrows
7 months ago
He knows that 2 cents a share is a good deal a week out, worth the risk. Sometimes even if you lose, the losing play was the "smart" play.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
scam.
Elyxir
7 months ago
yes looks like so, thanks for sharing it
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
it's not about the social media platform, it's about the companies bank accounts
alwaysrightforever
7 months ago
Brazil's Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes decided to lift freezes previously imposed on Starlink and X bank accounts after ordering the transfer of 18.35 million reais ($3.3 million) from the accounts to the national coffers.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
they're talking about bank accounts, doesn't change much
alwaysrightforever
7 months ago
Brazil's Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes decided to lift freezes previously imposed on Starlink and X bank accounts after ordering the transfer of 18.35 million reais ($3.3 million) from the accounts to the national coffers.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
yeah, they added the bank to bank account
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
what was it before?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
what was it before?
MrNFT
7 months ago
reuters changed their title lol
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
but it seems like the lift is only on the bank accounts, not on x as a social media platform
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
what's going on, lol
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
just saw your post down below, thx
MrNFT
7 months ago
got unbanned
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
what's going on, lol
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
don't be ridiculous
neeraj
7 months ago
you can't bet on a draw?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
now it's Dollars on sales for 93 cents, lol
Ferguson,Turd
7 months ago
lol
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
lfg
Ferguson,Turd
7 months ago
Dollars on sale for 87 cents TY
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Your thought process is flawed. No money has to be moved at all to make Microsoft the most valuable company, most certainly not 214 Billion dollars, just like the price of No here could rise to 99c without any shares actually getting bought or sold.
Tenebrus7
7 months ago
214 Billions difference in Market cap.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Because it doesnt have anything to do with his political campaign
Dogevb
7 months ago
I saw the video on twitter, I don't know if its ai or not, but its is not on trumps event page
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Deepfake analyzer says it is likely genuine, scam would only make sense if you link to wallet immediately, not refer to a date 4 days from now
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
I think it's called a pod.
sharky🦈🦈🦈
7 months ago
its a whale group bro
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Heslov's new movie: The Men Who Stare at Order Books 😂
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
How so?
0xD905af39F7843f08620771982AcE6B5fe80612Ce-1724383336589
7 months ago
Polymarket is censoring people on all the politics posts
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
which source actually put a number to it?
Sit
7 months ago
There is currently 85% chance of it hitting the US according to credible sources. This market has good potential
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
They don't call her Kamabla for no reason ;)
wyn
7 months ago
This market is truly under appreciated. All you need to do is go back and watch kamala’s vice presidential debate vs pence in 2020. She kept going even when her time ran out. Additionally, trump has publicly made it clear that he is going to let her talk as she is her own worst enemy. Thirdly, each candidate is likely going to use up all of their time to answer each question, so on that factor alone, the odds should be 50-50
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
This won't move the needle much, at least not on poly and even less so within 24 hours
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Debates usually don't have much of an impact (with the one obv. exception). Although, I do believe Harris has more upwards potential, expectations for Trump are low, so if he simply can contain himself for 90 minutes and stay on policy, people might say he did better than expected.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Debates usually don't have much of an impact (with the one obv. exception). Although, I do believe Harris has more upwards potential, expectations for Trump are low, so if he simply can contain himself for 90 minutes and stay on policy, people might say he did better than expected.
Tories4Harris
7 months ago
Kamala is currently ahead in the polls. Polymarket expects her to win the debate and gain more in the polls after the debate. But somehow this is 25%. Make it make sense.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
She's down over 5 points on Poly, and today Times/Siena released a Trump +2 pop vote poll, one of the most reputable pollsters in the country. Swing state polls by Ipsos also showed a slight trend toward Trump. Those might just be outliers or they might be the beginning of a larger trend.
