This market is closed and no longer accepting bets.
326
Comments
18
Markets
0
Comments per hour
Summary

The discussion revolves around interpreting what Trump said during his Wisconsin speech, specifically whether he said "debate" or "tax to pay." Users are divided, with some asserting that Trump slurred his words and might have said "debate," while others insist "tax to pay" makes more contextual sense. A significant portion of the conversation discusses the reliability of past market resolutions and the potential for disputes based on the ambiguity of slurred words.

  • Many participants believe the specific wording Trump used is ambiguous and could be interpreted as either "debate" or "tax to pay," leading to heated debates and calls for a 50/50 resolution.
  • There is a strong focus on the implications of slurred speech, with comparisons to past market resolutions and concerns about how these factors should influence the current market’s outcome.
Comments