#7
Rank
1132
Comments
566
Likes Received
2844
Likes Given
n/a
8 hours ago
@Le-King Because for them to milk as nuch money off the project as possible, they should aim to launch before the election. Either Trump wins and he's set to no longer be a private citizen, or he loses and the Trump brand becomes far weaker.
n/a
21 hours ago
https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-world-liberty-financial-aave-v3-instance-on-ethereum-mainnet-proposal/19383
n/a
15 hours ago
Looks like they'll be able to launch by the end of the month if they're aiming for pre-election.
n/a
21 hours ago
https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-world-liberty-financial-aave-v3-instance-on-ethereum-mainnet-proposal/19383
n/a
15 hours ago
What does that have to do with token deployment?
Tentaclecracy
19 hours ago
Aside from past coin conjectures, I find really difficult for world liberty financial to launch their 0 yield non transferable "governance" token before the election, because they aim at issuing it as unregistered security (hence the 1 million min capital for qualified investors) and that exception requires approval from SEC which is controlled by the Democrats. I don't see this happening any time soon, the Democrat majority in SEC will vote No or in the best case slow it down with a fair amount of red tape.
n/a
21 hours ago
https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-world-liberty-financial-aave-v3-instance-on-ethereum-mainnet-proposal/19383
n/a
1 day ago
lol
Bepper
1 day ago
They actually said it was Adam Back. You see how they kept him in the shot the whole time and then panned to his face. That was the whole point.
n/a
1 day ago
Sure DM me @aenews_PI on X or @aenews on Discord
Lawyered.eth
1 day ago
sigh. happy to hash it out via dm's on X if you want... but I really think you should think this through. That's a lot of dough and I'm virtually positive you are going to lose.
n/a
1 day ago
So when are they going to release then?
dimmas
2 days ago
No, Trump definitely won't release a coin in his name before the election, even if Barron's really asked for it. Yesterday, the NYT published an article titled “The ‘Crypto Punks’ Behind Trump's Murky New Business Venture” that two of his crypto partners are former crooks. He won't take any chances when the entire election is decided by a few thousand votes in two or three states.
n/a
1 day ago
Sweet, guess I can rebuy the shares I sold
n/a
2 days ago
I can't believe this, I never thought we'd go out this way... cold and alone waiting for the rescue that never came
n/a
2 days ago
Hopefully next week, I want this market over with already
Car
2 days ago
What does soon mean
n/a
2 days ago
"The @WorldLibertyFi token sale is coming soon! Don’t miss out—only those on the whitelist will be able to participate. Link in bio"
n/a
2 days ago
https://x.com/worldlibertyfi/status/1843414417536634902?t=Fo5hrzUubq-tV70-NhArpQ&s=19
n/a
2 days ago
https://x.com/worldlibertyfi/status/1843414417536634902?t=Fo5hrzUubq-tV70-NhArpQ&s=19
n/a
2 days ago
Did I really derisk at the bottom before this wins? Fek
n/a
2 days ago
I doubt that is true
PolyRig-Fried
2 days ago
Also this dispute is the ONLY time this year where the popular vote doesn not eqal to the total votes for the final resolution: https://x.com/primo_data/status/1843378713662238748
n/a
2 days ago
ok
n/a
2 days ago
Balz against the Walz rn, hucker down team
n/a
3 days ago
gn
n/a
3 days ago
It's too bad YouGov wasn't 1 point better for Walz
n/a
3 days ago
Bros are we getting scammed? Where the FUCK is the poll?
n/a
3 days ago
u the GOAT
Gauth
3 days ago
personally i'm all in bro
n/a
3 days ago
cause ur a fatass duck dude
RaidsAreNotInvasions
3 days ago
i don't understand, i was informed that yes is an absolute mortal lock. why is no one filling my orders
n/a
5 days ago
Meh. Every reputable poll has been close to even: +2 Vance, +1 Vance, or tied
MAGAKen
5 days ago
This is a load of bullcrap. Anyone with two eyes and ears can tell you JD Vance dominated the debate. The immediate post debate poll showed JD Vance won. Every other poll has shown JD Vance won, but I bet you're waiting to cherry pick the one poll full of paint chip eating idiots who says Walz won and you're gonna take off with people's money. I bought JD Vance at 29 cents because I knew it was a bargain, and was familiar with JD Vance's debating style, it was a bargain for me. JD Vance exceeded expectations, NOW PAY UP or I'll be laywering up.
n/a
6 days ago
Is this really what the Vance guys are betting on? Look. Y'all may win. But it'll be razer close. This is not the bond you think it is.
Balls2theWalz
6 days ago
Of 13 Liberal New York Times columnists, only 2 said Walz won. One of which was “just barely.” All 11 others said Vance won. This is the LIBERAL NEW YORK TIMES. Reuters is not rigging this poll.
n/a
1 week ago
Walz won IMO but I'm a LIB. For the purposes of this market, seems like a coin flip.
Balls2theWalz
1 week ago
Why would anyone in their right mind bet on Walz. We all know he lost.
n/a
1 week ago
I did, I think
n/a
1 week ago
when is this shit coming out
n/a
1 week ago
np, put up a bit more if you want
n/a
1 week ago
thanks
n/a
1 week ago
Just crapped and I feel better now
n/a
1 week ago
When I take a crap, pretty close to my toilet 🚽
n/a
1 week ago
Last chance to sell for 0.1c guys. I'm pulling my sell order in an hour.
n/a
1 week ago
When I take a crap, pretty close to my toilet 🚽
n/a
1 week ago
when is this shit coming out
n/a
1 week ago
Yep
Waifu Hunter
1 week ago
did anyone notice aenews shares from 500k++ yes to 400k yes lol? he is exiting xD
n/a
1 week ago
Yes 99.18% (1,946,401.8) vs. Early Request 0.82% (16,097.04)
n/a
1 week ago
Yes 98.67% (1,198,718.02) vs. Early Request 1.33% (16,097.04)
n/a
1 week ago
You're mixing it up with the other vote. The current results are 98.48% Yes and 1.52% P4.
n/a
1 week ago
It's actually Early requ... 2.36% (16,046.42) Yes 55.20% (375,355.17) unknown/50... 42.44% (288,606.25) ... with still 96% of votes to be revealed
n/a
1 week ago
97.6% P2 Yes
n/a
1 week ago
Seriously? Dump your bags now. Stop holding worthless shares.
n/a
1 week ago
No
Jurad0x
1 week ago
They entered in October 1st not in September.
n/a
1 week ago
Final resolution is Yes, will be resolved in 23.5 hours
n/a
1 week ago
Whatever the final resolution is, it shouldn't be voted by the stakeholders. Makes 0 sense...
n/a
1 week ago
Reveal period is 24 hours
n/a
1 week ago
Gg
n/a
1 week ago
You should exit before your shares are worth zero.
