Airdrops by September 30?

This market is closed and no longer accepting bets.

466

Comments

Markets

Comments per hour

Summary

The discussion surrounding the "Airdrops by September 30?" market primarily revolves around the timing and validity of the airdrop, as well as the role of major voting influencers known as "whales." Proponents of resolving "Yes" argue that on-chain evidence shows airdrop transactions occurring before the deadline, while opponents cite the official announcement from Eigenlayer, which was made post-deadline, as justification for a "No" resolution. The influence of large stakeholders, particularly UMA voters, is also a contentious point, with some participants suggesting that decisions should align with these powerful voters' interests.

On-chain data suggests airdrops were swapped before the deadline, contradicting the formal announcement timeline.
The significance of large stakeholders ("whales") impacts voting outcomes, emphasizing a shift towards their influence over official sources.

Comments