This market is closed and no longer accepting bets.
545
Comments
18
Markets
0
Comments per hour
Summary

The discussion surrounding Trump's Arizona rally revolves around whether phrases like "Venezue" should count as valid mentions of "Venezuela" for the outcome of a betting market. Participants are divided on whether partial or mispronounced words should meet the criteria for a successful resolution. They reference a previous case involving Tim Walz, where an incomplete word was accepted, to argue for consistency. The debate underscores a broader issue of maintaining fair and transparent criteria in event-based betting markets.

  • The key contention is whether mispronounced or incomplete mentions like "Venezue" should be accepted, with comparisons made to previous rulings on similar issues.
  • Participants emphasize the need for consistent rules across betting markets to ensure clarity and fairness, amidst concerns about potential arbitrariness in decision-making.
Comments
mr.ozi
8 months ago
The point is how many times did he say Venezuela. He said it twice, and then he said Venez once. That's it. No? 😄 We cannot count half-finished words that might've or might've not been the word.
Anon5215
8 months ago
One guy put it best: "He clearly did not say venezuela, he cut off mid word. We do not know if he would have finished with "venezuela" or "venezuelan" as he very well could have said "we buy our oil from venezuelan companies"."
asdfvergvd
8 months ago
As an outsider, that additional context makes no sense because couple days ago they counted "borrd" as border in the border 30+ market. They are really inconsistent.
Cash4fun
8 months ago
https://www.youtube.com/live/GORH0evdlto?si=cKZgUqdZBBYkVnSt 10:18 "Venezuelan" - 22:21 "Venezuela" - 1:22:24 "Venezuelan"
0xE42c9d2ef
8 months ago
Yeah add crypto please, I need the free 3%
EscalateFund
8 months ago
No crypto?
GrapeFlavoredDrinkMix
8 months ago
It's obvious his intent was to say Venezuela, and I think it sounds phonetically close enough. I'd refer you guys to the CNN-Walz precedent set a few months ago, that one was a lot more debateable and it resolved in the affirmative.
Infringe
8 months ago
the discussion on polymarket discord is getting good if you're a yes holder you should join and see.
Pidor🐓
8 months ago
we are only a few hours before the Yes truthers say to join UMAcord and make your voice heard. good job disputor thx for $1500
0xffffffff
8 months ago
so we need to be... TOO BIG TO RIG!
R13
8 months ago
I was in the same boat couple of days ago when he said border clearly 28 times but even after disputes 30+ was given yes no point of beating the bush yes holders they never listen it’s all rigged
Secret14thKey
8 months ago
he clearly said "VENEZ-WHALE" which was a signal to Kevin Chan to resolve this YES and rug everyone