#1406
Rank
17
Comments
9
Likes Received
38
Likes Given
georgejetson
4 months ago
this is driven by Trump (not novelty, like Kamala). Trump may let up on the 51st state talk, but probably won't
0xAeacfB0dAb039CA210
4 months ago
CPC majority is at 95% chance according to 338 canada. Why Poilievre is so low ?
georgejetson
4 months ago
ok then just buy more poilievre? he's making it cheaper for you! no need to post nonsense here
I.Like.MommyTulsi
4 months ago
TeeVee27 is purposely posting EKOS push polls to influence the market, which is really bad cuz EKOS is not creditable https://x.com/BagelPolling/status/1882520452045635690
georgejetson
7 months ago
hiking? wtf are you talking about fool
Atsumu
7 months ago
If Trump's chances of being elected increase further, there's a greater likelihood that interest rates won't be hiked in November.
georgejetson
8 months ago
venzue- we call it venezuelan tar = venezuela does not hit
NiggaCat
8 months ago
did Venezuela hit?
georgejetson
8 months ago
then buy more...
ilfrenkie
8 months ago
I hope the reviewers go count the china properly, I'm 90% sure it stayed at 9
georgejetson
8 months ago
he said REBATE, not debate lmao
georgejetson
8 months ago
this isn't even implicit support, as pointed out earlier (since it doesnt say that kamala actually supports what trump is accusing her of). *By definition* it is not **explicit** support. Time to wake up and dump your shares bro
mr.ozi
8 months ago
Here's another one: https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1831512664507314308 For me, this is explicit enough. They are clarifying what they're supporting. It's Harris's official Twitter account.
georgejetson
8 months ago
if your analysis requires 4 steps (most of which do not follow from each other", then the support is clearly not explicit. the twitter post doesnt even say she supports it, (only that the thing trump is criticizing her for supporting applies to those with $100M or more, which does not imply that she supports it). in any case, it is not **explicit** support, which is what this market requires. there is absolutely no evidence, of any kind, that kamala harris or her campaign has **explicitly** supported a tax on unrealized gains. the campaign is clearly intentionally trying to avoid explicitly saying anything about this. therefore, the only logical conclusion is that she has not yet explicitly supported a tax on unrealized gains.
mr.ozi
8 months ago
Her official channel clarified that Harris's tax on unrealized capital gains would apply only to people with "with at least $100 million in wealth." https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1827073628162130283 So, let's go through this. 1. Harris says that she supports Biden's tax package, which includes a "billionaire minimum tax," which is administration's idea to tax unrealized capital gains of people with $100M in wealth. 2. Trump sees that and says that Harris idea to tax unrealized capital gains will kill small business owners. 3. Harris's official Twitter channel debunks Trump's statement by saying that the tax on unrealized capital gains "applies only to individuals with at least $100 million in wealth." 4. Harris explicitly says that she supports a "billionaire minimum tax" in both her policy document and on Twitter. That makes her support even more explicit.
georgejetson
8 months ago
market resolution requires **explicit** support, and the harris campaign (probably intentionally) never done this. all arguments for the Yes side rely on mental gymnastics and or implicit statements made by the campaign. The discord discussion is worth seeing for those interested: https://discord.com/channels/710897173927297116/817444472009785366/1288946906592051362
georgejetson
8 months ago
exactly 15 (by my count) but could be higher
IONLYBETONX
8 months ago
border count?
georgejetson
8 months ago
you're right
R13
8 months ago
I count 9 borders
georgejetson
8 months ago
please stop posting incorrect information...
SkillzThatKillz
8 months ago
In his last 5 speeches: China has only hit 2x; border has hit 3x; millions has hit 3x; MAAA has hit 0
georgejetson
8 months ago
these numbers are wrong btw, the second link is not the full event, he said it 27 times not 16. this event is basically the same genre as the second event you posted
BuckMySalls
8 months ago
Trump addresses the economic club: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leomt_FY_zw&pp=ygUVdHJ1bXAgcmVtYXJrcyBlY29ub215 11x Border Trump delivers remarks on economic policy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_HZOI61BNA&pp=ygUVdHJ1bXAgcmVtYXJrcyBlY29ub215 16x Border
georgejetson
8 months ago
https://www.savannahcivic.com/events/donald-trump-town-hall
georgejetson
8 months ago
border is free money, don’t know why it says “speech”, the event is just a town hall: https://www.savannahcivic.com/events/donald-trump-town-hall and he dropped like 20 borders at the last town hall. the man loves to say border border borderrr
georgejetson
8 months ago
border is free money, don’t know why it says “speech”, the event is just a town hall: https://www.savannahcivic.com/events/donald-trump-town-hall and he dropped like 20 borders at the last town hall. the man loves to say border border borderrr
georgejetson
8 months ago
this didnt work last time but yeah he seems to be using it more freely on truth social now, unlike last time where he just used it in a "quote"
Tenebrus7
8 months ago
Thought I can get more Conrad even cheaper, but still got some. It is Pennsylvania he will talk about what Conrad Kamala will do to ban fracking:https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113185000999885454
georgejetson
8 months ago
comrade kamala is back, just sold and switched to no lmao: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113187829420592812