#11
Rank
1341
Comments
689
Likes Received
3103
Likes Given
aenews2
3 months ago
True
Qualitative
3 months ago
A rare market where both the whales and the insiders got rinsed
aenews2
3 months ago
Yep, today was always the most likely day for him to launch. I agree it's unlikely just given the post frequency. But it's doable for sure. If I held N, I can't imagine holding at 95c.
iamhungry
3 months ago
Tokens are usually launched on Friday
aenews2
3 months ago
Kanye is always full of surprises, let's never forget that
aenews2
3 months ago
Gotcha, thanks for explaining
curupirAA
3 months ago
18h left
aenews2
3 months ago
Exit at 100c, or exit at better price if it's close
mk27
3 months ago
How is this market still at 11c?
aenews2
3 months ago
no need to lie bro
curupirAA
3 months ago
18h left
aenews2
3 months ago
Yeah should be at 20c at least, wild
mk27
3 months ago
How is this market still at 11c?
aenews2
3 months ago
What do you mean by extra yes? Multiple accounts?
SpankyMCmuffin
3 months ago
Bought some yes as a hedge, because I’m off to bed. Stay strong gents. See you on the other side!
aenews2
3 months ago
Seems nuts to me to hold at 90c, is that really worth the heartache?
SpankyMCmuffin
3 months ago
Bought some yes as a hedge, because I’m off to bed. Stay strong gents. See you on the other side!
aenews2
3 months ago
Is he ramping up for release? He came back despite saying he'd be gone.
aenews2
3 months ago
Kanye launched a coins in hearts and souls, you can't beat that 😭
Joe44
3 months ago
We will dispute and win on UMA
aenews2
3 months ago
It's not too late to Martingale into N and make it all back. Let's do it 😟
Original-Zyn
3 months ago
They told me WAGMI but I'm starting to think maybe we are not all going to make it
aenews2
3 months ago
😭
aenews2
3 months ago
Joining Zyn on this journey to zero has been one of the biggest mistakes of my entire prediction market career.
aenews2
3 months ago
Because it could still happen, never know. Just unlikely obvs.
aenews2
3 months ago
Joining Zyn on this journey to zero has been one of the biggest mistakes of my entire prediction market career.
aenews2
3 months ago
Yes, easily
aenews2
3 months ago
Joining Zyn on this journey to zero has been one of the biggest mistakes of my entire prediction market career.
aenews2
3 months ago
Joining Zyn on this journey to zero has been one of the biggest mistakes of my entire prediction market career.
aenews2
3 months ago
Good idea, will be getting my dispute ready
TrumpDaddy88
3 months ago
To all the 'yes' whales.... Are you guys praying for a UMA Hail Mary? Praying that it settles 50/50 or 'yes' because he is not kanye anymore?
aenews2
3 months ago
Market believes Kanye is a liar
truthteller
3 months ago
Kanye already said he was launching this week, YES should be 60c
aenews2
3 months ago
Please Lord forgive me for my greed, forgive me for mistaking a piece for the puzzle. Please let Kanye tweet the coin launch, for the lols and for my pocketbook 🙏
aenews2
3 months ago
Same! Please have mercy, let me cash out at 30c at least...
Dropper11
3 months ago
Please I beg you, this time is the last one, no more gambling, I promise. Just put me breakeven please lord. I promise never to gamble again jesus. I am repentant, I have understood the lesson.
aenews2
3 months ago
You're the insider bro, just DM the deats
bullishonsol
3 months ago
IMAGINE THIS NIGGA ACTUALLY LAUNCH BEFORE MARCH
aenews2
3 months ago
Patience, wait till Friday
Car
3 months ago
I was promised a coin.
aenews2
3 months ago
You and me both, brother
bullishonsol
3 months ago
FROM 100K UP TO ROUND TRIP FUCK MY LIFE
aenews2
3 months ago
Please message me @aenews on Discord if you require an emotional support group
bullishonsol
3 months ago
IM GONNA KMS FML
aenews2
7 months ago
GGs, see y'all again in 2026 when Kari Lake tries to run unsuccessfully a third time!
aenews2
7 months ago
Patience, shall resolve today
moshito
7 months ago
why hasnt this market resolved?
aenews2
7 months ago
;)
moshito
7 months ago
why hasnt this market resolved?
aenews2
7 months ago
God speed brother
Symbolic17
7 months ago
I'm buying more, the RNC seems serious this time about voter fraud
aenews2
7 months ago
Why are you emotionally invest in a whackjob winning? Jeez
Russet
7 months ago
Only people still holding Lake Win are emotionally invested we know we are going to lose but just cannot bring ourselves to accept it LOL
aenews2
7 months ago
Because Lake is a complete trash candidate. The GOP would have been at 54 senate seats if they ran literally anyone else.
ProudVirgin
7 months ago
in a MAGA coattails presidential year where a republican actually won the popular vote, Kari Lake is currently UNDERPERFORMING her 48.8% results in maricopa county 2022 by 2.3%
aenews2
7 months ago
It'll be like 3% to the nearest % by the end, lol
REEEEEEEEEE
7 months ago
Trump wins by 5.7, Lake loses by 2.2, 7.9 spread between the two - BULLSHIT! MY ASS!
aenews2
7 months ago
Yeah, this is probably going to be called by the remaining outlets today or tomorrow.
aenews2
7 months ago
Who cares about the courts
chance99
7 months ago
rules say if MSM calls the race for wohoever then it resolves? Thtats kinds goofy. How about official results after court?
aenews2
7 months ago
Democrats literally gained seats in the House. Out of all the swing state seats, Republicans only managed to win 1. It's a great year for Trump, but same doesn't apply downballot.
Slan
7 months ago
It's really annoying this far left scum gets elected to the Senate in ARIZONA in a RED WAVE year. Fuck. He's basically an open borders Bernie type candidate. That's just ridiculous.
aenews2
7 months ago
You do realize... DDHQ called the race, right?
TartarianRetard
7 months ago
still says 35.1% for Lake
aenews2
7 months ago
No, they haven't. I traded this across sites.
GT510
7 months ago
Can someone explain to me why people think this is over? Kari needs 55% of the remaining votes to win and it has not been called yet.
aenews2
7 months ago
You can only convert N into Y in all other brackets, or N in multiple to Y in others + USDC. And yes.
aenews2
7 months ago
Alright guys, I'd like to buy another 50K Lake NO, could you help a brother out?
aenews2
7 months ago
It isn't a red wave year
Slan
7 months ago
It's really annoying this far left scum gets elected to the Senate in ARIZONA in a RED WAVE year. Fuck. He's basically an open borders Bernie type candidate. That's just ridiculous.
aenews2
7 months ago
1. It's clearly over, that's why price went to 99c. 2. After price went to 99c, DDHQ called. Now it's really over.
GT510
7 months ago
Can someone explain to me why people think this is over? Kari needs 55% of the remaining votes to win and it has not been called yet.
aenews2
7 months ago
Because this is certain. I don't doubt AP is correct for PA, but eacch decision desk has their own data and DDHQ probably did not reach that critical level of certainty.
aenews2
7 months ago
https://twitter.com/DecisionDeskHQ/status/1855430284428161399
aenews2
7 months ago
Called by DDHQ. Will be called by AP, NBC, Fox in the next 2 days, if not this weekend.
aenews2
7 months ago
https://twitter.com/DecisionDeskHQ/status/1855430284428161399
aenews2
7 months ago
https://twitter.com/DecisionDeskHQ/status/1855430284428161399
aenews2
7 months ago
Yeah frankly doesn't matter. But yeah, the analysts were correct to say that remaining were Gallego-favorable. Regardless, this is now far beyond what Lake can overcome. It's over.
aenews2
7 months ago
Yeah, officially callable. No joke, I've actually seen enough now. Ruben Gallego (D) has won the AZ Senate seat in the 2024 General Election
aenews2
7 months ago
Yeah, officially callable. No joke, I've actually seen enough now. Ruben Gallego (D) has won the AZ Senate seat in the 2024 General Election
aenews2
7 months ago
negrisk conversion
aenews2
7 months ago
Alright guys, I'd like to buy another 50K Lake NO, could you help a brother out?
aenews2
7 months ago
?
aenews2
7 months ago
Alright guys, I'd like to buy another 50K Lake NO, could you help a brother out?
aenews2
7 months ago
Alright guys, I'd like to buy another 50K Lake NO, could you help a brother out?
aenews2
7 months ago
🤪
Spartan37
7 months ago
Yuma, Yavapai, and Cochise will add up to around 30k gain for Lake if she hits targets. Pima, at this rate, would only cost her 9k. That means she will narrow the gap to 13k. If she wins 50% of Maricopa (50 to 48), she wins.
aenews2
7 months ago
No
Spartan37
7 months ago
Yuma, Yavapai, and Cochise will add up to around 30k gain for Lake if she hits targets. Pima, at this rate, would only cost her 9k. That means she will narrow the gap to 13k. If she wins 50% of Maricopa (50 to 48), she wins.
aenews2
7 months ago
haha ty
Spartan37
7 months ago
When Cochise finally comes in, and Yavapai too, suddenly this will be extremely close.
aenews2
7 months ago
I'm afraid your side is the only one that will be feeling the six paths of pain...
biggamefish
7 months ago
Almighty push is coming
aenews2
7 months ago
Serious cope
Spartan37
7 months ago
When Cochise finally comes in, and Yavapai too, suddenly this will be extremely close.
aenews2
7 months ago
Yes. Doesn't matter what political leanings we have, it's about making money. I may be a libtard, but I bet big on Florida 12+ and 8+ margin, which people thought unlikely. Made almost 150K. Bet according to the data, not your political beliefs and hopes.
aenews2
7 months ago
Where did all the Lake buyers here come from? Are you MAGA money? Curious. Personally, been here since 2021. How about you?
aenews2
7 months ago
So why didn't Harris win?
REEEEEEEEEE
7 months ago
Election lawyer saying "More than 48K voters in AZ had their votes erased at MCTEC. None of the voters who had their votes "backed out" and "retabulated" can be sure that their votes were counted as originally cast (or even counted at all)." He suspects those votes were retabulated as Gallego votes. AZ GOP put out a notice saying their call centers are being flooded with people calling about canceled ballots - canceled ballots cannot be cured. https://x.com/Ryan_L_Heath/status/1854713842586001518
aenews2
7 months ago
Yep, great site. I enjoy trading here =)
aenews2
7 months ago
Where did all the Lake buyers here come from? Are you MAGA money? Curious. Personally, been here since 2021. How about you?
aenews2
7 months ago
January 2021 to be precise, first trade was on Biden inauguration. As expected, he was inaugurated a few days later.
aenews2
7 months ago
Where did all the Lake buyers here come from? Are you MAGA money? Curious. Personally, been here since 2021. How about you?
aenews2
7 months ago
Where did all the Lake buyers here come from? Are you MAGA money? Curious. Personally, been here since 2021. How about you?
aenews2
7 months ago
Remember when Trump was at 90c to win the Presidency a few days ago? This is about as certain as that was back then. We're probably going straight to 100 unless Lake gets some semi-decent drops in.
Spartan37
7 months ago
I cannot even imagine being dumb enough to buy Gallego yes at 90% right now. Horrible, horrible odds given the outstanding ballots.
aenews2
7 months ago
Not really. My only queue for Lake is at 2.1c. It's just kinda fun posting here, tbh.
aenews2
7 months ago
If you're still buying Lake here, I suggest you put an end to your suffering and move on.
aenews2
7 months ago
If you're still buying Lake here, I suggest you put an end to your suffering and move on.
aenews2
7 months ago
gg
david689314
7 months ago
Breaking another small drop: Arizona - Santa Cruz batch drop: Lake +411 (28.56%) Gallego +954 (66.30%) Batch delta: Gallego +543
aenews2
7 months ago
Or rather, they don't favor her significantly enough to matter
Amandacoch
7 months ago
I thought the only counties left favored Kari?
aenews2
7 months ago
They don't
Amandacoch
7 months ago
I thought the only counties left favored Kari?
aenews2
7 months ago
Are you being serious right now? Clearly this is over 90% Gallego at this point
Spartan37
7 months ago
I've chosen to not risk any more than the 2.2k that I've put in. Just in case we get more average drops and it ends up not being enough. Or, Pima comes in strong for Gallego and Maricopa isn't strong enough for Lake. But I'm still saying this is a 60% chance for Lake right now. Holding for now.
aenews2
7 months ago
That is a bad drop for Lake lol
n/a
7 months ago
NEW Pinal County drop - Lake ~51%, Gallego: ~45% Gallego now only +1.1%
aenews2
7 months ago
Nice bro
JackBeTrader
7 months ago
that means there are about 124K Election Day drop offs out there to process. Those will go big for Lake you can see it in the turnout party splits
aenews2
7 months ago
lol
JackBeTrader
7 months ago
that means there are about 124K Election Day drop offs out there to process. Those will go big for Lake you can see it in the turnout party splits
aenews2
7 months ago
woah!
n/a
7 months ago
NEW Pinal County drop - Lake ~51%, Gallego: ~45% Gallego now only +1.1%
aenews2
7 months ago
I admit I am retarded for not buying more at 75c
aenews2
7 months ago
Correct
mona.lisa
7 months ago
Lol future dumps are going to be MORE NARROW, not stronger for Lake: https://x.com/Garrett_Archer/status/1855067895224512953
aenews2
7 months ago
Remember when we discussed pop vote? I was right!
mona.lisa
7 months ago
The liberal Lake supporters keep pointing out my 8k loss. Fake news! I'm a business man. I used the bankruptcy laws of this country to do the right thing for my family, my business and the country. We don't need weak people like Kari Lake in the senate!
aenews2
7 months ago
Mb looks like I sold some at 93c, so it's $60K now.
aenews2
7 months ago
Trading against MAGAts is like taking candy from a baby
aenews2
7 months ago
I've seen enough. Ruben Gallego (D) has won the US Senate seat in Arizona.
aenews2
7 months ago
I have $100K on Gallego
aenews2
7 months ago
Trading against MAGAts is like taking candy from a baby
aenews2
7 months ago
Trading against MAGAts is like taking candy from a baby
aenews2
7 months ago
Maricopium
JackBeTrader
7 months ago
Kari got 50% of that Maricopa drop a little less than she needed to maintain previous pacing. However, still positive AND has been outperforming on pretty much every other drop, if other counties keep beating their previous numbers this turns more green again.
aenews2
7 months ago
I told you so!
aenews2
7 months ago
I'll be laughing to the bank making 10% on my 100K! Free money =)
zero96
7 months ago
https://x.com/nomoresilence80/status/1855053347860185457 52,51% of the remaining vote isnt impossible considering thats pretty much Trump's lead %
aenews2
7 months ago
cope
zero96
7 months ago
https://x.com/nomoresilence80/status/1855053347860185457 52,51% of the remaining vote isnt impossible considering thats pretty much Trump's lead %
aenews2
7 months ago
How would Lake win? Gallego is up and should be favored in the remaining ballots.
Spartan37
7 months ago
Is there any argument against Lake at this point? Anyone?
aenews2
7 months ago
Because it's a bond for Gallego unless you can't math
Supeg
7 months ago
Woah Lake actually gained again in the Pima drop. How is this still 15 cents lol.
aenews2
7 months ago
Amen, brother
Spartan37
7 months ago
Last night, I put $1000 into Lake at 5% because I saw it was criminally underrated. Now I might become rich. (That $1000 was just a fraction of how much I made this election)
aenews2
7 months ago
Not saying it won't be net R, but no chance the remaining Maricopa will be this red.
FUENTES
7 months ago
its over :(
aenews2
7 months ago
common sense
FUENTES
7 months ago
its over :(
aenews2
7 months ago
??? Zero chance that it's as red as this drop lol
FUENTES
7 months ago
its over :(
aenews2
7 months ago
Unless the batches everywhere are all heavy R slanted
aenews2
7 months ago
Nice pump folks, but Gallego is almost assuredly the winner. One good batch is not enough to overcome the deficit.
aenews2
7 months ago
Not ever lol
aenews2
7 months ago
Nice pump folks, but Gallego is almost assuredly the winner. One good batch is not enough to overcome the deficit.
aenews2
7 months ago
Nice pump folks, but Gallego is almost assuredly the winner. One good batch is not enough to overcome the deficit.
aenews2
7 months ago
nom nom nom
aenews2
7 months ago
Big if true
Samuellim
7 months ago
A 4% chance to buy a 0.9% lead that dems have, out of a 7 to 10% remaining pool of votes. I say that's a good small bet. Think about it.
aenews2
7 months ago
https://x.com/RalstonReports/status/1854329131615539368
aenews2
7 months ago
https://x.com/lxeagle17/status/1854330478985191610
aenews2
7 months ago
https://x.com/lxeagle17/status/1854330478985191610
aenews2
7 months ago
Buy more!
FBInformationsider
7 months ago
Ok I've seen enough
aenews2
7 months ago
Osborn has little to no chance of winning lol
Rayse
7 months ago
Why is Osborn crashing? I see no new info from yesterday.
aenews2
7 months ago
Same
Rayse
7 months ago
I just hope this gets to 99.9 quickly on election night
aenews2
7 months ago
Why?
badatthis
7 months ago
Iowa poll affects Florida. Yeah makes totally sense.
aenews2
7 months ago
I queued 57c, you'll need to fill me. I'm an addict and I can't get enough
aenews2
7 months ago
Oh God, im down 50K today it hurts so bad
aenews2
7 months ago
Oh God, im down 50K today it hurts so bad
aenews2
7 months ago
I am no longer hungry, got indigestion after Selzer
aenews2
7 months ago
😋 I'M STILL HUNGRY
aenews2
7 months ago
Feed me guys, I'm hungry
aenews2
7 months ago
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/release_dates.html
Stoop
7 months ago
when is data generally released?
aenews2
7 months ago
Yeah I'm not bullish anymore, so sold
easyn1
7 months ago
Its pretty warm here today
aenews2
7 months ago
Feed me guys, I'm hungry
aenews2
7 months ago
My ERA5-only projection of GISTEMP went up to 136 with the latest data. Not feeling as bullish as earlier this month, but it'll be fairly close even if it doesn't make it.
easyn1
7 months ago
Its pretty warm here today
aenews2
7 months ago
Lol today was the highest anomaly this year since early February
easyn1
7 months ago
Its pretty warm here today
aenews2
7 months ago
Naw Ficher has it in the bag, maybe I won't buy more at this price tho
Rayse
7 months ago
I really hope we get a neutral poll before the election. Its crazy that there hasn't been one yet.
aenews2
7 months ago
Seems pretty clear consensus to me
n/a
7 months ago
Clearly, the last thing we have atleast in the comment section - is consensus 😂
aenews2
7 months ago
Seriously?
enderone
7 months ago
$51,012,404 is the final number. Time to resolve this prediction.
aenews2
7 months ago
The rules definitely say consensus of internet retards, good point
n/a
7 months ago
Clearly, the last thing we have atleast in the comment section - is consensus 😂
aenews2
7 months ago
Also Osborn +1 (RV) though that isn't a big deal
aenews2
7 months ago
NYT/Sienna: Fischer +2 (LV)
aenews2
7 months ago
Nebraska Senate 🟥 Fischer (inc): 48% 🟨 Osborn: 46%
aenews2
7 months ago
NYT/Sienna: Fischer +2 (LV)
aenews2
7 months ago
NYT/Sienna: Fischer +2 (LV)
aenews2
7 months ago
NYT/Sienna dropped shit
Rayse
7 months ago
I really hope we get a neutral poll before the election. Its crazy that there hasn't been one yet.
aenews2
7 months ago
Ok, now you next!
aenews2
7 months ago
The commit period will last for 24 hours, and the reveal for another 24 hours. Afterwards, the market will resolve to the consensus answer assuming it has met quorum. Meaning, in 45 hours, the market will resolve to Yes and shares can be redeemed.
aenews2
7 months ago
Sell your shares before they go to zero!
aenews2
7 months ago
The commit period will last for 24 hours, and the reveal for another 24 hours. Afterwards, the market will resolve to the consensus answer assuming it has met quorum. Meaning, in 45 hours, the market will resolve to Yes and shares can be redeemed.
aenews2
7 months ago
It will never be proposed Yes again, don't worry. Your shares will be redeemable for $0 once the dispute ends.
AceBeaker
7 months ago
If this seriously gets proposed as yes another time, this website is a complete scam
aenews2
7 months ago
The commit period will last for 24 hours, and the reveal for another 24 hours. Afterwards, the market will resolve to the consensus answer assuming it has met quorum. Meaning, in 45 hours, the market will resolve to Yes and shares can be redeemed.
aenews2
7 months ago
45 hours now before it resolves Yes
aenews2
7 months ago
Reminder that market will resolve in 46.4 hours, then we'll be able to redeem our shares
aenews2
7 months ago
Lol
MeNoDatNutReelMuni
7 months ago
poly will scam this to a yes like they did with the trump coin
aenews2
7 months ago
There's a clear consensus, sorry
SirBra
7 months ago
This is frankly ridiculous that Polymarket put a statement out on this when there isn’t a consensus. Damage recon is still being done. There was early reporting that there was bombing in Iraq but they just heard it from over the border. Since then no one has said Iraq was attacked. At the very least the market shouldn’t resolve until the damage recon is done. You literally cannot find anything mentioning that Iraq was struck after the early reports that were later dismissed. Don’t you think all the reports talking about Israel launching from Iraq would contain word about how they hit Iraq as well? Where there are none. This is a terrible precedent to set if they close out the market early before it’s truly determined.
aenews2
7 months ago
Reminder that market will resolve in 46.4 hours, then we'll be able to redeem our shares
aenews2
7 months ago
*yawn*
n/a
7 months ago
If this seriously resolves to "yes" just because a polymarket staff member decided so, I will unironically spend the next week to make sure that more people hear about how rigged and centralized this platform really is. Polymarket staff members should NOT have the right to just add "additional context" and resolve the market themselves, it goes against the entire concept of the platform.
aenews2
7 months ago
It will be in 46.4 hours
Matter15
7 months ago
I can’t find any information on this ? How is this resolved yes?
aenews2
7 months ago
Let's go N bros! /s
Shekel
7 months ago
By the way, previous 100K+ Yes holder @aenews2 switched to 70K+ No position. She was also active spreading bullsh*t on Uma discord. This is how it works 🤘
aenews2
7 months ago
what does that mean
NERA
7 months ago
this is the craziest "No" Remontada ever in this Platform
aenews2
7 months ago
What's happening??
YaronL16
7 months ago
Yes holders starting to sell, wake up people its gonna be a no
aenews2
7 months ago
Feeling nervous yet, Billy?
aenews2
7 months ago
It's just how the values are rounded. You're thinking too hard.
TimeTraveler
7 months ago
Jatinder should work on his basic math though, again 0.5M off (22+16.5=38.5) on his own estimate.
aenews2
7 months ago
What?
TimeTraveler
7 months ago
Jatinder should work on his basic math though, again 0.5M off (22+16.5=38.5) on his own estimate.
aenews2
7 months ago
I'd do 81c
aenews2
7 months ago
Where are the Osborn believers? I want MOAR Fischer!
aenews2
7 months ago
Amen
Predicto123
7 months ago
We might be cooked fam 💀
aenews2
7 months ago
Where are the Osborn believers? I want MOAR Fischer!
aenews2
7 months ago
Bet still has plenty of room to end either way at this point
aenews2
7 months ago
As always, thanks for donating =)
aenews2
7 months ago
@TheBillyBoy It's a joke, I love you brother =)
aenews2
7 months ago
As always, thanks for donating =)
aenews2
7 months ago
@TheBillyBoy Sorry, but I'm drinking your tears, Billy Boy. Your tip is my sell order, possibly the last chance to exit if things continue going downhill 😉
aenews2
7 months ago
As always, thanks for donating =)
aenews2
7 months ago
Special thanks to Billy!
aenews2
7 months ago
As always, thanks for donating =)
aenews2
7 months ago
As always, thanks for donating =)
aenews2
7 months ago
The amendment won't pass lol
Erick1025
8 months ago
This market will be determined, by how many turn out for the abortion amendment. Those voting for the amendment, are then going to vote for Trump and Vance? Don’t think so.
aenews2
7 months ago
Love these markets!
CPU
8 months ago
Temp markets are so much better than shitcoins (im coping)
aenews2
8 months ago
🔥🔥🔥
Schorle65
8 months ago
Curious to hear your thoughts on this. So far, 15 out of 17 days in October 2024 have been colder than those of October 2023 (which was the hottest ever recorded). The data is based on the daily ERA5 update (global surface air and global sea temperatures), which overall is very close to the Global Land-Ocean Temperature
aenews2
8 months ago
Ok
aenews2
8 months ago
Well, it's too bad but I guess no one's willing to fill me anymore. Been fun, guys.
aenews2
8 months ago
Well, it's too bad but I guess no one's willing to fill me anymore. Been fun, guys.
aenews2
8 months ago
Please buy N and fill me!
johnveltk
8 months ago
Osborn at 35% now, up from 30% 2 days ago https://www.racetothewh.com/senate/24
aenews2
8 months ago
Because it won't
rtels2023
8 months ago
Still not sure why no one outside the campaigns is polling this race. It could determine the Senate majority.
aenews2
8 months ago
Last poll from her camp was +6, and this one was +7
EdgyUsername
8 months ago
What did her past internal polls say (for comparison's sake)?
aenews2
8 months ago
You're a time traveler, aren't you? Just buy the winning sharres!
TimeTraveler
8 months ago
Where's my boi Jatinder at with his estimates, how am I supposed to make decisions without him.
aenews2
8 months ago
🐔🐔🐔🐔🐔
aenews2
8 months ago
I told you it was resolving soon, jeez. Dumbasses.
aenews2
8 months ago
Alright, I gave in. I'll do 77c, I guess.
Rayse
8 months ago
Haha keep buying more shares I want this to get back down to 15 cents so I can buy in again. Fischer is toast.
aenews2
8 months ago
Meh just nothing to indicate Osborn has a chance, ignoring the rigged polling
EdgyUsername
8 months ago
The Republicans might win, but why are you so sure it's a lock. It looks like it could go either way. You might have thought of something I haven't, however.
aenews2
8 months ago
Naw, I'll buy at 75ish tho. If y'all are so confident that Fischer is cooked just fill me.
Rayse
8 months ago
Haha keep buying more shares I want this to get back down to 15 cents so I can buy in again. Fischer is toast.
aenews2
8 months ago
This is a lock, free money
aenews2
8 months ago
Osborn has no chance to win, imo
c4t4
8 months ago
First non-commissioned poll with Osborn up this thing goes 50/50. Get in now.
aenews2
8 months ago
im so scared bro!
Muromec
8 months ago
if you so confident, why you opening this market and writing here?
aenews2
8 months ago
naw bro maybe the UMA whales will side with the N guys for that 50X return ammiright?
Ferguson,Turd
8 months ago
High five to all the green share guys. We did it another successfully rigged market!
aenews2
8 months ago
How do these N tards expect to win when they can't even get the price to reach 5c?
aenews2
8 months ago
amen
Pen-Vitamin-Keys
8 months ago
Return to God
aenews2
8 months ago
Oh no I missed that new poll
aenews2
8 months ago
Just like the election!
SureBet745
8 months ago
No, you can endorse something without being directly involved
aenews2
8 months ago
Reading comprehension issues
Reaper01
8 months ago
Wtf NO guys why are you buying when Polymarket directly says you this will end YES
aenews2
8 months ago
Really?
SureBet745
8 months ago
No, you can endorse something without being directly involved
aenews2
8 months ago
Yes you get bond back once settled in 2 hours, plus $5 reward
mojos
8 months ago
will i get rewarded if i propose resolution on uma?
aenews2
8 months ago
He already did bro
MichaelBurryd
8 months ago
According to market logic, the future president of America is launching a crypto, couple weeks ago couldnt figure out a QR code
aenews2
8 months ago
If I had only stinkbid, I'd have been able to catch the dip to a few cents when you dumped, too.
aenews2
8 months ago
Ggs
aenews2
8 months ago
I deeply regret dumping at 45c
aenews2
8 months ago
Ggs
aenews2
8 months ago
Ggs
aenews2
8 months ago
Probably will be fixed later today
aenews2
8 months ago
Lol Mojo site changed the domestic number from $18,893,642 to $14,117,291, removed international, and global is now the previous domestic. Not that it matters, of course. Dumb site...
aenews2
8 months ago
Lol Mojo site changed the domestic number from $18,893,642 to $14,117,291, removed international, and global is now the previous domestic. Not that it matters, of course. Dumb site...
aenews2
8 months ago
I mean, that part isn't really up for debate
Erfank
8 months ago
How could you believe that they will anounce Trump was involved in this kind of action. It would bring lots of more cases to him by the democrats
aenews2
8 months ago
Why isn't naturalnoob buying more?
aenews2
8 months ago
Probably couple hours, dunno why people are still buying
dav1
8 months ago
When will the real 100% accurate number come out? On Tuesyda?
aenews2
8 months ago
It's /s
EdgyUsername
8 months ago
link? lol
aenews2
8 months ago
Thank you decap
Apsalar
8 months ago
everybody say thank you to decap for making the brackets interesting this week
aenews2
8 months ago
Surprised Y for 19+ is so low. Usually market is quick to react to Jatinder and Empire updates.
PickleRick
8 months ago
https://x.com/EmpireCityBO/status/1845658579606421640
aenews2
8 months ago
Yeah that's what I was saying earlier
Mountainman
8 months ago
You are going to make a windfall, and you held the whole time, without trading like a madman like me. Much deserved win. With that being said they are doing a call the day before launch, and the team is aware of this market. I still think we resolve YES but I wouldn't be suprised with some last second fuckery/FUD.
aenews2
8 months ago
I wonder what it tells us when the most vocal Y guy is downsizing
NIGGA
8 months ago
Nooo!! Mountaincuck, don’t size down when you’re so confident!!
aenews2
8 months ago
Such is life 😭
HouseAlwaysWins
8 months ago
so you couldnt be the biggest winner so now you decide to compete for biggest loser? 🤣🤣 🤣🤣
aenews2
8 months ago
It ain't over until the fat lady sings 👵 🎤
Mountainman
8 months ago
Now that it is over can we enjoy it just one more time???? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iP6XpLQM2Cs
aenews2
8 months ago
As the former #1 / #2 Yes Bro I will salute you
Myh
8 months ago
https://etherscan.io/token/0xdA5e1988097297dCdc1f90D4dFE7909e847CBeF6 token is already deployed lets wait just for official confirm and aenews2 blowjob
aenews2
8 months ago
I will paperhand both sides, going for a record
DonaldEnjoyer
8 months ago
Mr. Paperhands over here trying to offset his loss lol
aenews2
8 months ago
Good luck holding Y when they say they are launching November 5 or date unknown in the Spaces tomorrow
aenews2
8 months ago
Please Lord forgive me for forsaking the wisdom of the Great Mountain Man. Now let us return to 20c for the lols and for my pocketbook.
aenews2
8 months ago
If I still owned Y, I'd definitely be selling. But tbf, I am Mr. Paperhands.
