#190
Rank
246
Comments
98
Likes Received
375
Likes Given
mona.lisa
5 months ago
A signal for 154m. LA County only has 526k left to process, down from 956k estimated on the SOS website. But they added 200k to the total votes, now at 3.3m votes, this means the unprocessed ballots were overestimated by about 230k. https://laist.com/news/politics/voter-turnout-2024-general-la-orange-county
mona.lisa
5 months ago
It's basically a coin flip at this point. To be over 155, there would need to be 98%+ turnout of the 2020 election.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
are you aware, contrary to your claims, that UF election project actually estimated 158 million originally? They brought it back down.
Justifax
5 months ago
I agree, don't take my advice. Especially since I haven't given any. But do look into the links and pay attention to facts rather than very careless pumping.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
explain where I have "pumped" ANYTHING 🤣
Justifax
5 months ago
I agree, don't take my advice. Especially since I haven't given any. But do look into the links and pay attention to facts rather than very careless pumping.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
UnlimitedMarketAbuse earlier claimed that university of Florida's estimate of 154 million was done intentionally to manipulate the market so they could profit on PolyMarket. Don't listen to his advice.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
"1m ahead" is not something you put "only" in front of
Justifax
5 months ago
AP is reporting 6.2M, and Sos is reporting 4.9M+.12 for 5.1M. So AP is only 1M ahead of the current report. We'll find out more very soon, though.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
so what? University of Florida already included this figure. Doesn't get you past 154.
Justifax
5 months ago
https://apps.arizona.vote/electioninfo/BPS/47/0 AZ is reporting 438K, which is close enough to AP
mona.lisa
5 months ago
No, lol. AP total would bring you to 18.26 million. California SOS would bring you to 16.4 million. So AP is over by 1.8 million.
Justifax
5 months ago
AP is reporting 6.2M, and Sos is reporting 4.9M+.12 for 5.1M. So AP is only 1M ahead of the current report. We'll find out more very soon, though.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
University of Florida has taken into account yet to be counted ballots, and they come in at 154 million. AP are implausibly overestimating California by 2.5 million over 2020 turnout, which is not going to happen. Turnout is way down.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
why would you put AP numbers up when they are clearly fucking wrong? Lmfao
Justifax
5 months ago
Here are the states greater than 50k, in sorted order by remaining ballots GA 51255,NC 55884,MI 56032,OH 56997,NV 65250,AK 78450,FL 89922,IL 98136,PA 101931,TX 114428,CO 214920,NY 257793,UT 262782,NJ 275341,WA 368820,OR 377249,MD 442398,AZ 442923,CA 6220890
mona.lisa
5 months ago
my stance is that it's very close to 155, and probably under given University of Florida team of statisticians was correct in 2020 too.
Justifax
5 months ago
I like to argue that AP is on the high side, and that people should be aware of that. This is literally how you can tell I'm not pumping.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
I haven't argued "one side", I am arguing against the narrative of these faulty estimates based on incomplete data. People want that knowledge.
Justifax
5 months ago
I like to argue that AP is on the high side, and that people should be aware of that. This is literally how you can tell I'm not pumping.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
you're the only one talking about 'pumping' and conspiracy theories. We have to wonder about your alt account, actually.
Justifax
5 months ago
I like to argue that AP is on the high side, and that people should be aware of that. This is literally how you can tell I'm not pumping.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
I haven't even decided which side to buy yet, so stop with the smearing.
Justifax
5 months ago
You'll keep hearing this ignorance/lie about lower turnout across the board. It's false. For example, Nevada has had higher turnout and they're not done counting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election_in_Nevada https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_Nevada Some people will say absolutely anything they can, but they do reveal themselves for who they truly are, which helps.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Nevada is a SWING STATE, the turnout is going to be higher. The states with the population necessary to get this over 155 are not swing states. Jesus Christ you need to stop with the conspiracy theories about my commenting.
Justifax
5 months ago
You'll keep hearing this ignorance/lie about lower turnout across the board. It's false. For example, Nevada has had higher turnout and they're not done counting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election_in_Nevada https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_Nevada Some people will say absolutely anything they can, but they do reveal themselves for who they truly are, which helps.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
We already know AP is overestimating Californias uncounted ballots by 2.5 million... but I took a look at other states. Maryland allegedly has 300k to count, which would mean it has higher voter turnout than 2020. That is controversial, because it's not a swing state. I think the estimates of 155+ are on shaky ground. University of Florida seems to agree.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Nope, AP and NEP are overestimating remaining ballots in MD. If there were 300k, then turnout would be higher in 2024 vs 2020.
plymarket-user
5 months ago
It really come down to the question if CA is 75% complete in counting or 66%. Depending on the source, I estimate 154.3m - 156.5m. This is a fun one to watch!
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Those have been well accounted for in the election project Florida data. The only controversy is California.
plymarket-user
5 months ago
It really come down to the question if CA is 75% complete in counting or 66%. Depending on the source, I estimate 154.3m - 156.5m. This is a fun one to watch!
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Do the math and it seems AP have overestimated California by at least 2.5 million. Wtf are they doing. Deduct that from Nate Silvers estimate and now you're at 154 million.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Nate Silvers estimate of 156.5 relies on the AP figures, which are ridiculous. They estimate 18.93 million voters in Cali? Cali only got 17.5m in 2020 and turnout is WAY DOWN. NEP and California SOS both estimate 16.1 to 16.3.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
those remaining counts are estimates, but they're clearly wrong when you compare them to 2020 voter turnout.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
National Election Pool now says there will be ~16.1 million votes in CA. If this is true, it would be ~154
mona.lisa
5 months ago
University of Florida prediction of 154m looks strong.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
no, NBC (using NEP figures) and AP figures are contradictory for a lot of states. It isn't clear who has the accurate estimate.
sshafique.10
5 months ago
Isnt this as simple as adding the remaining estimated votes to the current total on election atlas? NBC estimated remaining is very close to the Cali SOS site's remaining ballot estimate
mona.lisa
5 months ago
National Election Pool now says there will be ~16.1 million votes in CA. If this is true, it would be ~154
mona.lisa
5 months ago
turnout in cali might be down a lot more than other states though
sneakySAN1C
5 months ago
Seems like everyone is using (state counted votes) / (counted %). This is reasonable, but it is very dependant on the reported counted % accuracy of big states like Cali. I've got methods that don't rely on Cali's counted %. Est: 156.8 - 157.5m
mona.lisa
5 months ago
and you think its under 155?