Tories4Harris
7 months ago
Kamala is currently ahead in the polls. Polymarket expects her to win the debate and gain more in the polls after the debate. But somehow this is 25%. Make it make sense.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
why is this market still open?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
why is this still open?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
https://www.investing.com/analysis/1-stock-to-buy-1-stock-to-sell-this-week-oracle-apple-200651680
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Why did this drop from 14ct to 10ct with markets closed? The only news we got was from Bloomberg, that key AI features of the new iOS will be pushed back even further. And according to investing Apple historically underperforms post keynote. Additionally, the EU will decide on Tuesday whether Apple has to pay a 14 Billion dollar in taxes from its tax avoidance scheme in Ireland. Analysts are also more bullish on Microsoft than an Nvidia than on Apple. This seems overpriced at 90ct. Or am I missing something?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-09-06/apple-sept-9-event-preview-iphone-16-apple-intelligence-airpods-and-watches
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Why did this drop from 14ct to 10ct with markets closed? The only news we got was from Bloomberg, that key AI features of the new iOS will be pushed back even further. And according to investing Apple historically underperforms post keynote. Additionally, the EU will decide on Tuesday whether Apple has to pay a 14 Billion dollar in taxes from its tax avoidance scheme in Ireland. Analysts are also more bullish on Microsoft than an Nvidia than on Apple. This seems overpriced at 90ct. Or am I missing something?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-09-08/apple-event-staggered-ai-rollout-and-same-iphone-design-means-no-super-cycle-m0tkgzqg
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Why did this drop from 14ct to 10ct with markets closed? The only news we got was from Bloomberg, that key AI features of the new iOS will be pushed back even further. And according to investing Apple historically underperforms post keynote. Additionally, the EU will decide on Tuesday whether Apple has to pay a 14 Billion dollar in taxes from its tax avoidance scheme in Ireland. Analysts are also more bullish on Microsoft than an Nvidia than on Apple. This seems overpriced at 90ct. Or am I missing something?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Why did this drop from 14ct to 10ct with markets closed? The only news we got was from Bloomberg, that key AI features of the new iOS will be pushed back even further. And according to investing Apple historically underperforms post keynote. Additionally, the EU will decide on Tuesday whether Apple has to pay a 14 Billion dollar in taxes from its tax avoidance scheme in Ireland. Analysts are also more bullish on Microsoft than an Nvidia than on Apple. This seems overpriced at 90ct. Or am I missing something?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Yeah, by the fed and they aren't even hiding it.
luoshenPL
7 months ago
The inflation rate has been strictly controlled
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
No, no fighting on the Sabbath.
Gena🐊
7 months ago
Honest question, there is any fighting during weekends? I dont see maps moving
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
"Full Scope PR reached out to Fox News & denied any involvement with the fake/forged documents regarding Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce’s relationship: “[the documents] are entirely false and fabricated and were not created by this agency.” Full Scope PR plans to take legal action"
BallzToTheWalz
7 months ago
So we not factoring in the leak that their relationship is "scheduled" to end Sept 28? https://www.foxnews.com/sports/travis-kelces-pr-firm-calls-lawyers-document-exact-date-taylor-swift-breakup-goes-viral-report
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
I don't follow
Justifax
7 months ago
wait wait... no of course, MSFT wants to absorb all 100B risk by itself. just because apple embedded chatgpt into it's os, why would it want to invest. makes no sense! and besides wsj always gets its reporting wrong.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
I don't think there are insider, the price would have jumped much more than that
PokerBrat
7 months ago
Is it confirmed that he was on?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
What do you mean? Are there rumors they already taped an episode?
PokerBrat
7 months ago
Is it confirmed that he was on?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Yeah, felt pretty good, when I read the news ^^ Congrats to you too :)
wyn
7 months ago
Why is there $1,755,334 bet on "Trump prison time in NY case before election?", vs only $7,891 bet in this market. Furthermore, the "no prison time" is still not settled, yet, the odds of no prison time were @.72c-78c prior to the motion to delay, and this market was @.35c-40c for the yes for majority of it's lifespan. P.S. this market was much more predictable. 🤑
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
100% agree. I was pretty reckless when I opened this account a month ago. I had much more money in the "Trump fined over 100k, No" bet than I was comfortable with, but there was no liquidity to sell, over the entire 3 weeks or so. I have no idea about the law either, hahah. I was just betting on the vibes I got from talking heads on TV. Most of the reasonable legal experts seemed to agree that the odds were fairly low that sentencing would actually take place before the election.