PBet
8 months ago
never doubted this to be yes but still uncertain on whether it will be stolen
aenews2
8 months ago
Alright Y bros, I've got a nice sell wall for you
aenews2
8 months ago
Car is a very reputable commenter 😳
DonaldEnjoyer
8 months ago
real?
aenews2
8 months ago
Well Mojo updated with 18.3M weekend (est). Nice try, guys.
aenews2
8 months ago
Nice try bro
aLaT
8 months ago
IMPORTED message for all the participants. Let me clue you in to some facts. I know most of you get your numbers from Either (Jatinder from X.com) or (the-numbers.com) but it can be vary Deceiving too Use those numbers Because Box mojo and the-numbers use different sources for Number confirmation. Let me explain While "the-numbers" Use more wide Sourcing method to get numbers. Box mojo On the other hand take information only from the Movie Distributor (i.e Cineverse) "Cineverse" the new Distributor of "Terrifier 3" did not Manage to confirm yet the "preview" numbers of the movie So hence it wasn't included in the numbers dropped by Box mojo. Thus the "3-day opening weekend" Will not include the preview until their Distributor Managed to confirm the numbers of the preview. also note That it happens a lot of time to other movies, thats way Rules say "(which typically includes Thursday's previews)" With emphasis on (typically) Because sometimes it just Happened Just like now.
aenews2
8 months ago
Ah yeah I also got the failed trxs
TwistedFate
8 months ago
i sold my shares as this market is clearly bugged, i don't want to get fked by a bug or whatever; after making a big market trade i got all the notification and stuff as it worked with "outgoing USDC", also charts have moved, orders disappeared from order book but nothing shoed up in activity neither i got anything, i can't stand it anymore, here proof if someone needs; https://i.gyazo.com/32c87d6738865db1d4c41d1e1d14a031.png https://i.gyazo.com/621afd765d6402e29616a13c531d5006.png
aenews2
8 months ago
Wasn't it tied in 2000?
MontyWalsh
8 months ago
trump beat biden by 3.4% in 2000. very low probability he wins by 8
aenews2
8 months ago
@Itzcoffeez Previews on Mojo (and all reporting outlets) are rolled into opening day. So Wednesday/Thursday previews are part of Friday's gross. New traders get confused by this every market and donate to the sharps, but that's the way the industry does it.
TimeTraveler
8 months ago
These margins are pretty thin: https://x.com/meJat32/status/1845290226417107221
aenews2
8 months ago
Only seems thin because we're dealing with a low grossing film. A 1M difference here is like ~10M difference for a 100M film. 8.2M is the final for Friday. With 5.5M Saturday, that's a 13.8M. Even with a 45% drop on Sunday, it'll still be over 16M for the weekend.
TimeTraveler
8 months ago
These margins are pretty thin: https://x.com/meJat32/status/1845290226417107221
aenews2
8 months ago
Do you want my shares bro
Clenc
8 months ago
it is 29 at 1:35:23 he said "Bor" and not all the word
aenews2
8 months ago
We cooked?
aenews2
8 months ago
Disputed
R13
8 months ago
Glover or someone else dispute time is running out
aenews2
8 months ago
Time to take the gloves off Glover, don't let Team Y get away with this one!
aenews2
8 months ago
Truth is I didn't watch this rally and didn't count, but it's just dumb money on N
aenews2
8 months ago
If people tell me it's a bond, I buy! ez money
Eridpnc
8 months ago
hey guys look it's aenews, he spent 20k because he hallucinated an extra border and wants to scam you
aenews2
8 months ago
Guess the Border N truthoors have given up, sad
aenews2
8 months ago
True, I can't argue with that!
Mountainman
8 months ago
Well you have made so many bad bets lately BUT have made even more Good bets ;)
aenews2
8 months ago
Not really, I'm still up 40K for the month. But yeah, it really should have been 60K, at least. Shouldn't have paper-handed.
Mountainman
8 months ago
You have been making so many bad bets lately. Such a shame.
aenews2
8 months ago
Sold it like a chump at 45c, that's the joke
Tenebrus7
8 months ago
What happened to your 70k Yes position in that market? If I recall correctly oo? I am always on the wrong side of volatility in this market oo
aenews2
8 months ago
Can we go back to 45c for old time's sake?
aenews2
8 months ago
What's the date?
eb..
8 months ago
what really counts here is a document called roadmap. in that document, according to the reporters, it is written that a token will be deployed in a certain date, in the next week. so, that is it.
aenews2
8 months ago
No one critically thinking believes there's an issue re:involvement of Trump. He's involved. And the idea that past NFT's count is also dumb. Currently, it's just a question of when WLFI deploys a token. Seems likely before election, but who knows really. We shall see, though I guess I'm out of the market for now.
Justifax
8 months ago
aenews, car, pence thing the scam will be based on something technical cucky, like trump isn't legally involved. others are betting on common sense reality, like the video he tweeted promoting it. i think common sense will win, and maybe this should be a bit higher, but who knows these days. credibility is at a low point
aenews2
8 months ago
Let's see
Mountainman
8 months ago
Most likely the frauds will try to dump the price again, if so you'll have the chance to hop back in.
aenews2
8 months ago
I know, I regret my sells already
Mountainman
8 months ago
Too bad you left, you had a nice sized win coming your way.
aenews2
8 months ago
@Le-King Because for them to milk as nuch money off the project as possible, they should aim to launch before the election. Either Trump wins and he's set to no longer be a private citizen, or he loses and the Trump brand becomes far weaker.
aenews2
8 months ago
https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-world-liberty-financial-aave-v3-instance-on-ethereum-mainnet-proposal/19383
aenews2
8 months ago
Looks like they'll be able to launch by the end of the month if they're aiming for pre-election.
aenews2
8 months ago
https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-world-liberty-financial-aave-v3-instance-on-ethereum-mainnet-proposal/19383
aenews2
8 months ago
What does that have to do with token deployment?
Tentaclecracy
8 months ago
Aside from past coin conjectures, I find really difficult for world liberty financial to launch their 0 yield non transferable "governance" token before the election, because they aim at issuing it as unregistered security (hence the 1 million min capital for qualified investors) and that exception requires approval from SEC which is controlled by the Democrats. I don't see this happening any time soon, the Democrat majority in SEC will vote No or in the best case slow it down with a fair amount of red tape.
aenews2
8 months ago
https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-world-liberty-financial-aave-v3-instance-on-ethereum-mainnet-proposal/19383
aenews2
8 months ago
Sure DM me @aenews_PI on X or @aenews on Discord
Lawyered.eth
8 months ago
sigh. happy to hash it out via dm's on X if you want... but I really think you should think this through. That's a lot of dough and I'm virtually positive you are going to lose.
aenews2
8 months ago
So when are they going to release then?
dimmas
8 months ago
No, Trump definitely won't release a coin in his name before the election, even if Barron's really asked for it. Yesterday, the NYT published an article titled “The ‘Crypto Punks’ Behind Trump's Murky New Business Venture” that two of his crypto partners are former crooks. He won't take any chances when the entire election is decided by a few thousand votes in two or three states.
aenews2
8 months ago
Sweet, guess I can rebuy the shares I sold
aenews2
8 months ago
I can't believe this, I never thought we'd go out this way... cold and alone waiting for the rescue that never came
aenews2
8 months ago
Hopefully next week, I want this market over with already
Car
8 months ago
What does soon mean
aenews2
8 months ago
"The @WorldLibertyFi token sale is coming soon! Don’t miss out—only those on the whitelist will be able to participate. Link in bio"
aenews2
8 months ago
https://x.com/worldlibertyfi/status/1843414417536634902?t=Fo5hrzUubq-tV70-NhArpQ&s=19
aenews2
8 months ago
https://x.com/worldlibertyfi/status/1843414417536634902?t=Fo5hrzUubq-tV70-NhArpQ&s=19
aenews2
8 months ago
Did I really derisk at the bottom before this wins? Fek
aenews2
8 months ago
I doubt that is true
PolyRig-Fried
8 months ago
Also this dispute is the ONLY time this year where the popular vote doesn not eqal to the total votes for the final resolution: https://x.com/primo_data/status/1843378713662238748
aenews2
8 months ago
ok
aenews2
8 months ago
Balz against the Walz rn, hucker down team
aenews2
8 months ago
gn
aenews2
8 months ago
It's too bad YouGov wasn't 1 point better for Walz
yoonmarketenjoyer
8 months ago
Bros are we getting scammed? Where the FUCK is the poll?
aenews2
8 months ago
u the GOAT
TooDumbToWin
8 months ago
personally i'm all in bro
aenews2
8 months ago
cause ur a fatass duck dude
Secret14thKey
8 months ago
i don't understand, i was informed that yes is an absolute mortal lock. why is no one filling my orders
aenews2
8 months ago
Meh. Every reputable poll has been close to even: +2 Vance, +1 Vance, or tied
MAGAKen
8 months ago
This is a load of bullcrap. Anyone with two eyes and ears can tell you JD Vance dominated the debate. The immediate post debate poll showed JD Vance won. Every other poll has shown JD Vance won, but I bet you're waiting to cherry pick the one poll full of paint chip eating idiots who says Walz won and you're gonna take off with people's money. I bought JD Vance at 29 cents because I knew it was a bargain, and was familiar with JD Vance's debating style, it was a bargain for me. JD Vance exceeded expectations, NOW PAY UP or I'll be laywering up.
aenews2
8 months ago
Is this really what the Vance guys are betting on? Look. Y'all may win. But it'll be razer close. This is not the bond you think it is.
Balls2theWalz
8 months ago
Of 13 Liberal New York Times columnists, only 2 said Walz won. One of which was “just barely.” All 11 others said Vance won. This is the LIBERAL NEW YORK TIMES. Reuters is not rigging this poll.
aenews2
8 months ago
Walz won IMO but I'm a LIB. For the purposes of this market, seems like a coin flip.
Balls2theWalz
8 months ago
Why would anyone in their right mind bet on Walz. We all know he lost.
aenews2
8 months ago
I did, I think
Glorp
8 months ago
when is this shit coming out
aenews2
8 months ago
np, put up a bit more if you want
watever345
8 months ago
thanks
aenews2
8 months ago
Just crapped and I feel better now
aenews2
8 months ago
When I take a crap, pretty close to my toilet 🚽
aenews2
8 months ago
Last chance to sell for 0.1c guys. I'm pulling my sell order in an hour.
aenews2
8 months ago
When I take a crap, pretty close to my toilet 🚽
Glorp
8 months ago
when is this shit coming out
aenews2
8 months ago
Yep
Waifu Hunter
8 months ago
did anyone notice aenews shares from 500k++ yes to 400k yes lol? he is exiting xD
aenews2
8 months ago
Yes 99.18% (1,946,401.8) vs. Early Request 0.82% (16,097.04)
aenews2
8 months ago
Yes 98.67% (1,198,718.02) vs. Early Request 1.33% (16,097.04)
aenews2
8 months ago
You're mixing it up with the other vote. The current results are 98.48% Yes and 1.52% P4.
Shayku
8 months ago
It's actually Early requ... 2.36% (16,046.42) Yes 55.20% (375,355.17) unknown/50... 42.44% (288,606.25) ... with still 96% of votes to be revealed
aenews2
8 months ago
97.6% P2 Yes
aenews2
8 months ago
Seriously? Dump your bags now. Stop holding worthless shares.
aenews2
8 months ago
Final resolution is Yes, will be resolved in 23.5 hours
n/a
8 months ago
Whatever the final resolution is, it shouldn't be voted by the stakeholders. Makes 0 sense...
aenews2
8 months ago
Reveal period is 24 hours
aenews2
8 months ago
Gg
aenews2
8 months ago
You should exit before your shares are worth zero.
JustGambling - 3165
8 months ago
Can someone link some background on how this voting works? How do I know that I'm not getting scammed?
aenews2
8 months ago
Last chance for dumbos to sell before their shares go to zero
aenews2
8 months ago
Gg
aenews2
8 months ago
Gg
aenews2
8 months ago
Sold out my N, this is dumb
aenews2
8 months ago
Because Yes is the correct answer. Who knows how UMA will rule tho
MyLossIsYourGain
8 months ago
50Pence and aenews are buying no while their pre-flip comments are still up in UMA discussions.
aenews2
8 months ago
No one should be confident, it's very close
donky
8 months ago
Again... the odds pre debate were 70 to 30 Walz. Post 70 to 30 Vance. This is a 80 point swing. We all know what we saw. Were just waiting to see of media biased can cover up a 80 point public opinion swing. Anythings possible. Thats why all the Walz bets were made. They figured performance + bias easy win. Then theybsaw the debate and said oh F@#$!
aenews2
8 months ago
Reporting seems pretty split, and reputable polls have been close to even
handiggity
8 months ago
Aka the market prices in a ~35% chance of media bias
aenews2
8 months ago
And of course the Vance people will boast even if Vance wins by 1%
donky
8 months ago
Again... the odds pre debate were 70 to 30 Walz. Post 70 to 30 Vance. This is a 80 point swing. We all know what we saw. Were just waiting to see of media biased can cover up a 80 point public opinion swing. Anythings possible. Thats why all the Walz bets were made. They figured performance + bias easy win. Then theybsaw the debate and said oh F@#$!
aenews2
8 months ago
Can't wait for meltdown here if Walz eeks this out
donky
8 months ago
Again... the odds pre debate were 70 to 30 Walz. Post 70 to 30 Vance. This is a 80 point swing. We all know what we saw. Were just waiting to see of media biased can cover up a 80 point public opinion swing. Anythings possible. Thats why all the Walz bets were made. They figured performance + bias easy win. Then theybsaw the debate and said oh F@#$!
aenews2
8 months ago
Time to tear down the wall
aenews2
8 months ago
Yeah 0% chance of hottest
ImHereForTheRewards
8 months ago
ERA5 Results are out for September. By their metrics (Daily mean absolute global mean near-surface (2m) air temperature): Sep23=16.377 Sep24=16.174
aenews2
8 months ago
I have zero sell orders, so no I'm not desperate. Hoping to ride to victory cause Vance is a snake oil salesman.
DS831228
8 months ago
Just open EU newspapers and pools- they are like 90/10 in Vance favor. I didn't watch anything, but if our left sided media says vance won i don't need any more info. GL guys
aenews2
8 months ago
Nice fat block at 20c for y'all
aenews2
8 months ago
Feel free to fill me if y'all are so confident it's a 🔒
aenews2
8 months ago
Fill me Vancetard 😆
DS831228
8 months ago
Just open EU newspapers and pools- they are like 90/10 in Vance favor. I didn't watch anything, but if our left sided media says vance won i don't need any more info. GL guys
aenews2
8 months ago
Alright, buy more then?
n/a
8 months ago
Ridiculous. Walz was thrashed.
aenews2
8 months ago
Feel free to fill me if y'all are so confident it's a 🔒
aenews2
8 months ago
I don't understand why people are so confident about this, could land either way
aenews2
8 months ago
Ok bro
Wayback
8 months ago
i just laughed at Walz buyers, theyre so delusional to think that he won, its crazy
aenews2
8 months ago
💩💩💩
Jayson242
8 months ago
Vance definitely won this debate. He was calm, collected, and was very confident. I think both Walz and Vance did pretty well, but Vance was better at answering questions, and walz just looked like he was crying because he was about to crap his pants the whole debate.
aenews2
8 months ago
Naw this is very close
Wayback
8 months ago
I just laughed at Walz buyers, because they're delusional to think that Vance lost.
aenews2
8 months ago
Will laugh at the Vance buyers if they lose this one
aenews2
8 months ago
The salty tears... I can't wait
AppleADay
8 months ago
did we watch the same debate?
aenews2
8 months ago
Vance is great at lying with a straight face, and he easily came off as more confident whereas Walz started off nervous. But VP debate watchers are more politically in tune than the Presidential. So I'd expect Walz to edge this.
donky
8 months ago
Anyone saying Walz won is delusional. This was a professional debater vs a school teacher and the teach got schooled. Not close. Those who bet Walz bet because the thought the media would bail them out are in for a big surprise. Only worse beat down was the recent Trump vs Biden.
aenews2
8 months ago
Why
BoeJiden420
8 months ago
-$4,300 lol
aenews2
8 months ago
Easy dubs
aenews2
8 months ago
I'm out, peace ✌
aenews2
8 months ago
Largest incursion into their territory in TWO DECADES, and multiple tanks have crossed the border along with actual ground troops. This is clearly not the type of special ops the rules are intended to exclude.
aenews2
8 months ago
"The Israeli military began a ground invasion of southern Lebanon, targeting what it said early Tuesday was Hezbollah military infrastructure in villages close to the Israel-Lebanon border, the first such incursion by Israel into its northern neighbor’s territory in nearly two decades." - New York Times
aenews2
8 months ago
"The Israeli military began a ground invasion of southern Lebanon, targeting what it said early Tuesday was Hezbollah military infrastructure in villages close to the Israel-Lebanon border, the first such incursion by Israel into its northern neighbor’s territory in nearly two decades." - New York Times
aenews2
8 months ago
You do realize November already resolved Yes, right?
NotJustKen
8 months ago
No point arguing. 50pence & aenews2 bought $800k worth of shares in Israel enter lebanon market, and UMA token price rose by 12% in last 24hrs . So I guess this is rigged. Whales can buy whatever they want and vote as per thier choice by stocking the UMA tokens. truth doesnt really matters
aenews2
8 months ago
Keep coping
JoeBETS
8 months ago
If they said war operations, sure but they specifically stated COMBAT OPERATIONS, acquiring intel is not that PERIOD. If there's no new update and this resolves as YES Polymarket should be ashamed of themselves for falling into peer pressure and mob mentality like that. Disgusting
aenews2
8 months ago
50Pence and I will resolve the market, many are saying this (joke)
ANONYMOUS.
8 months ago
Who controls final review?
aenews2
8 months ago
Some serious copium
aenews2
8 months ago
People are still fading this market?
aenews2
8 months ago
Wdym
Justifax
8 months ago
Selling as a whale is trying to scam the market. Very sad and unfortunate, but not surprising.
aenews2
8 months ago
Clear site cookies and log back in first
Caligulas.dog
8 months ago
Using mobile? I noticed polymarket mobile page has issues atm. I couldn't sell my shares there
aenews2
8 months ago
Good luck with your argument
shinigami.3
8 months ago
Rip yes holders https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-822290
aenews2
8 months ago
"However, Israel has just succeeded in significantly degrading Hezbollah’s capabilities without putting a single troop on the ground in Lebanon — at least for now." - Punchbowl News
shinigami.3
8 months ago
Rip yes holders https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-822290
aenews2
8 months ago
You can average down if you still believe there's a shot. Though... I don't think so.
CultArtist
8 months ago
i will ride this to zero
aenews2
8 months ago
thanks for playing
aenews2
8 months ago
Welcome back!
Hungrytoad
8 months ago
might buy back in .. big
aenews2
8 months ago
Tick tock naturalnoob 🕦
aenews2
8 months ago
Huobi is a Chinese exchange
McLarry
8 months ago
Polymarket didn't even have the decency to say that there would probably be no more announcements. Pathetic, but this way the Chinese can see straight away what kind of business Polymarket is.
aenews2
8 months ago
It's alright, that was my bad for sure
YatSen
8 months ago
死人妖和孙炒流量,流量过了就烂尾不管了,polymarket第一个国人盘就这样rug了,毫无信用,无视规则。The first Polymarket for Chinese users got rugged like this—zero credibility and completely ignoring the rules. What a joke!
aenews2
8 months ago
You're lucky I left limits up and let you effectively roll back most your trades at 30c.
YatSen
8 months ago
死人妖和孙炒流量,流量过了就烂尾不管了,polymarket第一个国人盘就这样rug了,毫无信用,无视规则。The first Polymarket for Chinese users got rugged like this—zero credibility and completely ignoring the rules. What a joke!
aenews2
8 months ago
That seems compelling to me, personally
mr.ozi
8 months ago
Here's another one: https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1831512664507314308 For me, this is explicit enough. They are clarifying what they're supporting. It's Harris's official Twitter account.
aenews2
8 months ago
I give up, the insiders are too stronk
aenews2
8 months ago
So I unfortunately know a thing or two about Justin Sun
uxzi
8 months ago
Man. But, "If no announcement is made by Huobi by September 30, 2024, 8:00 PM (UTC+8), this market will resolve to 50-50."
aenews2
8 months ago
Justin Sun is a flaker tho, no? I had all crypto in TRX before I did Polymarket.
uxzi
8 months ago
Man. But, "If no announcement is made by Huobi by September 30, 2024, 8:00 PM (UTC+8), this market will resolve to 50-50."
aenews2
8 months ago
Good chance they flake? Even delaying would be enough, if not.
uxzi
8 months ago
Man. But, "If no announcement is made by Huobi by September 30, 2024, 8:00 PM (UTC+8), this market will resolve to 50-50."
aenews2
8 months ago
Do the Chinese even use sarcasm to the extent it is used in the West?
Fred19999
8 months ago
Because we understand the sarcasm in her tweets, and know the probability of a random person being trans. It's not rocket science.
aenews2
8 months ago
How so? I bought at 30c
BlackSky123
8 months ago
看来你自己也相当有信心。
aenews2
8 months ago
Why are people so confident? Idgi
aenews2
8 months ago
NaturalNoob should just DM me on Discord. Let's negotiate an exit, brother!
Mountainman
8 months ago
Love seeing the big "NO" holders starting to unload serious amounts of their shares, some leaving all together. Some were up BIG and now selling close to break even…. Watch the panic set in after their winning positions go underwater with no one to dump on. "Yes" doesn't even need anyone buying to skyrocket, just "NO" unwinding their positions :) Tik Tok ladies and gents, Tik Tok.
aenews2
8 months ago
Polymarket is basically determining the market, not UMA
Gena🐊
8 months ago
Not high enough for your entry point, but with your UMA lobbying powers I would say your EV is break even
aenews2
8 months ago
So what are the odds Huobi actually makes an announcement?
aenews2
8 months ago
too hot
gkg
8 months ago
Pretty much everywhere, it’s gonna be hot
aenews2
8 months ago
At long last, the streak has been broken! We shall be unburdened by what has been, global warming is over...
aenews2
8 months ago
Oh no
aenews2
8 months ago
ggs
aenews2
9 months ago
Maybe this is the last chance for Team N to come out winners 🙏🙏🙏
Lawyered.eth
9 months ago
pump it back to 75% let's run it again
aenews2
9 months ago
R.I.P.
LaCuriosidad
9 months ago
Apparently, yeah https://imgur.com/a/o72J02U
aenews2
9 months ago
It hurts, I know. But we will get through this brother
Hungrytoad
9 months ago
new market idea guys … WILL HUNGRY TOAD ROPEMAX place your bets in boys it’s a dirty world we live in
aenews2
9 months ago
You market sold all your shares at 7c
Hungrytoad
9 months ago
can someone explain where my money went ?
aenews2
9 months ago
"prediction markets.... get ready to cash your tickets, the answer is YES"
aenews2
9 months ago
I'm not the 2nd tho
Hungrytoad
9 months ago
aenews2 you took my place 😠 I liked being the number 2 holder
aenews2
9 months ago
hold my hand
aenews2
9 months ago
FEK
Mountainman
9 months ago
I’m sorry guys I was completely wrong. I thought that Farokh had a cryptocurrency podcast but I just found out that he is actually a famous Italian chef, and Trump is going onto the X Space to give his top secret lasagna recipe!!!!! SELL OFF YOUR “YES” while you still can!!!! Only 30 minutes left!!!
aenews2
9 months ago
I'm sweating bullets!
aenews2
9 months ago
Woah some serious diamond hands in this market
aenews2
9 months ago
Ok bro, I'm sure I'll lose more in this market than my Top 5 all time losses combined
LaCuriosidad
9 months ago
Last chance to sell for YES holders with Trump Coin Derangement Syndrome
aenews2
9 months ago
If any of you retardio N folks decide to dump, I'm keeping some sells open for you. Will pull an hour before the livestream!
aenews2
9 months ago
I don't understand why you are so confident. A lot of the Y holders are sharp traders and would be posting the largest L of their prediction market careers if this goes N.
Lawyered.eth
9 months ago
lol I'm a little worried but pretty confident
aenews2
9 months ago
🐔🐔🐔
aenews2
9 months ago
He's gonna lose, and he knows it
RememberAmalek
9 months ago
rekt u scared u gonna burn ur money betting on urself?
aenews2
9 months ago
Doubt it
LaCuriosidad
9 months ago
maybe cause they know something you don't
aenews2
9 months ago
Why are people still buying N on this?
aenews2
9 months ago
No?
Glover
9 months ago
CHINA 5+ THERE WE GO
aenews2
9 months ago
I do both. I buy early-middle, buy near the end, and buy start of the next month.
BonScott
9 months ago
Do tell no pple why you're so confident so early into September
aenews2
9 months ago
We've managed to make it every single month, even if only by a little. Now's finally the time, probably.
BonScott
9 months ago
Do tell no pple why you're so confident so early into September
aenews2
9 months ago
Pretty obvious what the rules intend and how the platform would rule
uxzi
9 months ago
As do I, specifically because I think the parameters surrounding the proposed resolution are very vague.
aenews2
9 months ago
Well it's a good sign you're on the wrong side. The good news? It's not too late to switch.
Whome
9 months ago
I hate being on the opposite side.of your bets.
aenews2
9 months ago
Fill me naysayers
aenews2
9 months ago
close to counting but rules say the cute furry animal with retractible claws
CouchWhale
9 months ago
Can I interest any 'fraudulent' buyers in my 'copycat' shares?
aenews2
9 months ago
I have yet to see a single reputable poll where Harris didn't win lol, even Republican pollsters had her up
Teumpwillwin
9 months ago
I can’t find a single big online poll where Harris won. This is some rigged shit. Polymarket is scamming people using a specific leftist poll while the title says “according to polls.”
aenews2
9 months ago
This is a very degen market
WhiteKing69
9 months ago
If i knew how to get crypto I would bet on this
aenews2
9 months ago
Moreover, Harris should be higher in the first place
Dick Cheney
9 months ago
If he has millions can’t he just overwhelm any other market action? We shall see
aenews2
9 months ago
What's the plan, chief?
wanyewest69
9 months ago
trump won the debate
aenews2
9 months ago
Harris is up on virtually every single prediction market and gambling site rn
Qualitative
9 months ago
Not a trump fan but too many people are trading this as if it's directly dependent on what happened in the debate vs an otm option with 1 dte.
aenews2
9 months ago
I did
Aldebaran
9 months ago
Put something up
aenews2
9 months ago
Where are the Trump fans?
aenews2
9 months ago
Thanks!
Thevsvsgs
9 months ago
Man your track record is Awesome
aenews2
9 months ago
Hate to say it, but I told you so 😆
aenews2
9 months ago
Woah so much liquidity for Trump holders to max buy worthless shares
aenews2
9 months ago
Sorry, but we'd RIG it anyways even if she makes a little oopsie, just like we RIGGED the election in 2020 👉
0x800977102c70ef82B2bE329585cAFB0AD03AA4c1-1724712090083
9 months ago
easy money your Indian non African candidate will lose
aenews2
9 months ago
That's every festival
Remontada
9 months ago
And if the coconut gets cracked?
aenews2
9 months ago
easy money, orange is getting SQUEEZED tonight
aenews2
9 months ago
Woo hoo! 😃
aenews2
9 months ago
It was published like an hour and 14 minutes ago, 11AM ET
n/a
9 months ago
How is it possible to close this bet before data was published by NASA ?
aenews2
9 months ago
I also have a few Y shares there
n/a
9 months ago
@aenews2 as long as yes hits on Kalshi I’ll survive lol
aenews2
9 months ago
I think it will, but only 87% confident there cause it's more narrow than this one
n/a
9 months ago
@aenews2 as long as yes hits on Kalshi I’ll survive lol
aenews2
9 months ago
Congrats and condolences to all, and see you in the next market!
aenews2
9 months ago
lolz love you too buddy
Eridpnc
9 months ago
Insider AKA Aescam at it again... stop trying to hack NASA GIsstemp we won't be fooled. Let's all chip in and market buy no. Just sold my kidneys, liquidity coming in soon.
aenews2
9 months ago
In a surprise to no one, the final is 130. Congrats and condolences to all, and see you in the next market.
aenews2
9 months ago
Implies hottest in GISTEMP
siim
9 months ago
Published a few days ago, and the data has been around, so not breaking news. But still interesting.
aenews2
9 months ago
True. Well, I do have multiple accounts in the first place, but most the action is from my main. You have a point. If nothing else tho, I kinda want to reach higher on the leaderboard.
raspberry17
9 months ago
hey @aenews2, have you considered betting on these temperature markets from alternate accounts? I figured it would tone down the vitriol from the jealous trolls, make it a bit harder for copycats, and hence maybe more enjoyable to all. Obviously you have done nothing wrong and it's totally OK if you like the current situation
aenews2
9 months ago
Post picture with Imgur, definitely don't believe that
aenews3
9 months ago
You did not parse the data correctly. I'm getting 119 every time.
aenews2
9 months ago
Where are you getting your information? The anomaly is roughly 130.
aenews3
9 months ago
You should have sold for profit when you had the chance. There will be little to no increase in temperature. It's a Tie.
aenews2
9 months ago
There's no mud. It'll likely be hotter in every single database. Won't be remotely close in GISTEMP. Last month was divided, and actually very close.
siim
9 months ago
No is absolutely underpriced here. The data is muddy enough that it's pretty clear that no isn't a 1% chance. The whales are selling off their positions incrementally to try to not spook the market, just check the activity tab.
aenews2
9 months ago
???
Fred19999
9 months ago
FUCK. Just sold my holdings after confirming. Thank you for sharing, I am forever grateful
aenews2
9 months ago
Are you finally realizing you're wrong? Well it's been fun.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
latest GHCN data shows 128, yikes. Should be fun though
aenews2
9 months ago
We are in ENSO Neutral, not La Nina. And the incoming La Nina is a weak La Nina. I don't understand if you are just trolling or this retarded.
aenews3
9 months ago
Ya and what come after is LA NINA !!!!
aenews2
9 months ago
Agreed. Price should be at 99.9 and it's been stubborn
0x330e1ed1f3A7Edfe00D2E02db7b2fb4CE34e77C0-1725898374832
9 months ago
The most mispriced market in the history of polymarket. They will write legends about me.
aenews2
9 months ago
El Nino has been over for 3-4 months, not really relevant
aenews3
9 months ago
If you mean El Nino is finally over you are correct. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/153058/el-nino-exits
aenews2
9 months ago
What conversion are you talking about?
analord
9 months ago
just tweaked the numbers of the JRP repository, returns 119 every time. 130 only returns if you don't account for the celsius/fahrenheit conversion in the first few lines
aenews2
9 months ago
Looks like the pump is finally over
aenews2
9 months ago
When will you stop pumping your bags
aenews3
9 months ago
We are going below average folks: Match this chart to NASAs #s. https://oz4caster.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/d1-gfs-gta-daily-2024-09-08.gif
aenews2
9 months ago
111M is pretty auspicious
aenews2
9 months ago
Assuming 2023 remains at 119, 2024 needs be at least 120. In reality, it'll be about 130.
