tsekinming01
#8398
Rank
2
Comments
1
Likes Received
1
Likes Given
Israel x Hezbollah Ceasefire in 2024?
tsekinming01
6 months ago
He has been detained, have you read the news
3
10201081
6 months ago
I think a possible solution could be for a larger number of people to spam the Polymarket CEO on LinkedIn and Twitter. Don't write nonsense; create a few sentences explaining why you disagree with the current situation and, for example, send it to him once an hour. I have tried this approach several times to address other issues, and occasionally it works. Ideally, also find other high-ranking individuals within the Polymarket structure and send the message to them as well. Links to his profiles here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shaynecoplan https://x.com/shayne_coplan?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Will Trump launch a coin before the election?
tsekinming01
8 months ago
Why you bet then?
0
n/a
8 months ago
The argument for “No” seems more logical because: 1. Official documents from WLFI clearly state that Donald Trump is not legally or technically affiliated with the project. This directly contradicts any claim of his involvement in the token’s deployment. 2. Marketing involvement is not the same as deploying a token. The market requires proof of Trump’s involvement in the technical or operational launch, not just promotional support. Thus, the argument for “No” is grounded in verifiable facts, while the argument for “Yes” relies on an expanded interpretation of his promotional role. Adding to the argument: The unfairness of the system is further exacerbated by the influence of large players (whales), who can manipulate the vote through their substantial token holdings. This turns the market into a game where financial power, rather than facts and truth, determines the outcome. The question arises, what’s the point of placing bets if the final result is often influenced by wealth rather than reality? This undermines trust in the system and the fairness of the process.