JustGambling - 3165
1 week ago
Can someone link some background on how this voting works? How do I know that I'm not getting scammed?
n/a
1 week ago
Last chance for dumbos to sell before their shares go to zero
n/a
1 week ago
Gg
n/a
1 week ago
Gg
n/a
1 week ago
Sold out my N, this is dumb
n/a
1 week ago
Because Yes is the correct answer. Who knows how UMA will rule tho
MyLossIsYourGain
1 week ago
50Pence and aenews are buying no while their pre-flip comments are still up in UMA discussions.
n/a
1 week ago
No one should be confident, it's very close
donky
1 week ago
Again... the odds pre debate were 70 to 30 Walz. Post 70 to 30 Vance. This is a 80 point swing. We all know what we saw. Were just waiting to see of media biased can cover up a 80 point public opinion swing. Anythings possible. Thats why all the Walz bets were made. They figured performance + bias easy win. Then theybsaw the debate and said oh F@#$!
n/a
1 week ago
Reporting seems pretty split, and reputable polls have been close to even
1 week ago
Aka the market prices in a ~35% chance of media bias
n/a
1 week ago
And of course the Vance people will boast even if Vance wins by 1%
donky
1 week ago
Again... the odds pre debate were 70 to 30 Walz. Post 70 to 30 Vance. This is a 80 point swing. We all know what we saw. Were just waiting to see of media biased can cover up a 80 point public opinion swing. Anythings possible. Thats why all the Walz bets were made. They figured performance + bias easy win. Then theybsaw the debate and said oh F@#$!
n/a
1 week ago
Can't wait for meltdown here if Walz eeks this out
donky
1 week ago
Again... the odds pre debate were 70 to 30 Walz. Post 70 to 30 Vance. This is a 80 point swing. We all know what we saw. Were just waiting to see of media biased can cover up a 80 point public opinion swing. Anythings possible. Thats why all the Walz bets were made. They figured performance + bias easy win. Then theybsaw the debate and said oh F@#$!
n/a
1 week ago
Time to tear down the wall
n/a
1 week ago
Lol
Mountainman
1 week ago
This was a clear Vance win. If the polls this resolves YES, I think independents and even some liberals may stop believing polling (a lot of conservatives already don't). BUT, being that this is probably the last debate before the election there is always a chance they rig it. I still think Vance takes this but it's not a sure thing solely because of the chance of polling dishonesty.
n/a
1 week ago
Yeah 0% chance of hottest
Tkromm
1 week ago
ERA5 Results are out for September. By their metrics (Daily mean absolute global mean near-surface (2m) air temperature): Sep23=16.377 Sep24=16.174
n/a
1 week ago
I have zero sell orders, so no I'm not desperate. Hoping to ride to victory cause Vance is a snake oil salesman.
DS831228
1 week ago
Just open EU newspapers and pools- they are like 90/10 in Vance favor. I didn't watch anything, but if our left sided media says vance won i don't need any more info. GL guys
n/a
1 week ago
Nice fat block at 20c for y'all
n/a
1 week ago
Feel free to fill me if y'all are so confident it's a 🔒
n/a
1 week ago
Fill me Vancetard 😆
DS831228
1 week ago
Just open EU newspapers and pools- they are like 90/10 in Vance favor. I didn't watch anything, but if our left sided media says vance won i don't need any more info. GL guys
n/a
1 week ago
Alright, buy more then?
n/a
1 week ago
Ridiculous. Walz was thrashed.
n/a
1 week ago
Feel free to fill me if y'all are so confident it's a 🔒
n/a
1 week ago
I don't understand why people are so confident about this, could land either way
n/a
1 week ago
Ok bro
Wayback
1 week ago
i just laughed at Walz buyers, theyre so delusional to think that he won, its crazy
n/a
1 week ago
💩💩💩
Jayson242
1 week ago
Vance definitely won this debate. He was calm, collected, and was very confident. I think both Walz and Vance did pretty well, but Vance was better at answering questions, and walz just looked like he was crying because he was about to crap his pants the whole debate.
n/a
1 week ago
Naw this is very close
Wayback
1 week ago
I just laughed at Walz buyers, because they're delusional to think that Vance lost.
n/a
1 week ago
Will laugh at the Vance buyers if they lose this one
n/a
1 week ago
The salty tears... I can't wait
PinochetsAirplane
1 week ago
did we watch the same debate?
n/a
1 week ago
Vance is great at lying with a straight face, and he easily came off as more confident whereas Walz started off nervous. But VP debate watchers are more politically in tune than the Presidential. So I'd expect Walz to edge this.
donky
1 week ago
Anyone saying Walz won is delusional. This was a professional debater vs a school teacher and the teach got schooled. Not close. Those who bet Walz bet because the thought the media would bail them out are in for a big surprise. Only worse beat down was the recent Trump vs Biden.
n/a
1 week ago
Why
BoeJiden420
1 week ago
-$4,300 lol
n/a
1 week ago
Easy dubs
n/a
1 week ago
I'm out, peace ✌
n/a
1 week ago
Largest incursion into their territory in TWO DECADES, and multiple tanks have crossed the border along with actual ground troops. This is clearly not the type of special ops the rules are intended to exclude.
n/a
1 week ago
"The Israeli military began a ground invasion of southern Lebanon, targeting what it said early Tuesday was Hezbollah military infrastructure in villages close to the Israel-Lebanon border, the first such incursion by Israel into its northern neighbor’s territory in nearly two decades." - New York Times
n/a
1 week ago
"The Israeli military began a ground invasion of southern Lebanon, targeting what it said early Tuesday was Hezbollah military infrastructure in villages close to the Israel-Lebanon border, the first such incursion by Israel into its northern neighbor’s territory in nearly two decades." - New York Times
n/a
1 week ago
You do realize November already resolved Yes, right?
n/a
1 week ago
No point arguing. 50pence & aenews2 bought $800k worth of shares in Israel enter lebanon market, and UMA token price rose by 12% in last 24hrs . So I guess this is rigged. Whales can buy whatever they want and vote as per thier choice by stocking the UMA tokens. truth doesnt really matters
n/a
1 week ago
Keep coping
JoeBETS
1 week ago
If they said war operations, sure but they specifically stated COMBAT OPERATIONS, acquiring intel is not that PERIOD. If there's no new update and this resolves as YES Polymarket should be ashamed of themselves for falling into peer pressure and mob mentality like that. Disgusting
n/a
1 week ago
50Pence and I will resolve the market, many are saying this (joke)
0x2A4cd726120A0d210ebE980328268163A6CB54E7-1720978918858
1 week ago
Who controls final review?
n/a
1 week ago
Some serious copium
n/a
1 week ago
People are still fading this market?
n/a
1 week ago
Wdym
Justifax
1 week ago
Selling as a whale is trying to scam the market. Very sad and unfortunate, but not surprising.
n/a
1 week ago
Clear site cookies and log back in first
Caligulas.dog
1 week ago
Using mobile? I noticed polymarket mobile page has issues atm. I couldn't sell my shares there
n/a
1 week ago
Good luck with your argument
shinigami.3
1 week ago
Rip yes holders https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-822290
n/a
1 week ago
"However, Israel has just succeeded in significantly degrading Hezbollah’s capabilities without putting a single troop on the ground in Lebanon — at least for now." - Punchbowl News
shinigami.3
1 week ago
Rip yes holders https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-822290
n/a
1 week ago
You can average down if you still believe there's a shot. Though... I don't think so.
