This market is closed and no longer accepting bets.
326
Comments
18
Markets
0
Comments per hour
Summary
The discussion revolves around interpreting what Trump said during his Wisconsin speech, specifically whether he said "debate" or "tax to pay." Users are divided, with some asserting that Trump slurred his words and might have said "debate," while others insist "tax to pay" makes more contextual sense. A significant portion of the conversation discusses the reliability of past market resolutions and the potential for disputes based on the ambiguity of slurred words.
- Many participants believe the specific wording Trump used is ambiguous and could be interpreted as either "debate" or "tax to pay," leading to heated debates and calls for a 50/50 resolution.
- There is a strong focus on the implications of slurred speech, with comparisons to past market resolutions and concerns about how these factors should influence the current market’s outcome.
Comments
NoNoiseKnifeOnly
1 week ago
LIKE if car is an asshole
16
·
Liked by n/a, n/a and 14 others
BlueSky123
1 week ago
No Bitcoin/Crypto? Come the fuck on, Polymarket.
11
·
Liked by Donkov, n/a and 9 others
fhantombets
1 week ago
check market, car scamming, close market
8
Donkov
1 week ago
Trump mentions is back on the menu, bois!
7
n/a
1 week ago
rsbn is always 2 dumb bitches telling each other “exactlyyyyy”
6
n/a
1 week ago
I never have called Trump boring, but I am bored. I'm usually outraged, annoyed, yet mildly amused.
6
n/a
1 week ago
Late as usual
5
heeeeez
1 week ago
He's lost it
5
idfkanything
1 week ago
the edibles are hittin hard
5
fhantombets
1 week ago
Dear new folks, this "debate" mention market will resolve No, contrary to efforts by Car, don't waste your money buying Y, and I don't recommend buying N either, move on!
5