#138
Rank
94
Comments
57
Likes Received
233
Likes Given
Robyratto1
3 months ago
Why is Harris so low? Last poll shows Trump ahead by just 4. Not saying it's happening, but it might
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Say trans damn
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Border count?
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Has it started?
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Thanks
imby
4 months ago
idk be he did yesterday "hunt Wesley Wesley's fantastic thank you Wesley came in with me and a woman who's uh unbelievable actually I've I've gotten to know her she endorsed me in 2016 and I said you got to be kidding it was a surprise endorsement and she believed in the message and what we were saying we were right about what we were saying you know when we came down that escalator and I made those statements everyone said how terrible are those statements turned out that they were minor compared they were like little minor statements by comparison but she got it better than anybody and she endorsed us very early when it wasn't the thing to do from Alaska the great Sarah"
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Why would he mention Alaska lol?
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Lol
R13
4 months ago
Border was no way 30 it was 28
Robyratto1
4 months ago
30
FromTheTrenches
4 months ago
what's the border count?
Robyratto1
4 months ago
No lol
samuraimyth
4 months ago
DID WE WIN?
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Say once more mf
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Why does Vance market keep reacting this way?
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Did he say Vance?
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Lol there's an 83% chance we are gonna win
BITCOINBEAST
4 months ago
we won.
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Thanks. I dont know why the yes on vance went up to 92
Matthias
4 months ago
not that i would have heard
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Did he say missile defence?
Robyratto1
4 months ago
This motherfucker
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Why does missile defence keep being so low?
Robyratto1
4 months ago
Why missile defence keeps being so low?
Vuk
4 months ago
Just tripled down
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Yesterday this mf said "anchors" instead of moderators
BlitzDaTweetGod
5 months ago
Bigger question is why TF is moderator at .17c lol
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Why is cats so lower than dogs?
Robyratto1
5 months ago
What did that motherfucker say?
auto
5 months ago
noooo trump you're saying the wrong word
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Harris will literally destroy Trump in the debate
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Dump has never won the popular vote, and it was before January 6th
Robyratto1
5 months ago
These fuckers are so annoying
Robyratto1
5 months ago
These people are so stupid
gun
5 months ago
whoever disputed, thank you for your donation
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Cope and seethe, no people
Robyratto1
5 months ago
And she will be the third person to beat Trump in the popular vote😂
Gena🐊
5 months ago
She was the first indian VP and now will be the first black women President. What a brave transformist 🤣
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Trump is gonna lose by a landslide
princess4trump
5 months ago
Kamala sucks
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Media reports are not a source for this market, and Kennedy spokesperson said that he did NOT endorse Trump
Robyratto1
5 months ago
RFK one was scammed. The rules referred to a formal endorsement, and media was not considered a source. Yet, the outcome was resolved to yes on the basis of an additional context added AFTER many people had already betted
Robyratto1
5 months ago
hope so
JanSobieski3
5 months ago
I can see that polymarket has acknowledged their mistake by making the tulsi gabbard endorses market rules more specific. Will this market's participants be refunded as they made bets on the rules set out in this market?
Robyratto1
5 months ago
They'll scam it like they did with RFK
Robyratto1
5 months ago
ah, I hadn't noticed that the event was "RFK endorses Trump".
Pony177
5 months ago
No holder tards, he's literally campaigning with Trump
Robyratto1
5 months ago
you made 400 dollars betting over 18k... what a satisfaction
Pidor🐓
5 months ago
No holders tried to pull a fast one and failed! I'm rich! Thanks dumb scammers but I believe REUTERS!! https://www.reuters.com/world/us/rfk-jr-suspends-us-presidential-campaign-endorses-trump-2024-08-23/
Robyratto1
5 months ago
I hope someone takes them to Court
isaidway
5 months ago
“Mr. Kennedy has not endorsed President Trump,” said spokesperson Stefanie Spear. https://apnews.com/article/trump-harris-vance-walz-election-dnc-93dc79917053d8c97db4bb9cd6b0130d
Robyratto1
5 months ago
then why don't you put your money on Yes?