CultArtist
1 week ago
i will ride this to zero
n/a
1 week ago
thanks for playing
n/a
1 week ago
Welcome back!
Hungrytoad
1 week ago
might buy back in .. big
n/a
1 week ago
Tick tock naturalnoob 🕦
n/a
1 week ago
Huobi is a Chinese exchange
Greta-Tunafish
1 week ago
Polymarket didn't even have the decency to say that there would probably be no more announcements. Pathetic, but this way the Chinese can see straight away what kind of business Polymarket is.
n/a
1 week ago
It's alright, that was my bad for sure
YatSen
1 week ago
死人妖和孙炒流量,流量过了就烂尾不管了,polymarket第一个国人盘就这样rug了,毫无信用,无视规则。The first Polymarket for Chinese users got rugged like this—zero credibility and completely ignoring the rules. What a joke!
n/a
1 week ago
You're lucky I left limits up and let you effectively roll back most your trades at 30c.
YatSen
1 week ago
死人妖和孙炒流量,流量过了就烂尾不管了,polymarket第一个国人盘就这样rug了,毫无信用,无视规则。The first Polymarket for Chinese users got rugged like this—zero credibility and completely ignoring the rules. What a joke!
n/a
1 week ago
That seems compelling to me, personally
rozi
1 week ago
Here's another one: https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1831512664507314308 For me, this is explicit enough. They are clarifying what they're supporting. It's Harris's official Twitter account.
n/a
2 weeks ago
I give up, the insiders are too stronk
n/a
2 weeks ago
So I unfortunately know a thing or two about Justin Sun
n/a
2 weeks ago
Man. But, "If no announcement is made by Huobi by September 30, 2024, 8:00 PM (UTC+8), this market will resolve to 50-50."
n/a
2 weeks ago
Justin Sun is a flaker tho, no? I had all crypto in TRX before I did Polymarket.
n/a
2 weeks ago
Man. But, "If no announcement is made by Huobi by September 30, 2024, 8:00 PM (UTC+8), this market will resolve to 50-50."
n/a
2 weeks ago
Good chance they flake? Even delaying would be enough, if not.
n/a
2 weeks ago
Man. But, "If no announcement is made by Huobi by September 30, 2024, 8:00 PM (UTC+8), this market will resolve to 50-50."
n/a
2 weeks ago
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/release_dates.html
dikec
2 weeks ago
At what time of the month did this market usually resolve in the past months?
n/a
2 weeks ago
Do the Chinese even use sarcasm to the extent it is used in the West?
Fatboyslim
2 weeks ago
Because we understand the sarcasm in her tweets, and know the probability of a random person being trans. It's not rocket science.
n/a
2 weeks ago
How so? I bought at 30c
BlueSky123
2 weeks ago
看来你自己也相当有信心。
n/a
2 weeks ago
Why are people so confident? Idgi
n/a
2 weeks ago
NaturalNoob should just DM me on Discord. Let's negotiate an exit, brother!
Mountainman
2 weeks ago
Love seeing the big "NO" holders starting to unload serious amounts of their shares, some leaving all together. Some were up BIG and now selling close to break even…. Watch the panic set in after their winning positions go underwater with no one to dump on. "Yes" doesn't even need anyone buying to skyrocket, just "NO" unwinding their positions :) Tik Tok ladies and gents, Tik Tok.
n/a
2 weeks ago
Polymarket is basically determining the market, not UMA
AugustoPinochet73
2 weeks ago
Not high enough for your entry point, but with your UMA lobbying powers I would say your EV is break even
n/a
2 weeks ago
So what are the odds Huobi actually makes an announcement?
n/a
2 weeks ago
too hot
gkg
2 weeks ago
Pretty much everywhere, it’s gonna be hot
n/a
2 weeks ago
At long last, the streak has been broken! We shall be unburdened by what has been, global warming is over...
n/a
2 weeks ago
Oh no
n/a
2 weeks ago
ggs
n/a
3 weeks ago
Maybe this is the last chance for Team N to come out winners 🙏🙏🙏
Lawyered.eth
3 weeks ago
pump it back to 75% let's run it again
n/a
3 weeks ago
R.I.P.
LaCuriosidad
3 weeks ago
Apparently, yeah https://imgur.com/a/o72J02U
n/a
3 weeks ago
It hurts, I know. But we will get through this brother
Hungrytoad
3 weeks ago
new market idea guys … WILL HUNGRY TOAD ROPEMAX place your bets in boys it’s a dirty world we live in
n/a
3 weeks ago
You market sold all your shares at 7c
Hungrytoad
3 weeks ago
can someone explain where my money went ?
n/a
3 weeks ago
"prediction markets.... get ready to cash your tickets, the answer is YES"
n/a
3 weeks ago
I'm not the 2nd tho
Hungrytoad
3 weeks ago
aenews2 you took my place 😠 I liked being the number 2 holder
n/a
3 weeks ago
hold my hand
n/a
3 weeks ago
FEK
Mountainman
3 weeks ago
I’m sorry guys I was completely wrong. I thought that Farokh had a cryptocurrency podcast but I just found out that he is actually a famous Italian chef, and Trump is going onto the X Space to give his top secret lasagna recipe!!!!! SELL OFF YOUR “YES” while you still can!!!! Only 30 minutes left!!!
n/a
3 weeks ago
I'm sweating bullets!
n/a
3 weeks ago
Same
Mountainman
3 weeks ago
Do you really think he is just coming on to talk about his love for the art of dance? Tell me what you know, please. I am getting very nervous.
n/a
3 weeks ago
Woah some serious diamond hands in this market
n/a
3 weeks ago
Ok bro, I'm sure I'll lose more in this market than my Top 5 all time losses combined
LaCuriosidad
3 weeks ago
Last chance to sell for YES holders with Trump Coin Derangement Syndrome
n/a
3 weeks ago
If any of you retardio N folks decide to dump, I'm keeping some sells open for you. Will pull an hour before the livestream!
n/a
3 weeks ago
I don't understand why you are so confident. A lot of the Y holders are sharp traders and would be posting the largest L of their prediction market careers if this goes N.