Justifax
5 months ago
For LA, I found this. https://www.dailynews.com/2024/11/08/2024-election-results-fridays-update-for-la-countys-closest-congress-state-senate-assembly-seats/ The article says there are 759K left, but the sos site says 956,421
mona.lisa
5 months ago
yeah I pointed to 99% count before. I think the decrease in voter turnout is the strongest evidence against 155+
Justifax
5 months ago
For LA, I found this. https://www.dailynews.com/2024/11/08/2024-election-results-fridays-update-for-la-countys-closest-congress-state-senate-assembly-seats/ The article says there are 759K left, but the sos site says 956,421
mona.lisa
5 months ago
then it wouldn't bode well for 155+
Justifax
5 months ago
For LA, I found this. https://www.dailynews.com/2024/11/08/2024-election-results-fridays-update-for-la-countys-closest-congress-state-senate-assembly-seats/ The article says there are 759K left, but the sos site says 956,421
mona.lisa
5 months ago
yes, if they were talking directly to the registrar that would mean the number on the site is an overestimate, no?
Justifax
5 months ago
For LA, I found this. https://www.dailynews.com/2024/11/08/2024-election-results-fridays-update-for-la-countys-closest-congress-state-senate-assembly-seats/ The article says there are 759K left, but the sos site says 956,421
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Election Lab already takes this figure into account.
Justifax
5 months ago
Does anyone want to have a fact based conversation on https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/unprocessed-ballots-status This is really the number that matters. It has increased from 16.2M to 16.4M (total counted + unprocessed) and there should be another update tonight. Any guesses what it will show?
mona.lisa
5 months ago
It's an estimate, and it doesn't matter if it's accurate
Justifax
5 months ago
Does anyone want to have a fact based conversation on https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/unprocessed-ballots-status This is really the number that matters. It has increased from 16.2M to 16.4M (total counted + unprocessed) and there should be another update tonight. Any guesses what it will show?
mona.lisa
5 months ago
show your working
sneakySAN1C
5 months ago
Seems like everyone is using (state counted votes) / (counted %). This is reasonable, but it is very dependant on the reported counted % accuracy of big states like Cali. I've got methods that don't rely on Cali's counted %. Est: 156.8 - 157.5m
mona.lisa
5 months ago
then you should be happy the market returned closer to 50:50, which is all I aimed to achieve.
Justifax
5 months ago
Sigh. Nate is chief analyst on the nyt needle team. Yes, that needle. The turnout numbers was their last estimate before they turned it off as Trump had won.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Use common sense, please. Turnout is down even in states reporting 99%. Yet somehow you think the total count will come 1 million shy of the historic turnout in 2020 at 158m?
Justifax
5 months ago
Sigh. Nate is chief analyst on the nyt needle team. Yes, that needle. The turnout numbers was their last estimate before they turned it off as Trump had won.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Nate Cohn's estimate was pre-election. It's irrelevant. Nate Silver's estimate of 156.5 relies on AP numbers, which are overestimating California by close to 2 million.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Nate Cohn estimate was pre-election and irrelevant. Nate Silver is based on AP figures, which overestimate cali by 2 million.
Sardinianshepherd
5 months ago
i have 156-158 as estimate bracket, Nate silver and Nate cohen have similar range all above 155, thou cali estimates have been growing
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Nate Cohns is based on the NY Times estimate *before* the election. You're a fool to be citing this. They haven't revised it.
Justifax
5 months ago
I follow AP quite a bit. They tweak their individual state estimates every 15 minutes or so, but the total estimate has not budged from ~158M. AP, DDHQ, and NateCohn all estimate around 157m. here's ap - https://imgur.com/a/VEmOiRU, and here's ddhq - https://imgur.com/a/caQkaMF here's nate's tweet https://x.com/Nate_Cohn/status/1854550651055063453 The cali estimate may come down at a future point, but so far cali is approach it rather than the other way around.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
BREAKING: Florida University estimates 154 million. Checking the California numbers, it looks like the AP is overestimating Cali votes by 2 million. The media are relying on the AP numbers, meaning 155-160 is overpriced.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Looks like University of Florida is right. This will be 154m. The models estimating above 155 are relying on shaky turnout estimates. Turnout is lower.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
thanks, sounds good
mona.lisa
5 months ago
thing that concerns me is that AP estimates, and the National Election Pool (NEP), have such wildly differing estimates on the votes remaining.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
How come you get beneath 155? Would be curious about explanation
Justifax
5 months ago
AP, DDHQ, and NateCohn all estimate around 157m. here's ap - https://imgur.com/a/VEmOiRU, and here's ddhq - https://imgur.com/a/caQkaMF here's nate's tweet https://x.com/Nate_Cohn/status/1854550651055063453
mona.lisa
5 months ago
thing that concerns me is that AP estimates, and the National Election Pool (NEP), have such wildly differing estimates on the votes remaining.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
UF election project says 154.5
Sardinianshepherd
5 months ago
i have 156-158 as estimate bracket, Nate silver and Nate cohen have similar range all above 155, thou cali estimates have been growing
mona.lisa
5 months ago
her odds have never exceeded 30%, so no she was not "projected to win" earlier today.
DSPRIDES
5 months ago
Is she not projected to win anymore? I mean 18% of counting still remains and she is only 1.1% behind
mona.lisa
5 months ago
You can find a crazy lawyer to say anything. This is retarded.
REEEEEEEEEE
5 months ago
Election lawyer saying "More than 48K voters in AZ had their votes erased at MCTEC. None of the voters who had their votes "backed out" and "retabulated" can be sure that their votes were counted as originally cast (or even counted at all)." He suspects those votes were retabulated as Gallego votes. AZ GOP put out a notice saying their call centers are being flooded with people calling about canceled ballots - canceled ballots cannot be cured. https://x.com/Ryan_L_Heath/status/1854713842586001518
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Lmaoooo she is coping
REEEEEEEEEE
5 months ago
Lake is saying Pima is changing the number of votes left. https://x.com/KariLake/status/1855097527927771163
mona.lisa
5 months ago
contrarians are usually wrong.
Spartan37
5 months ago
I cannot even imagine being dumb enough to buy Gallego yes at 90% right now. Horrible, horrible odds given the outstanding ballots.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
you do realise GPT hallucinates?