BabyYoda12
9 months ago
What will the exact number required to be for it to finish as hottest on record?
aenews2
9 months ago
Do you... Want more? Always happy to fill you more at 4c. But fair warning that the shares are worthless as I explained in previous thread.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
every time im sad i dont have enough 1.20-1.24 shares, i see aenews is there to help!
aenews2
9 months ago
Land-Ocean anomaly on 1951-1980 base period, as posted by NASA/GISTEMP
MOA
9 months ago
Can some one explain what this is an increase over? August 2023? July 2024? It’s like children write these things…..
aenews2
9 months ago
I'm here
AppleADay
9 months ago
erm where is aenews2
aenews2
9 months ago
because the film was a big success
Ania-chan
9 months ago
It is weird that even a est, Fri and Sat have a same number
aenews2
9 months ago
I know you do lol. I guess either you are pumping your bags or you are retarded.
aenews3
9 months ago
You're right I suck at Math.
aenews2
9 months ago
Meh. I'd say 65% above 129, 35% 125-129, 0% everything else
joe.night2024
9 months ago
I hope so, but i guess, the probality for under 120 = 20%, between 120-129 = 70%, and above 129 = 10%.
aenews2
9 months ago
Ignore. It's a troll. Tho you should dump your N fr.
efren1983
9 months ago
are you selling now?
aenews2
9 months ago
NOAA uses the same GHCN+ERSST data that GISTEMP uses, and it was only 0.01° hotter. With the market rules at the time, it would have resolved N if NOAA was the resolution source. The reason I bet the way I did is because there was a buffer of 1 due to the downrevision. And indeed, it was incredibly close with GISTEMP landing at 1.39 vs the 1.37 strike in the market. If it had been 2 lower, N would have taken it.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Also, those that think Aenews is the reincarnation of Einstein, he was wrong about the March market, even though SST and ERA5-Land showed an increase in 2024 wrt 2023.
aenews2
9 months ago
It's objectively true, why are you saying "wrong"? I'm not doing any calculation, I'm just relaying the actual numbers.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Also, those that think Aenews is the reincarnation of Einstein, he was wrong about the March market, even though SST and ERA5-Land showed an increase in 2024 wrt 2023.
aenews2
9 months ago
It was an incredibly close market (like last month). NOAA and Berkeley Earth both reported only 0.01° hotter than the record. Moreover, revisions hurt Y in that market because it was pegged to the value itself not the record. If NOAA had been the resolution source, market would have resolved N on tie due to the 0.01° downrevision in both NOAA and GISTEMP.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Also, those that think Aenews is the reincarnation of Einstein, he was wrong about the March market, even though SST and ERA5-Land showed an increase in 2024 wrt 2023.
aenews2
9 months ago
And what is the anomaly in ERA5? That is a 131 anomaly. A tie in ERA5 in my model implies a median of about 127 in GISTEMP. Last year during El Nino, ERA5 kept outpacing GISTEMP. This differential has shrunk to very little the past few months, and we are back to historical normalcy on average.
aenews3
9 months ago
Uhhmmm This says he lies: https://x.com/Domahhhh/status/1555575974560993287
aenews2
9 months ago
I expect an apology once the data releases in a few days
aenews2
9 months ago
Ignore the crazy guy pumping in the comments. I was correct about 121 last month as well. I'm just sharing the alpha. This isn't remotely close, so y'all should save your money.
aenews2
9 months ago
ae-projection (Final): 130
aenews2
9 months ago
Hope not
n/a
9 months ago
https://x.com/SimbaSnell/status/1832621503969398890
aenews2
9 months ago
Please buy more N 🙏
sosuke
9 months ago
Friday 41.5 m and Saturday 41m ? No drop ? When's the last time you seen that happen for a movie no drop from Friday to Saturday
aenews2
9 months ago
Good one!
YoungGriff
9 months ago
I'm praying for my bags. Please lord forgive me for my greed. Please let the Beetlejuice lovers flee the theatres with terror, for the lols and for my pocketbook.
aenews2
9 months ago
Please take price back to 50
sosuke
9 months ago
Bidding 68c on 105m+ based off an early estimation is crazy
aenews2
9 months ago
Thanks, keep coping while I win both bets
aenews3
9 months ago
you spray and pray like a true larp. Your technical analysis is really top notch.
aenews2
9 months ago
Beetlejuice is a bond, wdym lol
aenews3
9 months ago
Ya I cant wait 3 days because I want to buy more beetlejuice box office lotto tickets. Larp Harder.
aenews2
9 months ago
As promised, I have a nice sell stack at 99.3c since I'm running low on cash. I recommend folks with N sell before they go to zero.
aenews2
9 months ago
1. The ERA5 data itself implies very low chance of N. 2. We have more data now, so it's definitive.
joe.night2024
9 months ago
Just to be Fair: aenews doesn't lie. He analyses correctly, or at least he really thinks so. And he has good arguments. He may be right. The possibility for Yes is bigger than possibilty for No. But the possibilty for No is bigger than 25%. So No buyer have a 25% chance to win. That means, they take the 25%-chance at the price of 2%-Chance. And that's why i bought No (in this market).
aenews2
9 months ago
Jk
aenews2
9 months ago
It's a BOND 🔐🔒🔐🔒
aenews2
9 months ago
It's a BOND 🔐🔒🔐🔒
Apsalar
9 months ago
say it a third time. i dare you.
aenews2
9 months ago
Gg... Again?
aenews2
9 months ago
Made more than 250K last month, try again
AiBets
9 months ago
aescams losing (zero predictive ability, he was copying others here) is a good day
aenews2
9 months ago
I'm praying for my bags. Please lord forgive me for my greed. Please let the Beetlejuice lovers swarm the theatres with glee, for the lols and for my pocketbook.
aenews2
9 months ago
Still have zero sell orders. Will add shortly tho, at 99.3
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
AENEWS wants you to dump your NO shares to get out of his position at 99.9 don't let him out!
aenews2
9 months ago
Why are you trying to make people lose money?
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
He has YES and No Shares and is trying to walk the price down. Create Doubt. Stick to your gut. Hold till reveal.
aenews2
9 months ago
I don't even have sell orders lol, tho I will add some soon since I'm still low on cash
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
AENEWS wants you to dump your NO shares to get out of his position at 99.9 don't let him out!
aenews2
9 months ago
ae-projection (Final): 130
aenews2
9 months ago
LOL. I made 175K last month alone, across accounts, across markets, and across sites.
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
you buying at 99 cents isnt profit ya larp.
aenews2
9 months ago
Pretty well, obviously. I've made 250K off them.
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
Already down bigly on September Hottest Month Market I see... How are your models working out for you?
aenews2
9 months ago
What a clown
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
3 more days till all your profits go bye bye. Start packing.
aenews2
9 months ago
You are a literal retard lol
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
It's a burner your models are trash. Keep buying beatlejuice box off and Kamala Shares you might get lucky.
aenews2
9 months ago
I think the guy larping is the maniac who spams the comments and owns zero shares.
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
Bro you are the biggest larp on PM. You and your idiot TG friends bought all those yes shares. These markets arent "projecting" Jack Shit. I cleared my schedule for Tuesday to watch you lose 400k. You deserve to get whipped out. We all know you are on the wrong side of the trade. MOG.
aenews2
9 months ago
I see this is landing about where was expected, a bit under the ERA5 anomaly of 131. Slightly overperforming my ERA5-only model.
joe.night2024
9 months ago
I don't have enough liquidity. And i am new to this market. And i care only for the end. You are smart. But maybe i see what you don't see.
aenews2
9 months ago
estimates are conservative tho
05brownboy
9 months ago
there was just to much optimism movie is underperforming the estimates
aenews2
9 months ago
If you disagree with the projection of the margin market, you should buy there and fade 1.30+. Moreover, if you were remotely close to right, it should be +EV to have 2c shares in this market and buy 5c shares of 1.20-1.24 in the margin. For 7c you win if not hottest and win if it is close! You probably won't tho cause you know your shares are worthless.
joe.night2024
9 months ago
And i expect every thing except 130 ;) only 3 day remainig ;)
aenews2
9 months ago
No. I said the market is projecting 130. Please re-read.
joe.night2024
9 months ago
If you are so sure, that it will be mor than 129, why don't you sell here and buy in the other market?
aenews2
9 months ago
While the margin market is projecting 130, real people here are still buying N. Y'all should be buying cheap in the other market if you think you're right.
aenews2
9 months ago
Well yeah, we have had the data since ERSST released on the 3rd. I already went big with 150K+ before that tho, so my modelling and analysis is simply superior.
BabyYoda12
9 months ago
even I am super curious. Imagine putting in $272K in a prediction market bet just to make $15K.
aenews2
9 months ago
Did I bond the wrong bracket? Or wagmi?
aenews2
9 months ago
Just woke up
AllForOne
9 months ago
@aenews2 what is going on bro ?
aenews2
9 months ago
More than one account and two markets, have sold and re-bought as well. So probably more like a 30K win, broski
BabyYoda12
9 months ago
even I am super curious. Imagine putting in $272K in a prediction market bet just to make $15K.
aenews2
9 months ago
Historically, the anomalies are close to even, with GISS slightly lower.
n/a
9 months ago
@aenews2 I am guessing you are so sure on yes because of historically higher temps from NASA datasets compared to copernicus?
aenews2
9 months ago
no matter how many times i smack it, it keeps coming back
Dangomil
9 months ago
Anyone know how to swat this mosquito?
aenews2
9 months ago
LOL
TimeTraveler
9 months ago
I'm giving 95-105 the best odds currently, this also means that I'm giving 85-95 and 105+ equal odds compared to eachother.
aenews2
9 months ago
Naw it's not just him. The estimates all align around 44M.
TimeTraveler
9 months ago
Also, Warner's and Deadlines's estimation (85-95) is now at 4% because some Indian guy is very good at predicting or something.
aenews2
9 months ago
Wagmi
PickleRick
9 months ago
https://x.com/meJat32/status/1832222409455186311
aenews2
9 months ago
You are delusional
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
Thanks for proving my point.
aenews2
9 months ago
Because I need cash for other markets
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
AE News will say he just wants liquidity to bet other markets but the truth is he doesnt trust his own data. The Real Batman is buying his worthless bags before the reveal!
aenews2
9 months ago
Bro you don't own any shares
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
uhoh the real batman buying AENews Trash YES. Whose gonna tell him!
aenews2
9 months ago
Shall see!
joe.night2024
9 months ago
My prediction: August 2024 anomaly will be 119 +/- 7 (112-126). Only 4 days remaining..
aenews2
9 months ago
It's impressive that the entire range is wrong despite the interval size
joe.night2024
9 months ago
My prediction: August 2024 anomaly will be 119 +/- 7 (112-126). Only 4 days remaining..
aenews2
9 months ago
I'm sure there will be promo's, but dunno about a regular $5 coming back.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
aenews2
9 months ago
@joe.night2024 You need to process the ERSST file to calculate
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
@joe.night2024 If you Google "ERSST", what you want is the top result which links to NOAA's website.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
Previews always count, you are simply wrong. They get rolled into Friday's number (or whatever the opening day is for a particular film).
TimeTraveler
9 months ago
It's a movie with a bunch of hardline fans, those tend to go to early screenings, but those hardline fans aren't representative for the general population, and the earnings from the early previews don't count for this bet either.
aenews2
9 months ago
@joe.night2024 You'd need to calculate it
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
The differential between GISTEMP and ERA5 that existed last year is gone. At this point, you should basically expect GISS to land on average slightly under the ERA5 anomaly.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
No, I'm taking everything into account there, including historical. You are just incorrect. What I'm saying applies before ERSST, tho. Since we have that now, we are good.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
I'd say judge for yourself
n/a
9 months ago
Seems more like $12m previews
aenews2
9 months ago
Deadline lowballs
n/a
9 months ago
Seems more like $12m previews
aenews2
9 months ago
A tie in ERA5 (131 anomaly) implies GISTEMP would be easily over, lol. 127 +/- 7 in my model. But yeah, we do have more data now.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
It's not remotely close. You must be messing up on your end.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
"We are likely at or near the peak for this warming event, as relative cooling is expected soon with the end of El Niño" June 2024
aenews2
9 months ago
Gg?
PickleRick
9 months ago
https://x.com/meJat32/status/1831926075477389819?t=NpkfiUj-mxnEqm5_cSB40A&s=19
aenews2
9 months ago
I don't want to spoonfeed all the information (though you can probably get the details from past markets). Just know that you're wrong, and you could have gleamed it from ERA5 alone even before ERSST dropped. GISTEMP anomaly should be pretty in line with ERA5.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
"We are likely at or near the peak for this warming event, as relative cooling is expected soon with the end of El Niño" June 2024
aenews2
9 months ago
Correction: Ocean slightly less, land way more!
Lowyrok
9 months ago
"We are likely at or near the peak for this warming event, as relative cooling is expected soon with the end of El Niño" June 2024
aenews2
9 months ago
@joe.night2024 NOAA's website
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
Where are you seeing that land is even with last year? You're living in an alternate reality, lol
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
Because the land is way hotter, it's not rocket science.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
💀 GISTEMP is Land+Ocean, silly
Lowyrok
9 months ago
" The current CPC/IRI analysis suggests that El Niño conditions will dissipate around Northern Hemisphere Summer in 2024. The current El Niño has weakened to a moderate intensity (after being roughly the 3rd strongest of the last 30 years) and is likely to continue dissipating over the next several months" - Berkley Earth, March 2024
aenews2
9 months ago
Surface air is the entire surface. Just as with the past few months, we'd expect the GISTEMP anomaly to be close to the ERA5 anomaly (131). Moreover, we have the data from ERSST now. So it's a done deal.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Aenew's model revolves around only air temperature, which was a minor factor in 2024, Ocean temp was causing records to be broken. I feel like Michael Burry right now
aenews2
9 months ago
GISS is Land+Ocean. So what if the ocean is slightly cooler? You need to look at both, then you'd see it's overall way hotter than last year. Or before ERSST, you could look at ERA5 surface air which captures the entire surface.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
aenews2
9 months ago
Looks like the insiders were right after all
aenews2
9 months ago
I think you're misreading. I'm saying it's irrelevant to look at only SST. We care about Land+Ocean. And we know roughly where it'll land because ERSST released on the 3rd. Again, I'm just saying this was a near certainty even before we got more data. Evidently, it's entirely dead now.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
aenews2
9 months ago
"Clear flip happening in july, with 0.1c disparity in august." Yeah that's pretty irrelevant, because GISTEMP is Land+Ocean.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
aenews2
9 months ago
Well ERSST releases on the 3rd, so more like I bet 200K or so before that release. The uncertainty is gone at this point. My point tho is that even before that, it was a done deal.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
aenews2
9 months ago
^ Applies to both of you
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
aenews2
9 months ago
No, my ERA5 model only takes into account the surface air (t2m). I don't use the SST from Copernicus. If you want to discuss further, hit me up on Discord (aenews), Twitter (aenews_PI), or Reddit (aenews).
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Also considering the chance of simple human error (they enter the wrong number and don't update it until after the resolution period for this market closes) or the chance that someone at NASA is aware of this market and attempts to manipulate the number to get 100:1 odds on their money. Crypto based prediction markets haven't been tested in the courts, and it's doubtful that SEC market manipulation laws apply to prediction markets.. so doing something like that could be seen by some unscrupulous actors as a low risk way to make a boat load of cash.
aenews2
9 months ago
The mistake you're making with ERA5 is that you're comparing the 131 anomaly to the 131 anomaly last year in 2023. You should be comparing ERA5 to GISTEMP, not ERA5 to ERA5. Same mistake people made last month. My ERA5-only model pegged this at 127 +/- 7 (2σ) when September started. You are clearly not correctly parsing the data.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Also considering the chance of simple human error (they enter the wrong number and don't update it until after the resolution period for this market closes) or the chance that someone at NASA is aware of this market and attempts to manipulate the number to get 100:1 odds on their money. Crypto based prediction markets haven't been tested in the courts, and it's doubtful that SEC market manipulation laws apply to prediction markets.. so doing something like that could be seen by some unscrupulous actors as a low risk way to make a boat load of cash.
aenews2
9 months ago
Because that is 131 anomaly in ERA5? So of course it implies GISS won't be close. And I'm not buying at 5%. I'm selling! Literally the opposite.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
If its 'unambiguously the hottest', then how do you explain ERA5's data? They are showing roughly 1.505 vs. 1.506 (0.001 difference). I know sattelties are a lot less accurate but that seems far from unambigious to me.. I'm sensing some serious overconfidence here.
aenews2
9 months ago
It doesn't make a difference. It's unambiguously the hottest. "V5" would not change this, given monthly rankings are relative to each other, and given the margin.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
For these reasons and others, buying YES at 98 cents or above is all but guaranteed to be negative EV over the long run.
aenews2
9 months ago
Lastly, database changes make no difference as the market is relative to all past months. As an aside, August will be the hottest in NOAA and Berkeley Earth, and probably every other dataset.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
aenews2
9 months ago
If Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that's good for Yes. Do you want to dump your bags? If so, I could let you out of some at 99c. Pretty clear this isn't remotely close.
WindWalk2
9 months ago
Even if you had 100% of the underlying data that NASA uses to produce this figure and thus you modeled it down to 0.01 celsius and were certain you know their true number, there is still plenty of NO risk here. 1) NASA frequently updates the way it collects and processes this data according to their FAQ (google gistemp faq). 2) NASA regularly updates historical data with corrections (so if Aug 2023 were updated to be lower, that would be very bad for YES holders.) 3) Gistemp v5 is coming, and NASA does not announce this ahead of time.. if it drops with this update, YES holders are up for a rude awakening.
aenews2
9 months ago
Ah yeah, I lost 20K that month betting on N. Was very close. NOAA and Berkeley Earth were only 0.01° over record, too.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
for some prespective, march (which won by 18 points) was trading at 50-50 on april 2nd. This market is much, much closer than that and yet N shares at 1.2, CRAZY
aenews2
9 months ago
Surface air being roughly the same means GISS probably won't be close lol
Lowyrok
9 months ago
ERSST v5 anomalies down 16% since 2023 august. Surface air temp relatively the same. Who are the idiots buying yes here?
aenews2
9 months ago
Wut
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
When you buy at 500k's worth at 93 and sell at 99 for a 600 Dollar profit is not a good trade.
aenews2
9 months ago
This is accurate, and the original comment was being dumb and thinking surface air does not cover the sea. In reality, it covers the entire surface and should be compared to land+ocean. Some people were confused and trying to double-count by adding surface air and sea.
Lowyrok
9 months ago
Proof aenews doesn't know what he's talking about: "Uhh no... *facepalm*. This is not how it works. Surface air temperature (t2m) covers the entire surface both above land and sea"
aenews2
9 months ago
Where? Link?
OmenOfLord
9 months ago
Guys it's leaked. The part 2 questions are leaked, there are insiders on Twitter leaked for us. Don't bet unless you have insiders please
aenews2
9 months ago
I just bought some
Nyr11messier - 2170
9 months ago
Is the townhall over yet?
aenews2
9 months ago
Second half tmrw
Nyr11messier - 2170
9 months ago
Is the townhall over yet?
aenews2
9 months ago
Yes, after a brief refractory period
Panzwalizka
9 months ago
what is happening? it rises again?
aenews2
9 months ago
Agree to disagree
Jane.Avenue
9 months ago
Should be ruled inconclusive. It was clear in the rules that it would be based on the video/audio that is aired on September 4th 9-10PM.
aenews2
9 months ago
Out of cash and want to buy other bonds like box office
aenews2
9 months ago
Well if anyone wants to sell N shares before they go to zero, I have a sell block at 99.3c / 0.7c
aenews2
9 months ago
It's guaranteed lol
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
Bro why you so paniced. Low Liquidity and Low Conviction? Maybe don't bet 500k on a dice roll.
aenews2
9 months ago
Well if anyone wants to sell N shares before they go to zero, I have a sell block at 99.3c / 0.7c
aenews2
9 months ago
Doubt, just rando
mango-lassi
9 months ago
Is this true?
aenews2
9 months ago
Finally someone who can math. Still seems a bit off tho, as I'd project 97% odds even with just ERA5 data. Not sure how you got 9%.
Drunken-Mentat
9 months ago
I seriously doubt the no will win: it makes sense as a low-probability bet, particularly as a reinvestment of previous gains in yes. But it was never too probable (August 23 in gistemp was much colder than the era equivalent, and my own reanalysis gave only 9% for the no for aug 24), but now with the land anomaly for 2024 at 1.62 vs 1.38 in 2023 (easy to calculate with gistemp python package), I would say it's really improbable that the land+sea anomaly would be smaller than that of 2023 (unless the gistemp sea anomaly turns out to be unexpectedly small wrt era5). So most probably "yes".
aenews2
9 months ago
Yeah, correct. This is a straightforward market that resolves according to NASA's published value.
raspberry17
9 months ago
Although the whole uma mechanism is sketchy at times, for this market the temperature value is provided by NASA. I don't see how the outcome could be disputed
aenews2
9 months ago
Only using ERA5 (was assuming it ends a virtual tie), my ERA-Only estimate a few days ago was 127 +/- 7.
raspberry17
9 months ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
aenews2
9 months ago
What does this market have to do with UMA? It's straightforward and goes by what NASA publishes on their website.
PanosMariolis2001
9 months ago
Serious question , if its actually a win for the no holders , can the uma scam us again and somehow the whales win again? No right???
aenews2
9 months ago
If it remains 119, then the anomaly needs be 120 or higher.
SudoWin
9 months ago
What should be the number in the NASA source for this to resolve to "Yes"?
aenews2
9 months ago
How would this help change last month's temperature?
lil-b
9 months ago
Maybe a scientist can help me - I've been up all night with my icemaker in overdrive - I keep making ice and then throwing it outside, figuring that the cold will help cool the Earth. I know its only a tiny bit but it could come down to that. I think I can feel a slight difference when I go outside. When the ice melts, it releases the stored-up cold out into the environment. Is this a sound strategy?
aenews2
9 months ago
NOAA and NASA land pretty close to each other most of the time
raspberry17
9 months ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
aenews2
9 months ago
That is definitely wrong
X9504
9 months ago
Tracking looks good but is getting soft. Seems like a movie that fans will watch but not the general public. ~3.25m in early showings, ~9m previews looks about a right for a total around 80-85m
aenews2
9 months ago
hi!
sosuke
9 months ago
aenews betting betting against me damn
aenews2
9 months ago
I love you
lil-b
9 months ago
There's kind of an X factor at play here, which I dont think anybody has really considered. I have heard from my sources that The Juice is Loose, which may have an impact. Those who are Beetlejuice fans will know that the hype is definitely causing higher body temperatures. However, if my sources are incorrect and the Juice is, in fact, NOT loose, then admittedly I will have made a giant blunder. Just my 2 cents.
aenews2
9 months ago
No. Being roughly tied (and it ended up marginally higher, mind you) implies GISS won't be close
raspberry17
9 months ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
aenews2
9 months ago
The Copernicus data would suggest it won't be close lol
raspberry17
9 months ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
aenews2
9 months ago
🔥🗻 + ❄🌊 = ?
raspberry17
9 months ago
I am new at this so you shouldn't believe anything I say. But it seems to me that the land temperature was hotter yet the ocean temperature was cooler. I think it will be close
aenews2
9 months ago
I'm joking, tbc 😆...
0xA8422eF2508826A2d08b3aaFC138a1B3474DE305-1723550268028
9 months ago
i thought about this also, but i will take the risk xD
aenews2
9 months ago
Think about it guys, would NASA want to let the streak end? We need to keep going through the election!
aenews2
9 months ago
...what?
lil-b
9 months ago
There's kind of an X factor at play here, which I dont think anybody has really considered. I have heard from my sources that The Juice is Loose, which may have an impact. Those who are Beetlejuice fans will know that the hype is definitely causing higher body temperatures. However, if my sources are incorrect and the Juice is, in fact, NOT loose, then admittedly I will have made a giant blunder. Just my 2 cents.
aenews2
9 months ago
maybe buy low, sell high?
SLEEPYJOE
9 months ago
Uh ok someones trying to dump 100k shares ... which YES holder is nervous they are on the wrong side of the trade?
aenews2
9 months ago
It'll resolve to whatever NASA publishes on their site
PanosMariolis2001
9 months ago
I'm new to this market , can they side with the whales once again or is it fixed so the no holders can win too?
aenews2
9 months ago
Nice
OmenOfLord
9 months ago
I'm just loading up as time goes. Depositing another 2000 once bank is open in the morning.
aenews2
9 months ago
That's not me. You are not very smart, are you.
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
We value your insight. I didn't mean to scare you with my comments. But sometimes you gotta get down to there level and punch up. I can see Aenews buying on his BigMike11 burner now panic buying... Stick to the science. I'll take care of the goons.
aenews2
9 months ago
nom nom
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
WINDWALKS!!! EAT SHIT AENEWS!
aenews2
9 months ago
who are you
0x2aB890a2d9e0DA3502a3D84807c0D1b5429D4441-1725290836240
9 months ago
@AENEWS2 Fly to close to the sun and you're gonna get burned bitch! Hope you brought some SPF Faggot!
aenews2
9 months ago
It's tied or marginally higher in ERA5. That implies GISS will be way higher, no?
OmenOfLord
9 months ago
https://x.com/EliotJacobson/status/1830623631757762652/photo/1
aenews2
9 months ago
This bill is incredibly light and has been watered down. Also this doesn't affect anyone except the largest companies in the space lol
Justifax
9 months ago
A simple example of how stupid this bill is. Today, if I use a computer to do a cyber attack the person who made the computer is not liable. Now if I use AI which is 1% better than just using the computer, the AI company is liable. That's tots insane.
aenews2
9 months ago
@BabyYoda12 It can be sooner than that date
husser
9 months ago
When does they publish the nubmers usually?
aenews2
9 months ago
Might be 600M today too
Ania-chan
9 months ago
599.X without Labor Day ^^
aenews2
9 months ago
Maybe it's cooked bro! But yeah they are ests.
Dropper11
9 months ago
yep. How do they already have today's revenue tho
aenews2
9 months ago
Blah blah blah
Guggs
9 months ago
I think the market is significantly overvaluing 'yes'. All the articles so far have just estimated the domestic gross. Or said it hit 600M based on some estimate. The numbers aren't out yet and there is a very small margin over 600m.
aenews2
9 months ago
Irrelevant on the market
sosuke
9 months ago
ah yes another rigged market on polymarket and if it isn't rigged from the start, uma and polymarket will solve that
aenews2
9 months ago
See y'all in the next market
aenews2
9 months ago
We care about the anomaly, not temperature
Caveman12
9 months ago
September is almost always colder than August, don’t see how this is Yes
aenews2
9 months ago
Who are you?
Lkeprfuh
9 months ago
Happened AFTER the deadline: "Russian social media channels claim that in the Moscow district of Kapotnya, where the refinery is located, two explosions were heard. According to residents of Kapotnya and nearby districts, one explosion occurred around 7:30 a.m., followed by the sounds of automatic gunfire and a second explosion approximately 10 minutes later." https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/fire-at-moscow-oil-refinery-assigned-highest-difficulty-level-after-drone-attack-russian-media/ar-AA1pNeWe
aenews2
9 months ago
Yeah I should have bought when price was low, might have missed the boat 🚤
tsybka
9 months ago
Another scammer, aenews, has appeared on the market... fun times.
aenews2
9 months ago
I've never even traded this market
tsybka
9 months ago
Another scammer, aenews, has appeared on the market... fun times.
aenews2
9 months ago
Well it's pretty precisely tied in ERA5 @joe.night2024
diddy
9 months ago
It’s a mistake to bet against aenews, that’s the true weather forecast-er
aenews2
9 months ago
Don't let the door hit you on the way out
RFKALLDAY
9 months ago
I will be Boycotting Polymarket if this resolves YES. Will move to Blast. Polymarket is the new Opensea.
aenews2
9 months ago
Well it's very clear market is resolving Y. I suggest N baggies dump their worthless shares while they are still worth something.
aenews2
9 months ago
Ah I see. Np
grape.legend
9 months ago
aenews leaving free money on the table from this supposedly decided market 🤔
aenews2
9 months ago
PM has already intervened to resolve this fairly. Just need to sit tight, and it will resolve in 26 hours.
northman
9 months ago
what can we do to get PM to solve this fairly?
aenews2
9 months ago
wdym, I'm at like 250K shares bro
grape.legend
9 months ago
aenews leaving free money on the table from this supposedly decided market 🤔
aenews2
9 months ago
Maybe you've hit a rate limit. Slow down, buster.
Mauz
9 months ago
Why they blocking comments???
aenews2
9 months ago
Because we have a finite amount of money
Panzwalizka
9 months ago
All Yes holder are no so stupid they can earn only a few USD more then on the begining. So why they want to show you that they are so sure not to close at 0.1 or 0.2?
aenews2
9 months ago
This is great evidence for Yes, thanks!
northman
9 months ago
Heres the part in discussion: https://streamable.com/cj7hbx WATCH IT IN 0.5x! TRY TO COUNT THE SYLLABES OF "TEACHER" HE DOESNT SAY IT
aenews2
9 months ago
Because people hear the teacher even if you personally don't. Not that surprising.
northman
9 months ago
Its simple. The rules state "The resolution source is the video of the interview". He doesn't say teacher in the Video. How is this even a debate? Its clearly no
aenews2
9 months ago
oh god
northman
9 months ago
Heres the part in discussion: https://streamable.com/cj7hbx WATCH IT IN 0.5x! TRY TO COUNT THE SYLLABES OF "TEACHER" HE DOESNT SAY IT
aenews2
9 months ago
No, I trust my ears and common sense. I trust CNN. And finally, I trust the clarification.
Astronaut
9 months ago
This market is a perfect example of the downside of using a decentralized voting system that allowes influence BY SHAREHOLDERS
aenews2
9 months ago
wdym
Astronaut
9 months ago
This market is a perfect example of the downside of using a decentralized voting system that allowes influence BY SHAREHOLDERS
aenews2
9 months ago
You whacks are free to buy more N if you really want, happy to leverage another 100K!
northman
9 months ago
It is a FACT that he does NOT say TEACHER! Someone make this viral and get us justice!!!!
aenews2
9 months ago
It is a fact that you need to get your hearing checked
northman
9 months ago
It is a FACT that he does NOT say TEACHER! Someone make this viral and get us justice!!!!
aenews2
9 months ago
Oh puw-lease, you're making me blush 😳
diddy
9 months ago
It’s a mistake to bet against aenews, that’s the true weather forecast-er
aenews2
9 months ago
Seems ogre tbh
aenews2
9 months ago
Where'd you find a 6th?
CansGonzalez
9 months ago
AI actually counted 6... oh well
aenews2
9 months ago
In some countries and jurisdictions, apparently you can count this as 4!
AgricultureSecretary
9 months ago
Total: five
aenews2
9 months ago
Welp, guess those folks saying they would dispute were all talk. Probably for the best tho, as they'd have just been burning their money.
aenews2
9 months ago
How many are we at?
n/a
9 months ago
comrade harris doesnt count right?
aenews2
9 months ago
You need to do homework in every market you trade, if you want to have an edge
oxamo
9 months ago
Unfortunately no. Although not 100% consistent the NASA numbers do correlate with other data sets. Barring some sort of statistical annomoly August will be the hottest. I'm done with these markets because I came here to gamble, not to do homework
aenews2
9 months ago
good one!