Lawyered.eth
3 weeks ago
lol I'm a little worried but pretty confident
n/a
3 weeks ago
🐔🐔🐔
n/a
3 weeks ago
He's gonna lose, and he knows it
RememberAmalek
3 weeks ago
rekt u scared u gonna burn ur money betting on urself?
n/a
3 weeks ago
Doubt it
LaCuriosidad
3 weeks ago
maybe cause they know something you don't
n/a
3 weeks ago
Why are people still buying N on this?
n/a
3 weeks ago
No?
Glover
3 weeks ago
CHINA 5+ THERE WE GO
n/a
3 weeks ago
I do both. I buy early-middle, buy near the end, and buy start of the next month.
n/a
3 weeks ago
Do tell no pple why you're so confident so early into September
n/a
3 weeks ago
We've managed to make it every single month, even if only by a little. Now's finally the time, probably.
n/a
3 weeks ago
Do tell no pple why you're so confident so early into September
n/a
3 weeks ago
Pretty obvious what the rules intend and how the platform would rule
n/a
3 weeks ago
As do I, specifically because I think the parameters surrounding the proposed resolution are very vague.
n/a
3 weeks ago
Well it's a good sign you're on the wrong side. The good news? It's not too late to switch.
n/a
3 weeks ago
I hate being on the opposite side.of your bets.
n/a
3 weeks ago
Fill me naysayers
n/a
3 weeks ago
close to counting but rules say the cute furry animal with retractible claws
n/a
3 weeks ago
Can I interest any 'fraudulent' buyers in my 'copycat' shares?
n/a
0 months ago
I have yet to see a single reputable poll where Harris didn't win lol, even Republican pollsters had her up
Teumpwillwin
0 months ago
I can’t find a single big online poll where Harris won. This is some rigged shit. Polymarket is scamming people using a specific leftist poll while the title says “according to polls.”
n/a
0 months ago
This is a very degen market
WhiteKing69
0 months ago
If i knew how to get crypto I would bet on this
n/a
0 months ago
Moreover, Harris should be higher in the first place
Dick Cheney
0 months ago
If he has millions can’t he just overwhelm any other market action? We shall see
n/a
0 months ago
What's the plan, chief?
wanyewest69
0 months ago
trump won the debate
n/a
0 months ago
Harris is up on virtually every single prediction market and gambling site rn
n/a
0 months ago
Not a trump fan but too many people are trading this as if it's directly dependent on what happened in the debate vs an otm option with 1 dte.
n/a
0 months ago
I did
n/a
0 months ago
Put something up
n/a
0 months ago
Where are the Trump fans?
n/a
0 months ago
Thanks!
Thevsvsgs
0 months ago
Man your track record is Awesome
n/a
0 months ago
Hate to say it, but I told you so 😆
n/a
0 months ago
Woah so much liquidity for Trump holders to max buy worthless shares
n/a
0 months ago
Sorry, but we'd RIG it anyways even if she makes a little oopsie, just like we RIGGED the election in 2020 👉
0x800977102c70ef82B2bE329585cAFB0AD03AA4c1-1724712090083
0 months ago
easy money your Indian non African candidate will lose
n/a
0 months ago
That's every festival
n/a
0 months ago
And if the coconut gets cracked?
n/a
0 months ago
easy money, orange is getting SQUEEZED tonight
n/a
1 month ago
Woo hoo! 😃
n/a
1 month ago
It was published like an hour and 14 minutes ago, 11AM ET
n/a
1 month ago
How is it possible to close this bet before data was published by NASA ?
n/a
1 month ago
I also have a few Y shares there
n/a
1 month ago
@aenews2 as long as yes hits on Kalshi I’ll survive lol
n/a
1 month ago
I think it will, but only 87% confident there cause it's more narrow than this one
n/a
1 month ago
@aenews2 as long as yes hits on Kalshi I’ll survive lol
n/a
1 month ago
Congrats and condolences to all, and see you in the next market!
n/a
1 month ago
lolz love you too buddy
Eridpnc
1 month ago
Insider AKA Aescam at it again... stop trying to hack NASA GIsstemp we won't be fooled. Let's all chip in and market buy no. Just sold my kidneys, liquidity coming in soon.
n/a
1 month ago
In a surprise to no one, the final is 130. Congrats and condolences to all, and see you in the next market.
n/a
1 month ago
Implies hottest in GISTEMP
siim
1 month ago
Published a few days ago, and the data has been around, so not breaking news. But still interesting.
n/a
1 month ago
True. Well, I do have multiple accounts in the first place, but most the action is from my main. You have a point. If nothing else tho, I kinda want to reach higher on the leaderboard.
n/a
1 month ago
hey @aenews2, have you considered betting on these temperature markets from alternate accounts? I figured it would tone down the vitriol from the jealous trolls, make it a bit harder for copycats, and hence maybe more enjoyable to all. Obviously you have done nothing wrong and it's totally OK if you like the current situation
n/a
1 month ago
Post picture with Imgur, definitely don't believe that
aenews3
1 month ago
You did not parse the data correctly. I'm getting 119 every time.
n/a
1 month ago
Where are you getting your information? The anomaly is roughly 130.
aenews3
1 month ago
You should have sold for profit when you had the chance. There will be little to no increase in temperature. It's a Tie.
n/a
1 month ago
There's no mud. It'll likely be hotter in every single database. Won't be remotely close in GISTEMP. Last month was divided, and actually very close.
siim
1 month ago
No is absolutely underpriced here. The data is muddy enough that it's pretty clear that no isn't a 1% chance. The whales are selling off their positions incrementally to try to not spook the market, just check the activity tab.
n/a
1 month ago
???
Fatboyslim
1 month ago
FUCK. Just sold my holdings after confirming. Thank you for sharing, I am forever grateful
n/a
1 month ago
Are you finally realizing you're wrong? Well it's been fun.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
latest GHCN data shows 128, yikes. Should be fun though
n/a
1 month ago
We are in ENSO Neutral, not La Nina. And the incoming La Nina is a weak La Nina. I don't understand if you are just trolling or this retarded.
aenews3
1 month ago
Ya and what come after is LA NINA !!!!
n/a
1 month ago
Agreed. Price should be at 99.9 and it's been stubborn
0x330e1ed1f3A7Edfe00D2E02db7b2fb4CE34e77C0-1725898374832
1 month ago
The most mispriced market in the history of polymarket. They will write legends about me.
n/a
1 month ago
El Nino has been over for 3-4 months, not really relevant
aenews3
1 month ago
If you mean El Nino is finally over you are correct. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/153058/el-nino-exits
n/a
1 month ago
What conversion are you talking about?
analord
1 month ago
just tweaked the numbers of the JRP repository, returns 119 every time. 130 only returns if you don't account for the celsius/fahrenheit conversion in the first few lines
n/a
1 month ago
Looks like the pump is finally over
n/a
1 month ago
When will you stop pumping your bags
aenews3
1 month ago
We are going below average folks: Match this chart to NASAs #s. https://oz4caster.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/d1-gfs-gta-daily-2024-09-08.gif
n/a
1 month ago
111M is pretty auspicious
n/a
1 month ago
Assuming 2023 remains at 119, 2024 needs be at least 120. In reality, it'll be about 130.