VinaCapital
5 months ago
As of November 9, 2024, the Associated Press has reported that approximately 160 million votes were cast in the 2024 U.S. presidential election. AP NEWS This figure aligns with the total voter turnout from the 2020 election, indicating a consistent level of electoral participation between the two election cycles.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
so what? AZ Republicans break heavily for Gallego because he is center right.
rutherford
5 months ago
yall undervaluing these outstanding counties
mona.lisa
5 months ago
you realise most AZ election officials are republicans? There is no cheating.
Symbolic17
5 months ago
I'm still bullish because the cheating will be revealed this time.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
no liquidity
Justifax
5 months ago
Tonnes to bet on in the https://polymarket.com/event/popular-vote-margin-of-victory-0pt25-ranges market
mona.lisa
5 months ago
btw, where do you track the drop? I can only see presidential but not senate
david689314
5 months ago
Pinal has dropped 19,563 #AZSen votes. Lake wins them 51/45 to net 1,204. Big yikes for Lake, she was 55+% before
mona.lisa
5 months ago
no, check my wallet, I have $30k https://polygonscan.com/address/0x93b9114efd9d72720f0a67205208b332ae6ba48b
TrumpGold
5 months ago
Kek, polywog & DunkBruntley showing massive losses, nearly 1m
mona.lisa
5 months ago
its more sad that you have $0 and spend your entire day in polymarket comment section.
TrumpGold
5 months ago
Kek, polywog & DunkBruntley showing massive losses, nearly 1m
mona.lisa
5 months ago
where do you track the drops?
Spartan37
5 months ago
I also want to see a strong Cochise drop for Lake. 65%+ on remaining ballots there. If she doesn't win Cochise by a lot, I'm out.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
First, they have a two page ballot. Second, 90% of Arizonans vote by mail, which means 3 million+ ballots need verification. And finally, by law voters can drop off early ballots at vote centers, and they must be verified like everything else.
TrumpGold
5 months ago
How is Arizona such a shit state when it comes to counting? Must be full of seething liberals who took sick leave after the election, leaving the booths short staffed
mona.lisa
5 months ago
gallego is a common sense democrat. Are you high?
Spartan37
5 months ago
I just gotta say, screw all the independents that voted Trump but not Lake. Like they're literally the same person politically.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
POV: you don't understand Arizona politics
Spartan37
5 months ago
I just gotta say, screw all the independents that voted Trump but not Lake. Like they're literally the same person politically.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Future dumps to be more narrow, not stronger for Lake. Disaster for Lake holders. https://x.com/Garrett_Archer/status/1855067895224512953
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Aenews2 was right about Trump PV so I think he's pretty smart lmao.
JackBeTrader
5 months ago
that means there are about 124K Election Day drop offs out there to process. Those will go big for Lake you can see it in the turnout party splits
mona.lisa
5 months ago
lmao I put around 40k USD on Kamala for PV and sold with an 8k loss. You are the broke one here.
QuteAnon
5 months ago
No use conversing with poors. If they had anything worth saying, their account balance would show it. Just check the box next to "Holders" and carry on.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
I lost money on the popular vote, which nearly everybody thought she would win. If it were so obvious Trump would win, his price would've been higher. An 8k loss isn't a big deal to me.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Lol future dumps are going to be MORE NARROW, not stronger for Lake: https://x.com/Garrett_Archer/status/1855067895224512953
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Lol future dumps are going to be MORE NARROW, not stronger for Lake: https://x.com/Garrett_Archer/status/1855067895224512953
mona.lisa
5 months ago
absolutely. pull all of your trump profits in!
Spartan37
5 months ago
Should I go in more into my Trump profits? Half in?
mona.lisa
5 months ago
If I triggered you, I succeeded.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
The liberal Lake supporters keep pointing out my 8k loss. Fake news! I'm a business man. I used the bankruptcy laws of this country to do the right thing for my family, my business and the country. We don't need weak people like Kari Lake in the senate!
mona.lisa
5 months ago
no u don't
aenews2
5 months ago
Trading against MAGAts is like taking candy from a baby
mona.lisa
5 months ago
The liberal Lake supporters keep pointing out my 8k loss. Fake news! I'm a business man. I used the bankruptcy laws of this country to do the right thing for my family, my business and the country. We don't need weak people like Kari Lake in the senate!
mona.lisa
5 months ago
wrong. I made a fortune. I'm a businessman. I have a company worth billions and billions. I only got a small loan of a million dollars.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
BREAKING: Lake will lose. Remember, I was right about the general election popular vote. Thank me later!
mona.lisa
5 months ago
BREAKING: Lake will lose. Remember, I was right about the general election popular vote. Thank me later!
mona.lisa
5 months ago
I think he needs to get to 7.5
TruthSearUm
5 months ago
Trump now up +6.3% if he gets to 7% I don't see how she loses.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
"its still a coin toss at the moment" https://x.com/ECaliberSeven/status/1855063454064713891
mona.lisa
5 months ago
yeah, she refused to concede last election and said it was stolen. The majority of AZ republicans thought she was retarded for that.
CYQ
5 months ago
It's over Ruben Sandwich. You lost to a Crazy Women!
mona.lisa
5 months ago
are you updating the sheet
mikenike360
5 months ago
Trump got more votes in Cali than he ever has before. I'm pretty sure it's gonna land 3-4% even with 45% of the cali vote left to count.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Lake holders are coping rn.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
You buffoon, multiple outlets have called it already for Gallego because the odds she can win are next to nothing.
CYQ
5 months ago
900 ,000 of the remaining 1000,000 votes are in two counties Maricopa and Pima where Gallego has a very high EV. Not only that but 700,000 of these votes are Early Votes where Gallego also has a high EV versus Lake
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Buy it then.
Ricardocunha
5 months ago
2-3% has an amazing risk/reward. Hard to see the needle getting below 2%. Kamala flopped huge, even in CA
mona.lisa
5 months ago
"This market will resolve based off the official vote count once all States and D.C. have certified their votes"
PunishedCK
5 months ago
I hereby confirm what another person reported. Donald Trump will win the Popular vote by around 2.1. Proof: https://imgur.com/a/UozU91q
mona.lisa
5 months ago
it will probably be Gallego but I'm just saying it's not impossible. Decision Desk says there's a 20% chance Lake wins. So... I think this market is overpriced.
Tetiana1
5 months ago
Can Kari still win this one?
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Yes
Tetiana1
5 months ago
Can Kari still win this one?