BlackSky123
9 months ago
Fact: yes holders are more likely to know that "Joyful" is not a compound word, whereas no holders are more likely to believe that it is.
aenews2
9 months ago
I think you should schedule a hearing test as soon as possible
Kade
9 months ago
just watch CNN interview part 3 at 01:06 subtitles have "Teacher " but he only say "English" skip the "Teacher " ?
aenews2
9 months ago
Thanks, best stream
null.eth
9 months ago
Starting now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
aenews2
9 months ago
Yeah for some reason I was getting filled at 99c, maybe people are betting on it not airing in the full interview? Or they just missed the excerpts.
minji
9 months ago
interview excerpts have been released and she said both "border" and "inflation"
aenews2
9 months ago
Can we take market back to 97c?
aenews2
9 months ago
Naw, it was 2 lower
ImHereForTheRewards
9 months ago
@aenews2 As we all recall :-) NASA was higher than ERA5 in July
aenews2
9 months ago
NASA is coming in lower than ERA5. Only month this year it was higher was April.
viltalik
9 months ago
NASA has been coming in hotter
aenews2
9 months ago
Data is coming in pretty hot
viltalik
9 months ago
What do the yesoors know?
aenews2
9 months ago
Seems hot to me
Hussieny
9 months ago
Greetings for you all,, What's your thoughts on this market?
aenews2
9 months ago
Fair, makes sense
ExhaustedBoyBilly
9 months ago
Thanks aenews will buy more in a few days of the data I got are the ones I like,
aenews2
9 months ago
Upped my bids, if you want more action
ExhaustedBoyBilly
9 months ago
I lost my 50K winning in last month's weather bet..... that's why
aenews2
9 months ago
Billy giving up the slack
BennyS
9 months ago
Viltalik, you gonna run out of money or?
aenews2
9 months ago
Correct. It's the same market.
nuggetsharambe
9 months ago
prob will resolve no but for the record, haven't seen one argument from a worthwhile source that counters all the sources linked by the yes voters. vibes wins against rules again whatever
aenews2
9 months ago
Just cash me out. 0% chance this goes Y after the last votes.
aenews2
9 months ago
The rules say it doesn't count. Jewish is considered an "other form".
nuggetsharambe
9 months ago
prob will resolve no but for the record, haven't seen one argument from a worthwhile source that counters all the sources linked by the yes voters. vibes wins against rules again whatever
aenews2
9 months ago
5.2M, another couple M and it reaches majority. 3.8M and reaches quorum
aenews2
9 months ago
23 hours
MrNFT
9 months ago
How long do we wait
aenews2
9 months ago
Sell your Y at 0.2c so I can move on with my life, TY
aenews2
9 months ago
The reason I support N is because Bernie endorsement resolved N despite media reporting he endorsed, precisely because of this formal endorsement clause. For consistency, this market must resolve N or one of the resolutions must necessarily be incorrect.
n/a
9 months ago
Just to clarify PolyMarket does not care about technicalities with verbiage. If you No sayers were right then China would of won the most gold medals prediction. The IOC recognizes Hong Kong as part of China and list them as so. That prediction clearly worded things by Country and not team. Polymarket did not pay out based on how the rules were written but based off of how the western media publicized things. The media has confirmed and multiple sources have published his endorsement. If that is not true then have them redact that.
aenews2
9 months ago
When the world 🌎 needed him most, he vanished
BennyS
9 months ago
@junkbonds we need you to take it from here
aenews2
9 months ago
Yea it's possible, never know!
ootharju
9 months ago
Hailey reposted the story with a blue heart and teddy bear so all you Girl consipiracists can cope with buying worthless shares
aenews2
9 months ago
Jack might have a twin named Jill, even if you're right! Unlikely tho, I know..
ootharju
9 months ago
Hailey reposted the story with a blue heart and teddy bear so all you Girl consipiracists can cope with buying worthless shares
aenews2
9 months ago
No need to be rude, dude. It's obviously possible. Also obviously very unlikely!
braunajb
9 months ago
nahhh I don't think so
aenews2
9 months ago
It's a joke. But it's possible.
braunajb
9 months ago
nope thats not the name
aenews2
9 months ago
It's not coping. I'm saying too early to resolve, lol. Obviously, it's way more likely a boy! But there is a chance it is a girl. Heck, maybe they had twins and only showed us one of them so far!
MineGuyBonds
9 months ago
Sadly this market still cannot be resolved according to the rules. Need an official confirmation that it is a boy.
aenews2
9 months ago
Jacqueline Bieber, we are ready!
aenews2
9 months ago
Might be Jacqueline and Jack is her nickname. Or could be a girl named Jack, which some parents absolutely do, even if rare.
MineGuyBonds
9 months ago
Sadly this market still cannot be resolved according to the rules. Need an official confirmation that it is a boy.
aenews2
9 months ago
What does that have to do with this market?
Pidor🐓
9 months ago
drop out already resolved. grats on spending $2250 to tie up our money hilary2win
aenews2
9 months ago
It's not a loose technicality. Bernie Sanders endorsement resolved N due to the formal endorsement clause. So either that misresolved, or this would misresolve. One must be wrong.
raspberry17
9 months ago
I also looked up the definition of formal. It includes: "constituting an official or important situation or occasion". It seems to me that clearly staying that he supports trump, will work for him, and asking his followers in the decisive states to vote for trump is clearly an official endorsement (and therefore, a formal endorsement). His goal is clear, there is no ambiguity. No supporters are arguing on loose technicalities that won't hold, IMHO. But my stake is small and I understand those of you who want to fight this. Hopefully, the people who draft these markets will learn to be more concise
aenews2
9 months ago
@asdf4 Yep, I agree. That's what I was saying.
X9504
9 months ago
Can someone link to a statement by RFK or one of his representatives stating that he is voting for or formally endorsing Trump?
aenews2
9 months ago
None exists. In fact, his team actually retracted a legal filing today that would have indicated endorsement.
X9504
9 months ago
Can someone link to a statement by RFK or one of his representatives stating that he is voting for or formally endorsing Trump?
aenews2
9 months ago
He did endorse him, but that's a different market
yourrapist1776
9 months ago
Not like he literally said he's joining the trump campaign or anything, or just went on stage at a trump rally where trump announced he would be the head of a new government agency. But no, all the credible sources are wrong, RFK himself is wrong, he never endorsed trump and doesn't back him in any way
aenews2
9 months ago
I think what happened is they made a decision for the speech market (which was correct) and then applied it to all endorsement markets without reading them (incorrect for this one).
XiJinPing
9 months ago
they fucked up by ignoring their own rules they wrote
aenews2
9 months ago
Yeah, optimally need to convince Polymarket
0xE42c9d2ef
9 months ago
Would not recommend disputing this as polymarket states it will be yes anyway. unless we can change their mind this will be yes unfortunately
aenews2
9 months ago
This one is actually wrong. If this resolves Yes, then that means either this or Bernie misresolved. I don't see any way around that?
aenews2
9 months ago
Must fight in UMA server
aenews2
9 months ago
The most economical approach would be to propose Y and dispute. Saves money. If N wins, your shares win anyways.
FrankyFourFingers
9 months ago
someone may re-propose this one, unfortunately - you can propose twice
aenews2
9 months ago
Must fight in UMA server
hillary2win
9 months ago
what do we do now?
aenews2
9 months ago
Speech market is correct, this one and November require formal endorsement which is different. Haley endorsement resolved Yes, so speech should be a Yes. Bernie formal endorsement resolved N. So this should be a N.
de5nuts
9 months ago
you should dispute the speech rfk endorsement market first if you're gonna do it
aenews2
9 months ago
If you dispute, you'll need to dispute November as well. Just as a note.
hillary2win
9 months ago
At 40 minute mark I will start a dispute and pay the fee. I have almost everything ready. I need you guys to start writing good arguments for why this should resolve as NO. And I have no idea how UMA processes this. Lets be respectful and polite throughout the process and use logic to correctly resolve this market. I believe its sent to a vote for UMA to review manually? Lets see if we can also discuss this on UMAs chats and channels if they require it. Need your help! Lets win this! If i lose the $750 its okay, I just wanted to do the right thing for the smaller betters here as well as myself ofc. Lets WIN! Team NO
aenews2
9 months ago
The clarification for this one is objectively incorrect. Bernie Sanders formal endorsement market resolved to No, so either this one must resolve to No or the prior resolution was incorrect. In reality, it seems they issued the same clarification to all endorsement markets without reading the differing rules.
aenews2
9 months ago
He suspended his campaign
Darknight
9 months ago
How the hell is this supposed to be an endorsement. I expect an endorsement to be something like” Pres Trump has my vote and support” if he’s still running then it shouldn’t count
aenews2
9 months ago
Neither is compound, as -ful and -less are suffixes.
HsB34sgg
9 months ago
The information on UMA is false without any authoritative reference to what comprises a compound word. Mirriam-Webster is an authoritative source for words, including compound words. According to Mirriam-Webster "joyful" is a compound word, like "joyless".
aenews2
9 months ago
Have you tried reading the rules for this market? They specifically say "Jewish" does not count as it is another form. They don't consider affixations to be compound. Neither did hopeful count for hope in Obama DNC mention. This isn't a new thing, lol.
HsB34sgg
9 months ago
Strawman arguments are not authoritative, however Mirriam-Webster is. Was it you who wrote the false August 23rd "Additional context"? The clarification is clearly factually incorrect. Furthermore, it references the incorrect section of the rules pertaining to compound words.
aenews2
9 months ago
Affixations aren't considered compound words and are always under the "other forms" that do not count. For that matter, "hopeful" did not count for "hope" in Obama either.
Car
9 months ago
can someone explain to me why JOY didnt win like im a 8 year old?
aenews2
9 months ago
Pluralization/possessive of the word will count toward the resolution of this market, however other forms will NOT count (i.e. "Jewish" would not count").
Car
9 months ago
can someone explain to me why JOY didnt win like im a 8 year old?
aenews2
9 months ago
gg guys
aenews2
9 months ago
rip to all the poor souls who bonded joy at 99c and are fading Merriam Webster
aenews2
9 months ago
Cope
tomxeth
9 months ago
She has zero aura
aenews2
9 months ago
Whew
aenews2
9 months ago
Wdym? What market are you talking about?
yourrapist1776
9 months ago
What is the % chance you pay out my winnings on your scam prediction market site insightprediction.com? Also probably 0% you fucking faggot
aenews2
9 months ago
I mean I agree. I had 70+ lol. It seemed clearly over 70, I stopped counting. I am kinda curious what it ended up being tho.
DECRAPisDUMBandGAY
9 months ago
just make something up, that's what you always do. There were an overwhelming number of mentions.
aenews2
9 months ago
Seems many people have very different opinions and are confused on what others actually think
satoshi sir
9 months ago
People are actually getting arrested while protesting the DNC and no holders be like "meh they were a few blocks away"
aenews2
9 months ago
What was the final count?
aenews2
9 months ago
@Iverson Yep. And I'm not even saying we didn't have more than a couple today, but there's nothing to indicate more just yet. We'll see how it goes tomorrow and how many CPD reports.
Mountainman
9 months ago
15 first night, at least 50-70 last night, more to come tonight, and the grand finale tomorrow night... I think this is a steal at these prices.
aenews2
9 months ago
I don't see much news for tonight other than the couple posted
Mountainman
9 months ago
15 first night, at least 50-70 last night, more to come tonight, and the grand finale tomorrow night... I think this is a steal at these prices.
aenews2
9 months ago
Is that 100+?
babendums
9 months ago
Theres been atleast 50-70 already. I exited by No position. https://blockclubchicago.org/2024/08/21/72-people-arrested-during-protest-outside-israeli-consulate/
aenews2
9 months ago
Bye 👋
aenews2
9 months ago
The CPD indicated in their press conference that they'd update with more accurate numbers once confirmed. So even if all arrests do in fact count, the number should be less than what that lawyer non-profit claimed.
aenews2
9 months ago
I already won, sorry
mr.ozi
9 months ago
We will see who laughs last 🖤🙂
aenews2
9 months ago
They need to say the Miranda rights, confirm verbally they are protesting for DNC specifically, and then report the arrest went through and not simply detained. Oh and need to count all the wheels on the bus for good measure.
DiversifyYoBonds
9 months ago
Can anyone from the "those arrests don't count" group share an example of an arrest that DOES count?
aenews2
9 months ago
Can't wait for Team Y to get sweaty hands after realizing they bonded a market that is fairly likely to resolve the other way
aenews2
9 months ago
I'd like to sue for copyright infringement
aenews2
9 months ago
Woah gopfan2 rlly stealing my mojo
aenews2
9 months ago
Woah gopfan2 rlly stealing my mojo
aenews2
9 months ago
@Iverson Meh, we'll see how it goes
Mommy
9 months ago
The main group behind the protests at the israeli consolate is called 'behind enemy lines'. They explicitly stated they want to 'shut down the dnc for gaza' and 'make it great like 68' (referring to 1968 dnc protests). Another is samidoun, who were carrying "shut down the dnc for gaza" banners. Some of you guys are lying through your teeth here. these were clear protests against the dnc.
aenews2
9 months ago
Do you think we'll get more arrests today and tomorrow?
Mommy
9 months ago
The main group behind the protests at the israeli consolate is called 'behind enemy lines'. They explicitly stated they want to 'shut down the dnc for gaza' and 'make it great like 68' (referring to 1968 dnc protests). Another is samidoun, who were carrying "shut down the dnc for gaza" banners. Some of you guys are lying through your teeth here. these were clear protests against the dnc.
aenews2
9 months ago
Huh? He said 55-60, what you smoking?
DeucePapi
9 months ago
Chicago Police Chief confirms 75+ mass arrested Day 2 https://youtu.be/MG4FnXjlFUk
aenews2
9 months ago
The whole integrity of the site is in question if this is graded a 'yes'. Just as easy to say! That said, we'll see what happens today and tomorrow re:arrests.
0x067F6C8FA38C71f30fA3d1aA72EE4004c027a821-1718211121352
9 months ago
The whole integrity of the site is in question if this is graded a 'no'. Are the people making this decision already betting this side? The protestors arrested outside the Israeli consulate are only effin there because of the DNC. the protestors arrested outside of the arena on Monday night... Who the hell is to say what they were protesting? Maybe just jackasses caught up larping. The whole point of this market was clearly to bet on mass arrests at the DNC, which is what happened last night.
aenews2
9 months ago
Yeah, correct. If you lose dispute, you lose the bond. And to answer the main question, UMA is the decentralized Oracle that handles resolutions and facilitates disputes. However, Polymarket may also at their discretion issue rules clarifications that UMA will generally follow.
Bigiorn
9 months ago
So can anyone explain how resolution works and who decides in such edge cases?
aenews2
10 months ago
Is there any confirmation of those numbers? Guess we'll see today.
homosexual
10 months ago
The National Lawyers Guild is now putting the number at "more than 70" today, meaning a total of at least 83. https://x.com/NLGChicago/status/1826139648772423996
aenews2
10 months ago
but will they protest again today?
homosexual
10 months ago
The National Lawyers Guild is now putting the number at "more than 70" today, meaning a total of at least 83. https://x.com/NLGChicago/status/1826139648772423996
aenews2
10 months ago
But you need people to get arrested for number to go up
homosexual
10 months ago
If we're being safe with the estimates, 65 today and 12 yesterday. It's more than on track for reaching 100 by Thursday.
aenews2
10 months ago
How do you know? @BellumM I don't understand
aenews2
10 months ago
What if everyone's inside information about the child being a girl and being a boy are all correct? Maybe they have twins or triplets and we resolve to 50/50 😃
aenews2
10 months ago
You seem like a s-.... like a guy.
ExhaustedBoyBilly
10 months ago
please dispute me
aenews2
10 months ago
I just thought about it, and it's a way for everyone with claims to be right!
JeffreyBezos
10 months ago
i knew you were retarded
aenews2
10 months ago
What if everyone's inside information about the child being a girl and being a boy are all correct? Maybe they have twins or triplets and we resolve to 50/50 😃
aenews2
10 months ago
Umm Idgi
jamesclove
10 months ago
Trying to get a lower cost on GIRL
aenews2
10 months ago
dumbos
TrumpGonnaPump
10 months ago
i am so confused as to what's happening
aenews2
10 months ago
you are buying boy at 70-80c dude
jamesclove
10 months ago
I got insider info that it's a girl
aenews2
10 months ago
Whatever you are trading on!
jamesclove
10 months ago
what inside info?
aenews2
10 months ago
Would be funny if the "inside info" were real, but market resolves 50/50 'cause not disclosed
aenews2
10 months ago
Should I buy more?
BennyS
10 months ago
Aenews bought yes?
aenews2
10 months ago
I'm sleepy aenews rn, when will this end?
homosexual
10 months ago
folks can someone nudge sleepy joe to mention the apartheid regime?
aenews2
10 months ago
That market is done, not related
zubinbets
10 months ago
Is this a Scam? Whats going on here:.... why is this bet allowed to happen when this polymarket bet has closed: https://polymarket.com/event/democratic-nominee-2024/will-gavin-newsom-win-the-2024-democratic-presidential-nomination?tid=1724082564506
aenews2
10 months ago
I don't know what you mean
p0wer
10 months ago
How fucked up is this bet?? "democratic nominee" was supposed to close on 21st, so why the fuck did you close it if there's still a chance she won't get nominated?? FUCK YOU POLYMARKET YOU FUCKING FUCK!!!!!!!
aenews2
10 months ago
wut?
p0wer
10 months ago
How fucked up is this bet?? "democratic nominee" was supposed to close on 21st, so why the fuck did you close it if there's still a chance she won't get nominated?? FUCK YOU POLYMARKET YOU FUCKING FUCK!!!!!!!
aenews2
10 months ago
No, that's not correct. This simply confirms the prior vote that more reporting is wanted by UMA.
PokerBrat
10 months ago
So the Assasination of Hamas Leader wont be a factor in this market anymore as per the vote, do I understand that correctly?
aenews2
10 months ago
They didn't vote for No. They voted that it was too early to close, punting decision to future.
just.some.guy
10 months ago
I'm new; could some kind soul help me out on how disputes work? Cuz I thought 'UMA' already voted on whether Haniyeh met the criteria to close the mkt and they voted for no like 70-30, or something. Since nothing's changed since the first vote, how could the second vote go the other way? I mean, it's the same voters, isn't it? Thanks for any info.
aenews2
10 months ago
"However, it was a covert / mossad action, not a military action." So a bomb exploding isn't a use of force? Big if true, must be a form of economic sanction!
Justifax
10 months ago
It's self evident at this point that Israel killed Haniyeh. They wouldn't subject themselves and the entire world to the level of fear and potential cataclysmic war if they did not. However, it was a covert / mossad action, not a military action. We do not need or want assasination markets.
aenews2
10 months ago
You should post in UMA. Voters are voting on this as we speak.
Oreophilic
10 months ago
"For the purposes of this market, a "military action" will be considered to be any use of force executed by Israel on Iranian soil, airspace, or maritime territory"
aenews2
10 months ago
Maybe, I guess
BennyS
10 months ago
Since some bettors are tailing you (and gopfan), selling and rebuying consistently might not be a bad idea.
aenews2
10 months ago
but even gopfan needs a coat?
BennyS
10 months ago
Maybe they needed to buy a coat? It's going to be kind of cold out on Tuesday
aenews2
10 months ago
Why is everyone selling?
aenews2
10 months ago
-___-
BennyS
10 months ago
Oh shoot, I just remembered that the Copernicus data is not reliable..
aenews2
10 months ago
The Polymarket Alpha group?
n/a
10 months ago
Does anyone have the TG link? I somehow left by accident
aenews2
10 months ago
Problem is that there was at least one non-compound usage of "fire" anyways.
herald
10 months ago
"Any usage of the word regardless of context will count toward the resolution of this market." Irrespective of context, fire (meaning to dismiss) and fire (meaning to ignite) are two different words albeit with the same spelling. The rules clearly imply that "the word" in the above statement refers to fire (meaning to dismiss). This brings us to the following statement: "Compound words will count as long as 'Fire' or 'Fired' is part of the compound word and references the meaning which refers to the act of dismissing an employee." Fired up and fire up are phrasal verbs, which are compound words. This is clear based on the definition of phrasal verbs and the classification of phrasal verbs. To support this, Oxford dictionary lists "fired up" as a compound verb. While other sources on this are less clear, the fact that fire up is a phrasal verb is undoubtable, which are accordingly classified as compound words.
aenews2
10 months ago
I mean. There's no argument at all if he said it separately lol
PoLOLitics
10 months ago
I am in the camp that fire will count because he specifically said "fire" aside from when he said "fired-up" but I'm along for the ride.
aenews2
10 months ago
Compound words will count as long as "Fire" or "Fired" is part of the compound word and references the meaning which refers to the act of dismissing an employee.
BuckMySalls
10 months ago
Compound words will count as long as "Fire" or "Fired" is part of the compound word !! and references the meaning which refers to the act of dismissing an employee.!!
aenews2
10 months ago
Note this only applies if the word is actually compound
herald
10 months ago
how to submit dispute?
aenews2
10 months ago
Compound words will count as long as Fire or Fired is part of the compound word and references the meaning which refers to the act of dismissing an employee.
JonJonesMMA
10 months ago
Please dispute it. He literally said “fired-up” twice in a different context and according to all dictionaries that’s a compound word!
aenews2
10 months ago
Not just some Democrat. The VP lol, Tim Walz
n/a
10 months ago
that some democrat wants to give tampons on male bathrooms
aenews2
10 months ago
He said it
StevenBonnell
10 months ago
wait when did he say maga? did i miss it?
aenews2
10 months ago
RIP my 100 shares of N on a few brackets, long live my 550 shares of tampon
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah I don't see how it could possibly not count, especially when DNC statement says he is a speaker at the caucus and council meetings, and said meetings are explictly on the DNC schedule.
mr.ozi
10 months ago
The convention happens across two venues, the primary one (United Center) and a secondary one (McCornick). The rules define that it needs to be a speech, not whether it needs to happen at the primary venue.
aenews2
10 months ago
Exciting times ahead!
sosuke
10 months ago
insiders back at it again with another market
aenews2
10 months ago
gg, thanks for playing
aenews2
10 months ago
-__-
HerbAlex
10 months ago
https://triunetimes.org/exit-poll-shows-don-samuels-leading-ilhan-omar-in-minnesotas-5th-congressional-district/
aenews2
10 months ago
Doesn't make a difference
DeucePapi
10 months ago
Isn't Minnesota an open primary where Republicans can vote in Democrat races?
aenews2
10 months ago
The hottest streak refuses to end! NASA won't let it...
Will143
10 months ago
the climate is out of control
aenews2
10 months ago
I've retired, sorry. Ask aenews3 instead.
7153649820
10 months ago
Waiting for aenews to make a bet so I can copy....
aenews2
10 months ago
Facts, they need the global "warming" narrative to continue!
JamesNaysium
10 months ago
it won't be. but they'll definitely claim it was.
aenews2
10 months ago
Guess folks realized the rig is in from NASA 🌞🌎
aenews2
10 months ago
July was 77c after it happened, and August is already that price. Whew 🔥🔥🔥
aenews2
10 months ago
July was 77c after it happened, and August is already that price. Whew 🔥🔥🔥
aenews2
10 months ago
Ayyy
SELL-YES-BUY-NO
10 months ago
welcome to the new comment section everyone
aenews2
10 months ago
@Resonant That is not how it works
0x6Fd73D35D35c4a54e0f66796FcF11D1edB85Db26-1721750436928
10 months ago
nasa said its tied? but resolved to yes? but rules say it should resolve to no?
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah and also, Team Yes literally posted the results of that analysis here including the 121 estimate. Team N simply believed their analysis was better and did not trust Team Y who gave them the answer.
BM5II5KJN2
10 months ago
@BlueSky123 Hmm, how is it a scam that some people somehow know the function they are using. Its the same as the fact that you can't reverse engineering an injective function per definition. Additionally if you find a function that gives you similar results based in historic data you first of all never know if it's actually the correct function and they could also make changes to the function weights etc. even if you had a good model nobody would have 80% confidence in the result. The chance that this is not insider trading is lower than 5% imo. Since this is a non regulated and 'scammy' website you obviously can't do shit other than not bet ever again on these markets
aenews2
10 months ago
The climate nerds bought before August even started, they bought before we got more data on the 5th, and they kept buying up to official release. There was no inside trading, just much better modelling for most of the market history, and better parsing of NASA data for the last few days.
BM5II5KJN2
10 months ago
They should make a new market if this was insider trading and rigged. YES or YES should be the options
aenews2
10 months ago
ty ty
BlackSky123
10 months ago
Congrats to the yes bettors - I put $18 on no as a lotto. Figured I would lose it, but thought it was worth the price. Congrats to y'all once again.
aenews2
10 months ago
thanks!
factman
10 months ago
Congrats aenews2
aenews2
10 months ago
June was revised upwards by 4, and July is the hottest on record by 2. It's over, and 2024 is the hottest year on record. 0% chance otherwise.
aenews2
10 months ago
climate deniers btfo
mag
10 months ago
Y’all hear about global warming?
aenews2
10 months ago
It updated 2 hours back. You are cached, check again in Incognito, different browser, or different device.
raspberry17
10 months ago
The table I see says 121 for June, nothing yet for July. Anyway, all you are likely to accomplish is to keep the winners from their cash for about 5 days. And maybe win a little reward for the correct appeal, IDK
aenews2
10 months ago
Thank you @TheDrachma
idfkanything
10 months ago
Wild ride. Chalking the $20 loss up to a learning experience. I’ve paid more for coffee. Appreciate the mostly cordial and candid back and forth. Looking forward to august. Cheers!
aenews2
10 months ago
Incorrect tho. Using just ERA5, odds were already 50% before July even ended. Overall odds with more data and databases were maybe 60-65% before NOAA released, and 80%+ after they released. Was 95%+ by yesterday.
n/a
10 months ago
Your regression analysis was based only on ERA5. At the same time, however, JRA3Q data and NOAA data also came out, which even suggested with a larger margin that July 2024 would not be the warmest. In addition, the blog post by Nick Stokes, which also suggested that it would not be the warmest month. I don't think we were unlucky, the yes holders didn't speculate on their luck, that can probably be explained differently.
aenews2
10 months ago
No. They are saying it's within the MoE. But currently, July 2024 is the hottest on record.
0x6Fd73D35D35c4a54e0f66796FcF11D1edB85Db26-1721750436928
10 months ago
nasa said its tied? but resolved to yes? but rules say it should resolve to no?
aenews2
10 months ago
Same! Cheers
idfkanything
10 months ago
Wild ride. Chalking the $20 loss up to a learning experience. I’ve paid more for coffee. Appreciate the mostly cordial and candid back and forth. Looking forward to august. Cheers!
aenews2
10 months ago
Because it's marginal
sosuke
10 months ago
nasa climate on twitter keeps repeating its a tie while putting 121 is all you need to know about insider trading
aenews2
10 months ago
@lakki More data came out lol. I'm talking about before July ended. Already bought a ton at 25-40c before we got more data.
sosuke
10 months ago
now that the result is up and it's a yes, we now know all the yes holders talking shit with confidence even though other websites showed evidence for no, are insiders
aenews2
10 months ago
Basically, Copernicus was way hotter than GISTEMP last year. So it was expected that the anomaly would be similar this year. On Copernicus, the anomaly was 123 this year.
sosuke
10 months ago
now that the result is up and it's a yes, we now know all the yes holders talking shit with confidence even though other websites showed evidence for no, are insiders
aenews2
10 months ago
@shouldntbhere I realized that people might buy N based on Copericus being colder than last year, almost 3 weeks back: https://i.imgur.com/7s7alAz.png
sosuke
10 months ago
now that the result is up and it's a yes, we now know all the yes holders talking shit with confidence even though other websites showed evidence for no, are insiders
aenews2
10 months ago
Or that people misinterpreted Copernicus data
sosuke
10 months ago
now that the result is up and it's a yes, we now know all the yes holders talking shit with confidence even though other websites showed evidence for no, are insiders
aenews2
10 months ago
Copernicus data suggested coinflip. I called this like 3 weeks ago, lol: https://imgur.com/7s7alAz
yourrapist1776
10 months ago
But, but, but, the copernicus data was lower!
aenews2
10 months ago
ohhh the guy who posted the graph and pastebin?
Fred19999
10 months ago
It would be funny, if he wasn't encouraging others to buy. I feel bad for them
aenews2
10 months ago
The problem is that they have no model
Justifax
10 months ago
A lot of people are commenting for No - have you backtested your approach? Look a prior months and make sure your model works.
aenews2
10 months ago
Which one?
moviesera92
10 months ago
Whatever you say, the one guy who is manipluting the prices and making all these comments might as well be doing this stupid stuff but is certainly funny.
aenews2
10 months ago
On or before the dates on release page: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/release_dates.html
Josebetandcourt
10 months ago
Anyone know when NASA typically posts?
aenews2
10 months ago
Yes was the right side even before that!
Apsalar
10 months ago
You're buying YES because you decoded and reverse engineered NASA's model and then plugged in the entirely of this months' data. I'm buying YES because I trust aenews to do that for me. We are not the same.
aenews2
10 months ago
Darn, was hoping no one would find out I'm good friends with Gavin Schmidt, but I guess you figured it out. Congrats! 🎉
n/a
10 months ago
@aenews2: Are you following best practices when it comes to money laundering, or are you hoping that no one looks too closely?
aenews2
10 months ago
Nice 1 share bro
JeffreyBezos
10 months ago
hello I am the Owner of NASA back again after my last update. I just wanted to let you all know I checked the records again and it is still going to be settle at NO. you are all welcome
aenews2
10 months ago
Is that N or Y
n/a
10 months ago
I've never seen a situation where the self described "smart money" deserved to lose so richly as on this market.
aenews2
10 months ago
I literally called this almost 3 weeks ago lol: https://i.imgur.com/7s7alAz.png
yourrapist1776
10 months ago
Never seen such an iq imbalance between yes and no holders in any market on this site as there is on this one
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah amazing how this site is an infinite money generator
n/a
10 months ago
By the way, anews2 and bama124 have bought 480000 shares in the last 24 hours without the price moving upwards. Amazing, isn't it? Have you ever seen anything like it?
aenews2
10 months ago
This is probably the most stubborn market I've ever traded
aenews2
10 months ago
classic 89/89 market
Observing
10 months ago
So while the 'no' holders are comfortable holding even though the current odds are against them, the 'yes' holders are holding their breath, can't sleep at night, and waiting on 89c to exit? Maybe that tells you something.
aenews2
10 months ago
“Things are going to continue to get worse because we haven’t stopped doing the thing that’s making them worse,” said Gavin Schmidt, climatologist and director of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, who wasn’t part of the report. Schmidt noted that different methodologies or calculations could produce slightly different results, including that July may have even continued the streak. The primary takeaway, he said: “Even if the record-breaking streak comes to an end, the forces that are pushing the temperatures higher, they’re not stopping.
aenews2
10 months ago
The top N holder has a -1.3 Million P/L
Wellmaybe
10 months ago
The fact that top 5 Yes holders are all in 50k+ profit and top 5 No holders are all in loss is astonishing
aenews2
10 months ago
Big Mike / Biden ticket
BigMike11
10 months ago
First July will be the hottest, and then #BigMIke will be coronated at the DNC. Dump your no & Kamala bags now.
aenews2
10 months ago
"No is undervalued considering it's a No" excellent reasoning!
JonJonesMMA
10 months ago
"No" is easily undervalued here considering that least year's July seems to have been the hottest.
aenews2
10 months ago
some say it is the second hottest
cryptuschrist
10 months ago
This is the hottest comment section on Polymarket.
aenews2
10 months ago
Maybe everyone is collectively making the same mistakes and we were looking at the wrong numbers all along!
larnzius.schmarnzius
10 months ago
my guess, nobody actually did the math and we are all just gambling degenerates
aenews2
10 months ago
I ain't no denier. This is the hottest July on record =)
SmartG
10 months ago
immediately after Copernicus press release there are climate change deniers saying it's all fake lol, hope people research into the bet and have more awareness on it
aenews2
10 months ago
I shared what I know in the comments.
FranciscoJoseEliasNavarro
10 months ago
The Y guys are scared af 🤣
aenews2
10 months ago
Ok, we'll see in a day or two. Or maybe next week.
TheDrachma
10 months ago
maybe if you are transparent with your method I can have something itelligent to say. If not, idk bro vibe it out
aenews2
10 months ago
I'm not sure if I'll be able to sleep tonight. I know I gots this, but it's still a lot of money...
FranciscoJoseEliasNavarro
10 months ago
The Y guys are scared af 🤣
aenews2
10 months ago
Do you think I should pull my buy orders? When I ran it this morning, I got 143 for 2023 and 2024 tho...
TheDrachma
10 months ago
Running the GISTEMP programme from steps 0 to 3 (just land station data) and using the most current data available: ghcnm.tavg.v4.0.1.20240805.qcf.dat, ghcnm.tavg.v4.0.1.20240805.qcf.inv, I find that July 2023 is hotter than July 2024.
aenews2
10 months ago
Mortgage your home and buy more #notfinancialadvice
BennyS
10 months ago
I ran out of more money to buy "No". It's frustrating to see the shares go on discount after I fully leveraged.
aenews2
10 months ago
Oh @aenews silly me. No 2.