n/a
1 month ago
What will the exact number required to be for it to finish as hottest on record?
n/a
1 month ago
Do you... Want more? Always happy to fill you more at 4c. But fair warning that the shares are worthless as I explained in previous thread.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
every time im sad i dont have enough 1.20-1.24 shares, i see aenews is there to help!
n/a
1 month ago
Land-Ocean anomaly on 1951-1980 base period, as posted by NASA/GISTEMP
MOA
1 month ago
Can some one explain what this is an increase over? August 2023? July 2024? It’s like children write these things…..
n/a
1 month ago
I'm here
PinochetsAirplane
1 month ago
erm where is aenews2
n/a
1 month ago
because the film was a big success
Makoto
1 month ago
It is weird that even a est, Fri and Sat have a same number
n/a
1 month ago
I know you do lol. I guess either you are pumping your bags or you are retarded.
aenews3
1 month ago
You're right I suck at Math.
n/a
1 month ago
Meh. I'd say 65% above 129, 35% 125-129, 0% everything else
joe.night2024
1 month ago
I hope so, but i guess, the probality for under 120 = 20%, between 120-129 = 70%, and above 129 = 10%.
n/a
1 month ago
Ignore. It's a troll. Tho you should dump your N fr.
n/a
1 month ago
are you selling now?
n/a
1 month ago
NOAA uses the same GHCN+ERSST data that GISTEMP uses, and it was only 0.01° hotter. With the market rules at the time, it would have resolved N if NOAA was the resolution source. The reason I bet the way I did is because there was a buffer of 1 due to the downrevision. And indeed, it was incredibly close with GISTEMP landing at 1.39 vs the 1.37 strike in the market. If it had been 2 lower, N would have taken it.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Also, those that think Aenews is the reincarnation of Einstein, he was wrong about the March market, even though SST and ERA5-Land showed an increase in 2024 wrt 2023.
n/a
1 month ago
It's objectively true, why are you saying "wrong"? I'm not doing any calculation, I'm just relaying the actual numbers.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Also, those that think Aenews is the reincarnation of Einstein, he was wrong about the March market, even though SST and ERA5-Land showed an increase in 2024 wrt 2023.
n/a
1 month ago
It was an incredibly close market (like last month). NOAA and Berkeley Earth both reported only 0.01° hotter than the record. Moreover, revisions hurt Y in that market because it was pegged to the value itself not the record. If NOAA had been the resolution source, market would have resolved N on tie due to the 0.01° downrevision in both NOAA and GISTEMP.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Also, those that think Aenews is the reincarnation of Einstein, he was wrong about the March market, even though SST and ERA5-Land showed an increase in 2024 wrt 2023.
n/a
1 month ago
And what is the anomaly in ERA5? That is a 131 anomaly. A tie in ERA5 in my model implies a median of about 127 in GISTEMP. Last year during El Nino, ERA5 kept outpacing GISTEMP. This differential has shrunk to very little the past few months, and we are back to historical normalcy on average.
aenews3
1 month ago
Uhhmmm This says he lies: https://x.com/Domahhhh/status/1555575974560993287
n/a
1 month ago
I expect an apology once the data releases in a few days
n/a
1 month ago
Ignore the crazy guy pumping in the comments. I was correct about 121 last month as well. I'm just sharing the alpha. This isn't remotely close, so y'all should save your money.
n/a
1 month ago
ae-projection (Final): 130
n/a
1 month ago
Hope not
1 month ago
https://x.com/SimbaSnell/status/1832621503969398890
n/a
1 month ago
Please buy more N 🙏
n/a
1 month ago
Friday 41.5 m and Saturday 41m ? No drop ? When's the last time you seen that happen for a movie no drop from Friday to Saturday
n/a
1 month ago
Good one!
n/a
1 month ago
I'm praying for my bags. Please lord forgive me for my greed. Please let the Beetlejuice lovers flee the theatres with terror, for the lols and for my pocketbook.
n/a
1 month ago
Please take price back to 50
n/a
1 month ago
Bidding 68c on 105m+ based off an early estimation is crazy
n/a
1 month ago
Thanks, keep coping while I win both bets
aenews3
1 month ago
you spray and pray like a true larp. Your technical analysis is really top notch.
n/a
1 month ago
Beetlejuice is a bond, wdym lol
aenews3
1 month ago
Ya I cant wait 3 days because I want to buy more beetlejuice box office lotto tickets. Larp Harder.
n/a
1 month ago
As promised, I have a nice sell stack at 99.3c since I'm running low on cash. I recommend folks with N sell before they go to zero.
n/a
1 month ago
1. The ERA5 data itself implies very low chance of N. 2. We have more data now, so it's definitive.
joe.night2024
1 month ago
Just to be Fair: aenews doesn't lie. He analyses correctly, or at least he really thinks so. And he has good arguments. He may be right. The possibility for Yes is bigger than possibilty for No. But the possibilty for No is bigger than 25%. So No buyer have a 25% chance to win. That means, they take the 25%-chance at the price of 2%-Chance. And that's why i bought No (in this market).
n/a
1 month ago
Jk
n/a
1 month ago
It's a BOND 🔐🔒🔐🔒
n/a
1 month ago
It's a BOND 🔐🔒🔐🔒
n/a
1 month ago
say it a third time. i dare you.
n/a
1 month ago
Gg... Again?
n/a
1 month ago
Made more than 250K last month, try again
AiBets
1 month ago
aescams losing (zero predictive ability, he was copying others here) is a good day
n/a
1 month ago
I'm praying for my bags. Please lord forgive me for my greed. Please let the Beetlejuice lovers swarm the theatres with glee, for the lols and for my pocketbook.
n/a
1 month ago
Still have zero sell orders. Will add shortly tho, at 99.3
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
AENEWS wants you to dump your NO shares to get out of his position at 99.9 don't let him out!
n/a
1 month ago
Why are you trying to make people lose money?
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
He has YES and No Shares and is trying to walk the price down. Create Doubt. Stick to your gut. Hold till reveal.
n/a
1 month ago
I don't even have sell orders lol, tho I will add some soon since I'm still low on cash
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
AENEWS wants you to dump your NO shares to get out of his position at 99.9 don't let him out!
n/a
1 month ago
ae-projection (Final): 130
n/a
1 month ago
Big if true
n/a
1 month ago
at this point no matter the saturday numbers, no one knows what the final number will be, it's a coinflip, place your bets accordingly
n/a
1 month ago
LOL. I made 175K last month alone, across accounts, across markets, and across sites.
