Will Hamas allow IDF to remain in Gaza?

This market is closed and no longer accepting bets.

Comments

Market

Comments per hour

Summary

The discussion centers on the ambiguity of the market concerning whether Hamas will allow the IDF to remain in Gaza. Participants express concerns about unclear wording, which could lead to different interpretations and disputes over outcomes. Some users suggest that a clear timeframe or conditions, similar to scenarios in Lebanon, would provide clarity and minimize disputes. Due to the lack of clarity, some users find the market "uninvestable" and are hesitant to participate.

Ambiguous Wording: Many users are frustrated by the market's vague contract wording, which could unpredictably affect the outcome.
Need for Clarity: Suggestions include specifying conditions or timeframes, akin to the situation in Lebanon, to provide a clearer resolution path.

Comments

greengasper

1 year ago

Another ambiguous market for more UMA disputes. You should clarify whether they allow them to stay for certain period of time and then leave gradually, similar to what is happening in Lebanon would be sufficient to qualify for a yes, because we are heading towards a gradual deal obviously

fa910

1 year ago

agreed, this is terrible, terrible wording. I'm skipping this market just because it's so ambiguous, and a future "note" from PM can swing it either way.

Im ASSUMING no wording in the ceasefire means yes it allows them to say because historically that's how ceasefires work but dude this wording is borderline crazy everyday