wyn
7 months ago
Why is there $1,755,334 bet on "Trump prison time in NY case before election?", vs only $7,891 bet in this market. Furthermore, the "no prison time" is still not settled, yet, the odds of no prison time were @.72c-78c prior to the motion to delay, and this market was @.35c-40c for the yes for majority of it's lifespan. P.S. this market was much more predictable. 🤑
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Probably because this market was so new and the other one was up since June. I requested this market weeks ago, but got no reply. Would have been interesting to see if people with more knowledge of the legal system would have corrected the price on here. I expected a price of 75-80%. The only reason I was hesitant to buy was because the price was so low, haha. I thought maybe others knew more than I did ^^
wyn
7 months ago
Why is there $1,755,334 bet on "Trump prison time in NY case before election?", vs only $7,891 bet in this market. Furthermore, the "no prison time" is still not settled, yet, the odds of no prison time were @.72c-78c prior to the motion to delay, and this market was @.35c-40c for the yes for majority of it's lifespan. P.S. this market was much more predictable. 🤑
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Wow, JustKam you're fast... In every single market. Congrats!
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Dude, you literally have funds left, but ok
Mountainman
7 months ago
Still not the price, you idiots will literally lie about anything. YAWN!
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
No, since all you could do is sell for 57 or get 100 by proposing.
Mountainman
7 months ago
Still not the price, you idiots will literally lie about anything. YAWN!
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Just propose, put your money where your mouth is.
Mountainman
7 months ago
Still not the price, you idiots will literally lie about anything. YAWN!
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Ok, then propose for a profit of 57ct * 1.7544 = 100.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
If NFTs count, why don't you put your entire bank roll in it and propose? Instant 80% return.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
56ct *1.8 " ~ 100
Mountainman
7 months ago
"Tokens launched prior to the start date of this market will qualify for a "Yes" resolution." He launched an NFT last week, don't let the scammers make you buy "NO" before it goes to zero. I don't want to hear any crying like last time when they fooled you into buying that Tate wasn't arrested, AFTER he was arrested!
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
If NFTs count, why don't you put your entire bank roll in it and propose? Instant 80% return.
Mountainman
7 months ago
"Tokens launched prior to the start date of this market will qualify for a "Yes" resolution." He launched an NFT last week, don't let the scammers make you buy "NO" before it goes to zero. I don't want to hear any crying like last time when they fooled you into buying that Tate wasn't arrested, AFTER he was arrested!
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
True, but if interest rates get cut by more than the expected 25bsp, Nvidia has a higher upwards potential
CookedAlligator
7 months ago
check the charts, NVDA is volatile and pumping super hard, 40% pumps. Meanwhile microsoft is a stable / not volatile stock. We all know microsoft is not making 400B in one month. But NVDA could pull that off with another pump
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Interest rates will be cut this month. The market expects a 25 point cut with a 70% probability, if the fed deviates from that, stocks might get volatile.
Car
7 months ago
And so its begins.. MSFT up 0.5% and AAPL down -1.2%.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
This may already get decided this week, stay tuned.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Viva Chavez
Gena🐊
7 months ago
You win an election? Believe it or not, jail. You loose the election, also jail
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Yeah, exactly. Nvidida has a much higher volatility than either Apple or microsoft. No is def. +EV here
WhaleHunter
7 months ago
I'm not a stock market expert, but I'm curious why people often compare Nvidia's market value to Apple's. Why doesn't Microsoft have a chance at competing for the top market value, even though it invested in OpenAI and is currently the second-largest company?
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Right to jail, right away.