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
you buying at 99 cents isnt profit ya larp.
n/a
1 month ago
Pretty well, obviously. I've made 250K off them.
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
Already down bigly on September Hottest Month Market I see... How are your models working out for you?
n/a
1 month ago
What a clown
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
3 more days till all your profits go bye bye. Start packing.
n/a
1 month ago
You are a literal retard lol
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
It's a burner your models are trash. Keep buying beatlejuice box off and Kamala Shares you might get lucky.
n/a
1 month ago
I think the guy larping is the maniac who spams the comments and owns zero shares.
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
Bro you are the biggest larp on PM. You and your idiot TG friends bought all those yes shares. These markets arent "projecting" Jack Shit. I cleared my schedule for Tuesday to watch you lose 400k. You deserve to get whipped out. We all know you are on the wrong side of the trade. MOG.
n/a
1 month ago
I see this is landing about where was expected, a bit under the ERA5 anomaly of 131. Slightly overperforming my ERA5-only model.
joe.night2024
1 month ago
I don't have enough liquidity. And i am new to this market. And i care only for the end. You are smart. But maybe i see what you don't see.
n/a
1 month ago
estimates are conservative tho
n/a
1 month ago
there was just to much optimism movie is underperforming the estimates
n/a
1 month ago
If you disagree with the projection of the margin market, you should buy there and fade 1.30+. Moreover, if you were remotely close to right, it should be +EV to have 2c shares in this market and buy 5c shares of 1.20-1.24 in the margin. For 7c you win if not hottest and win if it is close! You probably won't tho cause you know your shares are worthless.
joe.night2024
1 month ago
And i expect every thing except 130 ;) only 3 day remainig ;)
n/a
1 month ago
No. I said the market is projecting 130. Please re-read.
joe.night2024
1 month ago
If you are so sure, that it will be mor than 129, why don't you sell here and buy in the other market?
n/a
1 month ago
While the margin market is projecting 130, real people here are still buying N. Y'all should be buying cheap in the other market if you think you're right.
n/a
1 month ago
Well yeah, we have had the data since ERSST released on the 3rd. I already went big with 150K+ before that tho, so my modelling and analysis is simply superior.
n/a
1 month ago
even I am super curious. Imagine putting in $272K in a prediction market bet just to make $15K.
n/a
1 month ago
Did I bond the wrong bracket? Or wagmi?
n/a
1 month ago
Just woke up
n/a
1 month ago
@aenews2 what is going on bro ?
n/a
1 month ago
More than one account and two markets, have sold and re-bought as well. So probably more like a 30K win, broski
n/a
1 month ago
even I am super curious. Imagine putting in $272K in a prediction market bet just to make $15K.
n/a
1 month ago
Historically, the anomalies are close to even, with GISS slightly lower.
n/a
1 month ago
@aenews2 I am guessing you are so sure on yes because of historically higher temps from NASA datasets compared to copernicus?
n/a
1 month ago
no matter how many times i smack it, it keeps coming back
n/a
1 month ago
Anyone know how to swat this mosquito?
n/a
1 month ago
LOL
TimeTraveler
1 month ago
I'm giving 95-105 the best odds currently, this also means that I'm giving 85-95 and 105+ equal odds compared to eachother.
n/a
1 month ago
Naw it's not just him. The estimates all align around 44M.
TimeTraveler
1 month ago
Also, Warner's and Deadlines's estimation (85-95) is now at 4% because some Indian guy is very good at predicting or something.
n/a
1 month ago
Wagmi
PickleRick
1 month ago
https://x.com/meJat32/status/1832222409455186311
n/a
1 month ago
You are delusional
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
Thanks for proving my point.
n/a
1 month ago
Because I need cash for other markets
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
AE News will say he just wants liquidity to bet other markets but the truth is he doesnt trust his own data. The Real Batman is buying his worthless bags before the reveal!
n/a
1 month ago
Correct
PanosMariolis2001
1 month ago
if its a tie No wins right?
n/a
1 month ago
Bro you don't own any shares
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
uhoh the real batman buying AENews Trash YES. Whose gonna tell him!
n/a
1 month ago
Shall see!
joe.night2024
1 month ago
My prediction: August 2024 anomaly will be 119 +/- 7 (112-126). Only 4 days remaining..
n/a
1 month ago
It's impressive that the entire range is wrong despite the interval size
joe.night2024
1 month ago
My prediction: August 2024 anomaly will be 119 +/- 7 (112-126). Only 4 days remaining..
n/a
1 month ago
I'm sure there will be promo's, but dunno about a regular $5 coming back.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
n/a
1 month ago
@joe.night2024 You need to process the ERSST file to calculate
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
@joe.night2024 If you Google "ERSST", what you want is the top result which links to NOAA's website.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
Previews always count, you are simply wrong. They get rolled into Friday's number (or whatever the opening day is for a particular film).
TimeTraveler
1 month ago
It's a movie with a bunch of hardline fans, those tend to go to early screenings, but those hardline fans aren't representative for the general population, and the earnings from the early previews don't count for this bet either.
n/a
1 month ago
@joe.night2024 You'd need to calculate it
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
The differential between GISTEMP and ERA5 that existed last year is gone. At this point, you should basically expect GISS to land on average slightly under the ERA5 anomaly.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
No, I'm taking everything into account there, including historical. You are just incorrect. What I'm saying applies before ERSST, tho. Since we have that now, we are good.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
I'd say judge for yourself
1 month ago
Seems more like $12m previews
n/a
1 month ago
Deadline lowballs
1 month ago
Seems more like $12m previews
n/a
1 month ago
A tie in ERA5 (131 anomaly) implies GISTEMP would be easily over, lol. 127 +/- 7 in my model. But yeah, we do have more data now.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
It's not remotely close. You must be messing up on your end.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
"We are likely at or near the peak for this warming event, as relative cooling is expected soon with the end of El Niño" June 2024
n/a
1 month ago
Gg?
PickleRick
1 month ago
https://x.com/meJat32/status/1831926075477389819?t=NpkfiUj-mxnEqm5_cSB40A&s=19
n/a
1 month ago
I don't want to spoonfeed all the information (though you can probably get the details from past markets). Just know that you're wrong, and you could have gleamed it from ERA5 alone even before ERSST dropped. GISTEMP anomaly should be pretty in line with ERA5.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
"We are likely at or near the peak for this warming event, as relative cooling is expected soon with the end of El Niño" June 2024
n/a
1 month ago
Correction: Ocean slightly less, land way more!