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Archived at 11.59pm EST https://archive.is/uCMpt
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Final result YES 13%: https://edition.cnn.com/election/2024/exit-polls/national-results/general/president/
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Final result YES 13%: https://edition.cnn.com/election/2024/exit-polls/national-results/general/president/
mona.lisa
5 months ago
do you read the rules for markets? It's based only on CNN exit polls.
n/a
5 months ago
https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2024/general-results/voter-analysis
mona.lisa
5 months ago
the CNN intern was buying at 5 cents
camheff
5 months ago
Wanna shout out whatever CNN intern caused this dip, buying dollars for 17 cents was very nice. Theyre absolutely not fake news.
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Inflation is down to 2% right now you idiot
CoconutsForTrump
5 months ago
I'm less exited about Trump winning than I am about Kamala losing. I didn't vote FOR Trump, but I voted AGAINST Kamala. Never again will I have to hear someone tell me "It's Comma-la"
mona.lisa
5 months ago
republicans are so close https://ig.ft.com/us-elections/2024/results/house/
codingnoob88
5 months ago
????? what happened
mona.lisa
5 months ago
do you think thats actually possible?
codingnoob88
5 months ago
????? what happened
mona.lisa
5 months ago
lmao enjoy your tariffs and inflation!
CoconutsForTrump
5 months ago
I'm less exited about Trump winning than I am about Kamala losing. I didn't vote FOR Trump, but I voted AGAINST Kamala. Never again will I have to hear someone tell me "It's Comma-la"
mona.lisa
5 months ago
Nate Silver's latest analysis gives Harris 71.2% chance of winning popular vote
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Dude just sell while you’re in profit lol. You’ll never beat UMA voters. I’ve been there before.
MIkeVers
6 months ago
Then the truth can't be hidden anymore
mona.lisa
6 months ago
If I was down 100k I’d cry too
Naturalnoob
6 months ago
© 2024 WorldLibertyFinancial, Inc. All Rights Reserved. *None of Donald J. Trump, any of his family members or any director, officer or employee of the Trump Organization, DT Marks DEFI LLC or any of their respective affiliates is an officer, director, founder, or employee of World Liberty Financial or its affiliates. None of World Liberty Financial, Inc., its affiliates or the World Liberty Financial platform is owned, managed, or operated, by Donald J. Trump, any of his family members, the Trump Organization, DT Marks DEFI LLC or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, affiliates, or principals. $WLFI tokens and use of the World Liberty Financial platform are offered and sold solely by World Liberty Financial or its affiliates.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
'broder' – polymarket is creating new technicalities to scam their users on
mona.lisa
6 months ago
lmao, you can skip to the end of the doc and see it's Todd. You must be trolling though.
eb..
6 months ago
people are way too confident because of these articles. the documentary is only showing now. expect a twist. I'm still seeing big signals for adam
mona.lisa
6 months ago
I freaking told ya'll the Forbes article included details that were *not* in the leaks, confirming it was Todd.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
perhaps brambough doesn't have much of a career anyway
Justifax
6 months ago
It's possible it's not Todd but if so Billy Brambough just took a serious hit to his career.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
where? All I can see on Twitter are tweets referencing the Forbes article. Searched "sacrifice bitcoins"
tomaz
6 months ago
Buddy this has been on twitter for a couple hours. just search it up. you cant be that dumb.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
multiple journalists have the movie. the best summary of the movie is the Forbes article, which implicates Todd. It also discusses reasoning not seen in the leaked clips.
popobet
6 months ago
So someone has the movie, but only 2 short clips leak? Sus, tho I admit @Anon1565 activity is more convincing
mona.lisa
6 months ago
he did, lol
tomaz
6 months ago
he did not.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
maybe he is... and stupid is controversial.
Justifax
6 months ago
The director can't be that stupid. I've 'sacrificed' crypto as well.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
This is in the Forbes article, but not in the leaked clips: "Hoback's theory relies on a chat log message written by Todd in which he claims to be the "world's leading expert on how to sacrifice your bitcoins ... I've done one such sacrifice and I did it by hand," Todd wrote. Hoback characterized the message as an "admission" by Todd that he destroyed his ability to access the 1.1 million bitcoin believed to be held by Satoshi Nakamoto, something Todd denies.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Read the Forbes article carefully. The author clearly discusses parts of the film that are not included in the leaks. I.e. he has seen it (Cullen said he sent the film to reputable crypto journalists ahead of time). The takeaway: Cullen largely identifies Peter Todd https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/10/08/who-is-peter-todd-the-man-named-by-hbo-as-bitcoins-mystery-creator-satoshi-nakamoto/
mona.lisa
6 months ago
because IDGAF about making 10% on Peter Todd. I'd rather lose the amount I spent on Adam.
topblaster
6 months ago
yeah why dont u sell ur adam back?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Cullen also warned people to stay away from media articles to avoid "leaks" ahead of the release. Strong Peter Todd signal.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Billy Brambough has seen the movie and says it's Peter Todd in the Forbes article. Just lol.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
you realise I lose if its Todd, you utter moron
Lukyyyyyyy
6 months ago
cope harder, it includes nothing not seen before, but I guess you gotta pump your alt's bags
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Just read Forbes article carefully. It includes quotes that are NOT seen in the leaked clips, strongly suggesting Cullens central thesis is that it is Todd. Cullen also gave the film to "reputable journalists" at major outlets. https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/10/08/who-is-peter-todd-the-man-named-by-hbo-as-bitcoins-mystery-creator-satoshi-nakamoto/
mona.lisa
6 months ago
why are people pretending the Forbes article is irrelevant? It includes multiple quotes from the film which were not seen in the available leaked videos. Cullen also said he gave the full film to journalists from reputable outlets. So it's a strong Todd signal.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The Forbes leak *clearly* includes quotes from the film which were *not* in the clips on Twitter. So I think it's pretty clear Cullen goes with Todd.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
It has additional quote from the movie, it's clear they have more.
Lukyyyyyyy
6 months ago
Forbes "article" nothing but a comment on the clip we all saw earlier today on Todd roleplaying as satoshi with adam behing him. paid articles....