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah, of course. Feel free to add me on Discord. I have the same username.
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah, of course. Feel free to add me on Discord. I have the same username.
Sleijffers
10 months ago
No idea which way this will flip which is probably why I shouldn't have bet. But this comment section is fascinating for the amount of bullshit people are posting in order to improve their position.
aenews2
10 months ago
Not great returns for 5 months, but hottest year is essentially a lock. I'll look into and trade August hottest after this market. Politics rn is pretty spicy, good opportunities there especially if you follow news closely.
Sleijffers
10 months ago
No idea which way this will flip which is probably why I shouldn't have bet. But this comment section is fascinating for the amount of bullshit people are posting in order to improve their position.
aenews2
10 months ago
Feel free to buy more N
cooker
10 months ago
The true odds are probably the other way around. At best a 50/50 conflip
aenews2
10 months ago
Gotcha. Yeah the anomaly is ~121 right now by my estimate. I'd say less than 1% chance it goes below and 10% it ties. So 90% we win.
Sleijffers
10 months ago
No idea which way this will flip which is probably why I shouldn't have bet. But this comment section is fascinating for the amount of bullshit people are posting in order to improve their position.
aenews2
10 months ago
Why are you filling me
Sleijffers
10 months ago
No idea which way this will flip which is probably why I shouldn't have bet. But this comment section is fascinating for the amount of bullshit people are posting in order to improve their position.
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah but NASA wants to keep the sweatytrain going. We can't break this streak, must own the Rethuglicans. We ain't Europe.
Sleijffers
10 months ago
No idea which way this will flip which is probably why I shouldn't have bet. But this comment section is fascinating for the amount of bullshit people are posting in order to improve their position.
aenews2
10 months ago
Don't know the answer, but it should be higher than last year.
gopfanfan
10 months ago
So according to the largest YES holder, land is a TIE. aenews2: "I get 1.43 for 2024 Land and 1.43 for 2023 Land" I also got TIE for my land calculations using NASA's python code and ghcnm.v4.0.1.20240805. I am still looking into how to convert noaa.ersst.v5 into SBBX.ERSSTv5. Being able to do that will give the answer to this market. However, TheDrachma shared some very clean code (https://pastebin.com/si5mF3aj) to calculate averages directly from noaa.ersst.v5.nc: Average SST for July 2023: 18.90°C Average SST for July 2024: 18.87°C So according to the same data that NASA is going to be using, the sea is a NO. (Or a TIE depending on how they round). Land TIE + Sea NO = $0.17 NO shares? Go ahead and build your own super advanced models, but the bet resolves on NASA code and that's where I'll be keeping my focus.
aenews2
10 months ago
Aren't you still 23K net Y?
yourrapist1776
10 months ago
I now stand to make more if No wins. I'm officially team faggot!
aenews2
10 months ago
Sit tight and buckle up. We're almost there.
Sleijffers
10 months ago
No idea which way this will flip which is probably why I shouldn't have bet. But this comment section is fascinating for the amount of bullshit people are posting in order to improve their position.
aenews2
10 months ago
We won by all accounts, all measures, barring a big surprise.
Sleijffers
10 months ago
No idea which way this will flip which is probably why I shouldn't have bet. But this comment section is fascinating for the amount of bullshit people are posting in order to improve their position.
aenews2
10 months ago
Please guys, stop giving me more shares. I'm tired of taking your money...
aenews2
10 months ago
It's a 90% coinflip, bro
AllForOne
10 months ago
Look at the answers. It looks like that nothing is decided yet. This market is just a coinflip
aenews2
10 months ago
Probably
FranciscoJoseEliasNavarro
10 months ago
Wait... Actually, is it free money?
aenews2
10 months ago
@oxamo Yeah, I think so. The N folks would have to get very lucky, but it's narrowly possible.
bendover
10 months ago
for fun, what do you thinks the odds would be, to bet it lands on 119?
aenews2
10 months ago
10%?
bendover
10 months ago
for fun, what do you thinks the odds would be, to bet it lands on 119?
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah August looks like it'll be another interesting month to model, see you there!
FOMOs-retardoo
10 months ago
I sold some of the shares. Enough so that there was a stoploss at all. In the event that the market resolved as a NO, what else did I lose but the knowledge and skills I had just gained? I spent a lot of time on it, but I had a great time. Btw. guess it will end up above 119, but I could be wrong ;) see you in the next markets
aenews2
10 months ago
Does that mean I made a mistake?
gopfanfan
10 months ago
So according to the largest YES holder, land is a TIE. aenews2: "I get 1.43 for 2024 Land and 1.43 for 2023 Land" I also got TIE for my land calculations using NASA's python code and ghcnm.v4.0.1.20240805. I am still looking into how to convert noaa.ersst.v5 into SBBX.ERSSTv5. Being able to do that will give the answer to this market. However, TheDrachma shared some very clean code (https://pastebin.com/si5mF3aj) to calculate averages directly from noaa.ersst.v5.nc: Average SST for July 2023: 18.90°C Average SST for July 2024: 18.87°C So according to the same data that NASA is going to be using, the sea is a NO. (Or a TIE depending on how they round). Land TIE + Sea NO = $0.17 NO shares? Go ahead and build your own super advanced models, but the bet resolves on NASA code and that's where I'll be keeping my focus.
aenews2
10 months ago
They'll come out when NASA interns press the button
Inverse-Bet-Wins
10 months ago
Are the results coming out tomorrow?
aenews2
10 months ago
I want to win 🏆 big and go down in history. If I sell, has to be 88c+.
pengstromjr
10 months ago
@aenews2, I'm kind of curious why your still in this market, why not take your wins and gamble in a less risky market with such profits? Especially with such a volatile and up in the air market?
aenews2
10 months ago
Maybe, I will have to retire from prediction markets if I lose this bet lol
Lyapunov
10 months ago
Highly regarded Yessers, did you really think this pump and dump through? Who do you think will buy your Yes bags at 87c when you can even produce a decent fake news link?
aenews2
10 months ago
oh no!
nononom
10 months ago
"Note: If 2024 July is tied for highest with another year, it will NOT suffice to resolve this market to "Yes" - it must be higher." Thank fucking god
aenews2
10 months ago
woah, very nice
SmartG
10 months ago
this is a reliable scientist running models with GHCN+ERSST data, he calls a virtual tie but favors 24 July higher. New data is revised down from yesterday, but still it's closer to 120 than 119. We may still have one or two days of data to see.
aenews2
10 months ago
aenews just sold all his shares for 60c, bet accordingly
aenews2
10 months ago
What forum?
Superque
10 months ago
This link was shared in a forum where groups from various universities are analyzing the impact of temperature along with the distance of the orbits. I'm here to shed some light since I see that everyone is looking out for their own interests depending on what they have invested. I'm going to provide objective data. On August 4th, we already had the GISS data available, as usual, these are not final data and have been changing as the beacons have been synthesized and grouped, which is why many models take a few days to provide their final data along with their reports. The data we are currently handling in the research groups range between 117 and 119, very close, almost identical to those of Era5 (other times there are small differences). This range of numbers is due to what I mentioned earlier. The first 14 days of July were colder than those of July 2023, which has significantly influenced the results, even though some parts of the Earth have exceeded their maximum temperatures. In water temperature, we found a deviation of 0.38. I hope that this discussion has excited or sparked curiosity about the world of meteorology, and we hope to see you in some forum where we will be happy to support you. Best regards.
aenews2
10 months ago
I've given away a mountain of alpha in the past 2 days. Honestly, probably should not have done that. At some point, I gotta call it. The models are secret sauce worked hard to refine. Put a lot of time into it after March fiasco. Anyways, you can shoot me a DM on Discord. I may give you something at least.
Gdubb47
10 months ago
I just can’t shake the feeling that despite this backend analysis purported by some users, there simply weren’t enough days to counteract how cool the beginning of the month was relatively. Like you can just look at the graph?
aenews2
10 months ago
lol yeah I meant land not SST oops. Well I haven't really calculated what SST by itself is tbh, only land.
TheDrachma
10 months ago
Also, if you are just calculating land temp differences, and you are getting less than 0.01 C difference; you still need to factor in sea surface temp. I haven't done land but SST is looking like 0.04 in favor of NO. Merging these two needs the GISTEMP programme to work, but I'm still struggling on being able to integrate the partially updated temp files to run. But it's still not even close to the current market odds.
aenews2
10 months ago
As expected from a Rethuglican
0x-JayBee
10 months ago
@gopfan you are all over the place lol
aenews2
10 months ago
GISS can be lower than Copernicus and still hotter than last year.
n/a
10 months ago
Copernicus says no. Climate science is already subject to such scrutiny, you think they will post different results? Then the boomers on facebook will say "these scientists can't even get their story straight".
aenews2
10 months ago
I get 1.43 for 2024 Land SST and 1.43 for 2023 Land SST. And they've remained the same for last three days of GHCN updates.
TheDrachma
10 months ago
these are based on the sea surface data that go into the index used to resolve the market. I have not caclulated the July 2024 values for land-based weather stations. I am struggling with the available source code for GISTEMP because many stations are dropped when using the most recently updated land based data. If others have been able to run this programme please share.
aenews2
10 months ago
Looks like market agrees
caesar
10 months ago
Finally can replicate the NASA index results and it's bad news for me :(
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah I said ERA5 = coinflip. It's not the only database you can look at tho, odds seemed better when putting it all together. The reason I keep saying ERA5 is because it's one of the main ones I look at, and everyone in the market keeps referencing it and saying that means 2024 isn't hottest. So I'm responding to that.
Gdubb47
10 months ago
I just can’t shake the feeling that despite this backend analysis purported by some users, there simply weren’t enough days to counteract how cool the beginning of the month was relatively. Like you can just look at the graph?
aenews2
10 months ago
Has everything to do with what you said lol because you're misinterpreting ERA5.
Gdubb47
10 months ago
I just can’t shake the feeling that despite this backend analysis purported by some users, there simply weren’t enough days to counteract how cool the beginning of the month was relatively. Like you can just look at the graph?
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah, no. ERA5 analysis by itself always suggested a coin flip. Because it won't be as different from GISTEMP compared to last year.
Gdubb47
10 months ago
I just can’t shake the feeling that despite this backend analysis purported by some users, there simply weren’t enough days to counteract how cool the beginning of the month was relatively. Like you can just look at the graph?
aenews2
10 months ago
If your results do not match the report exactly, you have not gotten it fully working yet. Mine is working, and I'm using the latest data. We have maybe 1-3 more updates before this is finalized.
CNMLGB
10 months ago
Again it's the same, the result is stable
aenews2
10 months ago
Ah I see what you're doing, it's a double subtraction issue. You're using the files from last report, so if your code is working then you'll reproduce the webpage results exactly with zero differences. Like this: https://i.imgur.com/K1POWUK.png
CNMLGB
10 months ago
Again it's the same, the result is stable
aenews2
10 months ago
July 2024 is currently 121 with latest run today.
mango-lassi
10 months ago
Can July '23 data be modified to 118 during this release? I guess that's the only scenario where Yes might win
aenews2
10 months ago
That's because June was revised upwards. Not sure what you mean about reliability.
CNMLGB
10 months ago
Ran the NASA's python code with default data for June, the number for June is 126 instead of 121. Defintely not reliable and still a coinflip
aenews2
10 months ago
another one bites the dust, welp
AppleADay
10 months ago
airplane sold, you guys scared me. see you next gamble
aenews2
10 months ago
Not really. This only really affects the last few days once ERSST drops. All the epic trading here before yesterday was done based on people using their own models. And Poly, Kalshi, and PredictIt have done GISTEMP and NOAA hottest month markets for many, many years. This is just code linked on the homepage.
FOMOs-retardoo
10 months ago
Wondering, how many on YES here based on very high YES on "Will 2024 be the hottest year on record?" market and reports of hottest days in measurement.
aenews2
10 months ago
But yeah I imagine they must have a process of doing it on the back-end.
gopfanfan
10 months ago
It just seems like something that should be available somewhere for download. It shouldn't have to be something we reverse engineer. Like, is the official copy just sitting on some NASA laptop somewhere?
aenews2
10 months ago
If it is, I don't know about it
gopfanfan
10 months ago
It just seems like something that should be available somewhere for download. It shouldn't have to be something we reverse engineer. Like, is the official copy just sitting on some NASA laptop somewhere?
aenews2
10 months ago
Err well that's not good lol
AppleADay
10 months ago
too bad youre on the wrong side of history bucko!
aenews2
10 months ago
Also since ERSST released 2 days late, trading up until yesterday was just based on everyone using their models. At the end of the day, looks like Team Y just modelled better.
tacotownz
10 months ago
this has actually been a pretty epic market for how niche it is
aenews2
10 months ago
cause past months they also moved it up, folks who traded previous markets know it already
Sleijffers
10 months ago
When is the index expected to post?
aenews2
10 months ago
This is where they post the release dates, but's on or before: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/release_dates.html They usually post earlier.
Sleijffers
10 months ago
When is the index expected to post?
aenews2
10 months ago
Not gonna just give it to you, but if you look at the directory there is some code to do the reverse. That might lead you in the right direction.
gopfanfan
10 months ago
Where is NASA's code to convert the ".nc" files at https://downloads.psl.noaa.gov/Datasets/noaa.ersst.v5/ into the "SBBX.ERSSTv5" file at https://data.giss.nasa.gov/pub/gistemp/"
aenews2
10 months ago
My guess would be end of this week, maybe Thursday/Friday. If not, then Monday/Tuesday
Sleijffers
10 months ago
When is the index expected to post?
aenews2
10 months ago
@tacotownz lol yeah, obviously there's a small chance they win if they get rlly lucky, but I'm sharing the accurate data as of today. And it's obviously true based on the multiple other guys who already leaked it or traded it like random, vanadium, and dank. Lead a horse to water, indeed.
FOMOs-retardoo
10 months ago
Wondering, how many on YES here based on very high YES on "Will 2024 be the hottest year on record?" market and reports of hottest days in measurement.
aenews2
10 months ago
I don't just think. I know. That's why the Vanadium guy sniped and took market to 97c. Looks like that was right after ERSST updated on NOAA website. The guy with random in his name also leaked this in comments below, that N is burning their money. In any case, I'm posting because I'd prefer cashing out at fair odds.
AppleADay
10 months ago
thinking many of the YES voters made this mistake LOL free money for us
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah just need to add the updated ERSST data from NOAA and add it to the GISTEMP ERSST. Actually someone posted about it here I think a month or two ago? But I guess no one understood what he meant. I figured it out eventually. Note tho I bet big BEFORE ERSST was out. So I predicted this correctly beforehand.
FOMOs-retardoo
10 months ago
Wondering, how many on YES here based on very high YES on "Will 2024 be the hottest year on record?" market and reports of hottest days in measurement.
aenews2
10 months ago
Well cat's out of the bag, so I might as well explain. Before the month is over, ERA5 and other databases are great. N folks have been misinterpreting ERA by not looking at how ERA5 and GISTEMP are correlated. ERSST dropped an update yesterday, so now you can actually just calculate the value directly using NASA's code. It's 121 vs last year's 119. For the record, ERA5 is 123 this year. Usually the anomalies are pretty similar (historically avg of 1 difference), but last year ERA5 was way hotter than GISTEMP. This seems to be what confused the N people who are comparing ERA5 to ERA5 and not comparing ERA5 to GISTEMP. Anyways, now we have NASA's own data showing 121. That's why the "insider" took market to 97c yesterday. There are no insiders. He was just running the code on GISTEMP homepage.
AppleADay
10 months ago
thinking many of the YES voters made this mistake LOL free money for us
aenews2
10 months ago
ty, I'm doing better now
raspberry17
10 months ago
Shit, I thought you meant a metaphorical ER given your position in this market! Hope you're OK and will recover soon!
aenews2
10 months ago
I... wasn't kidding. I'm fine now, but that hurt like a bitch
aenews2
10 months ago
I'm in the ER rn
aenews2
10 months ago
Yes, and FTR Copernicus implies greater than 40% chance of hottest even before considering other datasets.
CouchWhale
10 months ago
he has 218k shares. i think he knows about the Copernicus data.
aenews2
10 months ago
That it's hot
0x32688B3b59312fcFc7ad8fAD64c4a5Ea24D96C13-1720981086792
10 months ago
What do the yes guys know?
aenews2
10 months ago
I'm in the ER rn
aenews2
10 months ago
I'll share in a couple days, probs
TheDrachma
10 months ago
Again yes peeps, I’d love to see your transparent methods and results!
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah this is irrelevant
0x03b08DF58990478765ACe29f7DD3D58a49c1215B-1720014453941
10 months ago
From Japan: https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Japan_sees_hottest_July_since_records_began_999.html
aenews2
10 months ago
alright bro, now go propose all the nomination markets. oh wait you won't because you'd get disputed on them and lose!
yourrapist1776
10 months ago
The democratic party officially nominated it's candidate today at 6pm, after kamala won enough delegates in the virtual roll call. Every single official source has stated this to be true
aenews2
10 months ago
For anyone who wants to exit, I have a nice sell stack at 89c. Will keep it open for the next 12 hours or so.
aenews2
10 months ago
Guess Team N has run out of money. Just let it happen, we're going to 90c and then 100c!
aenews2
10 months ago
Guess Team N has run out of money. Just let it happen, we're going to 90c and then 100c!
aenews2
10 months ago
Good luck 👍🏽
vote.fun
10 months ago
market closes when the Democratic Party officially nominates its candidate for the 2024 presidential election. (some time tm)
aenews2
10 months ago
Im queued at 69c if you want more N at 31c, chief
BennyS
10 months ago
What is the market reacting to?
aenews2
10 months ago
1 Hour left
Makaveli
10 months ago
does anyone know what time zone polymarket uses? will this end on EST or pacific time?
aenews2
10 months ago
Looks like you'll lose lol
Laura
10 months ago
Ok well, it looks like they're not even going to bother putting out a statement telling us what everyone knows to be true, so tomorrow it is. I JUST WANT THIS TO BE OVER OMG 😭😭😭
aenews2
10 months ago
ERA5 data is pretty hot, implies higher than 40% of Y
BennyS
10 months ago
Does Yes have a case besides insider trading? Share your perspectives.
aenews2
10 months ago
No one is an insider, that was always a crackpot theory from people who lose in these markets. No one is larping as an insider, a few are joking about it because it's an inside joke at this point.
MrRat
10 months ago
Convinced people are just LARPing as insiders, you would think the nerds at NASA would have something better to do than gamble their money. I'm only here because I am bored and having nothing better to do.
aenews2
10 months ago
Same, I should probably start trading there
raspberry17
10 months ago
Regardless of the end result, just wanna say that I have enjoyed this market and its comments a lot! Much more exciting than the politics markets, and far fewer trolls! Thank you all for the good time, and looking fwd to the August market
aenews2
10 months ago
Thanks, can we take it back to 90?
temporaryname
10 months ago
ggs to the yes. you won
aenews2
10 months ago
Polymarket, Kalshi, and PI have always used GISTEMP or NOAA. Both which release after 1-3 weeks. For that matter, almost none of the major reporting agencies are immediate (NOAA, GISTEMP, Berkeley Earth, HADCRUT).
gopfanfan
10 months ago
I feel like these markets would be better resolved by Copernicus because they release their data continuously. NASA waiting for like 2 weeks after the month is over makes this more of a gambling market than a prediction market.
aenews2
10 months ago
Glad you've seen the light, itys
yourrapist1776
10 months ago
I am sorry I deceived you all, but I am the insider. It's yes. It's over.
aenews2
10 months ago
Well I'd wait until at least one of the nomination markets is settled and resolved before proposing. No biggie, just another 2 hours.
Laura
10 months ago
Alright guys, I'm quite happy to put through the proposal once the DNC announces they've officially nominated her. Do we want to wait until she accepts the nomination (I'm assuming the same day)? Either way, it will all be time stamped so no need to be reckless in rushing it through.
aenews2
10 months ago
oh yeah i know that, just blanked on the abbreviation
fineptune
10 months ago
Pity I'm out of cash to buy more N.
aenews2
10 months ago
My ERA5 model only takes into account surface air. That already includes the entire globe. Didn't look at ERA5 sea. What is LOTI?
fineptune
10 months ago
Pity I'm out of cash to buy more N.
aenews2
10 months ago
"Shapiro covers up the sexual harassment and murder of young women for his friends" just sounds like such a damning attack line
arius
10 months ago
Sexual Harassment Josh has kickstarted a wave of doomposting among Democrats and attacks from a newly euphoric right. Everyone on the left is praying it's not him, while the Republicans, believe me, they are having fun with him!
aenews2
10 months ago
That only makes sense if you think no chance VP announcement happens today. Could be true at this point.
Laura
10 months ago
Ty. I'm glad you didn't lose it all!
aenews2
10 months ago
No I think odds are higher, obvs. But just saying I don't understand why he says definitely N when ERA5 implies it is very likely (40%+).
aenews2
10 months ago
Well I queued up sells at 89c. If you're an insider pls cash me out chief!
aenews2
10 months ago
Not over yet
MalikNabers
10 months ago
Congrats to no holders. Lost a few hundred in this market. Y’all played it well. Gg
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah I meant coinflip based only on ERA5. My ERA5-only model said greater than 40% chance of hottest.
fineptune
10 months ago
Pity I'm out of cash to buy more N.
aenews2
10 months ago
I mean I got my MS in astronomy
TheNoobBeaver
10 months ago
https://twitter.com/25_cycle/status/1820151708770529392
aenews2
10 months ago
tbh I did not even check JRA-3Q this month, surprised it's 12 under
TheNoobBeaver
10 months ago
https://twitter.com/25_cycle/status/1820151708770529392
aenews2
10 months ago
dunno why y'all were burning all ur cash on a coinflip
fineptune
10 months ago
Pity I'm out of cash to buy more N.
aenews2
10 months ago
real odds are 99% imo
Wisdomtime
10 months ago
95% according to latest data -- https://www.carbonbrief.org/state-of-the-climate-2024-now-very-likely-to-be-warmest-year-on-record/
aenews2
10 months ago
Maybe you're looking at the wrong data cause my ERA5 calcs say 40% chance of hottest
aenews2
10 months ago
Well I queued up sells at 89c. If you're an insider pls cash me out chief!
aenews2
10 months ago
What makes you say that @Iverson
aenews2
10 months ago
Well I queued up sells at 89c. If you're an insider pls cash me out chief!
aenews2
10 months ago
Guess I'm getting zero sleep for the next few days or week
aenews2
10 months ago
Well I queued up sells at 89c. If you're an insider pls cash me out chief!
aenews2
10 months ago
Well I queued up sells at 89c. If you're an insider pls cash me out chief!
aenews2
10 months ago
i mean it would suck, but I was already up 300K this year, no biggie really
yourrapist1776
10 months ago
Either v-for-vanadium is an insider and you win & he goes to prison or he's just gambling and you got blown out chasing steam
aenews2
10 months ago
why is N going up
aenews2
10 months ago
I refuse to flip and be on the same side as you
Laura
10 months ago
BREAKING: aenews2 begins the sell off! (Although it’s never too late to flip!)
aenews2
10 months ago
March was not wrong. It was very close (and both NOAA and Berkeley Earth were only 0.01 hotter!). But yes, basically the same reasons for March apply here as well.
fineptune
10 months ago
Maybe you compare between June and July’s anomaly of ERA5, which are about the same, then concluded NASA’s won’t be lower than June’s anomaly, 121. This assosiation you did in March ended up wrong. Are you repeating the same reasoning?
aenews2
10 months ago
Probably will soon
andybeshear
10 months ago
so... anyone start looking at august?
aenews2
10 months ago
But he didn't emerge victorious
n/a
10 months ago
those who correctly predicted that maduro will emerge victorious deserve to get payed. Those who rely on polling data to argue someone else is the winner, predicted absolutely nothing as the polling was known before the election. We waited a few days just in case it gets overturned. Well, it didnt.
aenews2
10 months ago
I dunno. ERA5 points to it being a close race.
JeffreyBezos
10 months ago
it's obviously no. Every single piece of data points to no, and not one single piece of data points to yes. The market is just yes becuase the yes people have more money. It's not manipulation it's just stupidity. If you have money bet no and enjoy the free money
aenews2
10 months ago
Bruh, that doesn't mean I won't sweat a 100K+ share position lol! And usually the market is wrapped up by the 3rd or 4th. The fact that it hasn't does make me anxious. But yes, I still believe I will win.
temporaryname
10 months ago
i know you are not scared, you are trolling about being scared. I know you bet your beliefs.
aenews2
10 months ago
👌🏾
Laura
10 months ago
What if we’ve been arguing all this time over semantics and he formally endorses at the final hour 😱😱😱
aenews2
10 months ago
Lol should buy more N, in that case
Iverson
10 months ago
Just put in another limit order. Seems to be a pretty remote chance Bernie formally endorses her in the next 24 hours. This should be closer to 5% Yes now.
aenews2
10 months ago
I bet my beliefs
temporaryname
10 months ago
ure a troll. 100%
aenews2
10 months ago
What matters is the liquidity not the volume. After all, if price is wrong on any of them, you can correct it.
yourrapist1776
10 months ago
None of those other markets have any volume and should be disregarded
aenews2
10 months ago
Did you actually?
Car
10 months ago
Oops misclick
aenews2
10 months ago
I added back an order if you want more. I have calmed down and feel zen.
gopfanfan
10 months ago
Are you willing to show your math on Copernicus being "fine"? Because Copernicus shows 16.90°C and it needs to be 16.96°C to beat last year.
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah maybe in a couple days
gopfanfan
10 months ago
Are you willing to show your math on Copernicus being "fine"? Because Copernicus shows 16.90°C and it needs to be 16.96°C to beat last year.
aenews2
10 months ago
Because Copernicus data is just fine. Implies maybe 40% chance. It's concerning that new accounts are swooping in with large orders.
gopfanfan
10 months ago
Why would you be scared now and not after all the Copernicus data came out?
aenews2
10 months ago
ngl I'm kinda scared, pulled my bids for now
aenews2
10 months ago
when the world needed him most, he vanished
CPU
10 months ago
where is dank when you need him
aenews2
10 months ago
Is that Team N or Team Y?
yourrapist1776
10 months ago
The worst archetype of people on the site are the ones who made out huge on biden dropping early/kamala getting the nom and now just degenerate gamble on everything thinking they are Nostradamus
aenews2
10 months ago
NASA won't let this streak end...
MrRat
10 months ago
I'm scared fellow NO bros, what do the YES bros know?
aenews2
10 months ago
It literally is in prediction markets. See the top traders!
ootharju
10 months ago
Past performance is not an indicator of future perfomance
aenews2
10 months ago
I want moar shares
Apsalar
10 months ago
you know aenews is sweating it when he resorts to arguing in the comments
aenews2
10 months ago
They usually strike by now, oddly radio silent this month
BenCM
10 months ago
Still a week to go.
aenews2
10 months ago
Guys, remember the last time when there was an obvious favorite candidate and slowly everyone issued statements against them or endorsed another person? Yeah I forget what happened there..
aenews2
10 months ago
Oh they're sweating. They're sweating hard.
GoblinMilk
10 months ago
lmaoing at shapiro bagholders being completely silent in the comments
aenews2
10 months ago
DM
AnEggplant
10 months ago
It also sounds bad when people say "All Republicans are pedophiles"
aenews2
10 months ago
Keep buying N guys, I double dog dare you! As a Bernie Bro, I believe in my guy to set the record straight.
aenews2
10 months ago
Regardless of the veracity, can we agree it sounds bad when people say "Shapiro covers up sexual harassment and MURDER of women!"
aenews2
10 months ago
Irrelevant. Folks have tried that argument in court many times the past few years, and it has never worked. Disputes determine validity of proposals at time of proposal. Does not matter if it was not proposed until a minute, hour, day, or weeks after rules being satisfied.
Iverson
10 months ago
Yes holders can already submit this as resolved if they believe Bernie already endorsed. Clearly you don't believe he has
aenews2
10 months ago
I don't think I said I would dispute. I said that it will definitely be disputed. And it will be.
Laura
10 months ago
Yes, but aenews picked them up and has already said they will dispute. I would advise caution when dealing with aenews.
aenews2
10 months ago
Feel free, I ain't deleting. Fair to say my stance has evolved over time.
vote.fun
10 months ago
take some screen shots pls, out rn. hell prob delete
aenews2
10 months ago
He definitely endorsed (See Haley). He definitely explicitly endorsed. But formal endorsement is arguable, higher bar that may or may not have been met. I think AOC resolved with a statement fairly similar to Bernie's. So I'm not sure what we are considering "formal endorsement". We won't have a prolonged fight over this anyways. Bernie likely will just endorse more strongly before official nomination, or if not, then Polymarket will clarify when disputed and save us time disagreeing.
yourrapist1776
10 months ago
Support doesn't equal formal endorsement. Bernie has made that clear himself many times over.
aenews2
10 months ago
There's no "scam" angle. If this goes to dispute, Polymarket will probably clarify and it won't even be technically decided by UMA.
vote.fun
10 months ago
yeah really hard to disagree. bernie has been so obvious about his stance. Sad ae is like this. People will try to scam wherever they can
aenews2
10 months ago
Agreed, encourage folks on both sides to join the process if and when it kicks off: https://discord.com/invite/uma
Laura
10 months ago
For the no holders, I predict that this will be disputed even without a formal endorsement by Bernie. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with the dispute process and join us on the UMA Discord server. Just search Google for the link.
aenews2
10 months ago
Looks like the insiders are on vacation this month
aenews2
10 months ago
Buy more
Laura
10 months ago
I literally just bought another 1000 shares
aenews2
10 months ago
I don't understand how the Y people are diamond handing at this price when interviews have yet to finish. I agree y'all will most likely win, but jeez.
aenews2
10 months ago
Air temperature is everything globally. Air is air whether over land or sea.
Fud
10 months ago
The copernicus data you're looking is surface temperature only. The NASA data that is the data source used for determining this market is land-ocean data. It includes more than just surface temps, but that full data set is not available until around mid August.
aenews2
10 months ago
Would be really annoying. Does that mean he pulled a fast one over me in March? Was hoping to make it all back this month...
bendover
10 months ago
if im right on the No and what he is doing. those following him on the yes side is gonna get creamed
aenews2
10 months ago
Good times, I lost 20K that month
Lyapunov
10 months ago
@Gopfan are you planning to pull a last minute flip like you did back in March? Buying No for 60c sell at 30c, and then buy Yes :))) Check it out https://polymarket.com/event/will-2024-have-the-hottest-march-on-record/will-2024-have-the-hottest-march-on-record?tid=1722640641333
aenews2
10 months ago
It is indeed genuine stupidity. It may well be Shapiro, but this news means nothing.
Republican
10 months ago
idk buying the news on this Philly story seems stupid
aenews2
10 months ago
I don't understand what crack the Y folks are smoking...
aenews2
10 months ago
Damn you're right
zyncet
10 months ago
Progs4Harris was fake... Account suspended by X.
aenews2
10 months ago
Lfgo!
fundamentalmisunderstanding
10 months ago
Looks like Bernie will formally endorse on Monday 8PM EST https://x.com/Progs4Harris/status/1819479936886833657
aenews2
10 months ago
Looks like they are currently unavailable to pick up the phone. I hear they are in mourning.