Greenfelder
1 month ago
"We are likely at or near the peak for this warming event, as relative cooling is expected soon with the end of El Niño" June 2024
n/a
1 month ago
@joe.night2024 NOAA's website
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
Where are you seeing that land is even with last year? You're living in an alternate reality, lol
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
Because the land is way hotter, it's not rocket science.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
💀 GISTEMP is Land+Ocean, silly
Greenfelder
1 month ago
" The current CPC/IRI analysis suggests that El Niño conditions will dissipate around Northern Hemisphere Summer in 2024. The current El Niño has weakened to a moderate intensity (after being roughly the 3rd strongest of the last 30 years) and is likely to continue dissipating over the next several months" - Berkley Earth, March 2024
n/a
1 month ago
Surface air is the entire surface. Just as with the past few months, we'd expect the GISTEMP anomaly to be close to the ERA5 anomaly (131). Moreover, we have the data from ERSST now. So it's a done deal.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
n/a
1 month ago
GISS is Land+Ocean. So what if the ocean is slightly cooler? You need to look at both, then you'd see it's overall way hotter than last year. Or before ERSST, you could look at ERA5 surface air which captures the entire surface.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
n/a
1 month ago
Looks like the insiders were right after all
n/a
1 month ago
I think you're misreading. I'm saying it's irrelevant to look at only SST. We care about Land+Ocean. And we know roughly where it'll land because ERSST released on the 3rd. Again, I'm just saying this was a near certainty even before we got more data. Evidently, it's entirely dead now.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
n/a
1 month ago
"Clear flip happening in july, with 0.1c disparity in august." Yeah that's pretty irrelevant, because GISTEMP is Land+Ocean.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
n/a
1 month ago
Well ERSST releases on the 3rd, so more like I bet 200K or so before that release. The uncertainty is gone at this point. My point tho is that even before that, it was a done deal.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
n/a
1 month ago
^ Applies to both of you
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
n/a
1 month ago
No, my ERA5 model only takes into account the surface air (t2m). I don't use the SST from Copernicus. If you want to discuss further, hit me up on Discord (aenews), Twitter (aenews_PI), or Reddit (aenews).
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Also considering the chance of simple human error (they enter the wrong number and don't update it until after the resolution period for this market closes) or the chance that someone at NASA is aware of this market and attempts to manipulate the number to get 100:1 odds on their money. Crypto based prediction markets haven't been tested in the courts, and it's doubtful that SEC market manipulation laws apply to prediction markets.. so doing something like that could be seen by some unscrupulous actors as a low risk way to make a boat load of cash.
n/a
1 month ago
The mistake you're making with ERA5 is that you're comparing the 131 anomaly to the 131 anomaly last year in 2023. You should be comparing ERA5 to GISTEMP, not ERA5 to ERA5. Same mistake people made last month. My ERA5-only model pegged this at 127 +/- 7 (2σ) when September started. You are clearly not correctly parsing the data.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Also considering the chance of simple human error (they enter the wrong number and don't update it until after the resolution period for this market closes) or the chance that someone at NASA is aware of this market and attempts to manipulate the number to get 100:1 odds on their money. Crypto based prediction markets haven't been tested in the courts, and it's doubtful that SEC market manipulation laws apply to prediction markets.. so doing something like that could be seen by some unscrupulous actors as a low risk way to make a boat load of cash.
n/a
1 month ago
Because that is 131 anomaly in ERA5? So of course it implies GISS won't be close. And I'm not buying at 5%. I'm selling! Literally the opposite.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
If its 'unambiguously the hottest', then how do you explain ERA5's data? They are showing roughly 1.505 vs. 1.506 (0.001 difference). I know sattelties are a lot less accurate but that seems far from unambigious to me.. I'm sensing some serious overconfidence here.
n/a
1 month ago
It doesn't make a difference. It's unambiguously the hottest. "V5" would not change this, given monthly rankings are relative to each other, and given the margin.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
For these reasons and others, buying YES at 98 cents or above is all but guaranteed to be negative EV over the long run.
n/a
1 month ago
Lastly, database changes make no difference as the market is relative to all past months. As an aside, August will be the hottest in NOAA and Berkeley Earth, and probably every other dataset.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
n/a
1 month ago
If Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that's good for Yes. Do you want to dump your bags? If so, I could let you out of some at 99c. Pretty clear this isn't remotely close.
WindWalk2
1 month ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
n/a
1 month ago
Ah yeah, I lost 20K that month betting on N. Was very close. NOAA and Berkeley Earth were only 0.01° over record, too.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
for some prespective, march (which won by 18 points) was trading at 50-50 on april 2nd. This market is much, much closer than that and yet N shares at 1.2, CRAZY
n/a
1 month ago
Surface air being roughly the same means GISS probably won't be close lol
Greenfelder
1 month ago
ERSST v5 anomalies down 16% since 2023 august. Surface air temp relatively the same. Who are the idiots buying yes here?
n/a
1 month ago
Wut
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
When you buy at 500k's worth at 93 and sell at 99 for a 600 Dollar profit is not a good trade.
n/a
1 month ago
This is accurate, and the original comment was being dumb and thinking surface air does not cover the sea. In reality, it covers the entire surface and should be compared to land+ocean. Some people were confused and trying to double-count by adding surface air and sea.
Greenfelder
1 month ago
Proof aenews doesn't know what he's talking about: "Uhh no... *facepalm*. This is not how it works. Surface air temperature (t2m) covers the entire surface both above land and sea"
n/a
1 month ago
Where? Link?
OmenOfLord
1 month ago
Guys it's leaked. The part 2 questions are leaked, there are insiders on Twitter leaked for us. Don't bet unless you have insiders please
n/a
1 month ago
I just bought some
Nyr11messier - 2170
1 month ago
Is the townhall over yet?
n/a
1 month ago
Second half tmrw
Nyr11messier - 2170
1 month ago
Is the townhall over yet?
n/a
1 month ago
Yes, after a brief refractory period
n/a
1 month ago
what is happening? it rises again?
n/a
1 month ago
Agree to disagree
Jane.Avenue
1 month ago
Should be ruled inconclusive. It was clear in the rules that it would be based on the video/audio that is aired on September 4th 9-10PM.
n/a
1 month ago
Out of cash and want to buy other bonds like box office
n/a
1 month ago
Well if anyone wants to sell N shares before they go to zero, I have a sell block at 99.3c / 0.7c
n/a
1 month ago
It's guaranteed lol
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
Bro why you so paniced. Low Liquidity and Low Conviction? Maybe don't bet 500k on a dice roll.
n/a
1 month ago
Well if anyone wants to sell N shares before they go to zero, I have a sell block at 99.3c / 0.7c
n/a
1 month ago
Doubt, just rando
n/a
1 month ago
Is this true?
n/a
1 month ago
Finally someone who can math. Still seems a bit off tho, as I'd project 97% odds even with just ERA5 data. Not sure how you got 9%.