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Adam crashing in light of the Forbes leak. LOL.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Forbes: Hoback characterized the message as an "admission" by Todd that he destroyed his ability to access the 1.1 million bitcoin believed to be held by Satoshi Nakamoto, something Todd denies.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Forbes: Hoback's theory relies on a chat log message written by Todd in which he claims to be the "world's leading expert on how to sacrifice your bitcoins ... I've done one such sacrifice and I did it by hand," Todd wrote.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Forbes leaked the synopsis of movie: it's Todd https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/10/08/who-is-peter-todd-the-man-named-by-hbo-as-bitcoins-mystery-creator-satoshi-nakamoto/
mona.lisa
6 months ago
then why are you selling your Adam? LMAO
informed
6 months ago
Adam obvious from the beginning. Feeling sorry for Multiple Others holders
mona.lisa
6 months ago
where did Cullen say that lol
MaxShorter
6 months ago
BRB adding more funds to wallet, adam short is so easy. Director said its not him and everyone seem to be ignoring that
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The Adam pump is ridiculous IMO.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
when has he ever taken profits 'for a few thousand'
8=====D
6 months ago
right.................gl arbing for a few thousand. let's all check back on your loss later
mona.lisa
6 months ago
ok but can we stop pumping it. I wanna buy cheap.
informed
6 months ago
Adam, it was obvious at the beginning, it is obvious at the end
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Other is clearly insider traded
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Why not Adam
dasdeqweq
6 months ago
dai or szabo 1 of them defo, can't be adam
mona.lisa
6 months ago
He’s gonna say Todd purely to create drama
mona.lisa
6 months ago
“ we make a hell of a case in the film, and I think that who we land on is unexpected and is going to result in a fair amount of controversy... but it’s going to be up to the audience”.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Lame meme coin ass
BibiNetty
6 months ago
$PETERTODD (8oAiUkC1gpr4Tuz3ZA7YUntWE47sop1fYmGWo4Zrpump) gonna blow tf up once this doco starts fellas... better return than can ever be offered here..
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Yeah but they’re all denying it’s them.
Justifax
6 months ago
I mean, Adam did say it wasn't him. Lol
mona.lisa
6 months ago
I don’t mean a photo of the film. If you attended a screening, you’ll have a screenshot of an email with the details. That would prove it.
Skippy-downunder
6 months ago
I screen tested this on behalf of Sircuit, contracted through HBO. The documentary filmmaker goes through an long list of possibilities and doesn't settle on anyone in partiuclar. However says it is most likely Zsabo in closing statements. I think 'other/multiple' wins technically, because it's not conclusive, but if there is ever gonna be a disputed market on Polymarket, it's this one. Might as well have a punt on the😄 mayhem that awaits
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Cullen says well respected journalists were given the film, and to stay offline to avoid leaks. So… who were they? https://x.com/cullenhoback/status/1843396714868416597?s=46&t=sEhIeX3cwuO-BwyUSt3igA
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Tweet evidence of your screen test and I’ll buy szabo 😂
Skippy-downunder
6 months ago
I screen tested this on behalf of Sircuit, contracted through HBO. The documentary filmmaker goes through an long list of possibilities and doesn't settle on anyone in partiuclar. However says it is most likely Zsabo in closing statements. I think 'other/multiple' wins technically, because it's not conclusive, but if there is ever gonna be a disputed market on Polymarket, it's this one. Might as well have a punt on the😄 mayhem that awaits
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Cullen: “I can confirm, we land on a specific name” https://x.com/cullenhoback/status/1842286135319691745?s=46&t=sEhIeX3cwuO-BwyUSt3igA
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Cullen said he settled on ONE name.
Skippy-downunder
6 months ago
I screen tested this on behalf of Sircuit, contracted through HBO. The documentary filmmaker goes through an long list of possibilities and doesn't settle on anyone in partiuclar. However says it is most likely Zsabo in closing statements. I think 'other/multiple' wins technically, because it's not conclusive, but if there is ever gonna be a disputed market on Polymarket, it's this one. Might as well have a punt on the😄 mayhem that awaits
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Cullen said he names a guy
MeVotedTwice
6 months ago
you know if they just say at the end that they really dont know if other resolves to Yes or NO?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
It doesn’t matter who Satoshi really is. It matters who CULLEN thinks is satoshi.
President-Elrond-Da-2nd
6 months ago
how stupid people are. it's literally Dorian Nakamoto. they have the same last name! and he obviously just changed his first name to satoshi thinking that would be enough. he also looks japanese which i always thought satoshi was
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Cullen said he settled on ONE name, not multiple.
MeVotedTwice
6 months ago
I don't understand how other/multiple is at 90? If they end without naming the persorn or group of people, wouldn't other resolve to NO along with every other market or is that a yes even if they don't name anyone?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The anon new whale wallets are bullish on Todd
mona.lisa
6 months ago
This clip is also bullish for Todd: https://x.com/theblockcitizen/status/1843732566261846387?s=46&t=sEhIeX3cwuO-BwyUSt3igA
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Can someone say?
informed
6 months ago
guess
mona.lisa
6 months ago
That’s retarded. The director confronts the guy. He’s not confronting either of them.
Mallardshead
6 months ago
🤣 watching all these people throw money at Adam "I love fame" Back and Nick "goldbug" Szabo. It can only be Wei Dei or Paul la Roux. The ghost or the crime boss. That's it.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Some say that Adam would’ve never made the mistakes observed in BTC code
Mallardshead
6 months ago
the code wasn't ahead of its time and had a ton of mistakes, like you'd expect from a single set of eyes
mona.lisa
6 months ago
High iq post
HaterzLoserz
6 months ago
Gavin Andresen has stated that he knows who Satoshi is and has seen hard evidence, but has signed NDAs and would never tell regardless. Interesting that he used to work for Adam Back over at Blockstream. I dont know of many Cypherpunk OGs who go around signing NDA with randomers claiming to be Satoshi. However, the doc doesnt need to reach any reasonable conclusions, they can pick what evidence they want to create the best story they can, which is their goal. If its other after all the new account activity there in the last couple days, this site is turning into a clown fest as it gets more mainstream attention lol
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Roux is in jail. How would the director have confronted him lmao.
Mallardshead
6 months ago
It’s been obvious for years who Satoshi is and racial bias won’t let people see the evidence—which isn’t a surprise in this community. It’s the only man that nobody has ever found a single verifiable photograph of ever. Including the unverified photo above. The ghost. It’s Wei Dei. He would’ve failed at a project like bitcoin before being able to create its nuance, and that was b-money, which Wei never brought to life. The giveaway was a 2010 chat when he claimed to have never heard of b-money and that he’d “look into it”. Right, and how many NBA players don’t know who Michael Jordan is? None. B-money was unavoidable to cypherpunks at that time. Satoshi never lied about anything. This was his only lie. Why? Or should I say, Wei? So join the smart money and bet Dai. The only other person it could be conceivably be is Paul La Roux. HBO isn’t making a documentary without a ghost or a crime boss. The rest of the has-beens you saw playacting Satoshi until asked, and pretending to be people with anything of value to say in the movie are fluff, about to make fools of themselves. Bet accordingly. A shot of Dai, and a pinch of Roux.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
How can it be wei when the director said he confronts the guy?