Pogpogpog
5 months ago
No voters coping for the third day in a row LMAO
Robyratto1
5 months ago
RFK campaign said that he did NOT endorse Trump. It's simply unbelievable that this market can be resolved as yes
Robyratto1
5 months ago
There has been no official endorsement, let alone a promise to VOTE for Trump, the proof being the fact that we have been debating this for three days. RFK issued no official statement
Robyratto1
5 months ago
True
PeterNh
5 months ago
This market for "formally endorse" resolved to YES, but the market for him using the word "endorse" resolved to NO. So we have him giving a formal endorsement without using the word endorse. That is quite a feat.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Rfk did not endorse Trump
Robyratto1
5 months ago
It was a scam. I hope someone takes them to the Court
scattering
5 months ago
feels so great to see the scammers digging their own grave. love u retards
Robyratto1
5 months ago
It's a fraud. The additional context shouldn'y have any relevance whatsoever
PeterNh
5 months ago
I have learned a lot from this. Turns out UMA is not really very distributed. Two or three large voters control the outcome. For them, the relationship with PM is top. So they weighted the PM "Additional context" heavily.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
How the hell can this be resolved as yes, when Kennedy spokeperson specified that he did not endorse Trump?
Robyratto1
5 months ago
There has been no formal endorsement
Robyratto1
5 months ago
It's a scam
Robyratto1
5 months ago
@empirepending but it will be resolved in 1 day and 1 hour, not in 1 hour, right? Thank you
432
5 months ago
these 60 mintues will be hot.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
What's happening?
432
5 months ago
these 60 mintues will be hot.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
I'm sorry to tell you, but "he did not deny to endorse" doesn't suffice as a *formal* endorsement
scottilicious
5 months ago
lying sack of shit or subpar intelligence: the no commitments was in reference to a cabinet position not in reference to the endorsement which he did not deny... good luck shilling your bags clown
Robyratto1
5 months ago
It's clear that RFK supports Trump in the swing states, but there has been no formal endorsement, nor Friday nor in the today's interview. In fact, Kennedy encourages his supporters to vote for him in most of the states. And guess what, Kennedy is from a safe state, and he'll be voting for himself, not for Trump
Robyratto1
5 months ago
https://x.com/NicoleShanahan/status/1827020725309653431?t=-g6ukI75rNyWLBmu64QAug&s=19 how can this be considered a *formal* endorsement?
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Then why don't you buy yes shares?
Pogpogpog
5 months ago
So much NO cope 😂😂😂😂
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Like "I endorse Trump".
milize
5 months ago
if that doesn't mean endorsement i doubt what means
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Thanks for stating the facts
yeamon
5 months ago
the word "endorse" matters in campaign finance regulations and ballot access across many jurisdictions. this is why RKF intentionally refuses to use the word "endorse" and its why his own campaign has explicitly stated (twice now i think) that he has not endorsed anyone. P4 is the correct decision, a refund is the weak decision, a "Yes" resolution is theft.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Ehm... That's literally the point of the market?
DeboBets
5 months ago
All those No holders who are disputing because RFK didn’t say the word “endorse”
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Do you have a source of the Kennedy campaign?
Pidor🐓
5 months ago
damn it's too bad the endorsement already happened
Robyratto1
5 months ago
"It's should resolve to yes because I want so"
Pidor🐓
5 months ago
hey guys look, this market should resolve to "Yes."!
Robyratto1
5 months ago
"During his remarks at an October 29 Restore America rally, Bevin said "I say with all due respect to a lot of folks who might say otherwise, sometimes we might need to get over it and move on. We have new races to run and new decisions to make. There is too much at stake." Asked if the comment amounted to an endorsement of McConnell, Bevin told reporters, "You've got ears."". This was after the primary election for the Senate in Kentucky, 2014. Matt Bevin made a declaration of support for his former opponent, McConnell, and implied that he was gonna vote for him. Still, this was not considered an endorsement, definitely not a formal one.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
The relevance of the additional context should be zero, as it was issued after many people had already betted. Only the initial rules must count
Gena🐊
5 months ago
The two walles are saying the'll be voting yes, and I think they'll do that because this time Polymarket has made a clarification. Also be carefull because probably first UMA votes will be NO so they can do some inside buying. But really polymarket, you should et ride of UMA, whats the point? Anyways after reading both arguments I'm neutral, just gonna play the "What UMA will decide" game.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
I'm surprised that this is even in doubt. It's very clear that there's no formal endorsement, just an informal political support. Also, additional context has no relevance whatsoever, since it was issued AFTER many many people had already betted millions of dollars.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Why are the no people selling?
Robyratto1
5 months ago
There has been no formal endorsement. There is no case for this market to be resolved to yes
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Then why don't you bet yes?