Drunken-Mentat
1 month ago
I seriously doubt the no will win: it makes sense as a low-probability bet, particularly as a reinvestment of previous gains in yes. But it was never too probable (August 23 in gistemp was much colder than the era equivalent, and my own reanalysis gave only 9% for the no for aug 24), but now with the land anomaly for 2024 at 1.62 vs 1.38 in 2023 (easy to calculate with gistemp python package), I would say it's really improbable that the land+sea anomaly would be smaller than that of 2023 (unless the gistemp sea anomaly turns out to be unexpectedly small wrt era5). So most probably "yes".
n/a
1 month ago
Yeah, correct. This is a straightforward market that resolves according to NASA's published value.
n/a
1 month ago
Although the whole uma mechanism is sketchy at times, for this market the temperature value is provided by NASA. I don't see how the outcome could be disputed
n/a
1 month ago
Only using ERA5 (was assuming it ends a virtual tie), my ERA-Only estimate a few days ago was 127 +/- 7.
n/a
1 month ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
n/a
1 month ago
Why?
PanosMariolis2001
1 month ago
oh you will lose this bet buddy
n/a
1 month ago
What does this market have to do with UMA? It's straightforward and goes by what NASA publishes on their website.
PanosMariolis2001
1 month ago
Serious question , if its actually a win for the no holders , can the uma scam us again and somehow the whales win again? No right???
n/a
1 month ago
If it remains 119, then the anomaly needs be 120 or higher.
SudoWin
1 month ago
What should be the number in the NASA source for this to resolve to "Yes"?
n/a
1 month ago
How would this help change last month's temperature?
lil-b
1 month ago
Maybe a scientist can help me - I've been up all night with my icemaker in overdrive - I keep making ice and then throwing it outside, figuring that the cold will help cool the Earth. I know its only a tiny bit but it could come down to that. I think I can feel a slight difference when I go outside. When the ice melts, it releases the stored-up cold out into the environment. Is this a sound strategy?
n/a
1 month ago
NOAA and NASA land pretty close to each other most of the time
n/a
1 month ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
n/a
1 month ago
That is definitely wrong
IWillReturn
1 month ago
Tracking looks good but is getting soft. Seems like a movie that fans will watch but not the general public. ~3.25m in early showings, ~9m previews looks about a right for a total around 80-85m
n/a
1 month ago
hi!
n/a
1 month ago
aenews betting betting against me damn
n/a
1 month ago
I love you
lil-b
1 month ago
There's kind of an X factor at play here, which I dont think anybody has really considered. I have heard from my sources that The Juice is Loose, which may have an impact. Those who are Beetlejuice fans will know that the hype is definitely causing higher body temperatures. However, if my sources are incorrect and the Juice is, in fact, NOT loose, then admittedly I will have made a giant blunder. Just my 2 cents.
n/a
1 month ago
No. Being roughly tied (and it ended up marginally higher, mind you) implies GISS won't be close
n/a
1 month ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
n/a
1 month ago
The Copernicus data would suggest it won't be close lol
n/a
1 month ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
n/a
1 month ago
🔥🗻 + ❄🌊 = ?
n/a
1 month ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
n/a
1 month ago
I'm joking, tbc 😆...
n/a
1 month ago
i thought about this also, but i will take the risk xD
n/a
1 month ago
Think about it guys, would NASA want to let the streak end? We need to keep going through the election!
n/a
1 month ago
...what?
lil-b
1 month ago
There's kind of an X factor at play here, which I dont think anybody has really considered. I have heard from my sources that The Juice is Loose, which may have an impact. Those who are Beetlejuice fans will know that the hype is definitely causing higher body temperatures. However, if my sources are incorrect and the Juice is, in fact, NOT loose, then admittedly I will have made a giant blunder. Just my 2 cents.
n/a
1 month ago
maybe buy low, sell high?
SLEEPYJOE
1 month ago
Uh ok someones trying to dump 100k shares ... which YES holder is nervous they are on the wrong side of the trade?
n/a
1 month ago
?
n/a
1 month ago
we can, but we won't unless rigged.
n/a
1 month ago
It'll resolve to whatever NASA publishes on their site
PanosMariolis2001
1 month ago
I'm new to this market , can they side with the whales once again or is it fixed so the no holders can win too?
n/a
1 month ago
Nice
OmenOfLord
1 month ago
I'm just loading up as time goes. Depositing another 2000 once bank is open in the morning.
n/a
1 month ago
That's not me. You are not very smart, are you.
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
We value your insight. I didn't mean to scare you with my comments. But sometimes you gotta get down to there level and punch up. I can see Aenews buying on his BigMike11 burner now panic buying... Stick to the science. I'll take care of the goons.
n/a
1 month ago
nom nom
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
WINDWALKS!!! EAT SHIT AENEWS!
n/a
1 month ago
who are you
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
1 month ago
@AENEWS2 Fly to close to the sun and you're gonna get burned bitch! Hope you brought some SPF Faggot!
n/a
1 month ago
It's tied or marginally higher in ERA5. That implies GISS will be way higher, no?
OmenOfLord
1 month ago
https://x.com/EliotJacobson/status/1830623631757762652/photo/1
n/a
1 month ago
🔥🔥🔥
OmenOfLord
1 month ago
https://x.com/EliotJacobson/status/1830623631757762652/photo/1
n/a
1 month ago
This bill is incredibly light and has been watered down. Also this doesn't affect anyone except the largest companies in the space lol
Justifax
1 month ago
A simple example of how stupid this bill is. Today, if I use a computer to do a cyber attack the person who made the computer is not liable. Now if I use AI which is 1% better than just using the computer, the AI company is liable. That's tots insane.
n/a
1 month ago
@BabyYoda12 It can be sooner than that date
husser
1 month ago
When does they publish the nubmers usually?
n/a
1 month ago
Might be 600M today too
Makoto
1 month ago
599.X without Labor Day ^^
n/a
1 month ago
Maybe it's cooked bro! But yeah they are ests.
Dropper11
1 month ago
yep. How do they already have today's revenue tho
n/a
1 month ago
Blah blah blah
Guggs
1 month ago
I think the market is significantly overvaluing 'yes'. All the articles so far have just estimated the domestic gross. Or said it hit 600M based on some estimate. The numbers aren't out yet and there is a very small margin over 600m.
n/a
1 month ago
Irrelevant on the market
n/a
1 month ago
ah yes another rigged market on polymarket and if it isn't rigged from the start, uma and polymarket will solve that
n/a
1 month ago
See y'all in the next market
n/a
1 month ago
We care about the anomaly, not temperature
Caveman12
1 month ago
September is almost always colder than August, don’t see how this is Yes
n/a
1 month ago
Who are you?
n/a
1 month ago
Happened AFTER the deadline: "Russian social media channels claim that in the Moscow district of Kapotnya, where the refinery is located, two explosions were heard. According to residents of Kapotnya and nearby districts, one explosion occurred around 7:30 a.m., followed by the sounds of automatic gunfire and a second explosion approximately 10 minutes later." https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/fire-at-moscow-oil-refinery-assigned-highest-difficulty-level-after-drone-attack-russian-media/ar-AA1pNeWe