Mallardshead
6 months ago
It’s been obvious for years who Satoshi is and racial bias won’t let people see the evidence—which isn’t a surprise in this community. It’s the only man that nobody has ever found a single verifiable photograph of ever. Including the unverified photo above. The ghost. It’s Wei Dei. He would’ve failed at a project like bitcoin before being able to create its nuance, and that was b-money, which Wei never brought to life. The giveaway was a 2010 chat when he claimed to have never heard of b-money and that he’d “look into it”. Right, and how many NBA players don’t know who Michael Jordan is? None. B-money was unavoidable to cypherpunks at that time. Satoshi never lied about anything. This was his only lie. Why? Or should I say, Wei? So join the smart money and bet Dai. The only other person it could be conceivably be is Paul La Roux. HBO isn’t making a documentary without a ghost or a crime boss. The rest of the has-beens you saw playacting Satoshi until asked, and pretending to be people with anything of value to say in the movie are fluff, about to make fools of themselves. Bet accordingly. A shot of Dai, and a pinch of Roux.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
it doesn't matter in this context, because the director says he settles on ONE name. That's what we are betting on.
tomaz
6 months ago
Satoshi was a group of cryptophunks from Cali.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
9pm EST
Panzwalizka
6 months ago
wen HBO?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
trades not working again
mona.lisa
6 months ago
other seems plausible given the newbie insider trading wallets
Polly Styrene
6 months ago
If you can't trade anyway, read why Adam Back or Other are they only plausible options: https://peakd.com/satoshi/@edb/will-money-electric-reveal-who-satoshi-nakamoto-is
mona.lisa
6 months ago
comment when back pls
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Same
averageuser
6 months ago
Is it just me or is polymarket down rn? I can't place order and cancel order.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
After checking the ‘other’ holders, this looks insider traded
mona.lisa
6 months ago
why are people still holding Paul LE roux. The director said he confronted "satoshi". Paul is in jail.
Maximemeliano
6 months ago
Guys, I watch the movie, and I was shocked. When the director asked Adam Back for the 69th time if he was Satoshi, he smirked mischievously, and that became the main proof
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The question isn’t “who is Satoshi” but rather “who will the documentary name as Satoshi?” So even if Nick Szabo is Satoshi a bet for him will lose if the documentary wrongly says it’s someone else.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
there is no HBO credit list that lists Nick Szabo.
n/a
6 months ago
Very likely it's Nick Szabo, he is in the HBO's documentary credit list but didn't appear in the trailer. So obviously they will point on him. If he is the real Satoshi or not we will probably never know.Tho many things point on him, he designed bitgold 1 year before bitcoin and was looking for a developer to help him then deleted that blog post. Then he had a Freudian slip in Tim Ferris's podcast.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
where was the blog post? What site?
n/a
6 months ago
deleted that blog post. Then he had a Freudian slip in Tim Ferris's podcast.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
where is the doco credit list?
n/a
6 months ago
Very likely it's Nick Szabo, he is in the HBO's documentary credit list but didn't appear in the trailer. So obviously they will point on him. If he is the real Satoshi or not we will probably never know.Tho many things point on him, he designed bitgold 1 year before bitcoin and was looking for a developer to help him then
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Watch the trailer. Adam is in about 10 different scenes and interviews. Would they show his face in the trailer? Is this consistent with the directors claim they "confront" Satoshi and got a "telling" reaction?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
lol the de-encrypted message on the first transaction to Hal Finney is signed by Paul Le Roux.
doriannakamoto
6 months ago
Probability of having the given name “Satoshi” = 1 / 1,000 = 0.001 - Probability of having the surname “Nakamoto” = 1 / 50,000 = 0.00002 -Probability of being a Japanese in the US = 0.00355 - Probability of living extremely close to Hal Finney Probability = 1 / 100,000 = 0.00001 - Probability of being highly intelligent = 0.02 - Probability of being in the right age group = 0.2. 0.00000002 * 0.00355 = 7.1 × 10^-11/7.1 × 10^-11 * 0.00001 = 7.1 × 10^-16/ 7.1 × 10^-16 * 0.02 = 1.42 × 10^-17/ 1.42 × 10^-17 * 0.2 = 2.84 × 10^-18 The probability of Dorian Nakamoto coincidentally fitting the profile of Satoshi Nakamoto is extraordinarily small — about 2.84 in 1 quintillion, or 0.000000000284%. He lied about his skills & past. Also the documentary dude said its non of those in the list… dorian wasn’t in that list. No brainer.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
tweet deleted
doriannakamoto
6 months ago
Probability of having the given name “Satoshi” = 1 / 1,000 = 0.001 - Probability of having the surname “Nakamoto” = 1 / 50,000 = 0.00002 -Probability of being a Japanese in the US = 0.00355 - Probability of living extremely close to Hal Finney Probability = 1 / 100,000 = 0.00001 - Probability of being highly intelligent = 0.02 - Probability of being in the right age group = 0.2. 0.00000002 * 0.00355 = 7.1 × 10^-11/7.1 × 10^-11 * 0.00001 = 7.1 × 10^-16/ 7.1 × 10^-16 * 0.02 = 1.42 × 10^-17/ 1.42 × 10^-17 * 0.2 = 2.84 × 10^-18 The probability of Dorian Nakamoto coincidentally fitting the profile of Satoshi Nakamoto is extraordinarily small — about 2.84 in 1 quintillion, or 0.000000000284%. He lied about his skills & past. Also the documentary dude said its non of those in the list… dorian wasn’t in that list. No brainer.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
HBO is gonna end it with “we are all Satoshi”
mona.lisa
6 months ago
based on what? You think it's Elon Musk, who isn't smart enough and doesn't have the skills to create bitcoin
n/a
6 months ago
Inb4 It's Craight Wright
mona.lisa
6 months ago
bro I only lost 145 I dont actually care, just memeing. You've got anger problems.
dancer
6 months ago
cry harder dumbfuck
mona.lisa
6 months ago
looks like people are not happy about the UMA situation: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/polymarket.com
mona.lisa
6 months ago
hasn't there been *one* case where PolyMarket overturned the UMA result? In reality, it's probably just a normal delay.
fhantombets
6 months ago
It's been 20 minutes and zero word from polymarket, I don't like this at all
mona.lisa
6 months ago
waiting for word form Q
mona.lisa
6 months ago
President Trump is about to burst into the headquarters at UMA and arrest the globalist pedophiles who rigged this result!