-nothingburger-
7 months ago
jail
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
This too shall pass.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
The CNN headline is misleading, he just got transferred to court, like expected. I still think it is Yes though.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Not much funds left and I’d rather not stay at an irrationally low No for an unreasonably long time. Kicking my ass, I didn’t invest last week when I wanted too.. Nice payday for you though
Chrome
7 months ago
Load the clips brother
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
The only way this can resolve in 2024 is the DEA opting to make the new rule effective immediately after publication. Which they legally don’t seem to be permitted to, since this is a “significant rule”, as defined by Executive Order 12866, which means, according to the DEA, that there will be a 60 day delay until the rule gets posted on the Federal Register (potentially longer, pending lawsuits).
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Given that this only resolves after the final rule becomes effective, which is usually 30 or 60 days after publication of the new rule, why is this not already at 99c, given that the hearings will be held on December 2nd. And that’s already under the assumption that they publish the rule immediately after the hearing, which is almost guaranteed to not be the case, as there will be significant debate at the hearings over whether to deschedule completely or reschedule to Class 3 (since this is incredibly important for cannabis businesses).
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
Given that this only resolves after the final rule becomes effective, which is usually 30 or 60 days after publication of the new rule, why is this not already at 99c, given that the hearings will be held on December 2nd. And that’s already under the assumption that they publish the rule immediately after the hearing, which is almost guaranteed to not be the case, as there will be significant debate at the hearings over whether to deschedule completely or reschedule to Class 3 (since this is incredibly important for cannabis businesses).
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
According to JustKam further down, it has to be after 30 days period, or when the rescheduling becomes effective.
caesar
7 months ago
No final rule can take effect less than 30 days after publication, so even if it's published after the hearing in December it won't take effect until 2025.... not sure how the market resolves in that case.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
thank you for clarifying! :)
🤺JustPunched
7 months ago
The market expires when marijuana is rescheduled. If it's not rescheduled for whatever reason (lawsuits, waiting period, whatever), it can't expire yes yet.
CheerfulPessimist
7 months ago
exactly, and back then media outlets reported that he endorsed her, and it still wasn't enough
Dooby
7 months ago
I’d imagine they have to look back at the Bernie sanders speech and see what they did there
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
https://www.regulatoryoversight.com/2024/08/cannabis-rescheduling-closing-of-the-comment-period-and-what-lies-ahead/
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Does someone know when this will (potentially) get resolved. So, after the DEA publishes its rule, there is either a 30 or 60 waiting period until the reschedule is officially in effect. However, durig that time lawsuits can get filed that might put the reschedule on hold. I'm assuming though that this resolves as soon as the DEA publishes it's rule, regardless of the wait period, or wether it stopped by lawsuits?
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Don't lose hope, itll happen eventually :)
Degen2005
8 months ago
FOMO is a dangerous drug. Seems like this will never happen.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Does someone know when this will (potentially) get resolved. So, after the DEA publishes its rule, there is either a 30 or 60 waiting period until the reschedule is officially in effect. However, durig that time lawsuits can get filed that might put the reschedule on hold. I'm assuming though that this resolves as soon as the DEA publishes it's rule, regardless of the wait period, or wether it stopped by lawsuits?
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
The pump was because a business insider article mentioned that they will pubilshe the new rule either August 20th or September 20th. So there would have been a possibility, at least according to BI. However, I don't know were BI got that info from, i think they were uninformed
Chrome
8 months ago
where were yall getting the updates at I couldn't find shit except the dates
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Here's good source on the timeline ahead: https://www.regulatoryoversight.com/2024/08/cannabis-rescheduling-closing-of-the-comment-period-and-what-lies-ahead/
Chrome
8 months ago
where were yall getting the updates at I couldn't find shit except the dates
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
But yeah, you know probably more about this than I do. And to your other points, yeah, I never argued those. I know they can just publish their rule without a hearing; or hold a hearing and procede to reschedule without taking objections into account.
Degen2005
8 months ago
Seems like this will be happening today. Apparently roughly 69% of the comments were in support of not only rescheduling but COMPLETE DESCHEDULING. Most public comments ever received.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
I'm not sure I fully underatand the processes here, but seems to me you just ave to write a letter, no? https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/05/21/2024-11137/schedules-of-controlled-substances-rescheduling-of-marijuana
Degen2005
8 months ago
Seems like this will be happening today. Apparently roughly 69% of the comments were in support of not only rescheduling but COMPLETE DESCHEDULING. Most public comments ever received.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
I think they will reschedule too, eventually
Degen2005
8 months ago
Seems like this will be happening today. Apparently roughly 69% of the comments were in support of not only rescheduling but COMPLETE DESCHEDULING. Most public comments ever received.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
I know they can reschedule without a hearing. And yes, several groups and individuals have requested a hearing.