Wook-Capital-Fund-I
10 months ago
@Laura and @wetard - As the unofficial spokespeople for all "No" bag holders, we respect your service and hope you guide us towards a winning resolution.
aenews2
10 months ago
Gg?
aenews2
10 months ago
Jeez this market just keeps pumping 10c for no reason, amazing
aenews2
10 months ago
"[Vereb] confronted and threatened me that evening leaving me weeping and in shock standing alone in a parking lot,"
aenews2
10 months ago
"You are going to continue to be nothing by the time Josh and I get done with you"
aenews2
10 months ago
"You are going to continue to be nothing by the time Josh and I get done with you"
aenews2
10 months ago
He obviously endorsed. Formal endorsement is arguable, but there's no incentive to propose rather than buy shares. People have argued what you're saying time and time again in court (for years). It has never won as an argument. Proposals are judged by validity when proposed, not by "oh it wasn't proposed last week". That is irrelevant.
vote.fun
10 months ago
if you think hes endorsed already, youve lost all credibility to argue yes by not proposing it yet.
aenews2
10 months ago
Disagree. Probably depends on VP as well. And this will be argued even if nothing further happens.
Laura
10 months ago
Nah I think he's set himself up really well to support her in defeating Trump while not associating himself with the big donor class influencing the DNC, drowning out the working American.
aenews2
10 months ago
Axios: "The Israeli Mossad assassinated Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh by detonating an explosive device planted in advance in his bedroom at the Iranian government official residence in Tehran, two sources with knowledge of the issue confirmed to Axios."
aenews2
10 months ago
I still think Bernie will issue another stronger endorsement before Harris becomes the nominee.
aenews2
10 months ago
No I'm saying if he believes what he's saying, should spend 100K proposing all the nominee markets. He won't. Reality is that anyone who tries will get disputed and lose them all.
Laura
10 months ago
My best interpretation of that part for the 'no' side is that the voting is the process of officially nominating the candidate, and through that process she has received enough votes to become the official candidate.
aenews2
10 months ago
Woah! Big news, man. Now try taking 100K to propose the nominee markets. Looks like free money!
Iverson
10 months ago
I believe this is now resolved. The Democratic Party has officially through its delegate polling nominated Kamala. On Monday she will officially ACCEPT the nomination. The Democratic Party though has already officially nominated her.
aenews2
10 months ago
Us Y folks just chilling
Eridpnc
10 months ago
Man I think no shares are negative EV just because you have to watch every Bernie interview that must be torture
aenews2
10 months ago
Lolz good point
Eridpnc
10 months ago
Man I think no shares are negative EV just because you have to watch every Bernie interview that must be torture
aenews2
10 months ago
Well yes, which was always the case lol
Laura
10 months ago
Bleh. She's secured the votes, but the DNC chair has said she won't officially be the nominee until next week.
aenews2
10 months ago
https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1819424186797846726
diogenes
10 months ago
This says she is the official nominee now? https://twitter.com/HarrisWarRoom/status/1819422054439137314
aenews2
10 months ago
Weird. Maybe we're doing something differently? My ERA5 model says it's possible.
nononom
10 months ago
out of curiosity if you use Copernicus data, what leads to you believe this can resolve as "Yes"? I've tried numerous stuff but everything point towards no
aenews2
10 months ago
Shit!
Lyapunov
10 months ago
Yes voters who are actually doing regression analysis, don't forget to bin your outputs, as you might have noticed results are announced with 2 digit precision. Meaning NASA will turn all values between [1.185 - 1.194] to 1.19
aenews2
10 months ago
Do it, might be free money!
babybeluga
10 months ago
someone triple dog dare me to dump another 10k into josh shap
aenews2
10 months ago
(Don't take seriously)
babybeluga
10 months ago
what's good shapiro holders, where are we going to celebrate after we claim our winnings?
aenews2
10 months ago
The morgue since apparently Shapiro covered up a murder case: https://gavinfish.com/blog/2024/07/28/opinion-anti-semites-shouldnt-stop-josh-shapiro-from-getting-the-veep-nod-but-a-murder-cover-up-should-23583/?feed_id=45&_unique_id=66a6173706622
babybeluga
10 months ago
what's good shapiro holders, where are we going to celebrate after we claim our winnings?
aenews2
10 months ago
I dl the data from the Copernicus website and then crunch numbers
tomn
10 months ago
Quick question - how are you doing your monthly ERA5 calculations and then comparing to GISTEMP at the same base years?
aenews2
10 months ago
Shapiro, obvs. Looks the 67c block was filled. I have the rest on offer at 65c.
ThrivingLeverage
10 months ago
Yeah but i can't see that. For what candidate ? What you're saying doesn't make sense, it can't be for any Y
aenews2
10 months ago
I put the offer up on the book now
ThrivingLeverage
10 months ago
Any Y ?
aenews2
10 months ago
Alright, new deal. I'm willing to cash Y folks out at 67c in size (beyond what's in book).
aenews2
10 months ago
Many of them cancelled events lol
barubas
10 months ago
Shapiro cancelling his campaign implies redundancy. Its a wrap folks
aenews2
10 months ago
Well you better be right because I'm tailing you. On vacation and haven't had much time to look at this in detail.
gopfan
10 months ago
@temporaryname why would I ever share my thoughts? It’s like showing cards playing a poker game
aenews2
10 months ago
Heyy am I invited? 😥
friendlyguyy
10 months ago
Almost there Shapiro fam. A beach vacation is waiting for us all.
aenews2
10 months ago
Should happen over the weekend, definitely would if she ultimately selects him.
barubas
10 months ago
Shapiro cancelling his campaign implies redundancy. Its a wrap folks
aenews2
10 months ago
Also consistent with him knowing he's the frontrunner. I very much doubt he knows he has been selected when the vetting process has yet to complete.
barubas
10 months ago
Shapiro cancelling his campaign implies redundancy. Its a wrap folks
aenews2
10 months ago
I mean, this is why I bought 55K shares N
babybeluga
10 months ago
literally no one cares about this
aenews2
10 months ago
https://x.com/leahmcelrath/status/1818712013444726941?t=qE-rhdAlLaTd_A0OugAFxA&s=19
aenews2
10 months ago
I'm negotiating. If anyone agrees, I'd put up a huge wall on the book.
MurkKellyVP
10 months ago
spread is too big right?
aenews2
10 months ago
If any Y holders are feeling weak in the knees, I'd cash you out 55K shares at 53c Y (47c N).
aenews2
10 months ago
Yes
Laura
10 months ago
It’s 6pm ET/Bernie time and still no formal endorsement 😢 Voting commences at 9am ET tomorrow. It will all be over soon.
aenews2
10 months ago
Np
BenCM
10 months ago
Thank you for providing liquidity
aenews2
10 months ago
Well you might be right. Probably will pull most of my orders in a couple hours.
monkeyboy77
10 months ago
How long does the data take to update after the end of the month?
aenews2
10 months ago
Yeah this is what Ive been saying
HouseSlytherin
10 months ago
If Shapiro is nominated the "helping to cover up sexual assault charges" isn't going away
aenews2
10 months ago
Sometimes you just gotta go big and hope your model is better
monkeyboy77
10 months ago
How long does the data take to update after the end of the month?
aenews2
10 months ago
Yes, can trade until market is resolved
raspberry17
10 months ago
What happens between July 31 and Aug 14, when the official data is released? Can we still buy and sell shares?
aenews2
10 months ago
Hope it's Beshear cause I lose the least money, err make the most
Ox8
10 months ago
Shapiro is the most controversal pick of the contenders within the party factions. Beshear seems like the candidate without any one in the party opposing him.
aenews2
10 months ago
Rlly? Why
Mooseton
10 months ago
you're overexposed in all the wrong directions lol
aenews2
10 months ago
Agreed. Oops I guess I was dumb selling earlier.
yoonmarketenjoyer
10 months ago
I'm operating under the assumption that nobody actually knows if they will be picked or not yet. Reporting suggested that Kamala was still doing interviews as late as Wednesday and maybe beyond.
aenews2
10 months ago
Does this mean definitely the VP or definitely not the VP?
aenews2
10 months ago
https://twitter.com/JSweetLI/status/1818816696813019464
aenews2
10 months ago
https://twitter.com/JSweetLI/status/1818816696813019464
aenews2
10 months ago
Ty
temporaryname
10 months ago
ahahaha gl bro
aenews2
10 months ago
Hope that vetting tosses out Shapiro like they did Kelly. The sexual harassment incident, mark my words, will be an issue in the general if it doesn't prevent him from getting VP.
aenews2
10 months ago
Ur right, I will bet more on this cause im not losing both 🙏
temporaryname
10 months ago
bro you're up $286,613.93 why focus on 20k ? Focus on what you can control
aenews2
10 months ago
Big if true!
Laura
10 months ago
It’s 6pm ET/Bernie time and still no formal endorsement 😢 Voting commences at 9am ET tomorrow. It will all be over soon.
aenews2
10 months ago
God my PV has gone down 20K in last 48 hours. Really hope I win this bet and take the edge off my Shapiro N shares...
aenews2
10 months ago
I dunno, bro. Just hoping I win at least one of these bets.
Hussieny
10 months ago
duuudde, you are so fucken rich, go have fun,, why are here with us poor ppl?
aenews2
10 months ago
With my luck, I may lose 40K on Shapiro N this month and this bet too!
aenews2
10 months ago
Yes is the reliable and predictable determination, in line with past resolutions. Every platform will have a resolving style and preferred ways of interpreting rules.
Julius2727
10 months ago
Yep. It's not about the money, it's about the bona fides. Poly should be reliable and preditable, not manipulable.
aenews2
10 months ago
This is just sad to see, why are people still buying?
aenews2
10 months ago
No one is obliged to share their methodology for data tracking and analysis. A lot of folks here put hard work into developing them. Of course, no matter how good your model, you can still be wrong.
Verified.Counts
10 months ago
The fact that we are 3 days away from resolution and the market sits at 38% means people don't trust the data or think Nasa differs from Copernicus significantly. Seems like free money but we'll see, you never know.
aenews2
10 months ago
I mean. You would have probably lost even if this went to UMA court or if Polymarket clarified. I really doubt they'd have ruled your way.
stuart
10 months ago
Whats the source to prove he is republican?
aenews2
10 months ago
Thanks Susan
SusanWarren,HR
10 months ago
Just a reminder that no month is "hotter" than any other; every month is equally beautiful. Period.
aenews2
10 months ago
@temporaryname I bet it wouldn't be hottest. Indeed, it was super close. NOAA and Berkeley Earth were even closer (0.01°). Anyways, I lost 20K that time. Embarrassing loss, but I will make it all back this month! Maybe?
BenCM
10 months ago
The big reveal will come from our NASA insiders a few days prior to the public announcement with a drive, one way or the other, towards 80%+.
aenews2
10 months ago
@Grothendieck Just makes sense to buy the cheaper shares, my reasoning is similar to when I lost in March tbh. Shall see if it works this time.
BenCM
10 months ago
The big reveal will come from our NASA insiders a few days prior to the public announcement with a drive, one way or the other, towards 80%+.
aenews2
10 months ago
People closely tracking data can strike whenever. We can also be massively wrong, like when I donated 20K in March.
BenCM
10 months ago
The big reveal will come from our NASA insiders a few days prior to the public announcement with a drive, one way or the other, towards 80%+.
aenews2
10 months ago
Naw, should resolve Republican. And it did.
JohnathanDoe
10 months ago
The market will resolve once there is defintive evidence of the shooters political affirmations. Hasnt resolved yet, if no more defintive republican info comes out this market should resolve TO: 50/50
aenews2
10 months ago
Resolved to 0/100 actually, gg
Flipp
10 months ago
50/50
aenews2
10 months ago
Dunno. No one disputed, so it's done anyways.
stuart
10 months ago
Whats the source to prove he is republican?
aenews2
10 months ago
Rethuglicans win again
Car
10 months ago
Car thanks you for the free money
aenews2
10 months ago
You lost money on No, lost money on Yes, and now you'll lose money on N again. IMO. Good luck, tho
Laura
10 months ago
Bernie is an independent though, so there isn't the same kind of pressure to endorse. There's also a handful of Dem house members who have yet to offer their endorsement, so this kind of thing isn't unusual at this stage.
aenews2
10 months ago
Indian and Black woman with Jewish husband, with a gay running mate. Gotta tick all the boxes!
0x1ea262777074bE2B109b39125519bc7a19060353-1721880478947
10 months ago
You’re funny if you think they’re going to put a gay dude and a black woman on the same ticket. Plus he’s not even from a swing state.
aenews2
10 months ago
Wut?
Laura
10 months ago
lol I didn't either but wish I did. But I'm less adverse to buying higher now that it's almost a done deal. Kinda surprising to me that yes isn't a long shot at this point
aenews2
10 months ago
Boom yeah 211M
aenews2
10 months ago
dw it'll be even higher once the final numbahs are in
aenews2
10 months ago
dw it'll be even higher once the final numbahs are in
aaaaadz
10 months ago
Boxmojo now showing 205
aenews2
10 months ago
You're double counting as air is both land and sea... Actually, ERA5 will be maybe 0.05 colder than 2023. On vacation rn, so haven't been tracking as closely.
ROROfrom16
10 months ago
Even with an air temperature of 17.16 and a sea temperature of 20.9 for the next few days, we'd still be slightly below the 2023 records. With the trends forecast, we'll probably end up with a difference of 1.16, a long way from the 1.19 of 2023.
aenews2
10 months ago
Bruh I'm agreeing with you and saying it's not formal (yet)
vote.fun
10 months ago
lmfaoooo nice try retard
aenews2
10 months ago
LATEST: Sen. Bernie Sanders endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris at a rally in Portland, Maine, on Saturday. - ABC https://x.com/ABC/status/1817274758590853549?t=XJZcpJy4gyBrMe-GqlGt4A&s=19 Rules do say "formal" endorsement. Obviously this is a big step up from prior statements though, and is an endorsement. Bernie probably is getting closer to a formal endorsement.
aenews2
10 months ago
https://x.com/ABC/status/1817274758590853549?t=dz29d6P8784zHKw-3gDvaQ&s=19
fundamentalmisunderstanding
10 months ago
yea I think if the media widely reported this as an endorsement, then it's proposable
aenews2
10 months ago
Admittedly, that may be correct
Laura
10 months ago
I think the best interpretation is that this could be considered an endorsement but not a formal one.
aenews2
10 months ago
Damn, maybe I shouldn't have bought 30K N shares based on that
PolyPredictor
10 months ago
Its a good thing that the chief of staff isn't running. Taxpayer-funded settlements aren’t new to Pennsylvania.. State officials paid at least $3.2 million in taxpayer funds between 2010 and 2019 to resolve more than two dozen sexual harassment complaints against government and public employees.
aenews2
10 months ago
"Shapiro's chief of staff sexually harassed an employee, and Shapiro paid her off with taxpayer dollars." Would be the attack line from GOP... Do we think it's easy to counter that? Personally, I think vetting will flag it, and it'll be an issue.
aenews2
10 months ago
https://x.com/BernieSanders/status/1817243928548319732?t=0EJTBLeRyOBoHaT2wchbIQ&s=19
aenews2
10 months ago
Not that it matters much but AZ is next to a battleground state
n/a
10 months ago
Shapiro seems to be the best pick. I would vote Trump and can say, this guy is good at politics. Also 19 electoral votes and surrounded by battleground states. Mark Kelly is on an island surrounded by Red States, AZ only 11 electorals.
aenews2
10 months ago
If it's 199 they are so gonna have to round that up!
n/a
10 months ago
Not 1 website is predicting over 200mil. Lol degens
aenews2
10 months ago
It'll be over 200M lol
aenews2
10 months ago
I dunno. I feel his odds are closer to 10c.
Yanoya4sure
10 months ago
With Shapiro up +10 againt trump as VP, and him headlining events this weekend and Monday for Harris (Monday with campaign co-chair), its hard to see Shapiro as anything but undervalued.
aenews2
10 months ago
Oh shit yeah, temps are like 0.55° colder this year...
abee-Capital-Management
10 months ago
I know NASA use diferente sources, but Copernicus is a big proxy
aenews2
10 months ago
It'll be sad when it's exactly 119 and the N's win
abee-Capital-Management
10 months ago
I know NASA use diferente sources, but Copernicus is a big proxy
aenews2
10 months ago
oh my sweet summer child
ActDrew
10 months ago
Bruh you bet yes on everyone
aenews2
10 months ago
Same reason the sky is blue
Donkov
10 months ago
How is Michelle still at 1.4?
aenews2
10 months ago
say it with me... BIG MIKE BIG MIKE!
aenews2
10 months ago
so true!
debased
10 months ago
Big Mike endorsing Kamala is part of the plan to ditch kamala at the convention. Diamond your shares and redeposit to buy the dip
aenews2
10 months ago
Your GOD BIG MIKE JUST ENDORSED 😆😂🤣
aenews2
10 months ago
Might legit be gg, ngl
AccountNames
10 months ago
Taylor Swift just posted about it, telling her fans to buy tickets. It's over.
aenews2
10 months ago
Lol I also joked about this with someone
Theodorus
10 months ago
There is no risk to the seat. The democratic governor of Arizona would appoint another democratic senator for 2 years, plenty of time to prepare a campaign for reelection. For fun it could be Scott Kelly, Mark Kelly's twin brother, also an astronaut :D
aenews2
10 months ago
No, as virtual roll call will start on August 1 and be finalized on August 7.
n/a
10 months ago
what is the official alternative? can a single candidate be nominated during the DNC?
aenews2
10 months ago
Someone bought views
Donkov
10 months ago
Holy fucking shit, how the hell did it gain so many views?
aenews2
10 months ago
Let's see if bot deletions or 30M happen first
aenews2
10 months ago
Buy low, sell high. Won't resolve for days, so might as well.
BUBASIIK
11 months ago
what's going on here?
aenews2
10 months ago
It'll go to vote tomorrow. Will take several days to resolve since UMA staff determined it should be disputed.
n/a
10 months ago
Why did this end up disputed? He dropped out
aenews2
11 months ago
But if she ran, would she win the nomination?
Plutos
11 months ago
Its not 100 % sure if its going to be kamalla, but its 100 % sure that it wont be obama. lol.
aenews2
11 months ago
In the span of a few hours Manchin went from saying folks were pushing him to run, to saying naw I'm not running. Cool.
aenews2
11 months ago
UMA staff disputed, for some reason.
BUBASIIK
11 months ago
what's going on here?
aenews2
11 months ago
Will have to wait almost 4 days for resolution because there was a dispute
BUBASIIK
11 months ago
what's going on here?
aenews2
11 months ago
Hey! I never said that. I will sue for defamation.
MWM
11 months ago
"Y is a bond" - aenews2
aenews2
11 months ago
neg risk conversion. Also, I sold the Biden. I re-bought at 8c.
premature-facts
11 months ago
If it was going to be Kamala, Biden would have endorsed her and we wouldn't have an open convention. It's Biden or Michelle. Don't waste your time.
aenews2
11 months ago
0% chance but alright
premature-facts
11 months ago
If it was going to be Kamala, Biden would have endorsed her and we wouldn't have an open convention. It's Biden or Michelle. Don't waste your time.
aenews2
11 months ago
Oops I have N now
aenews2
11 months ago
It was over the second you bought!
aenews2
11 months ago
It was over the second you bought!
Apsalar
11 months ago
you maga people are so fucking lucky
aenews2
11 months ago
Maybe if you have nothing to lose, and this is your possibly only shot to be relevant *cough* Harris
MichaelFowlie
11 months ago
Trump is basically guaranteed to win now with the assassination attempt turning him into an American hero. Why would anyone in the Democratic Party want to run against Trump and lose? It would be a stain on their resume. It is better to run in 2028. The only way I see someone else winning is if Biden dies (and he is very old so it's not impossible).
aenews2
11 months ago
Yeah
LittleW
11 months ago
Or Biden is going to become an automatic looser and need to drop out to try to give someone else the push which comes from a fresh face being in the race... Yeah though... who knows....
aenews2
11 months ago
Sorry, been preoccupied with tracking politics this past month and especially past two weeks
moviesera92
11 months ago
This market was so much more fun before (because of the liquidity)
aenews2
11 months ago
You can sell your shares at 50c for the same amount you'd get if you waited.
Xplayer
11 months ago
it's always gonna show 50% now?
aenews2
11 months ago
BIG MIKE BIG MIKE BIG MIKE
defianceDeprecated
11 months ago
Lets go Michael!
aenews2
11 months ago
Actually the request data for the market (and all other non-negrisk markets) include P3 (50/50) as an option.
n/a
11 months ago
The rules state Yes or No. No chance for a 50/50 is included.
aenews2
11 months ago
You'll need to wait 38 hours, or sell out.
gregus
11 months ago
Does this market just stay like this forever? Do we have to sell or will it pay out
aenews2
11 months ago
Yes, well needs to meet quorum so effectively closer to a super-majority in practice because not everyone votes every round.
Massa
11 months ago
so if the majority votes yes on uma itd go to yes then?
aenews2
11 months ago
@JustAcar Because the vote rolled due to lack of quorum. So it'll get a re-vote.
Robyratto1
11 months ago
When will it be decided?
aenews2
11 months ago
Looks like it'll take another 61 hours to resolve
Robyratto1
11 months ago
When will it be decided?
aenews2
11 months ago
Yeah... No one is even voting for P1
NigelFarage
11 months ago
why are people bidding above 50c
aenews2
11 months ago
I assume because Y is currently leading the vote and N is completely shot.
NigelFarage
11 months ago
why are people bidding above 50c
aenews2
11 months ago
Because no one is voting N, so it can't win
RustyShip
11 months ago
in common parlance biden is senile by the definition and examples used here he is clearly not
aenews2
11 months ago
Sorry Susan, I apologize. I will attempt to maintain compliance with the HR standards into the future.
SusanWarren,HR
11 months ago
Let's try to refrain from using comparisons like "cow", "whale", "pig", or any other animal that could be interpreted as fat-shaming.
aenews2
11 months ago
Market won't be resolving N
RustyShip
11 months ago
in common parlance biden is senile by the definition and examples used here he is clearly not
aenews2
11 months ago
4.15M Y / 1.00M 50 50 / 0.22M N
aenews2
11 months ago
Lol the largest whale voted Yes, not even P3. We'll see what happens, will be interesting.
aenews2
11 months ago
Lol the largest whale voted Yes, not even P3. We'll see what happens, will be interesting.
aenews2
11 months ago
to what side
WeFinallyBeatMedicare
11 months ago
How is this not resolved yet?
aenews2
11 months ago
im shaking
inmate
11 months ago
i'm gonna crash out if no
aenews2
11 months ago
Hold strong, don't let N winning with 0.1% of the vote in sway you
SaudiMinisterOfHomeEntertainment
11 months ago
🫣
aenews2
11 months ago
Alright, guys. Soon it'll be the moment of truth...
aenews2
11 months ago
Well, it's been interesting but soon it'll be time to bid this market farewell. Hope to see everyone in the next senile market, or similar.
aenews2
11 months ago
You may suffer from an inability to do basic math and statistics. I think P3 is the likely answer, but P1 is more likely than P2. This brings the EV below 50%.
AppleADay
11 months ago
If you think its p3 why are you selling off your yes shares for under 50c? lmfaoooooo
aenews2
11 months ago
Because I think it is most likely P3. We'll see tomorrow when votes are revealed, but implied odds here should be a bit lower than 50% IMO.
AppleADay
11 months ago
you are just trying to pump that shit so you can sell off all your shares ahah, we all see your share numbers decreasing. If you have so much confidence why are you selling?
aenews2
11 months ago
Not really. If you asked anyone how bad a debate night it would have to be for Biden to drop out, they'd have said he would need to be senile.
Ckai
11 months ago
that's one heck of a leap
aenews2
11 months ago
He may drop out because he was arguably senile in the debate
Ckai
11 months ago
What does this market have to do with the dropout market?
aenews2
11 months ago
Biden crashed again, and drop out went to 50c. Very much doubt this market resolves to N at this point...
aenews2
11 months ago
Get involved and fulfill your constitutional right as a Polymarket citizen
gregus
11 months ago
Don’t make me get involved UMA
aenews2
11 months ago
The N proposals were disputed, and it'll be put up to a vote starting in a couple hours.
ShyLOCKz
11 months ago
So the outcome proposed was NO twice after two disputes. What data changed since the previous NO proposals?
aenews2
11 months ago
I re-watched the entire debate. I think N is better than Y, but honestly it was worse than I thought the first time. Probably fair to just toss this market into the blender.
yourrapist1776
11 months ago
i don't think a single yes holder watched the debate, they just saw a few clips on twitter and bought shares lmao
aenews2
11 months ago
Bro Biden is unstoppable, can't wait for MAGA to get rekt!
aenews2
11 months ago
Yes, it's over. Same for the other Barron involvement market.
ramibtc
11 months ago
why dont u pay already mf
aenews2
11 months ago
@SerSwallowtail When a dispute happens, it goes to a vote in UMA. Correct, anyone with staked $UMA can vote. So it is not simple majority of voting UMA but rather must be the higher threshold of majority of staked $UMA. Since not everyone votes in every vote, these days, that works out to about a supermajority. 7 hours because the vote reveal period ends at 0 UTC / 8PM ET. Then market will resolve to N shortly afterwards.
ramibtc
11 months ago
why dont u pay already mf
aenews2
11 months ago
Need to wait about 7 hours
ramibtc
11 months ago
why dont u pay already mf
aenews2
11 months ago
It's the balls of one guy, basically.
Lawyered.eth
11 months ago
impressed by the balls of YES holders
aenews2
11 months ago
I proposed N. They can still dispute if they want, though they will lose if they do.
LesterSmith
11 months ago
gg
aenews2
11 months ago
And the other Barron market (with a lower bar of preponderance of evidence) has already been proposed and disputed. Voting for that and DJT real will commence in 3 hours. I would guess this one would also be disputed, based on the other two markets. But shall see.
Nicky-Boi
11 months ago
“The resolution source for this market will be public statements from Barron Trump confirming his involvement or *definitive* evidence that Barron was involved.” Looking forward to folks disputing what is an objectively correct resolution for this market later on.
aenews2
11 months ago
The deadline passed. But proposal was disputed, so will take two days to go through the dispute process. If vote no conclusive, it may take longer.
HenryN
11 months ago
we arent at the deadline yet so obviously not
aenews2
11 months ago
Yeah, I encourage people on both sides to post here if you care how this resolves. Voting starts in 3 hours.
dacoop1
11 months ago
also anyone can leave comments regarding the bet which voters will review
aenews2
11 months ago
Because preponderance of evidence (more likely than not) is the bar used in civil court? I'm saying it is a lower bar used in civil court, and this would not go far as evidence even with that low bar.
bwt06
11 months ago
In UMA discord, they just googled "Is Barron involved in DJT?" and then went with that
aenews2
11 months ago
Preponderance of evidence is the standard used in civil court. I'm saying that even with that lower bar, a witness who does not provide evidence orationale, and says he is withholding that information, won't be taken seriously. What he provided is merely an assertion.
bwt06
11 months ago
In UMA discord, they just googled "Is Barron involved in DJT?" and then went with that
aenews2
11 months ago
@bwt06 That is an assertion, not evidence. Even with the lower bar used in civil court, Mike's statements would not be remotely sufficient.
bwt06
11 months ago
In UMA discord, they just googled "Is Barron involved in DJT?" and then went with that
aenews2
11 months ago
@truthteller It's not that he did no post sources. He did not provide any of the evidence and specifically said he would not release said evidence for now.
bwt06
11 months ago
In UMA discord, they just googled "Is Barron involved in DJT?" and then went with that
aenews2
11 months ago
Only Mike is claiming involvement and has not provided any evidence or rationale. He said he may in the future if the situation changes, but that's beyond the timeframe of this market.
bwt06
11 months ago
In UMA discord, they just googled "Is Barron involved in DJT?" and then went with that
aenews2
11 months ago
Yeah that is not a thorough search. But it's also true and telling that no reputable news outlet has claimed that Barron was involved with $DJT. At best, there is some speculation but no evidence.
bwt06
11 months ago
In UMA discord, they just googled "Is Barron involved in DJT?" and then went with that
aenews2
11 months ago
Are you on Discord?
madkkee
11 months ago
Please stop using Mario as a source: Mario Nawfal is a serial scammer, just google: "Mario Nawfal Scam" and even he has the moral to post that it is not 100% confirmed. Also please check the profiles he tagged, all of them are scammers and involved in big memecoin scams. But sure, the son of a Billionaire who was a president and will most likely be president again launched a memecoin for what exact reason? To give Biden more ground to blame and cook Trump? It does not make any sense at all and there is no clear evidence besides grifters and scam influencers.
aenews2
11 months ago
You may want to post on UMA later today, since they decide resolution.
madkkee
11 months ago
A billionaire launching a memecoin when his dad is about to run for president? Martin is a big serial scammer, I am surprised this is a market at all and more importantly that people are even buying YES. The only people claiming Barron was involved are low tier irrelevant Crypto grifters/serial scam influencers
aenews2
11 months ago
It'll be an interesting dispute, but would be pretty surprised if it doesn't resolve N. Doesn't seem we'll be getting any more evidence in the next 5 hours.
aenews2
11 months ago
It's resolving N
fetfitta
11 months ago
How many credible sources have to confirm this before this gets resolved to yes? This is crazy.
aenews2
11 months ago
It's free money for N
Car
11 months ago
you have a limit sell for your whole bag at 4.8ct you are UNETHICAL AS FUCK right now trying to get the new people to be your exit liq
aenews2
11 months ago
@fckUMAnerds No, I previously had 13K N
0xaf
11 months ago
The question boils down to whether UMA senior staff is willing to call Mike Solana, Chief Marketing Officer to the largest investor in Polymarket, a liar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPSNuRXGRC4
aenews2
11 months ago
You legitimately think that a witness who takes the stand but refuses to provide their reasoning/evidence would pass muster, even in a civil case where the bar is preponderance of evidence? Obviously false. No matter how credible the witness, it won't amount to anything if the witness does not even provide an account to corroborate their claim.
0xaf
11 months ago
The question boils down to whether UMA senior staff is willing to call Mike Solana, Chief Marketing Officer to the largest investor in Polymarket, a liar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPSNuRXGRC4
aenews2
11 months ago
I'm swing trading. No, I don't think so.
gregus
11 months ago
If it’s only possibly fake twitter screenshots so far for the yes side it’s not gonna resolve as yes, is there any actual evidence so far?
aenews2
11 months ago
Whether he's telling the truth or not is irrelevant. He hasn't shared the evidence that led to that conclusion, so we can't assess it.