Justifax
5 months ago
When UMA votes YES, just remember it wasn't poly or uma that scammed you. It was the pumper and dumpers that sold at a profit that conned you into giving them your money.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Kennedy 8 mins ago "time to support Trump". He's avoiding the word endorsing because he has NOT endorsed Trump. Definitely he did not endorse him formally
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Then why don't you bet?🤔
DanVMia
5 months ago
Virginia is the one state that could surprise and flip red-- value in betting GOP here
Robyratto1
5 months ago
He literally asked his supporters to vote for him in most of the states. Plus, he lives in California, so he'll likely vote for himself, not for Trump
n/a
5 months ago
According to the criteria set by Polymarket, this is a definite no. I initially bet yet but switched against it as Kennedy's declarations are not formal endorsements (in fact, some of his stated support is every begrudging) and he has not said he will vote for Trump.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Trump is famous for telling the truth and being precise!
princess4trump
5 months ago
On trumps Instagram he says rfk endorsed him
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Nicole Shananan: "we are waiting for Trump to admit that Warp Speed was a failure before we give an endorsement". Indeed, there is no endorsement
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Well, it's a stupid note. A *formal* endorsement, by definition, implies that there is no debate around it
Pidor🐓
5 months ago
you might have missed 'this market should resolve to "Yes."'
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Where do you read "the media is a source"?
Pidor🐓
5 months ago
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/rfk-jr-suspends-us-presidential-campaign-endorses-trump-2024-08-23/
Robyratto1
5 months ago
RFK "I'm not ending my campaign"
Robyratto1
5 months ago
it's clear that RFK is unformally supporting Trump, but there is no formal endorsement. Unlike many endorsements market, in this one the media is not even an official source
ElonMuskin
5 months ago
There is literally no doubt about it. He formally threw his support. What’s there to context, other than not lose money?
Robyratto1
5 months ago
May someone please give me the link for Discord?
Robyratto1
5 months ago
well, there is. Unlike in many endorsement markets, in this one the media is not considered as a source, and the focus is on the *formal* endorsement
ElonMuskin
5 months ago
There isn’t any debate. Accept it.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
You got the point. If there is debate, it's not formal
EmpirePending
5 months ago
The pure fact that there is this much debate about the resolution proves that it is not a formal endorsement. Formal definitively means that there is can be no debate, yet here we are debating.
Robyratto1
5 months ago
The media is not a source for this market
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Kennedy spokeperson "Mr Kennedy has not endorsed Trump"
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Moreover, Kennedy is from a safe state himself, thus he'll vote for himself and not for Trump
432
5 months ago
how can he vote when he is still running on majority of states?
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Polymarket didn't fuck up, it was actually very clear: either RFK had to announce he'd be voting for Trump (he didn't) either a formal endorsment (he didn't)
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Sanders market was resolved to no
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Kennedy is from a safe state, California, and he said that his supporters who live in safe states should still vote for him. Thus, Kennedy himself won't even vote for Trump. This is not an endorsement
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Can someone please explain how the "dispute" thing works?
Robyratto1
5 months ago
Bernie Sanders market resolved to no, and it was the very same situation of Rfk towards Trump
Robyratto1
5 months ago
He literally said that his supporters have to vote for him in safe states. This is not an endorsment
Robyratto1
5 months ago
RFK asked to vote for him is safe states. How can this be considered an endorsement??
Robyratto1
5 months ago
I panic sold my 13 shares at 12.96, now it'an open order. Lol
ppsp
5 months ago
I'm in shambles also lol I panic sold at 90, I'm new to polymarkets and didnt know there would be so much disagreement over the obvious
Robyratto1
5 months ago
When can I buy?
Robyratto1
6 months ago
AIPAC didn't endorse Samuels
homosexual
6 months ago
I think 96% is too high of a likelihood given the millions AIPAC has spent this year to further entrench Zionism in the US political system. But even the Times of Israel says that a challenge is not realistic: https://www.timesofisrael.com/why-pro-israel-groups-arent-going-after-ilhan-omar-after-helping-oust-others-in-squad/. The polling that Samuels' campaign has done at best shows him losing by 3 points, with it being as bad as losing by 22 points. If AIPAC doesn't care, and he is way behind on fundraising, there is no path to victory for him. Election is in just a few days.
Robyratto1
7 months ago
why do a share of 35-40% cost 97c despite having 48% of chance??
Robyratto1
7 months ago
When will it be decided?