Degen2005
8 months ago
Seems like this will be happening today. Apparently roughly 69% of the comments were in support of not only rescheduling but COMPLETE DESCHEDULING. Most public comments ever received.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Here's for example a request for hearing by a ton of former DEA administrators: DEA-2024-0059-23173
Degen2005
8 months ago
Seems like this will be happening today. Apparently roughly 69% of the comments were in support of not only rescheduling but COMPLETE DESCHEDULING. Most public comments ever received.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
I don't think it will happen today. I can't imagine the DEA rescheduling without a hearing, somthing the business insider article glosses over entirely, they only mention the deadline
Degen2005
8 months ago
Seems like this will be happening today. Apparently roughly 69% of the comments were in support of not only rescheduling but COMPLETE DESCHEDULING. Most public comments ever received.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Seems so, https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVP/5513
VibesGreaterRules
8 months ago
Is the deadline 30 days after sentencing?
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
The buzz is getting louder. Who's it gonna be? Remember, it can only be one.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Just read the rules on it, you're right pretty fucked up
Gena🐊
8 months ago
It was, only a couple of freaks where betting Maduro because they supported him or though he would win honestly. Then JustScam used his influence over UMA and they started to accumulate shares at 5%. Polymarket hasnt issued an statement yet, and that's a disgrace
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Hmm, didn't know you could stll access closed markets. Well, you're actually right. It says official information is the primary source. That sucks, and it erodes trust in Polymarket pretty substantially
XiJinPing
8 months ago
No one can actually bet meaningful amounts in this market because JustScam and his mob can easily steal this like they did the other one. Shame on Polymarket.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Hmm, maybe they should have kept the market open longer until there was more information available, but most credible evidence suggests that he actually did lose. And most countries throughout the world reject his claim that he won. Of course a dictator would claim so
XiJinPing
8 months ago
No one can actually bet meaningful amounts in this market because JustScam and his mob can easily steal this like they did the other one. Shame on Polymarket.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
How did they resolve the election market?
XiJinPing
8 months ago
No one can actually bet meaningful amounts in this market because JustScam and his mob can easily steal this like they did the other one. Shame on Polymarket.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Lol, their def there for Biden
Car
8 months ago
Wow ambulances at the white house
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
51.2% vs 48.8
ionlywin
8 months ago
Also, males are just born more often statistically.
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
and it's also the 12 month likelihood
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Excerpt: While we now think the risks are somewhat higher than the historical unconditional average 12-month probability of about 15%, we continue to see recession risk as limited because the data still look fine overall and we do not see major financial imbalances”
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Excerpt: While we now think the risks are somewhat higher than the historical unconditional average 12-month probability of about 15%, we continue to see recession risk as limited because the data still look fine overall and we do not see major financial imbalances”
MichaelFowlie
8 months ago
JP Morgan says there's a 35% probability of recession by end of 2024
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
any day now!
BigBetsBonanza
8 months ago
Highly likely she drops out I think!!! For sure!!
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
So almost every time 😂
polymathead
8 months ago
I'm kinda flip--flopping but based on Chatgpt, there have only been 3 instances since 2000 where the first cut has been 50bps: January 3, 2001: 50 bps cut in response to the dot-com bubble burst. September 18, 2007: 50 bps cut during the onset of the financial crisis. March 3, 2020: 50 bps emergency cut due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Is it really as bad as any of these right now?
CheerfulPessimist
8 months ago
Lol, Maduro lost. Just bc he says otherwise doesn't mean it's true ^^
diddy
8 months ago
Also, I have seen Gonzalez win the election instead of Maduro here. I think there is alternative reality going on at the moment.