mona.lisa
6 months ago
President Trump is about to burst into the headquarters at UMA and arrest the globalist pedophiles who rigged this result!
mona.lisa
6 months ago
why would you buy 70k shares at 100cents in an extremely contentious disputed market?
fhantombets
6 months ago
It's been 20 minutes and zero word from polymarket, I don't like this at all
mona.lisa
6 months ago
UMA "decentralised" protocol determined the outcome, but one voter overpowers them all: https://x.com/primo_data/status/1843284148649406842
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Ok, thanks for clarifying
ANudeEgg
6 months ago
@mona.lisa Not unusual at all. Resolution on PolyMarket is always delayed by about an hour after UMA.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
PolyMarket must resolve this 50/50 or as a yes. Far too contentious. Multiple media outlets were clear about the invasion. Outrageous that Kevin Chan at UMA gets to determine the outcome, the ONLY time this year where the popular vote != total votes for the final resolution https://x.com/primo_data/status/1843378713662238748
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Looks like a future PR nightmare for PolyMarket with that UMA share distribution. Should revert 50/50.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
https://x.com/primo_data/status/1843284148649406842?s=46&t=sEhIeX3cwuO-BwyUSt3igA Kevin chan fixed the outcome
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Kevin Scam
Secret14thKey
6 months ago
Kevin Chan fan club 👇
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Kevin Chan talking about UMA protocol 'resolving disputes' (he means himself and a few whales): https://x.com/kevinchan2020/status/1839522928565912048?s=46&t=sEhIeX3cwuO-BwyUSt3igA
mona.lisa
6 months ago
make your thoughts heard about the UMA system lol
mona.lisa
6 months ago
https://trustpilot.com/review/polymarket.com
mona.lisa
6 months ago
https://trustpilot.com/review/polymarket.com
mona.lisa
6 months ago
he means whales on UMA, like Kevin Chan, who basically chooses the outcome himself.
🤺JustPunched
6 months ago
Can you help me understand this one? The yes side had more whales.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
I only just learned Kevin Chan owns 32% of the UMA votes. I don't think I'll take PolyMarket seriously now.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
you are free to report him to the SEC (or other relevant authorities) if you think there's something here.
PolyRig-Fried
6 months ago
@Chad and the Yes holders: if you need a name and a face, Kevin Chan of UMA voted NO with 32.5% of all shares. I wonder if this constitutes fraud in the US, since he's gaining financial incentive from voting on false outcomes. Interestingly, Pablo Maldonado of UMA voted No, but he has only has 3.3% of all shares. Source: https://dune.com/primo_data/uma-voter-polymarket-disputes?market_tc8b8e=Will+Israel+invade+Lebanon+in+September%3F&time_td376e=1728001850
mona.lisa
6 months ago
does this display the revealed votes ahead of the UMA website?
PolyRig-Fried
6 months ago
@Chad and the Yes holders: if you need a name and a face, Kevin Chan of UMA voted NO with 32.5% of all shares. I wonder if this constitutes fraud in the US, since he's gaining financial incentive from voting on false outcomes. Interestingly, Pablo Maldonado of UMA voted No, but he has only has 3.3% of all shares. Source: https://dune.com/primo_data/uma-voter-polymarket-disputes?market_tc8b8e=Will+Israel+invade+Lebanon+in+September%3F&time_td376e=1728001850
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Can token holders re-commit to a different side before revealing?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Yup, I regret not selling when I was up $500
dancer
6 months ago
Imagine not selling for 70 because you thought this wasn't rigged. PSYCHOS!
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Taylor Lorenz at WaPo will probably write an article about this... when the 'yes' Karens (good people!) contact her about it!
mona.lisa
6 months ago
do token holders choose when to reveal addresses? Can YES voters delay intentionally to send the price down and buy up?
Phoenix777
6 months ago
47,6% of token holder haven't voted yet YES not over/under, the voting is still in process
mona.lisa
6 months ago
wouldn't that go 50/50
PokerBrat
6 months ago
Not over yet. It could fail to reach consensus which could be catastrophic
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Chad still buying yes is insane… unless he has an enormous UMA share
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Your $1 will become $2!
Carlossss
6 months ago
if a whale with 2 or 3 million enters, can make a lot of money.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Is there any possibility this can still resolve yes?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
It’s determined by UMA holders, not Polymarket )
0x6b07D80f00a65bE25C8FF1bA57063e5e09D85F59-1722856566954
6 months ago
Well obviously the answer is Yes based on news reports. But if Polymarket wants to keep both sides happy they may just resolve to 50-50
mona.lisa
6 months ago
WOW! Huge whales are announcing they’re changing Uma votes to yes!! Get in quick!
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The elites (yes buyers) are in command!
Phoenix777
6 months ago
NO guys selling and YES guys buying--- the world order is stabile again
mona.lisa
6 months ago
UMA is destroying PolyMarket! We must make Polymarket GREAT again!
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Car, can you please tip me $100?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
honestly, I found the reporting was so obvious it had to resolve yes. But whales can just choose based on self interest.
1mperator17
6 months ago
probably shouldnt buy into a disputed market
mona.lisa
6 months ago
I would honestly prefer if Polymarket abolished the UMA system, and just had a team of staff deciding.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Now up to 25% yes on UMA. Whales incoming. It's over for the nos.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
and yet yes is pumping.
aldynspeedruns
6 months ago
GUYS NOW THAT IM ON THE NO SIDE, THAT MEANS IT'S GOING TO PUMP, YES SIDE YOU'RE SAVED IT'S GOING TO THE MOON
mona.lisa
6 months ago
No, there are many hours of UMA revealing votes.
DeucePapi
6 months ago
Is this over in ~8 min?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Fear not, my faithful... nothing can stop the return of 'yes'.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
because they want to cause nervous breakdowns
FamilyCapital
6 months ago
what is the logic behind of having delay on reveal of votes rsult. why not to do that at the same time?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
That would only be the case if UMA reveals votes in a representative fashion. But doesn't UMA reveal it by addresses, meaning huge whales sway things?
DFK
6 months ago
people asking if Yes still stands a chance: statistically in an evenly distributed voting right system, the answer would be no. Here Yes hangs on to the possibility (remote?) that a few heavyweight would vote against consensus. What we already have in hands is an idea of the consensus, statistically significant (imagine early results coming like that in the presidential election for example: the outcome would be crystal clear).
mona.lisa
6 months ago
I am hearing that huge whales are set to vote yes, and the no's will be left holding empty bags.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Maybe, but assuming a significant fraction of the 87% 'no' is due to whales, you wouldn't expect the votes revealed are a representative sample?