0xaf
11 months ago
The question boils down to whether UMA senior staff is willing to call Mike Solana, Chief Marketing Officer to the largest investor in Polymarket, a liar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPSNuRXGRC4
aenews2
11 months ago
No, there's no evidence (excluding Martin and his screenshots). Some high confidence assertions, but that's it. Mike Solana said he wouldn't release any evidence at this time, but may in the future if the situation changes.
gregus
11 months ago
If it’s only possibly fake twitter screenshots so far for the yes side it’s not gonna resolve as yes, is there any actual evidence so far?
aenews2
11 months ago
Free Money 💰
aenews2
0 years ago
You need USDC.e on Polygon. You can also withdraw funds from Polymarket to your wallet and that will work. Just hit the USDC.e.
nawf
0 years ago
im trying to but it keeps saying i dont have enough usdc even though i have more then the bond...
aenews2
0 years ago
Last chance for the Y bag holders to dispute, or else market will resolve to N in 85 minutes. You will lose though, if you do. Fair warning.
aenews2
0 years ago
I'm officially Team Yes!
aenews2
0 years ago
Where are scottylicious and therealbatman when you need them?
aenews2
0 years ago
Not just involved. Involved with the "creation" specifically.
truthteller
0 years ago
To prove an element by a preponderance of the evidence simply means to prove that something is more likely than not. In other words, in light of the evidence and the law, do you believe that each element of his/her [claim/counterclaim] is more likely true than not?
aenews2
0 years ago
@aeon69 The rules for the market
PovertyGCR
0 years ago
Everyone knows this market should resolve to yes but we're going to get cucked on a quirk of the platform. I'll take my medicine but wish there was a better resolution mechanism.
aenews2
0 years ago
And also only requires Barron and not Trump's consent
PovertyGCR
0 years ago
Everyone knows this market should resolve to yes but we're going to get cucked on a quirk of the platform. I'll take my medicine but wish there was a better resolution mechanism.
aenews2
0 years ago
The new market has a different resolution mechanism. It'll be decided by UMA and not Polymarket clarification: https://polymarket.com/event/was-barron-involved-in-djt
PovertyGCR
0 years ago
Everyone knows this market should resolve to yes but we're going to get cucked on a quirk of the platform. I'll take my medicine but wish there was a better resolution mechanism.
aenews2
0 years ago
Easiest money on the site rn 💰💸
aenews2
0 years ago
Alright, show's over guys. Time for the Y folks to dump their bags before this goes to zero tomorrow.
aenews2
0 years ago
Clearly, the LayerZero market should resolve to Yes.
aenews2
0 years ago
Evidence that is definitive, not that complicated
djtbetter
0 years ago
what is 'definitive evidence'? we've seen multiple people who claim to work in martins office say the met with baron, the founder of ANKR said he saw cameron on a call with barron, mario on spaces said yesterday essentially 'if this person confirms, then its true' referring to Ryan Fang's (founder of ankr) friend, referred to as 'Mr T' , in addition to all of the screenshots
aenews2
0 years ago
Only if with T's consent
aenews2
0 years ago
No
aenews2
0 years ago
Martin said it was a pleasure working with Barron Trump, send this back to 50/50
PowerPlay
0 years ago
Hmmm, on the space they said it was Barron Trump
aenews2
0 years ago
Yep, sadly for me
Car
0 years ago
I have noticed on markets where theres a lot of new people you can make tons of money
aenews2
0 years ago
Meanwhile this $DJT fake coin is going straight to 0
aenews2
0 years ago
Looks like the Y folks don't have enough faith, can't even keep Yes above 10¢ lmao
aenews2
0 years ago
Looks like the Y folks don't have enough faith, can't even keep Yes above 10¢ lmao
aenews2
0 years ago
Until it doesn't work. Sometimes, the fish win and beat all the sharps. Happened in Garvey, sharps lost 100K and the fish made it.
Car
0 years ago
I have noticed on markets where theres a lot of new people you can make tons of money
aenews2
0 years ago
It's not over yet!
Dantellox
0 years ago
This was literally free money. Thank you so much all "Yes" shareholders!
aenews2
0 years ago
Okay, good luck
PsychosCalls
0 years ago
soon
aenews2
0 years ago
The token is going to zero, my dude. Dump while you can.
PsychosCalls
0 years ago
soon
aenews2
0 years ago
Fek what happened?
PsychosCalls
0 years ago
Tried to tell yall, this is a no brainer. Never bet against me
aenews2
0 years ago
They know it's a fake shit coin and aren't willing to put more money where their mouth is
VibesGreaterRules
0 years ago
SAD THAT THE YES TEAM IS UNABLE TO PULL OFF A 3:30 AM PUMP. NOT BRINGING THEIR BEST.
aenews2
0 years ago
gg? Doubt
PsychosCalls
0 years ago
"I know for a fact there will be more media coverage within 12 hours"
aenews2
0 years ago
Please Lord
89898
0 years ago
no buyers in shambles
aenews2
1 year ago
FIRE SALE: Need some more monies so I'm selling dollars for 99.7c
aenews2
1 year ago
We'll see
Coram_Deo
1 year ago
Market Close Not After hours
aenews2
1 year ago
Another month, another month for me to donate to people. Congrats on last month, you did well Kapii.
Kapii
1 year ago
Why is Polymarket torturing its users so much? I´m afraid....
aenews2
1 year ago
Another month, another bond
aenews2
1 year ago
Brokie is going BROKE 😳
aenews2
1 year ago
No? The outcome is pretty uncertain. We are halfway with a day and 6 hours to go.
Car
1 year ago
i suggest you dont buy more
aenews2
1 year ago
buy more N
CapitalTrader
1 year ago
no way beating 100m... thursday these time is best day of the week to getting engagement. but anyway it doesnt go more. i think gonna be stay 80M or smthng.
aenews2
1 year ago
Ok Dr. Sato 😐
Dr.ChristmasJones
1 year ago
NASA is a scam.
aenews2
1 year ago
And furthermore, even reverse engineering or similar is imperfect and leaves a +/- 2 MoE. Does not even kill these brackets. If the value was known more precisely, then the "winning" bracket would not be at only 90c.
Drunken-Mentat
1 year ago
Yes, I agree: it is plausible (though "reverse-engineer" might be a strong word, as there is a conversion fortran program in one direction and what remains is a convoluted problem of formats). But this poses a problem: soon a few people here will have working codes for a sneak peek, so does it make sense to have gistemp temp markets? At least with an ERA5 temp market there's no early advantage for people able to untie the messy gistemp calculation.
aenews2
1 year ago
NOAA and NASA temperature markets have been around for a very long time both on Polymarket and on other prediction markets (and both NOAA/NASA use the same underlying GHCNv4 and ERSSTv5 data). Never really been an issue. Besides, the code in question is linked on the GISTEMP homepage. Also take in mind that I've LP'd these markets and actually taken an L these past few months. I certainly would have benefited from using ERA5 instead of GISTEMP. Despite that, I do honestly think GISTEMP is the more fun option because it can cuck even sharps like me =P
Drunken-Mentat
1 year ago
Yes, I agree: it is plausible (though "reverse-engineer" might be a strong word, as there is a conversion fortran program in one direction and what remains is a convoluted problem of formats). But this poses a problem: soon a few people here will have working codes for a sneak peek, so does it make sense to have gistemp temp markets? At least with an ERA5 temp market there's no early advantage for people able to untie the messy gistemp calculation.
aenews2
1 year ago
Can you buy more? I wanna short too
Smokey-Joe
1 year ago
I see TruthTeller has decide to build a Ben Carson long position starting at 15c. Knowing his panic buying habits, I would not be surprised if Ben Carson is 45c tomorrow.
aenews2
1 year ago
Pretty sure the guy explained he reverse engineered it. Seems about right, wish I knew about this in March when I lost 20K R.I.P.
Drunken-Mentat
1 year ago
An alternative method would be to know some insider, ask for the latest SBBX.ERSSTv5 file (which is generated a few days before it is published, usually around the 5 or 6 of each month) and then run de python code. Trivial. And coincides with the timing at which these markets change their pricing ;)
aenews2
1 year ago
Good idea, he took it!
VibesGreaterRules
1 year ago
Maybe Aebonds will buy them!
aenews2
1 year ago
Good luck to all with the new month!
aenews2
1 year ago
I brought my sells back up! Having another fire sale to free cash
Idontwantausername
1 year ago
can I have some of the yeses
aenews2
1 year ago
No thanks, I'm done for now. Have enough free cash.
Idontwantausername
1 year ago
can I have some of the yeses
aenews2
1 year ago
Ah good point, cancelled my sells!
enderone
1 year ago
For those tracking, a deal has been struck with his coalition partners and Modi's swearing in ceremony as Prime Minister is tentatively scheduled for June 8.
aenews2
1 year ago
Alright, you lucky N bag holders. I need to dump and move onto new markets. So it's your lucky day, limited time offer to exit
aenews2
1 year ago
the insiders should invite me because i've been losing 10's of K
Kapii
1 year ago
OK, cool, so 1.10-1.16 seems to be the winner. Just like last month, a few days before the release, the correct bracket suddenly spikes - despite the absence of any new information. Probably just a coincidence...
aenews2
1 year ago
Shall see
Kapii
1 year ago
OK, cool, so 1.10-1.16 seems to be the winner. Just like last month, a few days before the release, the correct bracket suddenly spikes - despite the absence of any new information. Probably just a coincidence...
aenews2
1 year ago
F
Brokie
1 year ago
can we undo?
aenews2
1 year ago
That's @drhorrible
gopfan
1 year ago
@planetline, I just misclicked at bought your 1.10-1.16 shares by an insane price, would you mind to dm me in discord (@gopfan) and make a reverse trade? 🙏
aenews2
1 year ago
You're asking Dr. Sato herself
gopfan
1 year ago
@Dr.ChristmasJones do you potentially want more 1.10-1.16 no shares?
aenews2
1 year ago
I already have, it's the bracket where I own the most shares. ERA5 (Final) is at 121 (15.914°). My assumption since the start has been that GISS should outpace ERA5, similar to last month. Historial and month-over-month trends would suggest around 3 higher. The reason I want to even out my exposure is because one of the other guys is bidding up high and that does concern me. We'll see who is correct in the next few days, I guess.
Kapii
1 year ago
No, I won't, because you're making a mistake and I don't want to be the one responsible for your losses. When your guess is 1.24, you need to buy the bracket including 1.24 and not a complete different one. You don't earn money by "even out your exposure" you lose it. You earn money by buying the bracket you think will win. I would suggest you put in a buy order in the 1.24 - 1.30 bracket, maybe up to 60%, and hope you get filled up.
aenews2
1 year ago
@Kapii fill me, dog I want to even out my exposure
aenews2
1 year ago
When will the Galvez tards dump all their bags?
aenews2
1 year ago
"Enkoll’s exit poll shows Claudia Sheinbaum leading with over 50% of votes." - Bloomberg
aenews2
1 year ago
https://x.com/enkoll_/status/1797441840666333340
aenews2
1 year ago
https://x.com/enkoll_/status/1797441840666333340
aenews2
1 year ago
Televisa Projects Claudia Sheinbaum to Win Mexico Election; El Financiero Projects Sheinbaum To Win Mexico Election
aenews2
1 year ago
naw bro me and scottie will be laughing to the bank!
inApocalypseTheBadsLooseAndCryForever
1 year ago
🤣he is trying to manipulate but will loose every dolar they put an we will gain every this dolar hahahaha
aenews2
1 year ago
Welp people keep bidding higher, so 20c it is! That should be pretty reasonable given current data.
aenews2
1 year ago
Doesn't seem right that 1.10-1.16 is so high. I guess I'd consider 15c sell out just to cover my bases. ERA5 is at 121, and I expect that GISS will be higher just like with April.
aenews2
1 year ago
ERA5: 121 If the trends hold from last month, we'd expect GISS to be a bit higher. That puts my median at 124.
aenews2
1 year ago
Doesn't seem right that 1.10-1.16 is so high. I guess I'd consider 15c sell out just to cover my bases. ERA5 is at 121, and I expect that GISS will be higher just like with April.
Kapii
1 year ago
Booooring...I'd like to lose some 10k as last month, but nothing is going on here 😴
aenews2
1 year ago
I just bought at 53c, I'm trying to buy more shares there. Well, I could settle at 9c for 1.10-1.16.
Kapii
1 year ago
Booooring...I'd like to lose some 10k as last month, but nothing is going on here 😴
aenews2
1 year ago
Interesting. My estimate is 124 +/- 7. But I guess I could be missing something.
Drunken-Mentat
1 year ago
Still possible, don't worry, it's not like these temp markets are devoid of last minute surprises ;=)
aenews2
1 year ago
Left up a 11K bid for you to dump your shares
Kapii
1 year ago
Booooring...I'd like to lose some 10k as last month, but nothing is going on here 😴
aenews2
1 year ago
Some people wanted to dispute it because they think it could be a deep fake. So we're waiting until the dispute ends.
Extremepyro
1 year ago
I'm new to this, why isn't this resolved yet?
aenews2
1 year ago
She said she wouldn't sell any coins and then dumped six figures, after calling out Sahil for doing the same. Might be a hack, tbh ✌
truthteller
1 year ago
Was Iggy Azalea hacked? https://polymarket.com/event/was-iggy-azalea-hacked?tid=1716944632749
aenews2
1 year ago
Hey can you Y holders dump your worthless shares already? I've got better things to do...
aenews2
1 year ago
"I want to make it very clear to you on the record. Obviously there were no deep fake videos... one had a filter. Only two devices connected to the account. That is something we really wanted to clear up."
truthteller
1 year ago
nah dude, it's still not enough proof. She needs to go on fox news and say it
aenews2
1 year ago
"We're going to limit what we say about that shady son of a bitch... all the coins that have been sold, were by that shady son of a bitch"
aenews2
1 year ago
https://x.com/Caitlyn_Jenner/status/1795517602275692708?t=wwJ5dYY07xrppPM5D-qxBQ&s=19
truthteller
1 year ago
Caitlyn jenner will be revealing that she got hacked any minute now.
aenews2
1 year ago
Interesting read
aenews2
1 year ago
https://twitter.com/lypp/status/1795382657364185256?s=19
aenews2
1 year ago
https://twitter.com/lypp/status/1795382657364185256?s=19
aenews2
1 year ago
Can the Yes chads do me a solid and fill my block? Please and thank you =)
aenews2
1 year ago
Smh, just dumb crypto degens
truthteller
1 year ago
What was the point of disputing the market if you're not going full port into shares now that caitlyn said sahil scammed her and she will be revealing the entire story tomorrow?
aenews2
1 year ago
"FUCK SAHIL! He scammed us! BIG TIME!"
aenews2
1 year ago
https://x.com/Caitlyn_Jenner/status/1795269306693075404
aenews2
1 year ago
https://x.com/Caitlyn_Jenner/status/1795269306693075404
aenews2
1 year ago
Alright guys, can you please pretty please take this to 90c one last time, for old time's sake? You'll never win if you let this go to 99.
aenews2
1 year ago
Nearly 100K shares to be bought now at 5-6c!
aenews2
1 year ago
YES HACK folks may notice there is a nice juicy block for you to smack and get a 20X return!
aenews2
1 year ago
alright, I wanna dump my shares
aenews2
1 year ago
YES HACK folks may notice there is a nice juicy block for you to smack and get a 20X return!
aenews2
1 year ago
😒
fhantombets
1 year ago
Jenner on Fox News 10 minutes ago, SHE SAID SHE WAS HACKE
aenews2
1 year ago
Have 55K in this market, hope you're wrong 😥
ColinOscopy
1 year ago
I refuse to believe she did all this for a few thousand dollars, she will get sued and fined into the dirt. Cant be her. Doubling down here
aenews2
1 year ago
this man speaks the truth
truthteller
1 year ago
The standard of proof has already been met. The only way it would be overruled if somehow it could be proven that the video where she said she wasn't hacked was fake. Which it wasn't. EVEN IF she went back on her word after saying she wasn't hacked wouldn't resolve this market to YES, becuase the market will resolve IMMEDIATELY once she makes the statement that she wasn't hacked. She made that statement
aenews2
1 year ago
Also, would you fine gentlepeoples be interested in a SEC Sue Jenner market? I hope to take your... see you guys in that one too!
aenews2
1 year ago
Come on guys, are you Y folks really gonna let us win? If we take this to 99, it's OVER.
aenews2
1 year ago
Come on guys, are you Y folks really gonna let us win? If we take this to 99, it's OVER.
aenews2
1 year ago
But the account was not compromised. Unfortunate we'll have to wait 4 days to resolve to N now.
depop
1 year ago
this really has nothing to do with the token and more to do with the account being compromised. token could run even if it was a hack as long as it isnt rugged
aenews2
1 year ago
Why are people buying Y?
aenews2
1 year ago
yes
fluffmoney
1 year ago
g-guys am i retarded
aenews2
1 year ago
You must not have seen the Haley and ETF disputes
Apsalar
1 year ago
this is one of the most interesting markets i've ever traded on. never seen two sides so convinced the other side is crazy.
aenews2
1 year ago
Lmfao
KanyeTruther
1 year ago
Sorry relay, but the universe physically doesn't allow me to lose money what can you do
aenews2
1 year ago
@relay bruh I was reacting to news alerts, if you understand the situation better than a noob like me good for you
aenews2
1 year ago
It's not that complicated. Haley endorsed Trump.
aenews2
1 year ago
It's not that complicated. Haley endorsed Trump.
Bonez0r
1 year ago
It's not that complicated. Ensorsement means she encourages her supporters to vote Trump as well. She did not do that.
aenews2
1 year ago
The fortunate side to Team Yes is that even if they lose the dispute, Haley can still say more things by June
aenews2
1 year ago
Looks like market has been proposed to Yes on UMA
aenews2
1 year ago
Hence this market should resolve to “Yes.” But we'll have to wait 26 hours for vote reveal on UMA go conclude the formal process.
K-pin-
1 year ago
What was the resolution?
aenews2
1 year ago
Well my private key has been leaked for a few years, so thought it would be a good idea to switch to a new account for 2024. Had been lazy and trusted no one would drain me.
DECRAPisDUMBandGAY
1 year ago
what happened to aenews1? did you kill him?
aenews2
1 year ago
good luck with your endeavors
trickykid
1 year ago
This should be counted as "No". No body evidence. Helicopter itself means nothing.
aenews2
1 year ago
Let the great dump begin, let's take this to 99.9 bois
aenews2
1 year ago
Terrible interpretation, and Polymarket will not rule that way.
Mr.Green
1 year ago
Well he still hasn't been located then, they're just saying he's dead.
aenews2
1 year ago
All I see is your bags burning!
Car
1 year ago
All i see is fog and clueless people. No president!
aenews2
1 year ago
Link?
aenews2
1 year ago
We're back, baby. Well if you're right, anyways.
aenews2
1 year ago
We're back, baby. Well if you're right, anyways.
Brokie
1 year ago
THERE IS A NEW LOCATION
aenews2
1 year ago
I think brokie was your counterparty
Car
1 year ago
who ever bought my no shares at 89 please contact me i will refund you because i am such a dick for manipulating the markets
aenews2
1 year ago
Yep, the kitty deniers are out of cash. They already broke all their piggy 🐷 banks.
aenews2
1 year ago
I see
treats
1 year ago
I won on the Biden election, but I think that was the only one I've done
aenews2
1 year ago
Have you traded on Polymarket before, or is this your first rodeo 🐂
treats
1 year ago
I might be wrong. But I have faith in Shl0ms. I don't think directly lying to his audience is the type of art he performs. And the content of the Roaring Kitty posts does allude to some kind of performance taking place. This feels absolutely like a Shl0ms performance. Right in front of our faces, telling us clearly what's happening. Yet the audience is unwilling to listen.
aenews2
1 year ago
Looks like the crazy sauce degens are finally out of money, whew
aenews2
1 year ago
holy shit
Car
1 year ago
I think 1713888952017 IS RoaringKitty.
aenews2
1 year ago
Throw us a bone and do $0.11
1713888952017
1 year ago
Someone sell me 300,000 YES shares at $0.1, or $1,
aenews2
1 year ago
R.I.P.
aenews2
1 year ago
hope this ages well
aenews2
1 year ago
Hope you guys are ready for the posting frenzy in the AM
aenews2
1 year ago
Hope you guys are ready for the posting frenzy in the AM
aenews2
1 year ago
It's 🔥🔥🔥
Apsalar
1 year ago
May isn't even halfway done!
aenews2
1 year ago
Back to another month of predicting how much the Earth will burn 🔥
aenews2
1 year ago
While we're waiting for the drop, what's everyone's guess for the anomaly? I'll go with 132.
aenews2
1 year ago
Yes they just joined and seem obscured, so probably alts. Could be new traders, but either way, they aren't insiders.
Kapii
1 year ago
Huge insider trading going on here. People who joined in May 24 are trading only in this market and are all of a sudden buying 1.31 like crazy.
aenews2
1 year ago
Doesn't seem the "insiders" want to buy any more shares, ah well
aenews2
1 year ago
decap is a masochist
Commodore
1 year ago
So... What is the story here? At first I admit I found the constant posting to be annoying, but now I'm kind of fascinated.
aenews2
1 year ago
Not funny, broski. Some people have their life savings in this market.
Pump
1 year ago
it is 1.51 , propose please
aenews2
1 year ago
Their buys don't make sense to me either, but I'd chalk that up to overconfidence in their data processing. I can understand maybe 80%, but 92% is crazy sauce.
Kapii
1 year ago
Huge insider trading going on here. People who joined in May 24 are trading only in this market and are all of a sudden buying 1.31 like crazy.
aenews2
1 year ago
It's very clear these are not new traders. They are alt accounts.
Kapii
1 year ago
Huge insider trading going on here. People who joined in May 24 are trading only in this market and are all of a sudden buying 1.31 like crazy.
aenews2
1 year ago
There is no insider trading, just people confident about their data analysis. Overconfident I'd say, at these prices. We'll probably land right over the mark.
Kapii
1 year ago
Huge insider trading going on here. People who joined in May 24 are trading only in this market and are all of a sudden buying 1.31 like crazy.
aenews2
1 year ago
On or before May 14 according to GISTEMP's website.
BenCM
1 year ago
When is the result expected?
aenews2
1 year ago
Might be like me last month when I lost 20K.
0x-JayBee
1 year ago
Yep I think we are dead om the water
aenews2
1 year ago
That was an estimate using only ERA5, and a day old. Using more data, median should be higher now with lower uncertainty. Not 90c tho, not sure why folks are that confident.
Kapii
1 year ago
why do you buy 1.31 at 80 cent, but say your estimate is 128?
aenews2
1 year ago
Because I got filled at 10c, so 80c is profitable. I still have more 126-131 shares than I do 132+
Kapii
1 year ago
why do you buy 1.31 at 80 cent, but say your estimate is 128?
aenews2
1 year ago
Someone took it to 90c. Unknown whether they have an edge or are just dumb.
rex48
1 year ago
Wdym?
aenews2
1 year ago
Looks like the NASA insiders finally blasted the market. Damn you Dr. Sato!
aenews2
1 year ago
Welp, there goes the liquidity
aenews2
1 year ago
I don't mind explaining in DM. @aenews on Discord or @aenews_PI on Twitter.
BenCM
1 year ago
If you don't mind sharing, how jave you estimated that?
aenews2
1 year ago
Well that was admittedly embarrassing. Bonded the wrong side after I woke up from a nap. It's alright tho, making it mostly back by bonding the right way this time.
aenews2
1 year ago
Shit wrong bracket
aenews2
1 year ago
Alright, now that I evened out my exposure, can someone explain what happened? My estimate based on ERA5 is 128 +/- 6.
aenews2
1 year ago
Shit wrong bracket
aenews2
1 year ago
What are you guys even doing? Jeez
aenews2
1 year ago
Fully agree with this
Drunken-Mentat
1 year ago
Agree, and people obviates the fact that the measure of the global temperature has an inherent degree of uncertainty that is impossible to circumvent. And this error is only a tad smaller than the bracket sizes of this market.
aenews2
1 year ago
Yep, that's right.
BenCM
1 year ago
1.13 is the record right? From 2020
aenews2
1 year ago
People seem pretty confident where the final value will land, shall see
aenews2
1 year ago
Yes that's right. Polymarket missed a clarification, however. Market will definitely resolve No.
daley116
1 year ago
I'm new, what's after the final review? Will we get our money then?
aenews2
1 year ago
There will be a vote on UMA to determine the winner.
daley116
1 year ago
I'm new, what's after the final review? Will we get our money then?
aenews2
1 year ago
It's alright. She hated the puppy and thought it was "less than worthless".
KenLydo
1 year ago
she killed a dog, not a puppy,,,, is a pretty bold campaign slogan.
aenews2
1 year ago
Anyone wanna side bet this month? Hit me up on Discord (@aenews) if you want to discuss specific lines not already on the books.
aenews2
1 year ago
Didn't see this until now. Thanks, appreciate it BenCM
BenCM
1 year ago
Chin up. Your california senate bet was clever. I thought it was more of a sure thing than it was, you only just missed out. Read all your posts on this market, again took an opposite position to you. Again you had a reasoned position, though it felt a bit more stright contrarian this time.
aenews2
1 year ago
I have Y shares, so it'll be the hottest
0x-JayBee
1 year ago
gm sir. Is this going to be the hottest year?
aenews2
1 year ago
im bored, guys pls talk to me
aenews2
1 year ago
lolz
ohwell
1 year ago
I fear your smack
aenews2
1 year ago
Feel free to DM on Discord (@aenews) or Twitter (@aenews_PI).
Drunken-Mentat
1 year ago
I get a number, with a standard deviation of 0.05 degrees (which I can't reduce further), but I feel that number sharing will begin a flamewar.
aenews2
1 year ago
Comments seem really quiet this month, what happened guys?
aenews2
1 year ago
congrats relay, I think fabi will make it
aenews2
1 year ago
dont make me smack you
ohwell
1 year ago
After it was so sweetly warm last month?
aenews2
1 year ago
Brrr is it getting cold yet, guys?
aenews2
1 year ago
Not a perfect arb, but revisions are only going to affect by +/- 0.01
Apsalar
1 year ago
not a perfect arb!
aenews2
1 year ago
The numbers haven't changed at all since Sunday morning / afternoon when they posted estimates. Looks like the studio correctly predicted the amount to the last dollar!
enderone
1 year ago
Box Office Mojo's final numbers are in with $25,712,608. Unfortunately they still have that italics/blue text which may confuse some.
aenews2
1 year ago
Garvey bros RISE
Apsalar
1 year ago
Complete Schiftie Victory incoming
aenews2
1 year ago
As I learned in the last market, Yes is a bond
Speculate
1 year ago
why you so confident in YES. the data for last 9 days is below the previous year and next 5 days we expect lower temperatures all around the world. That is crazy
aenews2
1 year ago
After losing 40K in the past month, I will need to Martingale even harder in the April market.
aenews2
1 year ago
I love you all and hope to see everyone in the next markets for April.
BenCM
1 year ago
Bit unnecessary. Aenews is a good sport.
aenews2
1 year ago
GISS was 5.2 higher than ERA5 in March 2016. You need to take that into account.
BenCM
1 year ago
We will find out in a couple of days, but i think the hard facts of the European measurement of climate change which are hard to ignore are that the sea temperature is sky high and that's 70% of the deal. Also they find a 0.1 deg increase in temperature vs March 2016, and a yes only requires a 0.02 degree increase. Those are the facts to face-value test your models against, if your model is pushing for a No.
aenews2
1 year ago
Yeah, that's not how it works.
BenCM
1 year ago
We will find out in a couple of days, but i think the hard facts of the European measurement of climate change which are hard to ignore are that the sea temperature is sky high and that's 70% of the deal. Also they find a 0.1 deg increase in temperature vs March 2016, and a yes only requires a 0.02 degree increase. Those are the facts to face-value test your models against, if your model is pushing for a No.
aenews2
1 year ago
@փիղ It's not like we have any new information from ERA5 since a week ago. Makes no sense to act like this is past tense unless you have other info.
Nasmutin
1 year ago
In the end, Respect 2 aenews2. Took balls 2 HODL.
aenews2
1 year ago
Nope, the results will definitely change. Just incredibly unlikely it would affect the margin enough for this market.
mrworldwide
1 year ago
All the counties certify today! We're almost there
aenews2
1 year ago
Why are you talking in past tense?
Nasmutin
1 year ago
In the end, Respect 2 aenews2. Took balls 2 HODL.
aenews2
1 year ago
136
fineptune
1 year ago
Who’s the smartest anyway? Let’s find out. What’s your one point prediction? No range please. Mine is 144.
aenews2
1 year ago
Well if interested, can message me @aenews on Discord or @aenews_PI on Twitter
fineptune
1 year ago
Who’s the smartest anyway? Let’s find out. What’s your one point prediction? No range please. Mine is 144.
aenews2
1 year ago
Yeah I'd side bet against 144+ at 95/5 odds
fineptune
1 year ago
Who’s the smartest anyway? Let’s find out. What’s your one point prediction? No range please. Mine is 144.
aenews2
1 year ago
Yeah, 2016 was 130.8 in ERA5. 2024 is 141.0.
BenCM
1 year ago
Right, If ERA5 in 2024 is 1.41 and it's 0.1 above 2016, then 2016 is 1.31. Sticking purely with ERA5 data.
aenews2
1 year ago
The final ERA5 for March 2024 is 14.137°C which translates to 141.0 in 1951-1980 Base Period. 12.727°C is the average temperature for that base period in ERA5.
BenCM
1 year ago
If you don not mind sharing, where is the refernce to EAR5 being 1.41, and i assume this is compared with the same base year(s) as GISS?
aenews2
1 year ago
Yes, it's more precise than that. July is 16.953°C which is 1.278°C in 1951-1980 base period, or 127.8.
agginswaggin
1 year ago
So era5 is precise up to the thousandth degree C?
aenews2
1 year ago
Brother, these are the values using the same 1951-1980 base period as GISTEMP. I already subtracted.
agginswaggin
1 year ago
You're right I take that back. But gisstemp is the average temperature above normal levels, era5 is just the average temperature. So you have to subtract a certain amount from era5 to make it make sense
aenews2
1 year ago
Uhh no... *facepalm*. This is not how it works. Surface air temperature (t2m) covers the entire surface both above land and sea.
agginswaggin
1 year ago
Are you combining air and sea from era5 bc gisstemp uses both
aenews2
1 year ago
Alright, well here's my data and what market is missing: (GISS, ERA5, Difference) July: 118, 127.8, -9.8 August: 119, 131.3, -12.3 September: 147, 157.7, -10.3 October: 134, 152.1, -18.1 November: 144, 152.3, -8.3 December: 137, 146.3, -9.3 January: 121, 133.3, -12.3 February: 144, 149.5, -5.5 ERA5 consistently overshoots GISTEMP by very wide margins. These are using precise numbers pulled from Copernicus/ERA5 and NASA/GISTEMP. March is 141.0 for the Final ERA5. Would suggest about 134 +/- 6 for GISS. 136 is a N for the market despite being hottest, which is an additional buffer of 1. The win condition for Y is 137 for GISS which means -4 or closer. That would require a total break from trend. Also, climatereanalyzer always used NCEP until just a few months ago. In NCEP, March 2024 is actually 7 *colder* than record (March 2016), a sizable margin. Market would almost definitely be N-favored if the site hadn’t switched to ERA5. Funny how one site using different datasets changes people’s perception so drastically.
aenews2
1 year ago
Yes, I would
Nasmutin
1 year ago
Weird, i got 152
aenews2
1 year ago
I promise not to laugh when you whip out your thing
SusanWarren,HR
1 year ago
"I'll show you mine if you show me yours" Alright on the count of three let's all whip out and show our models and promise not to laugh.
aenews2
1 year ago
Never really seen any major side bet issues in the community over the years. The one time I do remember was treated as a major scandal and was for a large sum of money (and also not a Polymarket trader I think). You're just never going to have issues with reputable traders here, especially not for small side bets. It does not make sense for large public traders to short change. I'd be willing to Escrow with reliable third party if needed, I guess. But in general, we just trust each other to pay out promptly.
