denizz
8 months ago
We’ve established that the Israeli ground operation started September 30 (100%), and that it intended to control territory by early October (97% so far). So, did the operational plans change, or did Israel already intend to control territory on September 30? The argument against intent to control on September 30 originates largely from Israel’s ongoing public claims about the operation, which we have already discounted. Meanwhile, on September 30, Israeli officials told CNN that there would be “no long-term occupation” of Lebanese territory. This suggests that they intended short term control over Lebanese territory. (https://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-lebanon-war-hezbollah-09-30-24-intl-hnk#cm1pnn1ki000l3b6mbkmq0ye5) Walla’s military correspondent reported on Oct. 1 morning that, per “the decision of the political echelon,” “the purpose of the limited ground maneuver is a high level of operational control in the area.” (https://news.walla.co.il/item/3695334) Thus, early inside reporting demonstrates Israeli intent to control on September 30. Finally, it should be noted that Israel’s national security cabinet approved the plan for the ground operation on September 30, and there have been no amendments since then to their authorization. The weight of evidence points strongly towards operational control being planned from the start of the operation. A decision of NO for this market would be anti-empirical and anti-common sense.
Reactions
User Date
Anti-ScamLawyer
55 years ago
Le-King
55 years ago
CheerfulPessimist
55 years ago
sharky🦈🦈🦈
55 years ago
BibiNetanCocksucker
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
McLarry
55 years ago
Remontada
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
zockerking
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
n/a
55 years ago
thismaysoundcornybutloveistheanswer
55 years ago