DFK
6 months ago
well it's the same thing as elections. Early results tell you a lot. Unless of course reveal is "organized". Which I don't think it is, despite all the noise. So it tells us 90% of UMA voters think it's No. Even if voting rights are unevenly distributed, it tells us about consensus, meaning it's not looking good for yes. Mathematically if voting rights were evenly distributed it would be statistically almost over for Yes, but if the whale stories are true, I guess Yes still stands a chance, but it is a shot in the dark (hanging on the remote decision of a few influent people against consensus). There you go.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
given only 9% of votes are revealed, it could still win if enough whales are voting yes.
BaruchAsulin
6 months ago
Dose yes stand a chance ?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Only 9.4% of the votes are even revealed, who cares about the score.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
can somebody pls confirm: can this be disputed again?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Yes, it's retarded.
DFK
6 months ago
so basically, what everybody seems to agree upon, is that it can be 90% going one way, and boom just like that it could reverse because 1 or 2 people have more voting rights than everybody else put together? Am I getting this right?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Riggers, time to buy yes on the cheap, and flip the score. MAKE POLYMARKET GREAT AGAIN.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
it's leaning no because of one giant whale. I'll wait.
mr.ozi
6 months ago
This is going strongly in the direction of No after 7% of votes and 17% voters revealed their votes, with 83% siding with No. And the Yes is still going strong on buying more shares. This is a fascinating case for a psychology paper.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
they have to establish control of Lebanese territory to make said buffer zone.
🤺JustPunched
6 months ago
Never understood this one. A buffer zone would imply no control by either side.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
I'm not panicking over $135, my guy.
Phoenix777
6 months ago
Haha panic bullshitt…
mona.lisa
6 months ago
It has to go 'yes'. Israel explicitly spoke of forming a buffer zone out of Lebanese territory.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Mummy, do you like bunnies?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Mama, do you like bunnies?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Israel openly discussed creating a 'buffer zone' out of Lebanese territory. That is absolutely 'intended to establish control' of Lebanon's territory.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
they're talking about creating a buffer zone out of Lebanons territory. So yes.
Anon5215
6 months ago
I don't disagree that they commenced a military offensive on the night of September 30, but is it truly intended to establish control over any portion of the country? It sounds to me that they are going in to knock out certain infrastructures as opposed to establish control. Please prove me wrong if you have evidence
mona.lisa
6 months ago
why does the second proposed outcome say 'no', wasn't it 'yes' originally?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
3 days final review 😂
mona.lisa
6 months ago
none of us care
duckduck
6 months ago
Yes buyers stressing xD
mona.lisa
6 months ago
it already did
Ferguson,Turd
6 months ago
Need this to go to 40 cents please so i can hit my risk limit please and ty
mona.lisa
6 months ago
thanks, what happens if it goes p4? I don't know what 'early request' means
shouldbealright
6 months ago
Looks like majority is still P4, but 18.75% voting for P2 (Yes). P1 (No) still only has 0.1%
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Where can we see that?
shouldbealright
6 months ago
Looks like majority is still P4, but 18.75% voting for P2 (Yes). P1 (No) still only has 0.1%
mona.lisa
6 months ago
this debate didn't matter. he won over nobody
SwiftiesForTrump
6 months ago
Vance destroyed him I fear. He won over a lot of people today
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Vance won but he didn't win anybody over. This debate didn't matter.
SwiftiesForTrump
6 months ago
Vance destroyed him I fear. He won over a lot of people today
mona.lisa
6 months ago
I am so tired of Drumpf ruining America.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The "vibes" are with Vance, but he lost major aura for refusing to say if Trump lost the election.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Damn I was gonna do $100 at 2 cents, would’ve been a nice 5k. Just shows, don’t be a pussy.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Just wait for it to be resolved completely and you can claim
Barfly
6 months ago
So how does one cash out? This is my first win...
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Lmao I bet right. I should've done more.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The future is female!
gun
6 months ago
somehow most female founders is are frauds
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Judge sentences her to 10 years prison and compulsory dental work.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Breaking: Joe Biden to award Caroline the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
“I’ve seen a lot of beautiful women in 30 years. I’ve never seen one quite like Ms. Ellison,” the judge said.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
breaking: judge wants to sleep with Caroline, gives her 0 jail time.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
HE IS GLAZING HER.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The judge says that he can’t remember a time when Ellison was even slightly inconsistent during her testimony.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The judge says that he can’t remember a time when Ellison was even slightly inconsistent during her testimony.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
The prosecutor argued that Ellison deserves “a sentence substantially below the guidelines.”
mona.lisa
6 months ago
judge should give a Stanford math graduate 110 years for saying "the human brain is bad at understanding big numbers"
mona.lisa
6 months ago
she went to Stanford, too
0xc26E37C84509c72b58171bEc9286fa83c73f5366-1719543164274
6 months ago
"The human brain is truly bad at understanding big numbers" - Caroline Ellison (who has a degree in mathmatics) LOL
mona.lisa
6 months ago
leniency could mean probation
DeucePapi
6 months ago
She said "lenient sentence"..
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Assistant US Attorney Danielle Sassoon is addressing the court now. She talks about Ellison deserving “leniency” right off the bat.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Prosecutors remarks: you're going to jail, Quasimodo!
mona.lisa
6 months ago
she's an inspiration.
Eridpnc
6 months ago
Who is Caroline Ellison? Why is everyone talking about her here?
mona.lisa
6 months ago
live updates: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blog/2024-09-24/caroline-ellison-sentencing
mona.lisa
6 months ago
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blog/2024-09-24/caroline-ellison-sentencing
0xBama
6 months ago
where are you watching it
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Judge Kaplan has started the hearing by asking “what is to be done about restitution.”
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Agree. Although I guess it’s a town hall, not a rally.
JackBauerPowerHour
6 months ago
He’s obsessed with the McDonald’s thing right now and how the media “isn’t covering it” I bet his a.d.d. brain brings it up again today
mona.lisa
6 months ago
~7 hours until sentencing. 3pm EDT.
mona.lisa
6 months ago
Very unlikely to happen, September 2023 was extreme.
mona.lisa
7 months ago
Read rules. 12pm EST. So around 20 hours.
090x
7 months ago
when counting start?