OracleMachine
1 year ago
Why/how should we trust you to make good on your bet if you lose?
aenews2
1 year ago
I'm more of a 136 guy, myself.
fineptune
1 year ago
will be 139
aenews2
1 year ago
Good point, market could be mispriced. Feel free to click the buy button and correct the pricing.
fineptune
1 year ago
When ERA5 hit a record high month, so did GISTEMP always, since 2016 with enough margin >0.02C. This March has 0.10C margin from 2016. Anyone can verify this fact easily. If GISTEMP disagreed with ERA5 this time, in terms of record-high-or-not, it would be a real big incident. The reliability of the dataset would be questioned, then it could lose power to support global warming theory… Democrats wouldn’t allow this to happen.
aenews2
1 year ago
For those reallly confident in the heat, I'll offer a side bet at 20/80 that the anomaly won't be higher than 140. I want N, so you get cheap Y at 20. Hit me up @aenews on Discord.
aenews2
1 year ago
True, wasn't that hot for me
HarvardInsider
1 year ago
"Most off-the-charts warmth was in Africa and Europe" maybe the Americans don't feel it and bought the other way
aenews2
1 year ago
Feel free to buy more shares, there's a lot of liquidity on the books.
eeeeee
1 year ago
ive got little clue as to how people could be pricing Y as ~60. I have Y as 89 given a dataset (or three) and some standard excel stuff. anyone want to point me towards what you im missing?
aenews2
1 year ago
April 12th
VibesGreaterRules
1 year ago
Time for the meta market on when this will resolve.
aenews2
1 year ago
@Matt0792090 Great, added!
aenews2
1 year ago
@Matt sure, what platform did you add me on and what's your username? I confirmed most of my pending requests
aenews2
1 year ago
Congrats
Melion
1 year ago
All news sources that I have seen report, state it was the warmest recorded march.
aenews2
1 year ago
Woah I'm sweating, it's the highest anomaly in history for UAH
fineptune
1 year ago
“a new high monthly anomaly record” -https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/04/02/uah-global-temperature-update-for-march-2024-0-95-deg-c/
aenews2
1 year ago
@Matt sure, what platform did you add me on and what's your username? I confirmed most of my pending requests
Fred19999
1 year ago
https://manifold.markets/Duncn/will-march-2024-be-the-hottest-marc
aenews2
1 year ago
Lol 0% chance of 152
Nasmutin
1 year ago
Weird, i got 152
aenews2
1 year ago
That market is closed. Forgot about it, probably should have bought more N.
Fred19999
1 year ago
https://manifold.markets/Duncn/will-march-2024-be-the-hottest-marc
aenews2
1 year ago
This is a perfectly reasonable range, my estimates always are +/- 6 or 7. One standard deviation covers 68% of all outcomes. With what you consider to be my "wide" range, would suggest a probability of ~65% for N in this market. Do you genuinely believe the range can be narrowed further with current data? It can be reasonably shrunk to +/- 5 (or maybe at best +/- 4) prior to NASA report.
MtrxZ
1 year ago
my bet is 138-139, because march 2024 is hotter than 2016 in the era5 data, but the difference is not as big as february so we will not reach 144. I could not pretend to have any scientific mean of giving an exact value just "logic". in a few days the explanation wont matter anymore anyway
aenews2
1 year ago
Alright, I'm selling at 97.5c/2.5c in size. Come and take it, Schiff bros ✌
aenews2
1 year ago
ae-estimate: 134 +/- 7 for March 2024
aenews2
1 year ago
Gg thanks for playing
aenews2
1 year ago
I think you are missing that in 2016, GISS was 5 lower than ERA5. Try taking 139 and subtracting 5. That's only 134.
Melion
1 year ago
Everybody should consider the increase of the https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/ by around 0.2 degrees. So even if the march air temperatures are the same as 2016, the index should at least hit 137
aenews2
1 year ago
Any of you guys on Discord? @MtrxZ @Melion @green-recruit-280 @Matt0792090 @Speculate Can add me @aenews... Or @aenews_PI on Twitter if you don't have Discord.
aenews2
1 year ago
Have you considered that it's actually cold?
Melion
1 year ago
Everybody should consider the increase of the https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/ by around 0.2 degrees. So even if the march air temperatures are the same as 2016, the index should at least hit 137
aenews2
1 year ago
If you want to see historical / prior versions, can check Wayback Machine. It's been 136 the whole year, bro. Until the February update a few weeks ago.
Matthias
1 year ago
pls fix the goddamn wording, the only thing making me nervous is the difference between the title and the description. its so badly formulated that this market has the worst odds by far from all similar markets. pls fix ur shit
aenews2
1 year ago
Yeah, I look at data and determine odds then buy shares I believe are +EV. I've made probably 40K across platforms on all these markets.
Matthias
1 year ago
pls fix the goddamn wording, the only thing making me nervous is the difference between the title and the description. its so badly formulated that this market has the worst odds by far from all similar markets. pls fix ur shit
aenews2
1 year ago
But your model is also wrong. You are both dumb, IMO. Just for different reasons.
MtrxZ
1 year ago
I don't know what is your prediction model but it sucks 🤣 My prediction model says you dumb
aenews2
1 year ago
Works same on Polymarket, Kalshi, and Insight. Markets are always pegged to a specific value, whatever the hottest month is at the time of market creation. That was 136, so the market description here indicates 137 or higher.
Matthias
1 year ago
pls fix the goddamn wording, the only thing making me nervous is the difference between the title and the description. its so badly formulated that this market has the worst odds by far from all similar markets. pls fix ur shit
aenews2
1 year ago
Seems pretty cold, my model says 133 for GISTEMP. My lower bound is 127 😃
MtrxZ
1 year ago
I dont know what you smoked but I want some
aenews2
1 year ago
When the market was created, the record was 136. It was revised to 135 when February update was posted.
Matthias
1 year ago
I just checked the data.. the highest increase value is 135, so why resolve to yes at 137 and not 136?
aenews2
1 year ago
This is pretty much why I bought N this whole time
Speculate
1 year ago
For those who enter when I entered at average of 38 I would recommend to sell at this point. Daily data as well as my projection model shows that the temperature will flatten and will be around 14.0 until end of month which is below what it was March 2016. Also water temperature went down and for water it will lower than 21 on average. My prediction model also shows that it not going to be higher than 136(even if last 2 days will be the hotest) which even if it will be 136 still will resolve to NO. At this point risk reward is not equal, and this market to resolve to YES is around 10 percent. I fixed slight profit of 5%.
aenews2
1 year ago
The record was 136 when this market was created, that's why
Matthias
1 year ago
I just checked the data.. the highest increase value is 135, so why resolve to yes at 137 and not 136?
aenews2
1 year ago
Woah, margin dropped to 5K. Nice 500 Garvey net in Kern.
aenews2
1 year ago
I'm selling my Garvey shares at 3.5c in size, if any Schiffh̶e̶a̶d̶s̶ bros want to exit and not have to hold for another two weeks (and risk any counties changing tallies slightly before certification).
aenews2
1 year ago
I'm selling my Garvey shares at 3.5c in size, if any Schiffh̶e̶a̶d̶s̶ bros want to exit and not have to hold for another two weeks (and risk any counties changing tallies slightly before certification).
aenews2
1 year ago
Unironically could be 136 given how close this is falling lol
SusanWarren,HR
1 year ago
...fuck, its going to be 1.36, isn't it.
aenews2
1 year ago
Are you sure you're looking at it correctly? Getting colder by the day, bro.
Melion
1 year ago
2023 has already been confirmed as the hottest year on record, surpassing the previous record set in 2016 by a considerable margin. The mean global temperature for 2023 was 1.48 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial average, with every month from June to December breaking existing records for high temperatures. This trend underscores the significant impact of human-caused climate change coupled with natural variations such as El Niño. Experts suggest that, as a result, 2024 is very likely to rank among the top three warmest years, if not the warmest on record. The UK Met Office has also predicted that 2024 could be the first year to surpass a global average temperature of 1.5 degrees Celsius, a critical threshold for limiting global warming. Given these insights and the fact that El Niño events typically lead to higher global temperatures, the Global Temperature Index for March 2024 could very well be among the highest on record, potentially exceeding the historical average by significant margins.
aenews2
1 year ago
I mean, I've been pretty clear I think N is better, though it'll likely be fairly close. I could be wrong, but we'll see.
Apsalar
1 year ago
>obtain alpha >bet a lot of money on it >act stupid in the comments in an effort to convince people there is dumb money on the other side >buy up even more shares for cheap >lose
aenews2
1 year ago
It will resolve to No
Pointman
1 year ago
Sick joke market, if doesn't resolve to 'yes'
aenews2
1 year ago
Once Mojo updates with the "actuals" then the market will resolve. Probably sometime today.
Speculate
1 year ago
Can some one explain , I see estimated on the website, but when we know it is final, the label will change? or what is going to happen? and is there are limit when polymarket will resolve it, like a last date?
aenews2
1 year ago
@Speculate I lost over $20K on Garvey recently, so I'm hoping to bet big on March N and make it all back. I think it'll be rather close but fall short of hottest, IMO. But we'll see.
aenews2
1 year ago
Sony rigged this because they bet BIG on Polymarket
aenews2
1 year ago
I looked at that, but it looks cold to me. Hope I'm not doing anything incorrectly cause Zeke got totally different numbers...
Melion
1 year ago
Feb 24 was 144 -> easy money
aenews2
1 year ago
Sony rigged this because they bet BIG on Polymarket
Yinyang
1 year ago
Any news?
aenews2
1 year ago
haha
Apsalar
1 year ago
Guy who has only traded in the California Senate market, trading in his second market: Getting a lot of 'Schiff vs Garvey' vibes from this...
aenews2
1 year ago
But it can be colder this month? Feels cold to me.
Melion
1 year ago
Feb 24 was 144 -> easy money
aenews2
1 year ago
Goddamn fudging studios =(
aenews2
1 year ago
I might be wrong, but I think this could be pretty close and will land N. Shall see, I guess.
MtrxZ
1 year ago
So why do you hold "no" shares... ?
aenews2
1 year ago
https://twitter.com/hausfath/status/1772124646600486965 wagmi
aenews2
1 year ago
Can confirm AnEggplant paid out his side bet, really cool guy. The $100 makes me feel a lil better about losing 20K.
aenews2
1 year ago
Thanks, man ❤. I'll get over it, still easily profitable for the year.
friendlyguyy
1 year ago
Love you! Don't take the loss badly.
aenews2
1 year ago
Hey, just wanted to congratulate the Schiffheads for winning this market. I lost big, but at least I made friends along the way 🤝Hope to see everyone in the next market I suggest to Polymarket and then lose 20K on 🥂
aenews2
1 year ago
It was left out overnight and spoiled 'cause Uncle Gus stuffed his fat ass and forgot
DumbDumb
1 year ago
Where is Garvey's gravy?
aenews2
1 year ago
If they weren't resolved they'd probably get rewards still lol
VibesGreaterRules
1 year ago
Katie Porter and Other need 50k of liquidity rewards.
aenews2
1 year ago
Not sure if my prayers worked, so I went back to the Temple today. It was peaceful, and I've come to terms with Garvey.
aenews2
1 year ago
I... Wasn't joking, btw 😆
BenCM
1 year ago
Lol. I enjoyed that.
aenews2
1 year ago
Close, was a strip of paper they provided.
AnEggplant
1 year ago
Was that piece of paper a $100 bill you pulled from your wallet?
aenews2
1 year ago
Went to a temple and prayed for Garvey. Wrote "Garvey gets the gravey" on a piece of paper and burned it 🙏🙏🙏
aenews2
1 year ago
Wake up Schiffheads! You can sell your shares for 75c in size 😁
aenews2
1 year ago
There's plenty of exit liquidity for Schiffheads
BenCM
1 year ago
Im not sure how you sold at 75 cents, there hasn't been a sell option available on this bet for sometime.
aenews2
1 year ago
Alright, moved my offers up to 28c. Schiffheads can exit at 72c on the dollar.
aenews2
1 year ago
Feel free to buy, ofc. Garvey may still have tbe gravey. Just don't want to stress while on vacation.
PabloB
1 year ago
wow do garvey believers not get some?
aenews2
1 year ago
I've set limits for 29c, very fair imo
lordprotector - 7340
1 year ago
Try a limit order, pal. That's how you save yourself
aenews2
1 year ago
Yea I did.
lordprotector - 7340
1 year ago
Try a limit order, pal. That's how you save yourself
aenews2
1 year ago
Alright, Schiffheads. No jokes, dead serious. I'll sell out 40K shares at 31c (69c for y'all). For any Schiff whales out there who want to exit, I think it's a reasonable offer in size.
aenews2
1 year ago
Hey, we take a W when we get it, alright? Capeesh? This is LA!
BenCM
1 year ago
Lol. 7 votes.
aenews2
1 year ago
No, it's correct. The last dump was 7 votes in Garvey's favor.
BenCM
1 year ago
You might be looking at different data, but AP data via CNN has shown no change in the % difference between the candidates over the past few days. Still 12.5%.
aenews2
1 year ago
It's true, let me have this one 🙏
DumbDumb
1 year ago
I want what you are smoking
aenews2
1 year ago
It's over. Garvey actually netted votes in today's LA update.
aenews2
1 year ago
But for who? 5.8K margin rn
sd0000
1 year ago
It's finally actually Joever
aenews2
1 year ago
I don't believe you
Pointman
1 year ago
Kern exhausted
aenews2
1 year ago
Lol Garvey just gained votes from a county where Schiff is winning 41.5%-27.4%
aenews2
1 year ago
I sing
friendlyguyy
1 year ago
Nah. Today I've been singing.
aenews2
1 year ago
You can hear the Schiffheads nervously laughing in the background...
aenews2
1 year ago
I'll be praying for the homeland of Kevin McCuckthy to come in CLUTCH 🙏🙏
aenews2
1 year ago
I'm still here, crying in my room, thinking of where it all went wrong =(
Pointman
1 year ago
Where did all the very, very insistent Garvey belivers go?
aenews2
1 year ago
*400K/month
aenews2
1 year ago
They don't. They only spend money. Currently, they give away something like 150K/month in rewards (reverse of charging fees).
aenews2
1 year ago
Keep breathing the Aaron Rodgers hopium, lads
aenews2
1 year ago
Funds are non-custodial, funds are solely in your wallet and Polymarket has no access to them. So they are not earning a penny of interest.
Nicky-Boi
1 year ago
Oh wait, could they be earning interest on all the money deposited/tied up in markets here? $90 million in POTUS market alone, which yields $4.5 million annually right now in T-bills.
aenews2
1 year ago
They don't. They only spend money. Currently, they give away something like 150K/month in rewards (reverse of charging fees).
Nicky-Boi
1 year ago
Only started here last month, so question: how does Poly Market make money? lol
aenews2
1 year ago
I will scream
benfitzzz
1 year ago
garvincels will seethe when they see schiffmaxxers win 🤣🤣🤣
aenews2
1 year ago
@BenCM Well you can either make it available on the book, or agree in comments and then put them up on book, or lastly organize a side bet.
aenews2
1 year ago
Not feeling as great, but coin flip seems about right. Willing to sell out at 50c, Schiffheads 😉
aenews2
1 year ago
Not feeling as great, but coin flip seems about right. Willing to sell out at 50c, Schiffheads 😉
aenews2
1 year ago
@AnEggplant Yeah sure. I'm @aenews on Discord and @aenews_PI on Twitter.
sd0000
1 year ago
If the rest of the remaining votes swing 2% from trend against Schiff and in favor of Garvey, Garvey STILL loses by ~5-10k votes.
aenews2
1 year ago
@mln19 Are you on Discord? I'd love to side bet against 60K+ margin.
sd0000
1 year ago
If the rest of the remaining votes swing 2% from trend against Schiff and in favor of Garvey, Garvey STILL loses by ~5-10k votes.
aenews2
1 year ago
Schiffheads once again got too cocky
aenews2
1 year ago
The demonrats are done for, Garvey's got the gravey! 😃
KanyeTruther
1 year ago
did the dems run out of paper to print votes on yet?
aenews2
1 year ago
Naw, rescinding offer. I'll do 65c.
snarf43
1 year ago
at the bargaining stage now I see
aenews2
1 year ago
Well, Schiffheads. I'm willing to compromise and sell out at 50c tonight if you wanna work it out. Might be legit the last chance tho.
aenews2
1 year ago
Red, I hope
0xaf
1 year ago
I guess everything is mail-in / provisional at this point. We already know how those votes split.
aenews2
1 year ago
But they have more ballots, just counting slowly afaik
sd0000
1 year ago
OC just updated, but they only counted ~7k incremental drops...bizarre. If it's exhausted already then Garvanzo bean is toast.
aenews2
1 year ago
Why? Drop seems about as expected.
sd0000
1 year ago
Hasn't been updated yet on the aggregator sites but huge print for Schiff out of LA - this is over.
aenews2
1 year ago
Honestly tempting, but I'm a bit overexposed.
snarf43
1 year ago
Garvey shares going for cheap, time to double down!
aenews2
1 year ago
Please Lord, forgive me for my greed. Lord, forgive me for mistaking a piece for the puzzle. Let my man Garvey get the gravey. Let Shifty Schiff get redschiffted out of existence, for the lols and for my pocketbook.
aenews2
1 year ago
Man, I'd love to side bet against a 50K or 60K margin
mln19
1 year ago
In my opinion, Schiff still the favorite to win by a 50k-60k margin overall. The Kern County votes broke a bit better than expected for Garvey.
aenews2
1 year ago
We barely got this market, too. I posted it, and they actually denied it the first time. Then they changed their mind and released it.
AnEggplant
1 year ago
I've been missing this kind of trading since PI withered into a husk. Man, I love taking other people's money
aenews2
1 year ago
Favoring dems is not the same thing as favoring Schiff tho
mln19
1 year ago
The issue is most of what is outstanding seems to favor Schiff. There's a few favorable counties out there for Garvey that have a bit left to count, but most of what's left seems to favour Schiff. Not going to be a lot in it in percentage terms
aenews2
1 year ago
Schiff is now "leading" by -4800 lmao
KanyeTruther
1 year ago
I was told schiff would be leading by 30k at the end of today
aenews2
1 year ago
Garvey has officially taken the lead, Schiffheads in total denial
aenews2
1 year ago
Lol 😂
KanyeTruther
1 year ago
I was told schiff would be leading by 30k at the end of today
aenews2
1 year ago
Well Schiffheads, my new sell point is 71c, or 29c for you. Take it or leave it! Don't be greedy.
aenews2
1 year ago
Everything changed when Kern County attacked
BigMike11
1 year ago
Kern dropped, changed everything, and now we have a mere 100 vote gap. But the schifties have to wait until the nytimes updates to sell.
aenews2
1 year ago
#notfinancialadvice
aenews2
1 year ago
You should dump before it's too late bro
aenews2
1 year ago
You should dump before it's too late bro
sd0000
1 year ago
Fresno just basically exhausted - what remains for Garvey?
aenews2
1 year ago
Schiff heads the ones sweating now!
aenews2
1 year ago
I added 20K block at 19c bro
AnEggplant
1 year ago
AeNews comment below not aging well
aenews2
1 year ago
then buy more dude
AnEggplant
1 year ago
AeNews comment below not aging well
aenews2
1 year ago
It's lower than the day started, what's stopping Garvey from pulling over the next few days?
AnEggplant
1 year ago
Well would you look at that. 31,500. Schiff has an extra cushion to play with
aenews2
1 year ago
What's so funny, bub? Got something to say?
DumbDumb
1 year ago
lol
aenews2
1 year ago
Today could also be the last chance for the Schiff heads to capitulate, just saying. If y'all change your minds, I'll consider exiting at 50c ;)
aenews2
1 year ago
I'll only sell if you guys have a wall at 50c for me to fill. I refuse to sell my Garvey for mere kitchen scraps.
AnEggplant
1 year ago
It's ok, baggies. You can sell right now, get some of your money back, and it will all be over.
aenews2
1 year ago
I think I prefer praying rather than panic dumping, gl!
AnEggplant
1 year ago
Last chance for Garvey bagholders to get out with profit before it all collapses
aenews2
1 year ago
fek
AnEggplant
1 year ago
Last chance for Garvey bagholders to get out with profit before it all collapses
aenews2
1 year ago
Again, Nikitis. From the very beginning, Polymarket designed the market to require the signature. They did so after asking traders for feedback. Also, government sources would indicate funding lapsed at midnight. You're confusing the WH halting shutdown procedures with funding lapsing. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7463
aenews2
1 year ago
Prediction markets always decide based on rules. It would be the same on PredictIt or Kalshi, if they used signature as rules requirement. Heck, on PredictIt they once had to keep a shutdown market open for a year because it was uncertain if rules criteria were met.
aenews2
1 year ago
Nope, clarification re-iterated the rules. Also, when the market was being created they even asked traders for feedback and ended up going with the signature requirement since least ambiguous, most concrete step in the process.
Nikitis
1 year ago
It's not UMA, this is on Polymarket. They were the ones that decided the market should be resolved as a Yes with the clarification that changed the rules. UMA just rubber stumped their decision (and made a ton of money by betting on yes)
aenews2
1 year ago
Prediction markets always decide based on rules. It would be the same on PredictIt or Kalshi, if they used signature as rules requirement. Heck, on PredictIt they once had to keep a shutdown market open for a year because it was uncertain if rules criteria were met.
JoKo125
1 year ago
This is just wrong, I’m new here and clearly put to much faith in ‘poly market’. I figured the title of ‘Shutdown’ should override fine print added later on. No longer trust this site.
aenews2
1 year ago
What happened is they resolved how they said they would.
SusanWarren,HR
1 year ago
The thing to do now is not commiserate with each other, but instead to go out into the world, talk to journalists, post on forums, let everyone know what happened here on Polymarket.
aenews2
1 year ago
Ah I see what you mean
AriaT
1 year ago
The final review is deterimined by a vote on UMA, and the vote is cast by staking UMA tokens to the outcome, and the outcome with most tokens win. So basically the rich with their bots can decide the outcome if they want
aenews2
1 year ago
21 hours until the market resolves
Eloy2401
1 year ago
Don't lose hope guys, we're still on track. Panic selling won't benefit anyone of us.
aenews2
1 year ago
Biden didn't sign the bill fast enough because it was past his bedtime.
Morifan
1 year ago
Probably a lot of the whales want to force the market to resolve even though there hasn't been a government shutdown.
aenews2
1 year ago
Woah and they're deciding to follow what Polymarket said it should resolve!
AriaT
1 year ago
The final review is deterimined by a vote on UMA, and the vote is cast by staking UMA tokens to the outcome, and the outcome with most tokens win. So basically the rich with their bots can decide the outcome if they want
aenews2
1 year ago
You need therapy
GodFuckingHimself
1 year ago
Insider her here , Christopher Nolan is a high ranking member of the tranny mafia that tried to control hollowwood via blackmail and this is a humilation ritual for him concluding tonight. Cheers.
aenews2
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree
ooops
1 year ago
It doesn't add a rule, if Joe Biden is the president or it was someone else at the time. Who cares? Him not being mentioned specifically doesn't even matter or change anything. What matters is the president didn't sign on time. Poly tried to explain better in the additional context and you still don't get it or don't want to.
aenews2
1 year ago
Incorrect. Market was already at 70c before the clarification.
0xaf
1 year ago
The price flipped after the clarification above, which was the defacto resolution here.
aenews2
1 year ago
It literally re-iterates the rules. Re-iterate means it says the rules again.
Qwan
1 year ago
The 'addition context' doesn't reiterate the rule, it literally adds another one. Nowhere in the market was Joe Biden mentioned. If you need to clarify that to swing this yes then it's wrong, plain and simple.
aenews2
1 year ago
Disagree. The community note simply reiterates the rules.
Qwan
1 year ago
Source: I'm an experienced UX Designer, Psychology Masters. + Studied and developed Smart Contracts.
aenews2
1 year ago
Not sure what you mean. Whether the signing is delayed by an hour or a day or a week makes no difference. Market is regarding signing, and the rules are pretty standard.
aenews2
1 year ago
It's very common and typical for prediction markets to revolve around the signing time since this is a completely unambiguous step in the process. I remember with the bipartisan infrastructure bill markets, one trader lost 100K because Biden delayed signing for a few days.
aenews2
1 year ago
Lol what?
Morifan
1 year ago
The whole point of Polymarket is to reflect what happens in the real world, correct? So why the hell are rules even relevant isn't this supposed to be an automatic process or something? Like you can't just arbitarily decide "actually it happened like this" You are inventing your own reality at that point. A shut down did not occur, if this market goes to Yes this website is rigged 100%
aenews2
1 year ago
Correct. The clarification simply re-iterated the rules, which say that a lack of signing means shutdown.
pkz
1 year ago
Market swung before the community note, that just repeated what it was already in the rules (that a law had to be signed by the deadline).
aenews2
1 year ago
It's very common and typical for prediction markets to revolve around the signing time since this is a completely unambiguous step in the process. I remember with the bipartisan infrastructure bill markets, one trader lost 100K because Biden delayed signing for a few days.
AriaT
1 year ago
I think UMA is resolving Yes, but I might be wrong. However, in all honesty, I think this SHOULD'VE resolved 50-50. Headline and rules are mismatched, making people fall in the trap. Also, the rules itself is false, as only Congress decides spending for the government, so when the bill has passed it means no shutdown is required, and spending for the government is counted by the day, not the hour, so on March 9th there is no legal definition of a shutdown, ever. Unfunded government work is still work, meaning no shutdown. The rules are miswritten to the headline and what ACTUALLY happens in reality, which is what the people know of and are familiar with to make bets. If PolyMarket keeps on making unrooted in reality rules like so, I'm sure not many people will feel compelled to continue using the service
aenews2
1 year ago
Polymarket already stated the market should resolve Yes. If it resolved No, then they lied. How would any customers possibly trust the platform if that happens?
Morifan
1 year ago
Yeah this is an absolute joke if this resolves to Yes I will stop using this because I can't trust them to make correct decisions rooted in reality. A shut down did not happen this is reality if they deny reality that's their problem but they can lose a customer.
aenews2
1 year ago
Well there is undeniable proof that the bill wasn't signed until today, so there isn't really an issue. UMA staff shouldn't have disputed after Polymarket's clarification. But it won't change the result. If UMA wasn't part of the equation, Polymarket simply would have resolved to YES by this time.
Qwan
1 year ago
The issue with this isn't the title, nor the rules. It's the negligence of the fact that Polymarket AND UMA both know betters will lose BECAUSE the final clause is pushed below the bet. Point 1: As a user, I shouldn't need to click "show more" in order to fully understand the bet. And If I do, it should be highlighted. Point #2 The fact that people argue and berate EACH OTHER in these comments is unproductive and bias. Nobody is going to agree on losing their 95¢ shares, but we ALL need to agree that the fact ADDITION CONTEXT needs to be highlighted, Highlights an issue in HOW THESE MARKETS ARE DELIVERED! I sold all my positions, i'm not being biased. It's been 6-7 months since I've used this platform and ill probably stop again because of issues like these. The blame gets split between UMA and Polymarket and it's NOT decentralized at all, it takes minimul resources to fine-tune an AI to create better and more clear market titles + clauses. Point #3 If being well-versed in the law and government is needed to win this bet, so should the resolvers. We should have undeniable proof that the 3rd clause is true. thank you.
aenews2
1 year ago
@KeyLockey The clarification is straightforward and just re-iterates the original rules which specifically state signing being required. Also, most whales acquired Y post-clarification.
aenews2
1 year ago
Well you can probably ignore the noise for this one as it isn't contentious. Polymarket issued a clarification, and market will resolve that way.
aenews2
1 year ago
I have 40K shares of Garvey at this point, it's difficult to sleep at night
sd0000
1 year ago
Bunch of Riverside just came in - made Garvey's nominal amount jump relative to Schiff, but not more than was expected.
aenews2
1 year ago
Well you can probably ignore the noise for this one as it isn't contentious. Polymarket issued a clarification, and market will resolve that way.
Whippet
1 year ago
This is my first time on a fake internet money play website. I can’t believe how inadequately this is run. I see people have put into the thousands of dollars in here and now they are discussing the outcome hours after the fact on discord. For crying out loud they are pulling random articles from who knows what side of the political arse sucking spectrum and they are going to use these articles as the evidence that decides who wins and who looses. This website is more incompetent than the US ground forces in Vietnam, and its more fun to make the rules up as we go along. Your all getting sodomised by bit coin nerds, enjoy.
aenews2
1 year ago
Please Lord, forgive me for my greed. Let my man Garvey get the gravey. Let Shifty Schiff get redschiffted out of existence, for the lols and for my pocketbook.
sd0000
1 year ago
Garvey got a strong dump out of OC and SD in the past hour but was totally counteracted by a *REALLY* strong dump out of LA for Schiff just now. I have Schiff in a better position than he was at begin of the day. +60k now forecast.
aenews2
1 year ago
oh God
sd0000
1 year ago
Garvey got a strong dump out of OC and SD in the past hour but was totally counteracted by a *REALLY* strong dump out of LA for Schiff just now. I have Schiff in a better position than he was at begin of the day. +60k now forecast.
aenews2
1 year ago
Hence, Polymarket issued a clarification that re-iterates the rules as stated.
Nikitis
1 year ago
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/08/government-shutdown-averted https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senate-poised-pass-spending-package-averting-government-shutdown-2024-03-08/
aenews2
1 year ago
From the rules: "If the US federal government goes unfunded for any period of time before a new budget/stopgap can be signed into law, it will be considered a government shutdown."
Nikitis
1 year ago
I don't get it. Every article I can find says the shutdown was narrowly averted. What's this bullshit about this resolving to yes?
aenews2
1 year ago
shit
Nicky-Boi
1 year ago
Orange County results today just released - Schiff:Garvey vote ratio actually got a little better for Schiff in OC. Virtually no change though.
aenews2
1 year ago
I hope not
Nicky-Boi
1 year ago
I do wonder if there's actually a slant in favor of Schiff with late arriving mail ballots. Would make sense that less involved Dems who wait to the last minute to research the candidates would herd towards the Dem frontrunner in a jungle primary like this.
aenews2
1 year ago
Gotta wait a week, broski
MtrxZ
1 year ago
Fuck Nasa they are sleeping on the data give me my $$$
aenews2
1 year ago
Garvey's just got the gravey
friendlyguyy
1 year ago
I feel like polymarket has a conservative bias with it.
aenews2
1 year ago
We definitely have a lot more than 10% remaining. DDHQ is way off.
BenCM
1 year ago
Can anyone explain why DDHQ say 90% of the vote was been counted by the Associated press say 55% of the estimated vote has been counted?
aenews2
1 year ago
One is very wrong with assumed outstanding vote
BenCM
1 year ago
Can anyone explain why DDHQ say 90% of the vote was been counted by the Associated press say 55% of the estimated vote has been counted?
aenews2
1 year ago
But I'm a lib
friendlyguyy
1 year ago
I feel like polymarket has a conservative bias with it.
aenews2
1 year ago
Garvey so cheap rn, I'm capped out tho
Nicky-Boi
1 year ago
I know I'm missing something, just not sure what yet...
aenews2
1 year ago
Yeah, they fixed that an hour after the initial post. Doesn't change the fact that the signed bill has now been sent to the office of the President. Either Laszlo signs it as the interim President, or Sulyok will sign it after he becomes President on the 5th.
archaic
1 year ago
László Kövér is no longer Speaker. Reporting by Reuters is inaccurate.
aenews2
1 year ago
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1763845475159932977
aenews2
1 year ago
Can't be resolved yet, as there are still absentee ballots that will be added to the total. Plus some minor corrections or wayward votes.
jmAUS
1 year ago
Can we get this settled? Surely no more votes to come in
aenews2
1 year ago
Need to wait for the UMA dispute to settle
aenews2
1 year ago
It will resolve in another 24 hours
aenews2
1 year ago
It will resolve in another 24 hours
patriot
1 year ago
this market should resolve - the rock did not sell. what's the fucking holdup lol
aenews2
1 year ago
Looks like we'll have to be our own needle now
aenews2
1 year ago
"With 84% of votes in, we’ve stopped updating our estimates. We don’t expect the final margin to change much once all votes are in..."
aenews2
1 year ago
"With 84% of votes in, we’ve stopped updating our estimates. We don’t expect the final margin to change much once all votes are in..."
aenews2
1 year ago
🙏
OneMoneyPlz
1 year ago
Hmm, looks like they will be voted in on Monday. Kinda tight but lets see
aenews2
1 year ago
Feel free to dispute, but NASA already confirmed it landed.
Apsalar
1 year ago
too early to propose. we have confirmation that it landed, but the state of the Odie has not been confirmed and if it's too damaged to achieve it's mission objectives, it was not a success.
aenews2
1 year ago
He disputed
41-17™askDomerWhatImean
1 year ago
50-penis is going to dispute this. You're not about to earn a free return in a matter of hours.